Stress, cognitive appraisal, and psychological health: testing instruments for health professionals

The job of health professionals, including nurses, is considered inherently stressful (Lee & Wang, 2002; Rutledge et al., 2009), and thus it is important to improve and develop specific measures that are sensitive to the demands that health professionals face. This study analysed the psychometric properties of three instruments that focus on the professional experiences of nurses in aspects related to occupational stress, cognitive appraisal, and mental health issues. The evaluation protocol included the Stress Questionnaire for Health Professionals (SQHP; Gomes, 2014), the Cognitive Appraisal Scale (CAS; Gomes, Faria, & Gonçalves, 2013), and the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12; Goldberg, 1972). Validity and reliability issues were considered with statistical analysis (i.e. confirmatory factor analysis, convergent validity, and composite reliability) that revealed adequate values for all of the instruments, namely, a six-factor structure for the SQHP, a five-factor structure for the CAS, and a two-factor structure for the GHQ-12. In conclusion, this study proposes three consistent instruments that may be useful for analysing nurses’ adaptation to work contexts.

Assessment of the DIXTAL DX-2710 Automated Oscillometric Device for Blood Pressure Measurement with the Validation Protocols of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI)

OBJECTIVE: To assess the Dixtal DX2710 automated oscillometric device used for blood pressure measurement according to the protocols of the BHS and the AAMI. METHODS: Three blood pressure measurements were taken in 94 patients (53 females 15 to 80 years). The measurements were taken randomly by 2 observers trained to measure blood pressure with a mercury column device connected with an automated device. The device was classified according to the protocols of the BHS and AAMI. RESULT: The mean of blood pressure levels obtained by the observers was 148±38/93±25 mmHg and that obtained with the device was 148±37/89±26 mmHg. Considering the differences between the measurements obtained by the observer and those obtained with the automated device according to the criteria of the BHS, the following classification was adopted: "A" for systolic pressure (69% of the differences < 5; 90% < 10; and 97% < 15 mmHg); and "B" for diastolic pressure (63% of the differences < 5; 83% < 10; and 93% < 15 mmHg). The mean and standard deviation of the differences were 0±6.27 mmHg for systolic pressure and 3.82±6.21 mmHg for diastolic pressure. CONCLUSION: The Dixtal DX2710 device was approved according to the international recommendations.

Exercise testing in hypertensive patients taking different angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors

OBJECTIVE: To compare blood pressure response to dynamic exercise in hypertensive patients taking trandolapril or captopril. METHODS: We carried out a prospective, randomized, blinded study with 40 patients with primary hypertension and no other associated disease. The patients were divided into 2 groups (n=20), paired by age, sex, race, and body mass index, and underwent 2 symptom-limited exercise tests on a treadmill before and after 30 days of treatment with captopril (75 to 150 mg/day) or trandolapril (2 to 4 mg/day). RESULTS: The groups were similar prior to treatment (p<0.05), and both drugs reduced blood pressure at rest (p<0.001). During treatment, trandolapril caused a greater increase in functional capacity (+31%) than captopril (+17%; p=0.01) did, and provided better blood pressure control during exercise, observed as a reduction in the variation of systolic blood pressure/MET (trandolapril: 10.7±1.9 mmHg/U vs 7.4±1.2 mmHg/U, p=0.02; captopril: 9.1±1.4 mmHg/U vs 11.4±2.5 mmHg/U, p=0.35), a reduction in peak diastolic blood pressure (trandolapril: 116.8±3.1 mmHg vs 108.1±2.5 mmHg, p=0.003; captopril: 118.2±3.1 mmHg vs 115.8±3.3 mmHg, p=0.35), and a reduction in the interruption of the tests due to excessive elevation in blood pressure (trandolapril: 50% vs 15%, p=0.009; captopril: 50% vs 45%, p=0.32). CONCLUSION: Monotherapy with trandolapril is more effective than that with captopril to control blood pressure during exercise in hypertensive patients.

