A importância da certificação do sistema de gestão ambiental para a melhoria do desempenho das empresas operadoras de resíduos em Portugal

A crescente preocupação e consciencialização do pensamento global, acerca dos problemas ambientais, por sua vez associados à rápida depleção dos recursos naturais, criaram uma forte aliança entre as pressões legais, sociais e políticas e a necessidade das organizações em preservar a sua imagem face a uma opinião pública cada vez mais exigente e atenta a esta problemática. Como resposta a este propósito, diversas organizações e entidades internacionais viram-se forçadas a criar padrões internacionais de qualidade ao nível ambiental. Nessa medida, a International Organization for Standardization (ISO) criou a família de normas ISO14000 como forma de procurar garantir aos legisladores, aos clientes e ao público em geral, produtos e/ou serviços ambientalmente mais sustentáveis. Para as empresas e organizações, este combinado de normas surge como uma ferramenta estratégica capaz de proporcionar a identificação, controlo e a melhoria contínua do seu desempenho ambiental. Por outras palavras, visam a implementação de um Sistema de Gestão Ambiental (SGA) mais eficiente. Atendendo a este contexto, a implementação da ISO 14001, e respetiva certificação, têm vindo a adquirir uma importância crescente dentro das organizações. Motivo pelo qual este trabalho teve como objetivo primordial estudar e avaliar a relevância da certificação através da norma ISO 14001 no sistema de gestão ambiental das empresas operadoras de resíduos em Portugal. O resultado deste estudo contribuiu para edificar o conhecimento dos motivos que levam as empresas a adotar esta norma, identificar os benefícios e dificuldades daí resultantes, bem como avaliar possíveis impactos na melhoria contínua do desempenho por parte das organizações, após a obtenção da certificação ambiental. Para almejar tal objetivo, realizou-se uma análise dos resultados obtidos através da aplicação de dois inquéritos por questionário, constituídos por questões autoresposta que fizeram face ao objetivo do estudo e que permitiram dar resposta ao mesmo. O inquérito por questionário, direcionado às empresas, foi enviado à totalidade das empresas operadoras de resíduos em Portugal, certificadas segundo a referida norma. A amostra estudada foi constituída por 22 empresas. A análise aos inquéritos por questionário direcionado aos colaboradores destas mesmas empresas decorreu de 429 inquéritos válidos. Sendo a aplicação dos mesmos efetuada via correio CTT, durante os meses de dezembro de 2013 e janeiro de 2014 e a respetiva análise com recurso ao Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS). Tornou-se, ainda, possível efetuar um conjunto de recomendações destinadas a orientar e facilitar o processo de adoção de sistemas de gestão ambiental neste setor. Conclui-se que a obtenção da certificação ambiental é potenciada pela melhoria da imagem pública da empresa e a melhoria do desempenho ambiental da mesma. Esta melhoria reflete-se no aumento das preocupações ambientais, ou seja, a minimização/eliminação dos impactos ambientais decorrentes das atividades destas organizações. No entanto, e apesar da possibilidade de obtenção de benefícios e ganhos esperados, entre os quais se incluem o aumento da consciencialização sobre os impactos ambientais entre os funcionários, a melhoria no desempenho da empresa e a influência positiva em algum processo de gestão interno (melhoria na otimização dos fluxos processuais), convém destacar que o processo poderá ser dificultado pelo aumento da quantidade de documentação interna da empresa, pela exigência de uma elevada formação pessoal dos colaboradores e pelas dificuldades inerentes ao próprio cumprimento da legislação ambiental. Mais do que explicar quais os fenómenos que levam as empresas a convergir na adoção de Sistemas de Gestão Ambiental, este estudo releva que as empresas detentoras da certificação ambiental exercem uma cultura ambiental que possibilita influenciar os colaboradores acerca das decisões a albergar em relação às práticas ambientais do quotidiano.

Deportação e criminalidade nos Açores

Dissertação de Mestrado em Ciências Sociais.

