A report of the judgment, delivered in the Consistorial Court of London, on the sixteenth day of July, 1811,

Mode of access: Internet.

A digest of the early Connecticut probate records.

"One thousand copies printed, no. 80."

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas

Mode of access: Internet.

Index of wills proved in the Prerogative court of Canterbury ... And now preserved in the principal probate registry, Somerset house, London.

Index locorum, v. 2-

Calendar of Sussex marriage licences recorded in the Consistory Court of the Bishop of Chichester for the Archdeaconry of Lewes, August, 1586, to March, 1642-3.

Mode of access: Internet.

A calendar of wills proved in the Consistory Court of the Bishop of Gloucester, 1541 [to 1800]

Wills during 1653-60 were proved in London, hence must be sought in the Principal Registry, Somerset House. cf. v. 1, p. viii.

Wills from Doctors' Commons. A selection from the wills of eminent persons proved in the Prerogative Court of Canterbury, 1495-1695.

Mode of access: Internet.

The Court leet records of the manor of Manchester, from the year 1552 to the year 1686, and from the year 1731 to the year 1846.

Includes index.

Reports of the United States Tax Court /

Reporters: Ella C. Thomas, Jan./Sept. 1970-; Mary T. Pittman, -19 ; John T. Fee, <1989->

United States of America, plaintiff, vs. Parents Magazine Enterprises, inc. and A. C. McClurg & Co., defendants. Transcript of proceedings

"No. 62 C 1453"

Catalogue ... of the renowned library formerly at Britwell Court, Burnham, Bucks, the property of S.R. Christie-Miller ... Which will be sold by auction by Messrs. Sotheby and Co ... 1916-1917.

[14] Apr. 7, 1924. Miscellaneous literature. 652 lots.--[15] March 23, 1925. Early English poetry and other literature. 692 lots.--[16] March 30, 1925. Early English Works on the arts and sciences. 797 lots.--[17] March 15, 1926. Early English poetry and other literature. 707 lots.--[18] March 22, 1926. Early English law and history. 570 lots.--[19] March 28, 1927. Final portion. 2151 lots.--[20] July 11, 1927. Books unsold or returned as imperfect. 183 lots.--[21] July 25, 1927. Books omitted from the sales of the Britwell Court Library. The property of S.R. Christie-Miller. 31 lots. (In Sotheby, firm, auctioneers, London. Catalogue of valuable printed books, illuminated and other manuscripts ... which will be sold ... Monday, 25th of July and two following days ... London [1927] p. 70-75, lots 456-486)

North Carolina reports : cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Vols. 1-62 reprinted by the State with consecutive numbering and title: North Carolina reports.

Pace of Civil Litigation in the Queensland Supreme Court

The overriding philosophy of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 in Queensland is to facilitate the just and expeditious resolution of the issues in a civil proceeding at minimum expense. The court is enjoined to apply the rules to avoid undue delay, expense and technicality. Parties impliedly undertake to the court and each other to proceed expeditiously. These rules adopt management theories developed to contain delay and cost in the civil justice system. A survey was designed to determine whether the overriding objective is being achieved in practice. The results indicate a reduction in the time from initiation of a proceeding to termination as compared to a sample of similar cases determined under the repealed Rules of the Supreme Court.

The Caribbean Court of Justice: An investigation of the impact of elites on its creation and present structure as it relates to original jurisdiction

The primary focus of this dissertation is to determine the degree to which political, economic, and socio-cultural elites in Jamaica and Trinidad & Tobago influenced the development of the Caribbean Court of Justice's (CCJ) original jurisdiction. As members of the Caribbean Community (CARICOM), both states replaced their protectionist model with open regionalism at the end of the 1980s. Open regionalism was adopted to make CARICOM member states internationally competitive. Open regionalism was also expected to create a stable regional trade environment. To ensure a stable economic environment, a regional court with original jurisdiction was proposed. A six member Preparatory Committee on the Caribbean Court of Justice (PREPCOM), on which Jamaica and Trinidad & Tobago sat, was formed to draft the Agreement Establishing the Caribbean Court of Justice that would govern how the Court would interpret the Revised Treaty of Chaguaramas (RTC) and enforce judgments. ^ Through the use of qualitative research methods, namely elite interviews, document data, and text analysis, and a focus on three levels of analysis, that is, the international, regional, and domestic, three major conclusions are drawn. First, changes in the international economic environment caused Jamaica and Trinidad & Tobago to support the establishment of a regional court. Second, Jamaica had far greater influence on the final structure of the CCJ than Trinidad & Tobago. Third, it was found that in both states the political elite had the greatest influence on the development and structure of the CCJ. The economic elite followed by the socio-cultural elite were found to have a lesser impact. These findings are significant because they account for the impact of elites and elite behavior on institutions in a much-neglected category of states: the developing world.^

A responsabilidade enunciativa na sentença judicial condenatória

The Textual Analysis of Discourse has its origin in Text Linguistics and it aims at studying the co(n)text meaning production based on the analysis of concrete texts by offering elements to the understanding of the text as a discourse practice throughout the plans or levels of linguistic analysis. In this perspective, we intend to investigate the enunciative responsibility phenomenon in the sentencing court judgment. To do so, we review the theoretical contributions of Textual Analysis of Discourse (ADAM, 2011) and the Enunciative Linguistics from various authors, among them, Rabatel (1998, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2008, 2009, 2010), Nølke (2001, 2005, 2009, 2013), Nølke, Fløttum and Norén (2004), Guentchéva (1994, 1996) and Guentchéva et al. (1994). In this direction, we investigate the enunciative responsibility through a range that comprises the phenomenon from four gradations, each one with a kind of point of view (PoV) and with links that may mark the assumption or the distance from the point of view. Regarding the legal approach of the thesis, our theoretical anchoring follows several authors, among them, Petri (1994), Soto (2001), Alvarez (2002), Alves (2003), Cornu (2005), Albi (2007), Bittar (2010), Asensio and Polanco (2011), López Samaniego (2006), López Montolío and Samaniego (2008), Montolío (2002, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013), Sterling (2010), Prieto (2013), Lawrence and Rodrigues (2013) and Rodrigues, Passeggi and Silva Neto (2014). Our corpus is composed of 13 sentences from criminal cases arising from the district of Currais Novos-RN, completed in 2012. The results reveal how the judge, from various enunciative instances, builds the court decision, which allowed us to understand the configuration of (non) assumption of enunciative responsibility in the sentencing court judgment discourse genre. In conclusion, we perceive that the discourse units are envisaged or through the assumption, or the non assumption of PoV by the enunciative instances, what guides the producer organization argumentative text and his (her) communicative purposes. With that, the judge creates and/or modifies values and beliefs, induces and/or guides his (her) interlocutor by being able to demonstrate objectivity and/or preventing his (her) face through the mediated constructions or engage through the assumption of the enunciative responsibility of the propositional content of an utterance. In short, we reaffirm our belief that the (non) assumption of the enunciative responsibility configures as an argumentative mechanism strongly marked by the producer of the text with a view to their communicative purposes. The sentence, therefore, is constructed in this game of taking and/or not taking of statements according to argumentative orientation and the objectives of the text producer.