987 resultados para Kleespies, Philip M
Resumo:
Soitinnus: puhallinorkesteri.
Resumo:
Soitinnus: puhallinorkesteri.
Resumo:
Soitinnus: puhallinorkesteri.
Resumo:
Franz Michael Franzén f. 9.2.1772 i Uleåborg d. 14.8.1847 i Säbrå, Härnösand, Sverige Frans Michael Franzén är den första utpräglade förromantikern i den finländska litteraturen och har gått till historien även som begåvad akademiker, biskop och tidningsman.
Franzén var produktiv som svenskspråkig diktare från det sena 1700-talet till de första decennierna av 1800-talet. Det förromantiska i produktionen tar sig uttryck i ett mera personligt och tidvis yvigt uttryck i jämförelse med tidigare diktning, samt i en idealisering av det äkta och naturliga framom det konstlade eller konstnärliga. Han är även en föregångare i skandinavismen vilket syns bl.a. i en idealisering av den nordiska naturen, t.ex. i hans dikt ”Sång öfver Grefve Gustaf Philip Creutz” (1797), hyllningsdikten till den tidigare diktarkollegan. För denna dikt belönades Franzén med Svenska Akademiens pris. Franzén går under sin diktarbana igenom olika litterära faser och i produktionen ingår allt ifrån psalmer till tillfällesdikter och dryckesvisor. Ofta skildrar Franzén ett idylliskt familje- och hemmaliv mot fonden av en orolig värld, och i dikterna framträder en ny syn på barnet samt ett nytt borgerligt kvinnoideal. Biografiskt lexikon för Finland: http://www.blf.fi/artikel.php?id=2609
Resumo:
Presentation at Open Repositories 2014, Helsinki, Finland, June 9-13, 2014
Resumo:
Kirjallisuusarvostelu
Resumo:
Kirjallisuusarvostelu
Resumo:
Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) is a serious weed in North America. A high number of wild proso millet biotypes are known but the genetic basis of its phenotypic variation is poorly understood. In the present study, a non-radioactive silver staining method for PCR-Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) was evaluated for studying genetic polymorphism in American proso millet biotypes. Twelve biotypes and eight primer combinations with two/three and three/three selective nucleotides were used. Pair of primers with two/three selective nucleotides produced the highest number of amplified DNA fragments, while pair of primers with three/three selective nucleotides were more effective for revealing more polymorphic DNA fragments. The two better primer combinations were EcoR-AAC/Mse-CTT and EcoR-ACT/Mse-CAA with seven and eleven polymorphic DNA fragments, respectively. In a total of 450 amplified fragments, at least 339 appeared well separated in a silver stained acrylamide gel and 39 polymorphic DNA bands were scored. The level of polymorphic DNA (11.5%) using only eight pairs of primers were effective for grouping proso millet biotypes in two clusters but insufficient for separating hybrid biotypes from wild and crop. Nevertheless, the present result indicates that silver stained AFLP markers could be a cheap and important tool for studying genetic relationships in proso millet.
Resumo:
In this thesis Philip Melanchthon’s doctrine of justification is analyzed, especially the aspects of favor and donum in his writings until 1535. The research task is defined in the introduction of the thesis. Researchers agree, that Melanchthon emphasized the forensic aspect of the doctrine of justification, but this is not the case with the effective aspect of his doctrine of justification. Therefore, I have chosen to focus on the concepts of favor (grace) and donum (gift). The thesis begins with an analysis of the first edition of the Loci communes of 1521 in chapter two, and it ends with the second edition from 1535 in chapter seven. Melanchthon’s most important writings from the intervening period are analyzed in chapters three to six. In chapter eight, I describe my final results from the analysis. Although I have focused on how Melanchthon perceived the relationship between favor and donum, I have also taken note of such loci that are associated with his view of justification. I have done this in order to get a clearer picture of Melanchthon’s doctrine of justification, and of the issues which change in his theological thinking over time. In the research overview in chapter one, I divided the researchers in four different groups depending on how they perceive Melanchthon’s doctrine of justification. This classification is of course not comprehensive, since the reality is much more complicated. The main interpretations present in Melanchthon research are: 1. Christ as favor in justification, but donum is excluded from justification. 2. Christ as favor in justification, but the Spirit is donum in justification. 3. Christ as both favor and donum in justification until the early 1530s. 4. Christ as both favor and donum in justification throughout his life. The fourth option is in my opinion the most preferable. The analysis of Melanchthon’s writings shows that he expects both a forensic, and an effective aspect in the doctrine of justification throughout the examined period. Melanchthon strongly emphasizes that justification is by grace alone through faith for Christ’s sake, but also that the Holy Spirit works the justifying faith, and is the gift bestowed on believers in connection with this. Where the opponents according to Melanchthon see deeds, virtues, or a quality in the believer as the cause of the justification, there Melanchthon sees only Christ.
Resumo:
Kahdessa osassa painettu kartta.
Resumo:
Lehti nro 34 jostakin Philip & Sonin julkaisemasta kartastosta.
Resumo:
Variantti A.