Perdas por imparidade em intangíveis

Dissertação de Mestrado apresentado ao Instituto de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto para a obtenção do grau de Mestre em Contabilidade e Finanças, sob orientação do Doutor Carlos Quelhas Martins

Essays on bounded rationality: Individual decision and strategic interaction

Economics is a social science which, therefore, focuses on people and on the decisions they make, be it in an individual context, or in group situations. It studies human choices, in face of needs to be fulfilled, and a limited amount of resources to fulfill them. For a long time, there was a convergence between the normative and positive views of human behavior, in that the ideal and predicted decisions of agents in economic models were entangled in one single concept. That is, it was assumed that the best that could be done in each situation was exactly the choice that would prevail. Or, at least, that the facts that economics needed to explain could be understood in the light of models in which individual agents act as if they are able to make ideal decisions. However, in the last decades, the complexity of the environment in which economic decisions are made and the limits on the ability of agents to deal with it have been recognized, and incorporated into models of decision making in what came to be known as the bounded rationality paradigm. This was triggered by the incapacity of the unboundedly rationality paradigm to explain observed phenomena and behavior. This thesis contributes to the literature in three different ways. Chapter 1 is a survey on bounded rationality, which gathers and organizes the contributions to the field since Simon (1955) first recognized the necessity to account for the limits on human rationality. The focus of the survey is on theoretical work rather than the experimental literature which presents evidence of actual behavior that differs from what classic rationality predicts. The general framework is as follows. Given a set of exogenous variables, the economic agent needs to choose an element from the choice set that is avail- able to him, in order to optimize the expected value of an objective function (assuming his preferences are representable by such a function). If this problem is too complex for the agent to deal with, one or more of its elements is simplified. Each bounded rationality theory is categorized according to the most relevant element it simplifes. Chapter 2 proposes a novel theory of bounded rationality. Much in the same fashion as Conlisk (1980) and Gabaix (2014), we assume that thinking is costly in the sense that agents have to pay a cost for performing mental operations. In our model, if they choose not to think, such cost is avoided, but they are left with a single alternative, labeled the default choice. We exemplify the idea with a very simple model of consumer choice and identify the concept of isofin curves, i.e., sets of default choices which generate the same utility net of thinking cost. Then, we apply the idea to a linear symmetric Cournot duopoly, in which the default choice can be interpreted as the most natural quantity to be produced in the market. We find that, as the thinking cost increases, the number of firms thinking in equilibrium decreases. More interestingly, for intermediate levels of thinking cost, an equilibrium in which one of the firms chooses the default quantity and the other best responds to it exists, generating asymmetric choices in a symmetric model. Our model is able to explain well-known regularities identified in the Cournot experimental literature, such as the adoption of different strategies by players (Huck et al. , 1999), the inter temporal rigidity of choices (Bosch-Dom enech & Vriend, 2003) and the dispersion of quantities in the context of di cult decision making (Bosch-Dom enech & Vriend, 2003). Chapter 3 applies a model of bounded rationality in a game-theoretic set- ting to the well-known turnout paradox in large elections, pivotal probabilities vanish very quickly and no one should vote, in sharp contrast with the ob- served high levels of turnout. Inspired by the concept of rhizomatic thinking, introduced by Bravo-Furtado & Côrte-Real (2009a), we assume that each per- son is self-delusional in the sense that, when making a decision, she believes that a fraction of the people who support the same party decides alike, even if no communication is established between them. This kind of belief simplifies the decision of the agent, as it reduces the number of players he believes to be playing against { it is thus a bounded rationality approach. Studying a two-party first-past-the-post election with a continuum of self-delusional agents, we show that the turnout rate is positive in all the possible equilibria, and that it can be as high as 100%. The game displays multiple equilibria, at least one of which entails a victory of the bigger party. The smaller one may also win, provided its relative size is not too small; more self-delusional voters in the minority party decreases this threshold size. Our model is able to explain some empirical facts, such as the possibility that a close election leads to low turnout (Geys, 2006), a lower margin of victory when turnout is higher (Geys, 2006) and high turnout rates favoring the minority (Bernhagen & Marsh, 1997).

