Social phobia in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Prevalence and correlates

Background: Social Phobia (SP) is an anxiety disorder that frequently co-occurs with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD); however, studies that evaluate clinical factors associated with this specific comorbidity are rare. The aim was to estimate the prevalence of SP in a large multicenter sample of OCD patients and compare the characteristics of individuals with and without SP. Method: A cross-sectional study with 1001 patients of the Brazilian Research Consortium on Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders using several assessment instruments, including the Dimensional Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Univariate analyses were followed by logistic regression. Results: Lifetime prevalence of SP was 34.6% (N=346). The following variables remained associated with SP comorbidity after logistic regression: male sex, lower socioeconomic status, body dysmorphic disorder, specific phobia, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, agoraphobia, Tourette syndrome and binge eating disorder. Limitations: The cross-sectional design does not permit the inference of causal relationships; some retrospective information may have been subject to recall bias; all patients were being treated in tertiary services, therefore generalization of the results to other samples of OCD sufferers should be cautious. Despite the large sample size, some hypotheses may not have been confirmed due to the small number of cases with these characteristics (type 2 error). Conclusion: SP is frequent among OCD patients and co-occurs with other disorders that have common phenomenological features. These findings have important implications for clinical practice, indicating the need for broader treatment approaches for individuals with this profile. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Instrumentos de avaliação para limitações funcionais associadas à instabilidade crônica de tornozelo: uma revisão sistemática da literatura

A instabilidade de tornozelo é definida como a sua tendência para sofrer falseios e entorses de repetição após a ocorrência de entorse lateral. Como a presença de instabilidade é definida por meio das queixas relatadas pelo indivíduo, apresenta caráter subjetivo, sendo importante identificar o melhor instrumento de avaliação para a determinação de sua presença e/ou gravidade. O objetivo deste estudo foi revisar, de forma sistemática, instrumentos de avaliação concebidos para pacientes com instabilidade crônica de tornozelo. Foram realizadas pesquisas bibliográficas nas bases de dados PubMed, Embase, BVS, LILACS e SciELO para identificar os instrumentos elegíveis. No total, seis estudos foram incluídos e apresentaram cinco instrumentos diferentes - Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI), Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AJFAT), Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool (AII) e Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Foram encontrados instrumentos com qualidade que detectam limitações funcionais em indivíduos com instabilidade crônica de tornozelo, não sendo instrumentos válidos para diagnóstico de instabilidade. O CAIT mostrou-se a ferramenta mais completa, mas não foi validada em uma população específica de indivíduos com condição de instabilidade do tornozelo. Observa-se a necessidade de mais estudos clinimétricamente válidos a fim de atestar a sua validade para se obter uma ferramenta eficaz e completa da instabilidade funcional do tornozelo.

La governance dei rifiuti in Europa. Territori, conflitti e partecipazione

I rifiuti come oggetti impegnano tutte le istituzioni umane in una lotta di definizione del posto che occupano e quindi del valore che assumono. In tale dinamica la gestione dei rifiuti diventa un fatto sociale totale che coinvolge tutte le istituzioni umane in una lotta di definizione territorializzata. La storia del movimento ambientalista ci mostra come partendo dal disagio nei confronti dell’oggetto si è passati ad un disagio nei confronti delle idee che lo generano. Modernizzazione ecologica e modernizzazione democratica sembrano andare per un certo periodo d’accordo. Nei casi di conflittualità recente, e nello studio di caso approfondito di un piano provinciale della gestione rifiuti, il carattere anticipatore dell’attivismo ambientalista, sta rendendo sempre più costosi e incerti, investimenti e risultati strategici . Anche i principi delle politiche sono messi in discussione. La sostenibilità è da ricercare in una relativizzazione dei principi di policy e degli strumenti tecnici di valutazione (e.g. LCA) verso una maggiore partecipazione di tutti gli attori. Si propone un modello di governance che parta da un coordinamento amministrativo territoriale sulle reti logistiche, quindi un adeguamento geografico degli ATO, e un loro maggior ruolo nella gestione del processo di coordinamento e pianificazione. Azioni queste che devono a loro volta aprirsi ai flussi (ecologici ed economici) e ai loro attori di riferimento: dalle aziende multiutility agli ambientalisti. Infine è necessario un momento di controllo democratico che può avere una funzione arbitrale nei conflitti tra gli attori o di verifica. La ricerca si muove tra la storia e la filosofia, la ricerca empirica e la riflessione teorica. Sono state utilizzate anche tecniche di indagine attiva, come il focus group e l’intervista.

