La tipicidad de las detenciones ilegales policiales. Revisión crítica de la aplicación jurisprudencial de los arts. 167 y 530 del Código Penal

Es difícil encontrar en el Código penal español una regulación tan deficiente y confusa de una serie de conductas delictivas tan relevantes para el funcionamiento del Estado de Derecho como es la relativa a las detenciones ilegales cometidas por funcionario público que se prevé en los arts. 167 y 530. Lejos de hallar criterios jurisprudenciales satisfactorios que reconduzcan, en la medida de lo posible, la situación se advierte que el caos se ha instalado en buena medida en las resoluciones de los tribunales. En este trabajo se describe la situación y se propone una revisión general de los criterios interpretativos de los tipos en cuestión con el fin de dotarlos de mayor coherencia y certeza en su aplicación.

Support for a colleague

As collaborators of Anders Pape Møller, we were shocked and surprised to read that he was accused of data fabrication ("Ecologists roiled by misconduct case," G. Vogel, F. Proffitt, R. Stone, News of the Week, 30 Jan., p. 606). We have never had cause to be concerned about any aspect of our collaborations with Møller. He is an amazing scientist, and his great organizational skills are a model for how to be productive in the face of competing time demands. Most of us are capable of much more than we actually accomplish, but we lack the dedication and self-discipline to follow through like Anders Møller. This is the secret of his phenomenal effectiveness that has been so puzzling to the scientific community. His achievements may have caused negative responses from some of his competitors. We would like to see a full, objective, and independent inquiry into the allegations. Our experience tells us that Anders Møller has an exceptionally complete focus on any task at hand, be it fieldwork, data analysis, or paper writing; this, combined with more than a little natural talent, is sufficient to explain his exceptional productivity. We have worked with him on a variety of projects, including collecting data, sometimes under arduous conditions, and in all our dealings with him, his behavior has been beyond reproach. We would ask colleagues to restrain from further public condemnation until such time as any allegations have been proven beyond doubt.

Choosy moral punishers.

The punishment of social misconduct is a powerful mechanism for stabilizing high levels of cooperation among unrelated individuals. It is regularly assumed that humans have a universal disposition to punish social norm violators, which is sometimes labelled "universal structure of human morality" or "pure aversion to social betrayal". Here we present evidence that, contrary to this hypothesis, the propensity to punish a moral norm violator varies among participants with different career trajectories. In anonymous real-life conditions, future teachers punished a talented but immoral young violinist: they voted against her in an important music competition when they had been informed of her previous blatant misconduct toward fellow violin students. In contrast, future police officers and high school students did not punish. This variation among socio-professional categories indicates that the punishment of norm violators is not entirely explained by an aversion to social betrayal. We suggest that context specificity plays an important role in normative behaviour; people seem inclined to enforce social norms only in situations that are familiar, relevant for their social category, and possibly strategically advantageous.

DCI Voter Fraud Investigations Report, May 8, 2014.

In March of 2012, the Iowa Secretary of State’s office compared Iowa’s voter registration records with the driver’s license record s of individuals that identified themselves as non-citizens with the Iowa Department of Transportation. After comparing those records, the Iowa Secretary of State’s office found that more than 3,000 individuals registered to vote that had previously identified themselves as non-citizens. More than 1,000 of these individuals had also cast a ballot. The Iowa Secretary of State’s office was not given timely access to the federal Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE)database, and therefore was unable to determine if any of these individuals had become citizens before they registered to vote or cast a ballot. On June 21, 2012, the Iowa Secretary of State’s office entered into an agreement with the Iowa Department of Public Safety’s Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) to review potential election misconduct crimes and improve the administration of federal elections. Over the last two years,DCI agents have reviewed thousands of instances of possible election misconduct. DCI’s review included cases referred by the Iowa Secretary of State’s office as well as by other state and local government agencies.

Issue review : state prison system budget.

This issue review examines the prison system fiscal year 2010 budget, including receipts and expenditures, average annual costs, personnel and inmate assaults.

Issue review : projected impact of elimination of the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

The federal Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 ended the Federal Family Education Loan Program, or FFELP, and no new FFELP loans will be issued after June 30, 2010. The Iowa College Student Aid Commission received approximately 14 million dollars of its 14.7 million dollar fiscal year 2010 administrative budget from the various fees associated with the FFELP program and services. With the cessation of FFELP loans, the commission project's revenues will decline, as the currently existing FFELP loans are paid off, beginning with a 2.7 million dollar decline in fiscal year 2011. This issue review examines the prison system fiscal year 2010 budget, including receipts and expenditures, average annual costs, personnel and inmate assaults.