Deux approches de l'influence du discours économique sur les phénomènes sociaux

The influence of theoretical discourse on the corresponding field of investigation is an important feature of social science : social scientists shape the world by describing it. This phenomenon has been studied in several ways. Economic sociology has recently focused on the fact that the economy is embedded in the economics through which it is scrutinized. Great names of economic theory have focused on the effects of economists' discourse on agents' behaviours. This article aims to bring out the distinction between these two kinds of contributions which deal with the same object. Finally, it explains the analytical distinction by a difference in the initial problematic. Following trends in the French school of the economics of convention, the social influence of theoretical discourse is analyzed on the strategic side (in connection with economics) and on the interpretative side (in connection with sociology).

In Search of Convergence: A Co-citation Analysis of Three Sport Management Journals

Responding to a series of articles in sport management literature calling for more diversity in terms of areas of interest or methods, this study warns against the danger of excessively fragmenting this field of research. The works of Kuhn (1962) and Pfeffer (1993) are taken as the basis of an argument that connects convergence with scientific strength. However, being aware of the large number of counterarguments directed at this line of reasoning, a new model of convergence, which focuses on clusters of research contributions with similar areas of interest, methods, and concepts, is proposed. The existence of these clusters is determined with the help of a bibliometric analysis of publications in three sport management journals. This examination determines that there are justified reasons to be concerned about the level of convergence in the field, pointing out to a reduced ability to create large clusters of contributions in similar areas of interest.

Discourses of Masculinity and Femininity in The Hunger Games: "Scarred," "Bloody," and "Stunning"

This article explores how characters in The Hunger Games trilogy are portrayed relative to Connell's gendered discourses of hegemonic masculinity, marginal masculinity, and emphasized femininity. We briefly review the plot of The Hunger Games trilogy and then discuss the ways in which three of the characters are represented with respect to societal gendered discourses, heteronormativity, and the use of violence. We argue that the ways in which these aspects are portrayed relate to the main characters' performance of discourses of hegemonic masculinity (Gale), marginalized masculinity (Peeta), and a complex amalgamation of the two that also draws somewhat on emphasized femininity (Katniss). Finally, we conclude that, while the trilogy could be read as taking a feminist stance with a strong female protagonist, it nonetheless also constrains Katniss in heteronormative ways.

Anachronistic Me: An Autoethnographic Account of Recovery through Volunteerism

The purpose of this autoethnography was to reflect upon the ways in which my recovery was aided by the personal connections made while volunteering in a homeless shelter. Congruent with autoethnographic best practice, data were collected through a variety of means, including: journaling, field notes, participant observation, and collection of artifacts. An autoethnographic narrative emerged out of the analysis of data detailing my recuperative journey. Results indicated that my time spent volunteering at the shelter: (a) fostered a sense of Community, (b) made me aware of Realizations that broadened my perspective, and (c) aided in motivating me to be Intentional about Improving my Life. These three themes proved to be important factors in my recovery process. This thesis will inform social science researchers and health advocates by making a contribution to the growing body of literature regarding recovery.

Les formes de l'illégitimité intellectuelle: genre et sciences sociales françaises entre 1890 et 1940

Thèse réalisée en cotutelle avec l'École des hautes études en sciences sociales

Modularité massive ou construction sociale? : une analyse de l'approche psychoévolutionniste de Cosmides et Tooby.

Ce mémoire se veut un examen épistémologique de la thèse psychoévolutionniste de Leda Cosmides et John Tooby, principalement en ce qui concerne la modularité massive. Nous avons tâché de voir si la modularité massive permet de rendre compte des processus mentaux complexes en nous penchant plus particulièrement sur le cas des émotions. Nous explorons d'abord la thèse de Cosmides et Tooby en la distinguant d'avec d'autres conceptions comme l'écologie béhaviorale et en expliquant le rôle particulier que jouent les émotions au sein de la théorie. Nous analysons ensuite la thèse de la modularité massive et les différents arguments théoriques ou empiriques qui l'appuient, et évaluons finalement des critiques de la modularité émises par certains philosophes, dont David Buller.