Retrospective adjustment of self-assessed medical competencies - noteworthy in the evaluation of postgraduate practical training courses

The efficacy of postgraduate practical training courses is frequently evaluated by self-assessment instruments. The present study analyses the effect of a basic course in laparoscopic surgery on self-assessed medical competencies.

The efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of procedural pain in preterm and term neonates. A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit are exposed to a high number of painful procedures. Since repeated and sustained pain can have consequences for the neurological and behaviour-oriented development of the newborn, the greatest attention needs to be paid to systematic pain management in neonatology. Non-pharmacological treatment methods are being increasingly discussed with regard to pain prevention and relief either alone or in combination with pharmacological treatment. AIMS: To identify effective non-pharmacological interventions with regard to procedural pain in neonates. METHODS: A literature search was conducted via the MedLine, CINAHL, Cochrane Library databases and complemented by a handsearch. The literature search covered the period from 1984 to 2004. Data were extracted according to pre-defined criteria by two independent reviewers and methodological quality was assessed. RESULTS: 13 randomised controlled studies and two meta-analyses were taken into consideration with regard to the question of current nursing practice of non-pharmacological pain management methods. The selected interventions were "non-nutritive sucking", "music", "swaddling", "positioning", "olfactory and multisensorial stimulation", "kangaroo care" and "maternal touch". There is evidence that the methods of "non-nutritive sucking", "swaddling" and "facilitated tucking" do have a pain-alleviating effect on neonates. CONCLUSIONS: Some of the non-pharmacological interventions have an evident favourable effect on pulse rate, respiration and oxygen saturation, on the reduction of motor activity, and on the excitation states after invasive measures. However, unambiguous evidence of this still remains to be presented. Further research should emphasise the use of validated pain assessment instruments for the evaluation of the pain-alleviating effect of non-pharmacological interventions.

Development of a screening tool predicting the transition from acute to chronic low back pain for patients in a GP setting: protocol of a multinational prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Low back pain (LBP) is by far the most prevalent and costly musculoskeletal problem in our society today. Following the recommendations of the Multinational Musculoskeletal Inception Cohort Study (MMICS) Statement, our study aims to define outcome assessment tools for patients with acute LBP and the time point at which chronic LBP becomes manifest and to identify patient characteristics which increase the risk of chronicity. METHODS: Patients with acute LBP will be recruited from clinics of general practitioners (GPs) in New Zealand (NZ) and Switzerland (CH). They will be assessed by postal survey at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 weeks and 6 months follow-up. Primary outcome will be disability as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); key secondary endpoints will be general health as measured by the acute SF-12 and pain as measured on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). A subgroup analysis of different assessment instruments and baseline characteristics will be performed using multiple linear regression models. This study aims to examine: 1. Which biomedical, psychological, social, and occupational outcome assessment tools are identifiers for the transition from acute to chronic LBP and at which time point this transition becomes manifest. 2. Which psychosocial and occupational baseline characteristics like work status and period of work absenteeism influence the course from acute to chronic LBP. 3. Differences in outcome assessment tools and baseline characteristics of patients in NZ compared with CH. DISCUSSION: This study will develop a screening tool for patients with acute LBP to be used in GP clinics to access the risk of developing chronic LBP. In addition, biomedical, psychological, social, and occupational patient characteristics which influence the course from acute to chronic LBP will be identified. Furthermore, an appropriate time point for follow-ups will be given to detect this transition. The generalizability of our findings will be enhanced by the international perspective of this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: [Clinical Trial Registration Number, ACTRN12608000520336].

Host- rather than virus-related factors reduce health-related quality of life in hepatitis C virus infection

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with decreased health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Although HCV has been suggested to directly impair neuropsychiatric functions, other factors may also play a role. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the impact of various host-, disease- and virus-related factors on HRQOL in a large, unselected population of anti-HCV-positive subjects. All individuals (n = 1736) enrolled in the Swiss Hepatitis C Cohort Study (SCCS) were asked to complete the Short Form 36 (SF-36) and the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: 833 patients (48%) returned the questionnaires. Survey participants had significantly worse scores in both assessment instruments when compared to a general population. By multivariable analysis, reduced HRQOL (mental and physical summary scores of SF-36) was independently associated with income. In addition, a low physical summary score was associated with age and diabetes, whereas a low mental summary score was associated with intravenous drug use. HADS anxiety and depression scores were independently associated with income and intravenous drug use. In addition, HADS depression score was associated with diabetes. None of the SF-36 or HADS scores correlated with either the presence or the level of serum HCV RNA. In particular, SF-36 and HADS scores were comparable in 555 HCV RNA-positive and 262 HCV RNA-negative individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-HCV-positive subjects have decreased HRQOL compared to controls. The magnitude of this decrease was clinically important for the SF-36 vitality score. Host and environmental, rather than viral factors, seem to impact on HRQOL level.