Regressió a segon grau: causes i conseqüències

La recerca aborda la situació penitenciària de regressió a segon grau d’una persona classificada en tercer grau de tractament. Aquesta recerca neix de la dada que a Catalunya el retorn esglaonat a la comunitat (a partir del tercer grau o de la llibertat condicional) no és la forma habitual en què les persones condemnades extingeixen la condemna sinó que resulta més comú la finalització en segon grau. Aquesta realitat resulta preocupant ja que existeix una evidència científica favorable al retorn esglaonat com un sistema amb més probabilitats d’aconseguir la reinserció de la persona. La recerca parteix de que un dels factors que explica aquesta taxa baixa de finalització de la condemna en tercer grau o en llibertat condicional és justament la regressió a segon grau. Acceptat aquest fet, els objectius de la recerca consisteixen en valorar si el nostre sistema penitenciari fa un ús restringit de la regressió i en explorar si es poden identificar les causes que expliquen que una vegada que s’ha produït la regressió sigui difícil reprendre el procés de reinserció a la comunitat. Per dur a terme la recerca s’ha pres com a població de referència les persones que van patir una regressió a segon grau a Catalunya durant l’any 2011 i que finalitzen la seva condemna entre l’1 de juliol i el 31 de desembre del 2012. Això dóna una població de 52 persones. S’ha procedit a estudiar els expedients penitenciaris d’aquestes persones i s’ha aconseguit entrevistar al 75% d’elles. La recerca posa de manifest que la nostra pràctica de regressió es troba encara allunyada d’un model garantista i rehabilitador, indica algunes raons que expliquen la dificultat de recuperar el tercer grau o la llibertat condicional una vegada regressat i finalment s’assenyalen un conjunt de recomanacions o bones pràctiques.

Regresión a segundo grado: causas y consecuencias

La investigación aborda la situación penitenciaria de regresión a segundo grado de una persona clasificada en tercer grado de tratamiento. Esta investigación nace del dato de que en Cataluña el retorno escalonado a la comunidad (a partir del tercer grado o de la libertad condicional) no es la forma habitual en que las personas condenadas extinguen la condena, sino que resulta más común la finalización en segundo grado. Esta realidad resulta preocupante ya que existe una evidencia científica favorable al retorno escalonado como un sistema con más probabilidades de lograr la reinserción de la persona. La investigación parte de que uno de los factores que explica esta baja tasa de finalización de la condena en tercer grado o en libertad condicional es justamente la regresión a segundo grado. Aceptado este hecho, los objetivos de la investigación consisten en valorar si nuestro sistema penitenciario hace un uso restringido de la regresión y en explorar si se pueden identificar las causas que explican que una vez que se ha producido la regresión sea difícil retomar el proceso de reinserción en la comunidad. Para llevar a cabo la investigación se ha tomado como población de referencia a las personas que sufrieron una regresión a segundo grado en Cataluña durante el año 2011 y que finalizaron su condena entre el 1 de julio y el 31 de diciembre de 2012. Esto da una población de 52 personas. Se ha procedido a estudiar los expedientes penitenciarios de estas personas y se ha conseguido entrevistar al 75% de ellas. La investigación pone de manifiesto que nuestra práctica de regresión se encuentra todavía alejada de un modelo garantista y rehabilitador, indica algunas razones que explican la dificultad de recuperar el tercer grado o la libertad condicional una vez regresado y finalmente se señalan un conjunto de recomendaciones o buenas prácticas.