Le transfert des connaissances historiques dans la résolution d'un problème actuel chez les étudiants de niveau collégial

Depuis quelques années déjà, la responsabilité de l’éducation à la citoyenneté est principalement confiée à l’enseignement de l’histoire dans le réseau scolaire québécois. Toutefois, aucune étude expérimentale n’a démontré que l’histoire était la matière la plus apte à éduquer à la citoyenneté. Cette recherche vise donc à savoir si les étudiants de niveau collégial transfèrent leurs connaissances historiques dans la résolution d’un problème d'actualité présentant une connotation historique. Le groupe cible de cette recherche est formé de vingt-cinq étudiants de Sciences humaines (ayant des cours d’histoire) et le groupe contrôle est constitué de vingt-cinq étudiants de Science de la nature (n’ayant pas de cours d’histoire). Durant des entrevues semi-dirigées d’une trentaine de minutes, les étudiants avaient à se prononcer sur une entente signée entre les Innus et les gouvernements fédéral et provincial. Une mise en situation leur était présentée préalablement. Il est ressorti peu de différences entre le groupe cible et le groupe contrôle. Ces deux effectifs considérés ensemble, le quart des répondants n’utilisait aucune connaissance historique. Surtout, la variable influençant le plus le transfert des connaissances historiques s’avère être le sexe. Parmi les répondants n’utilisant aucune connaissance historique, il n’y avait qu’un répondant de sexe masculin; et les seuls répondants à avoir utilisé les connaissances conditionnelles étaient tous de sexe masculin. C’est donc dire que le système scolaire québécois ne favoriserait pas suffisamment le transfert des connaissances historiques dans l’analyse de situations actuelles.

Circuitos, perturbaciones y transformaciones de la modernidad/colonialidad : análisis discursivo en contextos chilenos y canadienses

La présente étude constitue une analyse comparative de discours qui articulent la problématique de l’héritage coloniale et des réclamations autochtones au Chili et au Canada : des livres de texte de sciences sociales, des discours d’opinion et des discours autochtones. Nous proposons que les similitudes surprenantes qui ont été révélées par les contextes nationaux canadiens et chiliens peuvent être expliquées, en partie, par leur articulation avec le discours globalisé de la modernité/colonialité. D’une part, les textes scolaires et les discours d’opinion font circuler des éléments discursifs de la modernité, tout en reproduisant des formes de savoir et de dire coloniaux. D’autre part, les discours autochtones se ressemblent entre eux dans la mesure où ils interpolent la modernité/colonialité transformant ainsi les termes d’engagement interculturel. Bien que les états canadiens et chiliens renforcent leur engagement à l’égard de la réconciliation avec les Autochtones durant les dernières décennies, les conflits interculturels continuent à se produire en impliquant toujours les mêmes acteurs : l’état, différents peuples autochtones, des entreprises privées, ainsi que des membres de l’élite intellectuelle, politique et patronale. En prenant en compte cette situation, l’objectif de cette thèse vise à mieux comprendre pourquoi ces conflits, loin d’être résolus, continuent à se reproduire. Dans ces deux pays, la problématique des conflits interculturels est fondamentalement mise en rapport avec la question des droits territoriaux et, par conséquent, sont inséparables de la question de l’héritage coloniale des états nationaux canadien et chilien. Pourtant cette dimension coloniale des conflits a tendance à être cachée autant par la rhétorique multiculturelle du discours national que par les polarisations produites par l’opinion publique, lesquelles ont l’habitude d’encadrer la problématique par des notions binaires, telles que « civilisation/barbarie » ou « authenticité/illégitimité ». De plus, on peut considérer l’ouest du Canada et le sud du Chili comme étant des contextes comparables, puisque ceux-ci ont été colonisés avec la base du discours moderne du progrès et de la civilisation, qui a servi à légitimer l’expansion de l’état national au dix-neuvième siècle. Cependant, il n’existe que très peu d’études qui comparent les productions discursives relatives aux relations interculturelles entre Autochtones et non Autochtones dans les contextes canadiens et chiliens, possiblement à cause des différences linguistiques, sociohistoriques et politiques qui paraissent insurmontables.