The Personal Background and Preparation Survey Early Identifies Nursing Students at Risk for Attrition

Introduction Nursing student attrition continues to negatively impact the supply of nurses and nursing workforce diversity. Little research has addressed student attributes affecting nursing student attrition today. Research with college undergraduates has indicated that noncognitive attributes influence academic achievement and retention as much as academic attributes. Early identification of such attributes can help students to timely access appropriate services, providing improved opportunities for success. However, convenient, valid, quantitative, reliable assessment instruments appropriate for nursing students have been lacking. The Personal Background and Preparation Survey (PBPS) addresses the need for such a tool. [See PDF for complete abstract]

The Relationship Among Resilience, Forgiveness, and Anger Expression in Adolescents

This study was designed to investigate and describe the relationship among resilience, forgiveness and anger expression in adolescents. The purpose of the study was to explore whether certain adolescent resiliencies significantly related to positive or negative affective, behavioral, or cognitive levels of forgiveness and certain types of anger expression in adolescents. This study also investigated whether there were certain adolescent resiliencies and types of forgiveness that can predict lower levels of negative anger expression in adolescents. This research was built on two conceptual models: Wolin and Wolin's (1993) Challenge Model and the Forgiveness Process Model (Enright & Human Development Study Group, 1991). It was based on a quantitative, single-subject correlational research design. A multiple regression analysis was also used to explore possible effects of resilience and forgiveness on anger expression in adolescents. In addition, two demographic variables, Age and Gender, were examined for possible effects on anger expression. Data were gathered from a convenience sample sample of 70 students in three Maine public high schools using three separate assessment instruments: the Adolescent Resiliency Attitudes Scale (ARAS), the Adolescent Version of the Enright Forgiveness Inventory (EFI), and the Adolescent Anger Rating Scale (AARS). Correlational analyses were done on the scales and subscales of these surveys. Significant relationships were found between several adolescent resiliencies and forms of forgiveness as well as between some adolescent resiliencies and types of anger expression. The data indicated that Total Resiliency significantly correlated with Total Forgiveness as well as Total Anger. The findings also identified particular adolescent resiliencies that significantly predicted types of anger expression, while forgiveness did not predict types of anger expression. The data revealed that Age and Gender had no significant affect on anger expression. These findings suggest that the constructs of adolescent resilience and forgiveness have commonalities that can influence how adolescents express anger, and further suggest that intervention and prevention programs expand their focus to incorporate forgiveness skills. The findings from this study can provide critical information to counselors, therapists, and other helping professionals working with adolescents, on approaches to designing and implementing therapy modalities or developmental school guidance programs for adolescents.

Methodological Proposal for Teamwork Evaluation in the field of training Project Management.

Teamwork, is one of the abilities that today is highly valued in the professional arena with a great importance for various personal and interpersonal skills associated with it. In this context, the Technical University of Madrid, is developing a coordinated educational innovation project, which main objective is to develop methodological and assessment tools for the acquisition of personal skills necessary to improve the employability of graduates and their skills for project management. Within this context, this paper proposes a methodology composed of various activities and indicators, as well as specific assessment instruments linked to the teamwork competence. Through a series of systematic steps it was allowed the design of an instrument and construction of a scale for measuring the competence of teamwork. The practical application of the methodology has been carried out in Projects lectures from different Schools of Engineering at the Technical University of Madrid, which results are presented in this document as a pilot experience. Results show the various aspects and methods that teachers should consider in evaluating the competence of the work, including analysis of the quality of results, through reliability and construct validity. On the other hand, show the advantages of applying this methodology in the field of project management teaching.

