64 resultados para Photosensitization


Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Identifying the cellular responses to photodynamic therapy (PDT) is important if the mechanisms of cellular damage are to be fully understood. The relationship between sensitizer, fluence rate and the removal of cells by trypsinization was studied using the RIF-1 cell line. Following treatment of RIF-1 cells with pyridinium zinc (II) phthalocyanine (PPC), or polyhaematoporphyrin at 10 mW cm−2 (3 J cm−2), there was a significant number of cells that were not removed by trypsin incubation compared to controls. Decreasing the fluence rate from 10 to 2.5 mW cm−2 resulted in a two-fold increase in the number of cells attached to the substratum when PPC used as sensitizer; however, with 5,10,15,20 meso-tetra(hydroxyphenyl) chlorin (m-THPC) there was no resistance to trypsinization following treatment at either fluence rate. The results indicate that resistance of cells to trypsinization following PDT is likely to be both sensitizer and fluence rate dependent. Increased activity of the enzyme tissue-transglutaminase (tTGase) was observed following PPC-PDT, but not following m-THPC-PDT. Similar results were obtained using HT29 human colonic carcinoma and ECV304 human umbilical vein endothelial cell lines. Hamster fibrosarcoma cell (Met B) clones transfected with human tTGase also exhibited resistance to trypsinization following PPC-mediated photosensitization; however, a similar degree of resistance was observed in PDT-treated control Met B cells suggesting that tTGase activity alone was not involved in this process.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A cavidade oral é um habitat favorável ao desenvolvimento de microrganismos, alguns dos quais podem causar doenças, sendo Enterococcus faecalis uma bactéria frequentemente encontrada em biofilmes instalados em diferentes nichos da cavidade oral. Este trabalho teve como objetivo testar a aplicabilidade da inativação fotodinâmica (PDI), usando porfirinas como fotossensibilizadores, como estratégia de controlo de biofilmes da cavidade oral, tomando E. faecalis como microrganismo modelo. Como fotossensibilizadores, foram testadas as porfirinas catiónicas Tetra-Py+-Me, Tri-Py+-Me-PF, PCat 2, PCat 3, PCat 4 e o corante azul de toluidina O (TBO), incluído como fotossensibilizador de referência. Os biofilmes de E. faecalis foram irradiados com luz branca (270 J.cm-2) a uma intensidade de 150 mW.cm-2, na presença de até 50 µM de porfirina ou até 20 µM de TBO. A cinética de inativação foi caracterizada pela variação da concentração de células viáveis ao longo da experiência. Foi também testada a inativação de células na forma livre, em condições equivalentes. Os biofilmes de E. faecalis mostraram-se muito resistentes à PDI com qualquer dos PS testados, não tendo sido conseguidos fatores de inativação superiores a 2 log com a concentração máxima de PS (50 µM) e a dose máxima de luz (270 J.cm-2). Na forma livre as células foram inativadas até ao limite de quantificação com concentrações de PS de 0,5 µM e doses de luz até 108 J.cm-2, com uma intensidade de 10 mW.cm-2. No entanto, a eficiência de ligação dos PS às células livres não foi maior do que aos biofilmes. Embora os fatores de inativação obtidos não permitam ainda considerar que a PDI com os compostos testados seja uma abordagem antimicrobiana eficiente contra biofilmes de E. faecalis, o facto de se confirmar uma relação entre as propriedades químicas e físicas do PS e a sua eficiência, bem como os resultados muito promissores obtidos com uma das famílias de porfirinas testadas apenas em células livres, justifica a prossecução do desenvolvimento de novos PS para o controle de biofilmes bacterianos na cavidade oral.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Animal, 2016.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Riboflavin is a vitamin very important in aerobic organisms, as a precursor of many coenzymes involved in the electron transporter chain. However, after photosensitization of riboflavin with UV or visible light, it generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can oxidize the DNA. The repair of oxidative lesions on DNA occurs through the base excision repair pathway (BER), where APE1 endonuclease plays a central role. On the other hand, the nucleotide excision repair pathway (NER) repairs helix-distorting lesions. Recently, it was described the participation of NERproteins in the repair of oxidative damage and in stimulation of repair function fromAPE1. The aim of this research was to evaluate the cytotoxic effects of photosensitized riboflavin (RF*) in cells proficient and deficient in NER, correlating with APE1 expression. For this propose, the cells were treated with RF* and it was performed the cell viability assay, extraction of whole proteins, cells fractionation, immunoblotting, indirect immunofluorescence and analysis of polymorphisms of BER gens. The results evidenced that cells deficient in XPA and CSB proteins were more sensitive to RF*. However, XPC-deficient cells presented similar resistance to MRC5- SV cells, which is proficient in NER. These results indicate that XPA and CSB proteins have an important role on repair of oxidative lesions induced by RF*. Additionally, it was evidenced that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in BER enzymes may influence in sensitivity of NER-deficient cell lines. Concerning the APE1 expression, the results showed that expression of this protein after treatment with RF* only changed in XPC-deficient cells. Though, it was observed that APE1 is recruited and is bound to chromatin in MRC5-SV and XPA cells after treatment with RF*. The results also showed the induction of DNA damage after treatment with RF*, through the analysis of-H2AX, since the treatment promoted an increase of endogenous levels of this phosphorylated protein, which acts signaling double strand-break on DNA. On the other hand, in XPC-deficient cells, regardless of resistance of RF*, the endogenous levels of APE1 are extremely reduced when compared with other cell lines and APE1 is not bound to chromatin after treatment with RF*. These results conclude that RF* was able to induce cell death in NERdeficient cells, where XPA and CSB cells were more sensitive when compared with MRC5-SV and XPC-deficient cells. This last result is potentially very interesting, since XPC-deficient cell line presents low levels of APE1. Additionally, the results evidenced that APE1 protein can be involved in the repair of oxidative damage induced by RF*, because APE1 is recruited and bound strongly to chromatin after treatment.