Vastuu toimitusvahingoista polttonesteen toimituksissa, case oy Shell ab

Tutkimustyön tavoitteena oli selvittää polttonesteiden toimituksiin osallistuvien tahojen, eli myyjän, itsenäisen rahdinkuljettajan ja ostajan vastuun jakautuminen.. Lähtökohtaisesti myyjällä on viivästystilanteissa sekä kuluttaja-, että yritysasiakkaita kohtaan kontrollivastuu välittömistä ja tuottamusperusteinen vastuu välillisistä vahingoista, mutta korvausvelvollisuudesta voidaan vapautua tietyt tunnusmerkit täyttävän esteen perusteella. Virhevastuukin perustuu samanlaiselle kaksinkertaiselle vahinkolajikohtaiselle vastuuperuste-erottelulle, mutta myyjän on aina korvattava kuluttajalle aiheutuneet välittömät vahingot aiheuttamisvastuun perusteella. Lisäksi hän voi joutua hyvittämään kaikki mahdolliset menetyksen annetun erityisen sitoumuksen nojalla. Maksuviivästystilanteissa ostajan molempia vahinkolajeja koskeva vastuuperuste sijoittuu puhtaan aiheuttamis- ja kontrollivastuun väliin. Lainmukaisen myötävaikutusvelvollisuuden laiminlyönnin aiheuttamat vahingot korvataan noudattamalla myyjän viivästysvastuusäännöksiä, mutta tavaran vastaanottamisen tai noutamisen osalta vastuun toteutuminen edellytetään vielä sitä, että kaupankohteen pois toimittamisella on ollut myyjäpuolelle erityistä merkitystä. Kuluttaja-asiakkaalla ei kuitenkaan ole edellä mainittua vastuuta. Rahdinkuljettajalla on tavara- ja viivästysvahingoista ankara vastuu tietyn force majeure poikkeuksin. Tavallisesti korvausvelvollisuus rajoittuu tavaravahinkojen osalta 20 euroon painokiloa kohti ja viivästysvahingot on korvattava rahtia vastaavaan rahamäärään saakka. Kyseinen taho voi myös vapautua vastuusta kokonaan laissa mainittujen vastuuvapausperusteiden nojalla, mutta tahallinen tai törkeän huolimaton toiminta aiheuttaa täyden vahingonkorvausvastuun.

Proyecto de inserción sociolaboral centro penitenciario de Pamplona

Este proyecto de intervención se basa en la elaboración y diseño de un Proyecto de Inserción Sociolaboral, aplicado a un caso real localizado en el Centro Penitenciario de Pamplona; la población diana es un grupo de internas entre 18 y 45 años. El objetivo general de este proyecto es: “capacitar a las internas en técnicas y habilidades encaminadas a lograr un alto grado de autonomía personal para la integración en el mercado laboral y a la sociedad”. El proyecto está dividido en diferentes partes: a) marco teórico como base conceptualizadora para la construcción del proyecto, b) el diagnóstico, a partir de la aplicación de diferentes técnicas cualitativas y cuantitativas, c) formulación del proyecto, d) aplicación y e) evaluación del mismo. El proyecto pretende mostrar y concienciar sobre la situación actual del colectivo penitenciario en relación al ámbito laboral, mostrando cuáles son sus necesidades y las que les dificultan de cara a su integración laboral al salir de prisión, y por lo tanto, de cara a su mejor integración social. Se pretende trasladar a la sociedad a nivel general y en especial, al resto de centros penitenciarios, la importancia que tiene realizar este tipo de intervenciones y proyectos desde prisión.

Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations.

In 2008, a Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences working group chaired by Professor Emilio Bossi issued a "Memorandum on scientific integrity and the handling of misconduct in the scientific context", together with a paper setting out principles and procedures concerning integrity in scientific research. In the Memorandum, unjustified claims of authorship in scientific publications are referred to as a form of scientific misconduct - a view widely shared in other countries. In the Principles and Procedures, the main criteria for legitimate authorship are specified, as well as the associated responsibilities. It is in fact not uncommon for disputes about authorship to arise with regard to publications in fields where research is generally conducted by teams rather than individuals. Such disputes may concern not only the question who is or is not to be listed as an author but also, frequently, the precise sequence of names, if the list is to reflect the various authors' roles and contributions. Subjective assessments of the contributions made by the individual members of a research group may differ substantially. As scientific collaboration - often across national boundaries - is now increasingly common, ensuring appropriate recognition of all parties is a complex matter and, where disagreements arise, it may not be easy to reach a consensus. In addition, customs have changed over the past few decades; for example, the practice of granting "honorary" authorship to an eminent researcher - formerly not unusual - is no longer considered acceptable. It should be borne in mind that the publications list has become by far the most important indicator of a researcher's scientific performance; for this reason, appropriate authorship credit has become a decisive factor in the careers of young researchers, and it needs to be managed and protected accordingly. At the international and national level, certain practices have therefore developed concerning the listing of authors and the obligations of authorship. The Scientific Integrity Committee of the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences has collated the relevant principles and regulations and formulated recommendations for authorship in scientific publications. These should help to prevent authorship disputes and offer guidance in the event of conflicts.