Safety, feasibility, and results of exercise testing for stratifying patients with chest pain in the emergency room

OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, feasibility, and the results of early exercise testing in patients with chest pain admitted to the emergency room of the chest pain unit, in whom acute myocardial infarction and high-risk unstable angina had been ruled out. METHODS: A study including 1060 consecutive patients with chest pain admitted to the emergency room of the chest pain unit was carried out. Of them, 677 (64%) patients were eligible for exercise testing, but only 268 (40%) underwent the test. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients studied was 51.7±12.1 years, and 188 (70%) were males. Twenty-eight (10%) patients had a previous history of coronary artery disease, 244 (91%) had a normal or unspecific electrocardiogram, and 150 (56%) underwent exercise testing within a 12-hour interval. The results of the exercise test in the latter group were as follows: 34 (13%) were positive, 191 (71%) were negative, and 43 (16%) were inconclusive. In the group of patients with a positive exercise test, 21 (62%) underwent coronary angiography, 11 underwent angioplasty, and 2 underwent myocardial revascularization. In a univariate analysis, type A/B chest pain (definitely/probably anginal) (p<0.0001), previous coronary artery disease (p<0.0001), and route 2 (patients at higher risk) correlated with a positive or inconclusive test (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: In patients with chest pain and in whom acute myocardial infarction and high-risk unstable angina had been ruled out, the exercise test proved to be feasible, safe, and well tolerated.

Proyecto integrado en el Area de Microelectrónica para el Diseño de circuitos integrados (Programa de Modernización Tecnológica III I-P - PAE 2006)

El objetivo general de este proyecto estratégico es incorporar una actividad de alto valor agregado como es el diseño de circuitos integrados dentro del segmento de alta tecnología de la cadena productiva nacional. Para ello resulta necesario cumplimentar los siguientes objetivos específicos:• Fortalecer los grupos de investigación y desarrollo que realizan tareas dentro de este área temática, tanto en infraestructura como en recursos humanos; • Fortalecer y desarrollar la Industria Electrónica mediante la incorporación de estas nuevas tecnologías en sus productos; • Representar y asistir a los grupos de diseño locales en la búsqueda de oportunidades para realizar “outsourcing” de diseño para compañías del exterior; • Establecer una primer masa crítica de diseñadores, que funcione como impulsora de la actividad en el medio; • Generar una red a nivel local, donde convivan empresas, universidades y profesionales. La mejora continua en las prestaciones de los productos y en los procesos productivos ha llevado a que la microelectrónica esté presente en los más diversos ámbitos de la actividad humana, con la perspectiva de ir incrementando constantemente su participación. Por eso mismo, un país que pretenda insertarse en el mundo de manera soberana no puede menospreciar la necesidad de incrementar la capacidad de su industria en el área. Los componentes de la Cadena de valor de la ME son los siguientes: • Diseño del circuito, con valor agregado de conocimientos y experiencia del diseñador; • Herramientas de Software de diseño (CAD) con verificación y simulación; • Prototipeo de circuitos y ensayo (testing); • Fabricación de chip en línea; •Encapsulado y testeo. Salvo el primer eslabón, los restantes requieren de una gran inversión en infraestructura, con una permanente actualización. Sin embargo, el Diseño de circuitos es perfectamente abordable en la Argentina, dado que solo requiere de conocimiento y experiencia, y se puede realizar sobre computadoras estándar.

Proyecto integrado en el área de microelectrónica para el diseño de circuitos integrados (Programa de Modernización Tecnológica III I-P - PAE 2006).

El objetivo general de este proyecto estratégico es incorporar una actividad de alto valor agregado como es el diseño de circuitos integrados dentro del segmento de alta tecnología de la cadena productiva nacional. Para ello resulta necesario cumplimentar los siguientes objetivos específicos: • Fortalecer los grupos de investigación y desarrollo que realizan tareas dentro de este área temática, tanto en infraestructura como en recursos humanos; • Fortalecer y desarrollar la Industria Electrónica mediante la incorporación de estas nuevas tecnologías en sus productos; • Representar y asistir a los grupos de diseño locales en la búsqueda de oportunidades para realizar "outsourcing" de diseño para compañías del exterior; • Establecer una primer masa crítica de diseñadores, que funcione como impulsora de la actividad en el medio; • Generar una red a nivel local, donde convivan empresas, universidades y profesionales. La mejora continua en las prestaciones de los productos y en los procesos productivos ha llevado a que la microelectrónica esté presente en los más diversos ámbitos de la actividad humana, con la perspectiva de ir incrementando constantemente su participación. Por eso mismo, un país que pretenda insertarse en el mundo de manera soberana no puede menospreciar la necesidad de incrementar la capacidad de su industria en el área. Los componentes de la Cadena de valor de la ME son los siguientes: • Diseño del circuito, con valor agregado de conocimientos y experiencia del diseñador; • Herramientas de Software de diseño (CAD) con verificación y simulación; • Prototipeo de circuitos y ensayo (testing); • Fabricación de chip en línea; • Encapsulado y testeo.