The reconstitution of vineyards in lime soils on suitable American stocks /

"No. 42, 1913."

The geology of Rutland and the parts of Lincoln, Leicester, Northhampton, Huntingdon, and Cambridge, included in sheet 64 of the one-inch map of the Geological survey, with an introductory essay on the classification and correlation of the Jurassic rocks of the Midland district of England.

"Bibliography of the district": p. 293-301.

Catalogue of the library of the Royal botanic gardens, Kew.

"Brought down to 1898. Annual lists of additions published in the Kew bulletin."

Popular official guide to the Royal botanic gardens, including an historic notice and descriptions of the collections in the botanic gardens proper, the glasshouses, museums and arboretum.

At head of title: Royal botanic gardens, Kew.

Ceremonial. 1912.

Mode of access: Internet.

National conventions of the Democratic & Republican parties. From 1832 & 1856, respectively.

Mode of access: Internet.

International botanical congress, Cambridge (England), 1930. Nomenclature; proposals by British botanists.

"Proposals by the Sub-committee on nomenclature, appointed by the Imperial botanical conference, London, 1924": p. 3-45; separate proposals by T.A. Sprague and five others: p. 46-203.

Kew bulletin additional series.

Mode of access: Internet.

New England stationer and printer.

Description based on: [vol. 11] (Mar. 1897).

Report of the departmental committee appointed by the Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries to consider the outbreak of foot and mouth disease wich occurred in 1923-24 ...

Ernest G. Pretyman, chairman.

Researches on the chemical origin of various lines in solar and stellar spectra : being the results of investigations made at the Solar physics observatory, South Kensington, after discussion /

At head of title: Solar physics committee.

Harmonic Encoding in Cochlear Implants

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Two envelope problems and the roles of ignorance

Four variations on Two Envelope Paradox are stated and compared. The variations are employed to provide a diagnosis and an explanation of what has gone awry in the paradoxical modeling of the decision problem that the paradox poses. The canonical formulation of the paradox underdescribes the ways in which one envelope can have twice the amount that is in the other. Some ways one envelope can have twice the amount that is in the other make it rational to prefer the envelope that was originally rejected. Some do not, and it is a mistake to treat them alike. The nature of the mistake is diagnosed by the different roles that rigid designators and definite descriptions play in unproblematic and in untoward formulations of decision tables that are employed in setting out the decision problem that gives rise to the paradox. The decision maker’s knowledge or ignorance of how one envelope came to have twice the amount that is in the other determines which of the different ways of modeling his decision problem is correct. Under this diagnosis, the paradoxical modeling of the Two Envelope problem is incoherent.

Prevalence of the use of cancer related self-tests by members of the public:A community survey

Background: Self-tests are those where an individual can obtain a result without recourse to a health professional, by getting a result immediately or by sending a sample to a laboratory that returns the result directly. Self-tests can be diagnostic, for disease monitoring, or both. There are currently tests for more than 20 different conditions available to the UK public, and self-testing is marketed as a way of alerting people to serious health problems so they can seek medical help. Almost nothing is known about the extent to which people self-test for cancer or why they do this. Self-tests for cancer could alter perceptions of risk and health behaviour, cause psychological morbidity and have a significant impact on the demand for healthcare. This study aims to gain an understanding of the frequency of self-testing for cancer and characteristics of users. Methods: Cross-sectional survey. Adults registered in participating general practices in the West Midlands Region, will be asked to complete a questionnaire that will collect socio-demographic information and basic data regarding previous and potential future use of self-test kits. The only exclusions will be people who the GP feels it would be inappropriate to send a questionnaire, for example because they are unable to give informed consent. Freepost envelopes will be included and non-responders will receive one reminder. Standardised prevalence rates will be estimated. Discussion: Cancer related self-tests, currently available from pharmacies or over the Internet, include faecal occult blood tests (related to bowel cancer), prostate specific antigen tests (related to prostate cancer), breast cancer kits (self examination guide) and haematuria tests (related to urinary tract cancers). The effect of an increase in self-testing for cancer is unknown but may be considerable: it may affect the delivery of population based screening programmes; empower patients or cause unnecessary anxiety; reduce costs on existing healthcare services or increase demand to investigate patients with positive test results. It is important that more is known about the characteristics of those who are using self-tests if we are to determine the potential impact on health services and the public. © 2006 Wilson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Linear binocular combination of responses to contrast modulation:contrast-weighted summation in first- and second-order vision

Binocular combination for first-order (luminancedefined) stimuli has been widely studied, but we know rather little about this binocular process for spatial modulations of contrast (second-order stimuli). We used phase-matching and amplitude-matching tasks to assess binocular combination of second-order phase and modulation depth simultaneously. With fixed modulation in one eye, we found that binocularly perceived phase was shifted, and perceived amplitude increased almost linearly as modulation depth in the other eye increased. At larger disparities, the phase shift was larger and the amplitude change was smaller. The degree of interocular correlation of the carriers had no influence. These results can be explained by an initial extraction of the contrast envelopes before binocular combination (consistent with the lack of dependence on carrier correlation) followed by a weighted linear summation of second-order modulations in which the weights (gains) for each eye are driven by the first-order carrier contrasts as previously found for first-order binocular combination. Perceived modulation depth fell markedly with increasing phase disparity unlike previous findings that perceived first-order contrast was almost independent of phase disparity. We present a simple revision to a widely used interocular gain-control theory that unifies first- and second-order binocular summation with a single principle-contrast-weighted summation-and we further elaborate the model for first-order combination. Conclusion: Second-order combination is controlled by first-order contrast.