The Swiss cohort study on substance use risk factors : findings of two waves

Aim: To summarize published findings in peer-reviewed journals of the first two waves of the Swiss Cohort Study on Substance Use Risk Factors (C-SURF), a longitudinal study assessing risk and protective factors of 5,987 young men during the phase of emerging adulthood (20 years at baseline, followed-up 15 months later). Methods: Included were 33 studies published until November 2014 focusing on substance use. Results: Substance use in early adulthood is a prevalent and stable behavior. The 12-month prevalence of nonmedical use of prescription drugs (10.6%) lies between that of cannabis (36.4%) and other illicit drugs such as ecstasy (3.7%) and cocaine (3.2%). Although peer pressure in the form of misconduct is associated with increased substance use, other aspects such as peer involvement in social activities may have beneficial effects. Regular sport activities are associated with reduced substance use, with the exception of alcohol use. Young men are susceptible to structural conditions such as the price of alcohol beverages or the density of on-premise alcohol outlets. Particularly alcohol use in public settings such as bars, discos or in parks (compared with private settings such as the home) is associated with alcohol-related harm, including injuries or violence. Being a single parent versus nuclear family has no effect on alcohol use, but active parenting does. Besides parenting, religiousness is an important protective factor for both legal and illegal substance use. Merely informing young men about the risks of substance use may not be an effective preventive measure. At-risk users of licit and illicit substances are more health literate, e. g., for example, they seek out more information on the internet than non-at-risk-users or abstainers. Discussion: There are a number of risk and protective substance use factors, but their associations with substance use do not necessarily agree with those found outside Europe. In the United States, for example, heavy alcohol use in this age group commonly takes place in private settings, whereas in Switzerland it more often takes place in public settings. Other behaviors, such as the nonmedical use of prescription drugs, appear to be similar to those found overseas, which may show the need for targeted preventive actions. C-SURF findings point to the necessity of establishing European studies to identify factors for designing specific preventive actions.

Virkavastuu. Määräaikainen virantoimituksesta erottaminen rajavartiomiehen, ammattisotilaan ja poliisin erityisenä kurinpitorangaistuksena.

Tutkielman tavoitteena on oikeudellisten lähteiden systematisoinnilla tuottaa johdonmukainen kuvaus poliisin, rajavartiomiehen sekä ammattisotilaan virkavelvollisuuksista, oikeudellisesta vastuusta ja virkarikosten rangaistavuudesta. Päähuomio kohdistuu virkamiehen määräaikaiseen virantoimituksesta erottamiseen. Oikeudellisella argumentaatiolla pyritään esittämään lainmukainen ja hyväksyttävä tulkintakannanotto siihen, miten kyseistä säädöstä tulisi tulkita. Tutkimusmetodi työssä on oikeusdogmatiikka. Ensisijaisena aineistona tutkielmassa on voimassa oleva lainsäädäntö valmisteluaineistoineen. Toissijaisina lähteinä käytetään kirjallisuutta, viranomaisten kurinpitopäätöksiä ja haastatteluja. Määräaikainen erottaminen voidaan määrätä virkamiehelle, joka toimii vastoin virkavelvollisuuksiaan tai laiminlyö niitä. Säädös on tulkittavissa laajentavasti siten, että myös muut kuin selkeästi viranomaisen valvontavastuulle kuuluvat teot voidaan katsoa virkatehtävien vastaiseksi. Erityisen käyttäytymisvelvoitteen johdosta menettely on rangaistavaa myös vapaa-ajalla. Määräaikainen erottaminen sijoittuu rangaistusasteikossa varoituksen ja irtisanomisen väliin. Rangaistus ei edellytä erityisen painavia perusteita, joita vaaditaan virkamiehen irtisanomiseen. Uuden säädöksen myötä irtisanomisten määrä on vähentynyt Rajavartiolaitoksessa. Säädöksestä on muotoutunut kurinpidollinen lisärangaistus, joka on määrätty virkamiehelle hallinnollisella päätöksellä yleensä rikostuomion jälkeen. Säädös on kuitenkin tarkoitettu ja se mahdollistaa myös puuttumisen varsinaisten virkatehtävien laiminlyönteihin. Lainsäädännön selkeyttämiseksi määräaikaisen erottamisen säädös tulisi poistaa eri viranomaisten erityislainsäädännöstä ja liittää suoraan virkamieslakiin. Säädöksen soveltaminen tulisi ulottaa koskemaan myös muita virkamiehiä, jotka palvelevat kyseisissä viranomaisissa. Tutkimuksen kohteena oleva virkamiesryhmä alistuu virkamiesoikeudessa blankkorangaistusuhan alle. Virkamiehen on vaikea hahmottaa kaikkea rangaistavaa toimintaa, ja virantoimittamisvelvollisuus on usein täsmentymätön ja tulkinnanvarainen. Kokonaisharkinnassa korostuvat myös muut kuin oikeudelliset lähteet (esimerkiksi moraalikäsitykset, etiikka, ohjeet, virkamiehen elämäntilanne). Sotilaiden ja poliisin oikeudenhoito poikkeaa monilta osin muiden virkamiesten oikeudenhoitomenettelystä. Rajavartiolaitoksessa sotilasoikeudenhoidon määräykset ja ohjeet ovat selkeästi puutteelliset. Rajavartiolaitoksen tehtäväkentän ja toimivaltuudet huomioiden tulisi kurinpito- ja virkarikosten tutkinnoissa lähentyä poliisin mallia sekä hyödyntää rikostorjuntahenkilöstön ammattitaitoa oman henkilökunnan esitutkinnoissa. Erityisen turvallisuusviranomaisten virkarikoksiin erikoistuneen tutkintaorganisaation perustaminen voisi tehostaa ja parantaa esitutkintojen tasoa sekä lisätä oikeusvarmuutta.