Modélisation systémique d’une pratique infirmière d’interface en contexte de vulnérabilité sociale

Dans les services de première ligne des Centres de santé et de services sociaux (CSSS) au Québec, les infirmières sont des acteurs clés des programmes destinés à des populations vulnérables. Ces programmes créent des opportunités pour les infirmières de développer une pratique à l’interface du CSSS et des ressources de la communauté afin d’agir pour réduire la vulnérabilité sociale. Des infirmières commencent d’ailleurs à se mobiliser au-delà de leurs frontières disciplinaires, organisationnelles et sectorielles pour s’engager dans l’environnement de personnes vulnérables, ce que nous désignons ici comme pratique infirmière d’interface. Aucune étude n’a toutefois été repérée en regard de cette pratique infirmière en émergence. Fondée sur une perspective constructiviste et systémique, de même qu’une analyse des conceptions de théoriciennes infirmières sur la pratique, notre recherche doctorale avait pour but de modéliser la pratique infirmière d’interface en contexte de vulnérabilité sociale. Elle a également constitué un cas à partir duquel contribuer aux savoirs théoriques sur le concept de pratique en sciences infirmières. Une étude qualitative exploratoire a été entreprise dans trois CSSS d’une région urbaine. Des entretiens semi-dirigés ont été réalisés avec quinze infirmières. La pratique d’interface de deux infirmières a ensuite fait l’objet d’une année d’observation directe et participante, ce qui a permis de procéder à des entretiens informels avec des gestionnaires ainsi que des membres des équipes interprofessionnelles et communautaires. Une analyse de documents programmatiques et gouvernementaux a complété notre description du contexte de la pratique d’interface. Une analyse thématique amorcée en cours de collecte de données ainsi que la méthode de modélisation systémique de Le Moigne ont permis de soutenir la démarche interprétative et de rendre compte des résultats. Quatre thèmes inter-reliés qualifient la pratique infirmière d’interface. Le premier met en évidence une finalité d’autonomie qui se traduit comme exigence de conformité sociale à l’endroit des personnes vulnérables. Le second porte sur des processus d’engagement relationnels des infirmières pour créer des liens et mettre en relation la clientèle et les acteurs du milieu. Le troisième thème est celui de l’action stratégique de l’infirmière. Enfin, le quatrième fait état d’un espace contradictoire à l’intérieur duquel se déroule la pratique d’interface, lequel comporte un processus de (re)configuration identitaire pour les infirmières. Une réflexion approfondie sur nos résultats, appuyée sur des savoirs disciplinaires en sciences infirmières et en sciences sociales, souligne des dimensions essentielles à considérer pour poursuivre le développement du concept de pratique en sciences infirmières. Spécifiquement, notre thèse permet de réfléchir les concepts centraux de soin et d’environnement en sciences infirmières, en plus d’expliciter le caractère fondamental de deux autres composantes à intégrer dans nos conceptions disciplinaires de la pratique, soit les savoirs et les projets. Cette thèse démontre la pertinence de contribuer à la création d’un « réseau de savoirs » avec d’autres disciplines pour soutenir notre capacité de théoriser la pratique et de renforcer l’intervention en contexte de vulnérabilité sociale.

Bridging The Unknown : An Interdisciplinary Case Study of Paratext in Electronic Literature

This chapter presents a dual perspective on the paratextual apparatus of a work of electronic literature, The Unknown: The Original Great American Hypertext Novel by William Gillespie, Scott Rettberg, Dirk Stratton, and Frank Marquardt. Approaches from literature studies and information science are combined to offer qualitative content analyses and close readings of the table of contents, titular apparatus, comments hidden in the source code, and other paratextual elements, in relation to the narrative. Findings indicate that the work's paratextual content presents inconsistencies and contradictions, both in terms of the use of the paratextual structure and of the information conveyed. The paratextual elements are analyzed through the lens of Gérard Genette's theory, as outlined in Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation, in order to gauge their role and efficiency as identifiers, organizational components, and information providers, as well as their literary effect. The value of the theory as an interdisciplinary tool is also discussed.