897 resultados para answer errors


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Pages 306, 307, and 310 of part 3 are misnumbered as 290, 291 and 294 respectively.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Cover title.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

At head of title: Circuit court of the United States, district of Vermont. In equity.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Supported in part by Maternal and Child Health, Grant No. MCS-000252-16 and by contributions to Friends of Metabolic Research."

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The relationship between spot volume and variation for all protein spots observed on large format 2D gels when utilising silver stain technology and a model system based on mammalian NSO cell extracts is reported. By running multiple gels we have shown that the reproducibility of data generated in this way is dependent on individual protein spot volumes, which in turn are directly correlated with the coefficient of variation. The coefficients of variation across all observed protein spots were highest for low abundant proteins which are the primary contributors to process error, and lowest for more abundant proteins. Using the relationship between spot volume and coefficient of variation we show it is necessary to calculate variation for individual protein spot volumes. The inherent limitations of silver staining therefore mean that errors in individual protein spot volumes must be considered when assessing significant changes in protein spot volume and not global error. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background: It is essential for health-care professionals to calculate drug doses accurately. Previous studies have demonstrated that many hospital doctors were unable to accurately convert dilutions (e.g. 1:1000) or percentages (e.g. percentage w/v) of drug concentrations into mass concentrations (e.g. mg/mL). Aims: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the ability of health-care professionals to perform drug dose calculations accurately and to determine their preferred concentration convention when calculating drug doses. Methods: A selection of nurses, medical students, house surgeons, registrars and pharmacists undertook a written survey to assess their ability to perform five drug dose calculations. Participants were also asked which concentration convention they preferred when calculating drug doses. The surveys were marked then analysed for health-care professionals as a whole and then by subgroup analysis to assess the performance of each health-care-professional group. Results: Overall, less than 14% of the surveyed health-care professionals could answer all five questions correctly. Subgroup analysis revealed that health-care pro-fessionals' ability to calculate drug doses were ranked in the following order: registrars approximate to pharmacists > house surgeons > medical students >> nurses. Ninety per cent of health-care professionals preferred to calculate drug doses using the mass concentration convention. Conclusions: Overall, drug dose calculations were performed poorly. Mass concentration was clearly indicated as the preferred convention for calculating drug doses.