Addressing conflicts of interest in the research paper: a societal demand in contemporary science?

In the last decade, dialogue between science and society has found a forum in an increasing number of publications on topics such as public engagement with science and public trust in science. Concerning the latter, issues that include cases of research misconduct, accountability in research, and conflicts of interest (COIs) have shaped global discussions on the communication of science. In the publication setting, the perception that hiding COIs and/or not managing them well may affect public trust in the research record has grown among editors. We conducted a search for editorials addressing COIs between 1989 and 2011, using four major databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge. We explored the content of these editorials and the relationship they established between COIs and the public trust in science. Our results demonstrate that the relationship between disclosure of COIs and public trust in science has become a major concern among editors. We, thus, argue that COIs should be discussed more openly and frequently in graduate courses in the sciences, around the globe, not only in biomedical but also in non-biomedical areas. This is a critical issue in contemporary science, as graduate students are the future voices and decision-makers of the research community. Therefore, COIs, especially in the broader context of science and society, merit closer attention from policymakers, researchers, and educators. At times of great expectations for public engagement with science, mishandling of COIs may have undesirable consequences for public engagement with science and confidence in the scientific endeavor.

Guerre défensive provoquée ou duel pour la prépondérance ? : nouveau regard sur les origines de la guerre franco-prussienne de 1870-71

La guerre franco-prussienne (ou franco-allemande) de 1870-71 fut un conflit majeur dont l’issue changea considérablement l’équilibre des puissances en Europe avec notamment l’émergence de l’Empire allemand. Pourtant, elle a été oubliée. Bien que depuis la fin du XIXe siècle, elle fut largement traitée par l’historiographie, la question des responsabilités relativement à son déclenchement demeure un sujet de débat. Tandis que certains historiens estiment que cette guerre fut sciemment provoquée par Bismarck afin de parachever l’unification allemande, d’autres croient que la responsabilité est partagée et que ce conflit était tout simplement inévitable dans le contexte du refroidissement des rapports franco-allemands depuis la défaite autrichienne de Königgrätz (Sadowa). Le présent mémoire entend se dissocier de ces interprétations en jetant un nouveau regard sur le rôle joué par Bismarck lors des « préliminaires » (Vorgeschichte) de 1870. En s’appuyant sur des sources primaires ainsi que sur ce que les historiographies allemande, française et anglo-saxonne nous apprennent, il sera démontré premièrement que la candidature Hohenzollern pour le trône d’Espagne n’a pas été « fabriquée » volontairement par le chef de la diplomatie prussienne afin de compléter l’unification allemande, mais qu’elle fut promue d’abord et avant tout pour des considérations de prestige politique. Deuxièmement, la fameuse dépêche d’Ems modifiée par Bismarck ne peut être considérée comme l’élément déclencheur de ce conflit, car la décision d’aller en guerre fut prise à Paris avant que les effets de la dépêche ne se fassent sentir. Enfin, par son besoin d’un succès politico-diplomatique qui aurait consolidé le Second Empire en faisant oublier les reculades antérieures, par son refus de se satisfaire du retrait de la candidature Hohenzollern et par les erreurs de sa politique étrangère en général, la France a adopté une position belliqueuse et s’est retrouvée seule dans une guerre qu’elle n’avait su ni prévenir, ni préparer. L’enjeu à Paris n’était finalement pas le règlement pacifique des différends avec la Prusse, mais la pérennisation de la prépondérance française sur le continent européen.