Repercusión y análisis de las nuevas tecnologías en el entorno educativo del siglo XXI

Desde que se implantó la Sociedad de la Información, educadores e investigadores de todo el mundo han discutido y reflexionado sobre temáticas acerca de cómo deben ser usadas las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (TIC) para apoyar los aprendizajes, y cómo estas herramientas pueden ser útiles para mejorar los resultados académicos. Vivimos en una sociedad dinámica, sujeta a continuos cambios que afectan a cada una de los sectores de nuestra vida. El auge de las TIC ha transformado nuestro modo de pensar, de relacionarnos e incluso la manera de enseñar y de aprender. De ahí que la incorporación de las TIC a la sociedad en general y, de forma específica, al mundo de la educación se perciba hoy, como una realidad cada vez más consolidada y también como una necesidad. Por eso, este trabajo tiene como objetivo fundamental la evaluación de la implantación y el desarrollo que la educación y las TIC han tenido desde comienzos del siglo XXI hasta nuestros días. Este trabajo se dividirá en dos partes diferenciadas y complementarias. En una primera sección se presenta el marco teórico de los pilares fundamentales que sustentan la interacción entre educación y nuevas tecnologías y lo que ello conlleva. Un segundo apartado presenta el diseño metodológico de la investigación y los resultados alcanzados al aplicar instrumentos de evaluación en un centro escolar y su posterior análisis e interpretación de los resultados en referencia al impacto de las nuevas tecnologías en las aulas. ABSTRACT Since Information Society was introduced, educators and researchers from around the world have discussed and have reflected on issues about how the Information Technology and Communication (ICT) must be used to support learning, and how these tools can be useful for improving academic outcomes. We live in a dynamic society that is subject to continuous changes affecting every sector of our life. The growth of ICT has transformed the way we think and interact and even the way of teaching and learning. Hence, the incorporation of ICT in society in general and, specifically, in the world of education today is perceived as an increasingly consolidated reality and also as a necessity. Therefore, this work has as main objective the evaluation of the implementation and the development that education and ICT have had since the beginning of the XXI century to today. This work is divided into two distinct and complementary parts. The first section presents the theoretical framework of the pillars that support the interaction between education and new technology and what it entails. The second section presents the methodology of the research and results achieved by applying assessment instruments in a school and its subsequent analysis and interpretation of the results concerning to the impact of new technologies in the classrooms.

Definición e implementación de métricas objetivas para la evaluación funcional del miembro superior: aplicación a población con lesión medular cervical

