922 resultados para Kozeny-Carman Generalized
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: 33E12, 33FXX PACS (Physics Abstracts Classification Scheme): 02.30.Gp, 02.60.Gf
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: 26A33, 33E12, 33C20.
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26A33, 33C20
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35E45
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: 30B10, 30B30; 33C10, 33C20
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 33E20, 44A10; Secondary 33C10, 33C20, 44A20
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: 33C05, 33C10, 33C20, 33C60, 33E12, 33E20, 40A30
Resumo:
A generalized Drucker–Prager (GD–P) viscoplastic yield surface model was developed and validated for asphalt concrete. The GD–P model was formulated based on fabric tensor modified stresses to consider the material inherent anisotropy. A smooth and convex octahedral yield surface function was developed in the GD–P model to characterize the full range of the internal friction angles from 0° to 90°. In contrast, the existing Extended Drucker–Prager (ED–P) was demonstrated to be applicable only for a material that has an internal friction angle less than 22°. Laboratory tests were performed to evaluate the anisotropic effect and to validate the GD–P model. Results indicated that (1) the yield stresses of an isotropic yield surface model are greater in compression and less in extension than that of an anisotropic model, which can result in an under-prediction of the viscoplastic deformation; and (2) the yield stresses predicted by the GD–P model matched well with the experimental results of the octahedral shear strength tests at different normal and confining stresses. By contrast, the ED–P model over-predicted the octahedral yield stresses, which can lead to an under-prediction of the permanent deformation. In summary, the rutting depth of an asphalt pavement would be underestimated without considering anisotropy and convexity of the yield surface for asphalt concrete. The proposed GD–P model was demonstrated to be capable of overcoming these limitations of the existing yield surface models for the asphalt concrete.
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 46F25, 26A33; Secondary: 46G20
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: 33D60, 33D90, 26A33
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: 44A05, 44A35
Resumo:
Mathematics Subject Classification: 33C60, 33C20, 44A15
Resumo:
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 26A33, 33C60, 44A20
Resumo:
AMS Subj. Classification: 90C27, 05C85, 90C59
Resumo:
MSC 2010: 30C45, 30A20, 34A40