983 resultados para institutional repositories


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Representative authorities" at end of chapters.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1959/60- issued also as United States. Office of Education. Circular; <1969-1975> as Library statistics; < > as DHEW publication; <1975, 1977> as NCES; 1976 as University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library Science. Monograph no. 16

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Title from cover of original work.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The generation of new knowledge through research can contribute significantly to the improvement of services for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. This study extends a previous study by Sigafoos, Roberts, and Couzens [Aust. N.Z.J. Dev. Disabil. 17 (1991) 331] by examining research productivity in intellectual and developmental disability in Australian journals for 1990-1999. Institutions that published research articles on intellectual and developmental disabilities in Australian journals in the 1990s were identified by noting the affiliations of authors. The most productive institutions were primarily universities in Australia and the United States of America. Publication trends in the decade of the 1990s are compared with trends of the previous decade (1980-1990). (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Creating competitive industries has become one of the key tasks of governments. Different adaptation outcomes in industries across nations cannot be accounted for fully simply by an emphasis on firm-level capabilities, market-driven policies, or state-level policies. We propose an integrative framework that draws on both the strategic management and political economy literature to explain variations in national industrial competitiveness.. We discuss differences with respect to institutional characteristics and capabilities, competitive outcomes, conditions of best fit, and who bears the cost of industry adaptation.