En personas que padecen una Lesión Medular cervical, la función de los miembros superiores se ve afectada en mayor o menor medida, dependiendo fundamentalmente del nivel de la lesión y de la severidad de la misma. El déficit en la función del miembro superior hace que la autonomía e independencia de las personas se vea reducida en la ejecución de Actividades de la Vida Diaria. En el entorno clínico, la valoración de la función del miembro superior se realiza principalmente con escalas clínicas. Algunas de ellas valoran el nivel de dependencia o independencia en la ejecución de Actividades de la Vida Diaria, como, por ejemplo, el índice de Barthel y la escala FIM (Medida de la Independencia Funcional). Otras escalas, como Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function, miden la función del miembro superior valorando la destreza y la habilidad en la ejecución de determinadas tareas funcionales. Estas escalas son generales, es decir, se pueden aplicar a distintas poblaciones de sujetos y a la presencia de distintas patologías. Sin embargo, existen otras escalas desarrolladas específicamente para valorar una patología concreta, con el objetivo de hacer las evaluaciones funcionales más sensibles a cambios. Un ejemplo es la escala Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), desarrollada para valorar Lesión Medular. Las escalas clínicas son instrumentos de medida estandarizados, válidos para su uso en el entorno clínico porque se han validado en muestras grandes de pacientes. No obstante, suelen poseer una elevada componente de subjetividad que depende principalmente de la persona que puntúa el test. Otro aspecto a tener en cuenta, es que la sensibilidad de las escalas es alta, fundamentalmente, a cambios groseros en el estado de salud o en la función del miembro superior, de forma que cambios sutiles en el sujeto pueden no ser detectados. Además, en ocasiones, poseen saturaciones en el sistema de puntuación, de forma que mejorías que se puedan producir por encima de un determinado umbral no son detectadas. En definitiva, estas limitaciones hacen que las escalas clínicas no sean suficientes, por sí mismas, para evaluar estrategias motoras del miembro superior durante la ejecución de movimientos funcionales, siendo necesaria la búsqueda de instrumentos de medida que aporten objetividad, complementen las valoraciones y, al mismo tiempo, intenten solventar las limitaciones que poseen las escalas. Los estudios biomecánicos son ejemplos de métodos objetivos, en los que diversas tecnologías se pueden utilizar para recoger información de los sujetos. Una concreción de estos estudios son los estudios cinemáticos. Mediante tecnología optoelectrónica, inercial o electromagnética, estos estudios proporcionan información objetiva acerca del movimiento realizado por los sujetos, durante la ejecución de tareas concretas. Estos sistemas de medida proporcionan grandes cantidades de datos que carecen de una interpretación inmediata. Estos datos necesariamente deben ser tratados y reducidos a un conjunto de variables que, a priori, posean una interpretación más sencilla para ser utilizados en la práctica clínica. Estas han sido las principales motivaciones de esta investigación. El objetivo principal fue proponer un conjunto de índices cinemáticos que, de forma objetiva, valoren la función del miembro superior; y validar los índices propuestos en poblaciones con Lesión Medular, para su uso como instrumentos de valoración en el entorno clínico. Esta tesis se enmarca dentro de un proyecto de investigación: HYPER (Hybrid Neuroprosthetic and Neurorobotic Devices for Functional Compensation and Rehabilitation of Motor Disorders, referencia CSD2009-00067 CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010). Dentro de este proyecto se lleva a cabo investigación en el desarrollo de modelos, para determinar los requisitos biomecánicos y los patrones de movimiento de los miembros superiores en sujetos sanos y personas con lesión medular. Además, se realiza investigación en la propuesta de nuevos instrumentos de evaluación funcional en el campo de la rehabilitación de los miembros superiores. ABSTRACT In people who have suffered a cervical Spinal Cord Injury, upper limbs function is affected to a greater or lesser extent, depending primarily on the level of the injury and the severity of it. The deficit in the upper limb function reduces the autonomy and independence of persons in the execution of Activities of Daily Living. In the clinical setting, assessment of upper limb function is mainly performed based on clinical scales. Some value the level of dependence or independence in performing activities of daily living, such as the Barthel Index and the FIM scale (Functional Independence Measure). Other scales, such as the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function, measure upper limb function in terms of the skill and ability to perform specific functional tasks. These scales are general, so can be applied to different populations of subjects and the presence of different pathologies. However, there are other scales developed for a specific injury, in order to make the functional assessments more sensitive to changes. An example is the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), developed for people with Spinal Cord Injury. The clinical scales are standardized instruments measure, valid for use in the clinical setting because they have been validated in large patient samples. However, they usually have a high level of subjectivity which mainly depends on the person who scores the test. Another aspect to take into account is the high sensitivity of the scales mainly to gross changes in the health status or upper limb function, so that subtle changes in the subject may not be detected. Moreover, sometimes, have saturations in the scoring system, so that improvements which may occur above a certain threshold are not detected. For these reasons, clinical scales are not enough, by themselves, to assess motor strategies used during movements. So, it’s necessary to find measure instruments that provide objectivity, supplement the assessments and, at the same time, solving the limitations that scales have. Biomechanical studies are examples of objective methods, in which several technologies can be used to collect information from the subjects. One kind of these studies is the kinematic movement analysis. By means of optoelectronics, inertial and electromagnetic technology, these studies provide objective information about the movement performed by the subjects during the execution of specific tasks. These systems provide large quantities of data without easy and intuitive interpretation. These data must necessarily be treated and reduced to a set of variables that, a priori, having a simpler interpretation for their use in the clinical practice. These were the main motivations of this research. The main objective was to propose a set of kinematic indices, or metrics that, objectively, assess the upper limb function and validate the proposed rates in populations with Spinal Cord Injury, for use as assessment tools in the clinical setting. This dissertation is framed within a research project: HYPER (Neurorobotic Devices for Functional Compensation and Rehabilitation of Motor Disorders, grant CSD2009- 00067 CONSOLIDER INGENIO 2010). Within this research project, research is conducted in relation to the biomechanical models development for determining the biomechanical requirements and movement patterns of the upper limb in healthy and people with Spinal Cord Injury. Moreover, research is conducted with respect to the proposed of new functional assessment instruments in the field of upper limb rehabilitation.

