935 resultados para groin pain treatment,sports hernia,athletic pubalgia,groin disruption injury,hip arthroscopy


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Trabalho Final do Curso de Mestrado Integrado em Medicina, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 2014

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

En chirurgie vasculaire, l’accès à l’artère fémorale, qu’il soit par une incision chirurgicale ou par une approche percutanée, est très fréquemment utilisé pour une multitude d’interventions vasculaires ou endovasculaires; pour des pontages divers, le traitement d’occlusions artérielles, la réparation d’anévrismes et la pose d’endoprothèses. L’objectif général de ce projet de recherche est de faciliter et réduire les risques des approches de l’artère fémorale par une meilleure compréhension anatomique du triangle fémoral. La méthodologie a été réalisée grâce à l’utilisation de cadavres spécialement embaumés par la méthode développée par Walter Thiel. Les résultats présentés dans ce mémoire ont permis de proposer des solutions en réponse à des problèmes cliniques en chirurgie vasculaire. Dans un premier temps, l’étude de la vascularisation cutanée du triangle fémoral a mené à proposer de nouvelles incisions chirurgicales afin de limiter la dévascularisation cutanée des plaies et ainsi réduire les problèmes de cicatrisation observés. Ensuite, nous avons validé l’identification radiographique et échographique de l’artère fémorale à son croisement avec le ligament inguinal afin de faciliter l’identification d’un site de ponction artérielle adéquat. Enfin, nous avons développé une méthode échographique simple qui facilite l’approche percutanée de l’artère fémorale, même chez les patients obèses. Les retombées de ce projet de recherche sont multiples pour les cliniciens, l’étude fournit une meilleure compréhension anatomique tridimensionnelle du triangle fémoral et les techniques proposées dans ce mémoire pourront apporter une amélioration de la pratique chirurgicale et faciliter le travail des médecins. Toutefois, ces propositions devront maintenant être validées en clinique.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Editor : Elizabeth Burchenal.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Description based on: 1914.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Bound in red-brown cloth, stamped in gold and black.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The persistence of negative attitudes towards cancer pain and its treatment suggests there is scope for identifying more effective pain education strategies. This randomized controlled trial involving 189 ambulatory cancer patients evaluated an educational intervention that aimed to optimize patients' ability to manage pain. One week post-intervention, patients receiving the pain management intervention (PMI) had a significantly greater increase in self-reported pain knowledge, perceived control over pain, and number of pain treatments recommended. Intervention group patients also demonstrated a greater reduction in willingness to tolerate pain, concerns about addiction and side effects, being a "good" patient, and tolerance to pain relieving medication. The results suggest that targeted educational interventions that utilize individualized instructional techniques may alter cancer patient attitudes, which can potentially act as barriers to effective pain management. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background and purpose: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.05 is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing a single 8 Gy with 20 Gy in five fractions of radiotherapy (RT) for neuropathic pain due to bone metastases. This paper summarizes the quality assurance (QA) activities for the first 234 patients (accrual target 270). Materials and methods: Independent audits to assess compliance with eligibility/exclusion criteria and appropriateness of treatment of the index site were conducted after each cohort of approximately 45 consecutive patients. Reported serious adverse events (SAEs) in the form of cord/cauda equina compression or pathological fracture developing at the index site were investigated and presented in batches to the Independent Data Monitoring Committee. Finally, source data verification of the RT prescription page and treatment records was undertaken for each of the first 234 patients to assess compliance with the protocol. Results: Only one patient was found conclusively not to have genuine neuropathic pain, and there were no detected 'geographical misses' with RT fields. The overall rate of detected infringements for other eligibility criteria over five audits (225 patients) was 8% with a dramatic improvement after the first audit. There has at no stage been a statistically significant difference in SAEs by randomization arm. There was a 22% rate of RT protocol variations involving ten of the 14 contributing centres, although the rate of major dose violations (more than +/- 10% from protocol dose) was only 6% with no statistically significant difference by randomization arm (P = 0.44). Conclusions: QA auditing is an essential but time-consuming component of RT trials, including those assessing palliative endpoints. Our experience confirms that all aspects should commence soon after study activation. Crown Copyright (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Study Design. A systematic review of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Objectives. To determine the efficacy of prolotherapy injections in adults with chronic low back pain. Summary of Background Data. Prolotherapy is an injection-based treatment for chronic low back pain. Proponents of prolotherapy suggest that some back pain stems from weakened or damaged ligaments. Repeatedly injecting them with irritant solutions is thought to strengthen the ligaments and reduce pain and disability. Prolotherapy protocols usually include co-interventions to enhance the effectiveness of the injections. Methods. The authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Science Citation Index up to January 2004, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register 2004, issue 1, and consulted content experts. Both randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing prolotherapy injections to control injections, either alone or in combination with other treatments, were included. Studies had to include measures of pain and disability before and after the intervention. Two reviewers independently selected the trials and assessed them for methodologic quality. Treatment and control group protocols varied from study to study, making meta-analysis impossible. Results. Four studies, all of high quality and with a total of 344 participants, were included. All trials measured pain and disability levels at 6 months, three measured the proportion of participants reporting a greater than 50% reduction in pain or disability scores from baseline to 6 months. Two studies showed significant differences between the treatment and control groups for those reporting more than 50% reduction in pain or disability. Their results could not be pooled. In one, cointerventions confounded interpretation of results; in the other, there was no significant difference in mean pain and disability scores between the groups. In the third study, there was little or no difference between groups in the number of individuals who reported more than 50% improvement in pain and disability. The fourth study reporting only mean pain and disability scores showed no differences between groups. Conclusions. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of prolotherapy injections in reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain. Conclusions are confounded by clinical heterogeneity among studies and by the presence of co-interventions. There was no evidence that prolotherapy injections alone were more effective than control injections alone. However, in the presence of co-interventions, prolotherapy injections were more effective than control injections, more so when both injections and co-interventions were controlled concurrently.