Risālah : manuscript, [ca. 1918]

Title supplied by cataloger.

Risālah fī maʻná al-mafhūm min al-manṭūq : manuscript, [ca. 1918]

Bound with: Risālah / ʻĪsá ibn Muḥammad ibn Nūr.

هذه رسالة الابحاث الملخصة في حكم كي الحمصة / لعبد الغني الشهير بابن النابلسي : مخطوطة، 1813

Unbound.

Hādhihi risālat al-Aḥkām al-mulakhkhaṣah fī ḥukm māʼ al-ḥimmaṣah / li-Mawlā al-Shaykh Ḥasan al-Shurunbulālī : manuscript, 1813

Copy completed on 3 Muḥarram 1229 [December 26, 1813] from the autograph copy of the author.

Risālat Rafʻ al-ḍarūrah ʻan ḥajj al-ṣayrūrah / li-Sayyidī ʻAbd al-Ghanī al-shahīr bi-al-Nābulusī al-Dimashqī al-Ḥanafī : manuscript

undated.

[ Fetâvâ] : manuscript, 1132 [ca. 1720 C.E.]

A typical fatwa collection covering almost all aspects of law: prayers, ablution, alms, fasting, divorce, capital punishment, etc.

Salāt-i Masʻūdī : manuscript, 1298-1299 [i.e. 1881-1882]

A manuscript treatise on prayer, ablution, alms, fasting, divorce, etc. The first volume opens with a chapter on "Tawḥīd", i.e. Islamic theology. This is followed by a chapter on Abū Ḥanīfah and his school of law.

Külliyat-i şerh-ı kanun-i arazi

Halis Eşref.

Hādhā kitāb Tuḥfat al-mulūk : manuscript, 1658

A short treatise on Ḥanafī fiqh.

[ Risālah fī masḥ al-aqdām fī al-wuḍūʼ] : manuscript, [ca. 1686]

A treatise on washing and wiping feet in ritual ablution.

Sharḥ al-Waraqāt / lil-Imām al-Maḥallī : manuscript, 1649

Dated 16 Rajab 1059 [July 26, 1649].

Zubdat al-mukhtaṣarāt fī sharḥ al-Waraqāt : manuscript, 1553

Copy completed on 26 Jumādá al-ūlá 960 [May 9, 1553] (f. 37v).

Sharḥ Naẓm al-zakāh : manuscript, [ca. 1704]

Bound with: al-Maqṣūd al-maḥmūd fī talkhīṣ al-wathāʼiq wa-al-ʻuqūd / ʻAlī ibn Yaḥyá al-Jazīrī.

[ Islamic hymns] : manuscript, undated

Title supplied by cataloger

Conventions in comparative constitutional law. Research Paper in Law 4/2003

Introduction. “Convention” is an ambiguous term, not only for lawyers, containing a wide variety of different meanings. Even when restricted to denote an assembly it may be used for all sorts of gatherings. In the context of constitutional law a convention is a very specific instrument, and the question is to what extent it is actually known in European constitutional law and whether the “Convention on the Future of Europe” as called forth by the Declaration of Laeken conforms to what is understood in constitutional law by “convention”.1 Or did the Laeken Council pick up a term without any foundation in European constitutional law, rarely practiced and even less understood, the only precedents of which are supposed to be the American Federal Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 and the convention that drafted the European Charter on Fundamental Rights, as can be read time and again? 2 As it is the privilege of the constitutional historian to make aware the evolution of legal institutions and to analyze their conferred meaning so that they will be available in political discourse, I shall examine the meaning of “convention” in constitutional history and comparative constitutional law in a first part, while a second part will place the Convention on the Future of the European Union according to its composition and commission into the context of constitutional conventions as understood in law.