Organização e dinâmica psíquica na obesidade infantil

Instrumentos de avaliação psicológica constituem-se em métodos sistemáticos de investigação e de compreensão de componentes estruturais e funcionais do comportamento humano, com diversificados objetivos e estratégias técnicas, respeitando-se especificidades das etapas do desenvolvimento. Em processos de avaliação psicológica de características da personalidade, os métodos projetivos, como o Método de Rorschach e o Desenho da Figura Humana, são recursos amplamente utilizados, contribuindo para a compreensão e elaboração de intervenções terapêuticas em variados campos de aplicação, como na área da obesidade infantil. Nesse contexto, este trabalho teve por objetivo identificar e comparar características psicológicas de crianças com obesidade em relação a eutróficas, a partir de métodos projetivos de investigação da personalidade. Foram examinadas 60 crianças de sete a 11 anos de idade, sendo 30 crianças diagnosticadas como obesas e em tratamento específico para o transtorno (Grupo 1 - G1) e 30 crianças com peso normal (Grupo 2 - G2), sem atraso acadêmico, sem limites cognitivos e sem histórico de outras doenças físicas. Os participantes de G1 foram recrutados em instituições de saúde voltadas ao tratamento da obesidade infantil e G2 foi constituído a partir de parceria estabelecida com instituição de ensino bem como a partir de contatos informais da pesquisadora e de seu grupo de pesquisa (técnica da \"bola de neve\"), buscando-se balanceamento dos grupos por sexo e idade. Os seguintes instrumentos de avaliação psicológica foram aplicados individualmente nas crianças: Teste das Matrizes Progressivas Coloridas de Raven (critério de seleção de participantes, incluindo-se na amostra apenas crianças com resultados intelectuais médios ou superiores), o Desenho da Figura Humana e o Método de Rorschach (Escola Francesa). Os pais das crianças participantes responderam ao Questionário de Capacidades e Dificuldades (SDQ) para caracterização da amostra. Os resultados foram examinados conforme padronização específica dos respectivos manuais técnicos dos instrumentos, realizando-se análises descritivas e inferenciais, a fim de examinar possíveis associações entre variáveis clínicas e demográficas e indicadores de características de personalidade das crianças. Foram efetuadas análises correlacionais entre resultados no DFH e no Rorschach, considerando também a classificação nutricional da criança. Os achados permitem compreender características do funcionamento psíquico envolvidas na obesidade infantil, de modo a favorecer estratégias futuras de intervenção terapêutica com crianças. (CAPES)

Interpreting Empirical Assessments from a Behavioral Perspective: A Rationale for Why and How

This paper provides a rationale on why and how to utilize assessment tools effectively within the behavioral framework through idiographic assessment. Empirical assessment instruments can provide guidance to the behaviorist that may prove useful in the idiographic formation of a behaviorally-based treatment plan. The paper will focus on two of the major traditional instrument tools, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory and the Rorschach inkblot test.

Coronary heart disease risk factors among tri-ethnic students at Florida International University

The present study identified and compared Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) risk factors quantified as “CHD risk point standards” (CHDRPS) among tri-ethnic (White non-Hispanic [WNH], Hispanic [H], and Black non-Hispanic [BNH]) college students. All 300 tri-ethnic subjects completed the Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Instruments and had blood pressure readings recorded on three occasions. The Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) was used to measure body composition. Students' knowledge of CHD risk factors was also measured. In addition, a 15 ml fasting blood sample was collected from 180 subjects and blood lipids and Homocysteine (tHcy) levels were measured. Data were analyzed by gender and ethnicity using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni's pairwise mean comparison procedure, Pearson correlation, and Chi-square test with follow-up Bonferroni's Chi-square tests. ^ The mean score of CHDRPS for all subjects was 19.15 ± 6.79. Assigned to the CHD risk category, college students were below-average risk of developing CHD. Males scored significantly (p < 0.013) higher for CHD risk than females, and BNHs scored significantly (p < 0.033) higher than WNHs. High consumption of dietary fat saturated fat and cholesterol resulted in a high CHDRPS among H males and females and WNH females. High alcohol consumption resulted in a high CHDRPS among all subjects. Mean tHcy ± SD of all subjects was 6.33 ± 3. 15 μmol/L. Males had significantly (p < 0.001) higher tHcy than females. Black non-Hispanic females and H females had significantly (p < 0.003) lower tHcy than WNH females. Positive associations were found between tHcy levels and CHDRPS among females (p < 0.001), Hs (p < 0.001), H males (p < 0.049), H females (p < 0.009), and BNH females (p < 0.005). Significant positive correlations were found between BMI levels and CHDRPS in males (p < 0.001), females (p < 0.001), WNHs (p < 0.008), Hs (p < 0.001), WNH males (p < 0.024), H males (p < 0.004) and H females (p < 0.001). The mean knowledge of CHD questions of all subjects was 71.70 ± 7.92 out of 100. The mean knowledge of CHD was significantly higher for WNH males (p < 0.039) than BNH males. A significant inverse correlation (r = 0.392, p < 0.032) was found between the CHD knowledge and CHDRPS in WNH females. The researcher's findings indicate strong gender and ethnic differences in CHD risk factors among the college-age population. ^