A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of immersion bath on labour pain

Objective: to evaluate the effect of an immersion bath on pain magnitude during the first stage of tabour. Design: a randomised controlled trial comparing the pain scores of bathing and non-bathing nulliparous women during birth was employed. Setting: the study was conducted at the Normal Birth Center of Amparo Maternal, Sao Paulo, Brazil. Participants: 108 birthing women, with 54 women randomly assigned to each group. Interventions: when the birthing women presented at 6-7cm of cervical dilation, they were placed in an immersion bath for 60 mins. Outcome measures: pain scores, using a behavioural pain scale and a numeric scale, were recorded at two evaluation time points: at 6-7cm of cervical dilation and 1 h after the first pain score evaluation. Findings: at the first evaluation, on the behavioural scale, the means were 2.1 for both groups (p = 0.914; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.9-2.3 for the control group and 2.0-2.2 for the experimental group). On the numeric scale, the means were 8.7 and 8.5 for the control and experimental groups, respectively (p = 0.235; 95% Cl 8.2-9.2 for the control group and 8.1-8.9 for the experimental group). At the second evaluation, the pain score means for both scales were statistically higher in the control group than in the experimental group. On the behavioural scale, the scores were 2.4 vs. 1.9, respectively, for the control and experimental groups (p<0.001; 95% Cl 2.2-2.6 for the control group and 1.7-2.1 for the experimental group). On the numeric scale, the scores were 9.3 vs. 8.5, respectively, for the control and experimental groups (p<0.05; 95% Cl 8.9-9.7 for the control group and 8.1-8.9 for the experimental group). Conclusions: mean tabour pain scores in the control group were significantly higher than those in the experimental group. The present findings suggest that use of an immersion bath is a suitable alternative form of pain relief for women during tabour. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Neuropsychological Profile of Brazilian Older Adults with Heterogeneous Educational Backgrounds

Education significantly impacts cognitive performance of older adults even in the absence of dementia. Some cognitive tests seem less vulnerable to the influence of education and thus may be more suitable for cognitive assessment of older adults with heterogeneous backgrounds. The objective of this study was to investigate which tests in a cognitive battery were less influenced by educational levels in a sample of cognitively unimpaired older Brazilians. In addition, we evaluated the impact of very high educational levels on cognitive performance. The cognitive battery consisted of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Cambridge Cognitive Test (CAMCOG), Clock Drawing Test, Short Cognitive Performance Test (SKT), Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test (RBMT), Fuld Object Memory Evaluation (FOME), Verbal Fluency Test (VF) fruit category, Trail Making Test A and B, WAIS-R Vocabulary, and Block Design. Education did not exert a significant influence on the RBMT, FOME, and VF (p < .05). Subjects with very high educational levels had similar performance on the latter tests when compared with those with intermediate and low levels of education. In conclusion, the RBMT, FOME, and VF fruit category seem to be appropriate tools for the assessment of cognitive function in elderly Brazilians with varying degrees of educational attainment.