The experience of transplantation for patients and their significant ones: A difficult encounter of two worlds

Objectives This paper reports on a longitudinal qualitative study exploring concerns of 60 patients before and after transplantation. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted without time constraints in a protected space out of the hospital. Qualitative analysis was performed. Results Prior to transplantation, all patients talked freely about negative feelings, stigmatisation, being misunderstood by others, loneliness and culpability caused by increasing physical dependency or abandoned roles. They mentioned alternative ways to cope (magic, spirituality), and even expressed their right to let go. In a subset of 13 patients, significant ones allowed themselves in the interview, or were integrated on the request of the patients. In this modified setting, two illness-worlds were confronted. If common themes were mentioned (e.g., modified life plans, restricted space, physical and psychological barriers), they were experienced differently. Fear of transplantation or guilt towards the donors was overtly expressed, often for the first time. Mutual hiding of anxiety in order to protect loved ones or to prevent loss of control was disclosed. The significant ones talked about accumulated stress and exhaustion related to the physical degradation of the patient, fear of the unpredictable evolution of illness and financial problems, and stressed their difficulty to adapt adequately to the fluctuating state of the patient. After transplantation, other themes emerged, where difficulty in disclosure was observed: intensive care and near death experiences, being a transplanted person, debt to the donor and his/her family, fear of rejection. Conclusions With the self-imposed strategy of hiding concerns to protect one another, a discrepancy between two illness-worlds was created. When concerns were confronted during the interviews, a new mutual understanding emerged. Patients and their families stated the need for sharing concerns in the course of illness.

Accès aux soins et maintien dans la communauté des personnes difficiles à engager dans un traitement psychiatrique [Access to care and maintenance in the community of persons who are difficult to engage in psychiatric treatment]

Psychotic patients to not access easily to psychiatric care. First, psychotic disorders are difficult to identify among a great number of non psychotic depressive and anxious disorders. Second, inpatient care has shortened and now focus on acute care rather than long stay. For some psychotic patients, desinstitutionalization means exclusion and marginalization. Intensive case management can answer these needs in collaboration with relatives and professionals of patient's social network. Results and care's steps of intensive case management as practiced in Lausanne are described and illustrated with cases vignettes.

Canakinumab vs triamcinolone acetonide for treatment of acute flares and prevention of recurrent flares in "difficult to treat" gouty arthritis

Monosodium urate crystal deposition seen in gout stimulates IL-1 beta OR IL-1_; release. Canakinumab, a long-acting, fully human anti- IL-1 beta OR IL-1_; monoclonal antibody, effectively neutralizes IL-1 beta OR IL-1_;. Methods: This was an 8-week, dose-ranging, multi-center, blinded, doubledummy, active-controlled trial. Patients (aged 18-80 years) with an acute gout flare, refractory to or contraindicated to NSAlDs and/or colchicine, were randomized to one dose of canakinumab 10, 25, 50, 90, 150 mg s.c. or triamcinolone acetonide (TA) 40 mg i.m. Primary variable was assessed as pain intensity at 72 h post-dose (0-100 mm VAS). Secondary variables included pain intensity 24 and 48 h post-dose, time to 50% reduction in pain intensity, time to recurrence of gout flares up to 8 weeks post-dose, and rescue medication use. Results: 191/200 enrolled patients (canakinumab, n_143; TA, n_57) completed the study. Canakinumab showed significant dose-dependent pain reduction at 72 h. Canakinumab 150 mg showed superior pain relief versus TA starting from 24 h: estimated mean difference in pain intensity on VAS was -11.5 (24 h), -18.2 (48 h), and -19.2 (72 h) (all p_0.05). Canakinumab 150 mg provided a rapid onset of pain relief: median time to 50% reduction in pain was reached at 1 day with canakinumab 150 mg versus 2 days with TA (p_0.0006). At Week 8, recurrent flares occurred in 1 patient (3.7%) on canakinumab 150 mg versus 25 (44.6%) patients on TA (relative risk reduction, 94%; p_0.006). During 7 days post-dose, 6 patients (22.2%) on canakinumab 150 mg, and 31 patients (55.4%) on TA, took rescue medication. Time to first rescue medication was significantly longer with canakinumab 150 mg versus TA (hazard ratio, 0.36; p_0.02). Serious adverse events (canakinumab _lsqb_n_4_rsqb_ and TA _lsqb_n_1_rsqb_) were considered not treatment-related by investigators and no patient discontinued due to adverse events. Conclusions: Canakinumab 150 mg was well-tolerated, provided rapid and sustained pain relief in patients with acute gout flares, and significantly reduced the recurrent flare risk by 94% at 8-weeks post-dose compared with triamcinolone acetonide.

A guide for easy- and difficult-to-treat hypertension.

Although the blood pressure (BP) of many patients can be controlled using standard combinations, treatment of hypertension frequently represents a clinical challenge to the primary care physician. This article will review best practices for managing patients with easy- and difficult-to-treat hypertension, including preferred antihypertensive combinations, optimizing adherence and persistence, recognizing white-coat hypertension, and intensifying therapy for treatment-resistant patients. Each physician must decide based on his or her own level of experience at what point a patient becomes too challenging and would benefit from referral to a hypertension specialist for more intensive management and to complete the exclusion of secondary forms of arterial hypertension. With intensive pharmacotherapy, many patients with difficult-to-treat hypertension can achieve BP control. If it fails, interventional strategies (e.g., renal denervation) are a valid option to get BP controlled.

Une ascite peu ordinaire... [An Unusual Ascites...]

La découverte d'une ascite en médecine interne ambulatoire ou hospitalière est relativement fréquente. Toutefois, le diagnostic différentiel s'étend parfoisà des pathologies plus rares qu'il convient d'investiguer rapidement afin de débuter un traitement et d'améliorer le pronostic du patient. Nous présentons le cas d'un patient de 50 ans avec une ascite d'apparition progressive dans le contexte d'une carcinose péritonéale avec un diagnostic histopathologique de mésothéliome malin péritonéal.[The finding of an ascites in in- or out-patients in inner medicine is relatively frequent. However, the differential diagnosis sometimes extends in rarer pathologies which need rapid investigations to begin a treatment and improve the patient's prognosis. We present the case of a 50-year-old patient with a progressive ascites in the context of a peritoneal carcinosis due to a malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.]

Canakinumab (Acz885) Relieves Pain And Controls Inflammation Rapidly In Patients With Difficult-To-Treat Gouty Arthritis : Comparison With Triamcinolone Acetonide

Background : Monosodium urate (MSU) crystals stimulate the productionof interleukin-1b (IL-1b), a potent inflammatory cytokine. Targeted IL-1b blockade with canakinumab, a fully human monoclonal anti-IL-1b antibody, is a novel treatment for gouty arthritis. Its effects on pain and inflammation in acute gouty arthritis flares were compared with triamcinolone acetonide (TA). TA has been shown to be effective in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis flares.Methods : This was an 8-week, dose-ranging, multicenter, blinded, active-controlled trial. Patients _18 to _80 years with an acute gouty arthritis flare, refractory to or contraindicated to NSAIDs and/or colchicine were randomized to one subcutaneous dose of canakinumab (10, 25, 50, 90, or 150 mg; n¼143) or one intramuscular dose of TA (40 mg; n¼57). Primary outcome was pain intensity at 72 hours post dose on VAS scale (0-100 mm). Secondary outcomes included Creactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), and physician's assessment of tenderness, swelling and erythema of target joint at 72 hours, 7 days, 4 and 8-weeks post dose.Results : 191/200 patients completed the study. Canakinumab showed a statistically significant dose response at 72 hours. The 150mg dose group reached superior pain relief compared to TA group starting from 24 hours as previously reported. At 72 hours post dose, 78% of canakinumab 150mg treated patients achieved _75% and 96% achieved _50% reduction in pain from baseline. In contrast, 45% and 61% of patients treated with TA achieved _75% and _50% pain reduction, respectively. Median CRP/SAA levels were normalized by Day 7 for all canakinumab doses above 10mg and remained below the upper limit of normal [(ULN): CRP 3.0 mg/L; SAA 6.7 mg/L)] for rest of the study. In TA group, median CRP levels remained above the ULN throughout the study while median SAA levels decreased below ULN only 28 days after first dose. At 72 hours post dose, canakinumab 150mg group was 3.2 (95% CI, 1.27-7.89) times more likely to have less joint tenderness and 2.7 (95% CI, 1.09-6.5) times more likely to have less joint swelling than TA group (p<0.05). At 72 hours post dose, erythema disappeared in 74.1% of patients receiving canakinumab150mg and 69.6% of patients receiving TA. At 7 days post dose, erythema was absent in 96.3% of canakinumab 150mg treated patients vs. 83.9% of patients receiving TA. The overall incidence of AEs was similar for canakinumab (41%) and triamcinolone acetonide (42%). Serious AEs (canakinumab treatment groups n¼4, TA n¼1) were not considered treatment-related by investigators. No discontinuationsdue to AEs occurred.Conclusions : Canakinumab 150mg provided superior pain relief compared to TA for acute flares in difficult-to-treat gouty arthritis patients. Canakinumab provided rapid normalization of markers of inflammation accompanied by reduction of clinical signs and symptoms of inflammation.Disclosure statement : U.A., V.M., D.R. and P.S. are shareholders and employees of Novartis Pharma AG. A.P. has received research support from Novartis Pharma AG. N.S. has received research support from and acts as a consultant for Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, has served on advisory boards for Novartis, Takeda, Savient, URL Pharma and Enzyme Rx, and is/has been a member of a speakers' bureau for Takeda. A.S. has received consultancy fees from Novartis Pharma AG, Abbott, Wyeth, UCB, Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Essex and Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Papillons d'hier - papillons d'aujourd'hui: la difficulté de les comparer

Plus de cinquante ans après la publication des travaux d'Arnold Pictet (1942), une étude comparative des la faune des Lépidoptères diurnes su Parc national suisse a été réalisée. Les résultats obtenus selon une approche méthodologique rigoureuse pose les bases d'un suivi à long terme de l'évolution de leurs populations et pourraient servir de fil conducteur à des nouvelles recherches.