Application of Heuristic Evaluation Method by Universal Design Experts

This study highlights how heuristic evaluation as a usability evaluation method can feed into current building design practice to conform to universal design principles. It provides a definition of universal usability that is applicable to an architectural design context. It takes the seven universal design principles as a set of heuristics and applies an iterative sequence of heuristic evaluation in a shopping mall, aiming to achieve a cost-effective evaluation process. The evaluation was composed of three consecutive sessions. First, five evaluators from different professions were interviewed regarding the construction drawings in terms of universal design principles. Then, each evaluator was asked to perform the predefined task scenarios. In subsequent interviews, the evaluators were asked to re-analyze the construction drawings. The results showed that heuristic evaluation could successfully integrate universal usability into current building design practice in two ways: (i) it promoted an iterative evaluation process combined with multi-sessions rather than relying on one evaluator and on one evaluation session to find the maximum number of usability problems, and (ii) it highlighted the necessity of an interdisciplinary ad hoc committee regarding the heuristic abilities of each profession. A multi-session and interdisciplinary heuristic evaluation method can save both the project budget and the required time, while ensuring a reduced error rate for the universal usage of the built environments.

‘Government(ality) By Experts: Human Rights as Governance’

The suggestion that the general economy of power in our societies is becoming a domain of security was made by Michel Foucault in the late 1970s. This paper takes inspiration from Foucault?s work to interpret human rights as technologies of governmentality, which make possible the safe and secure society. I examine, by way of illustration, the site of the European Union and its use of new modes of governance to regulate rights discourse – in particular via the emergence of a new Fundamental Rights Agency. „Governance? in the EU is constructed in an apolitical way, as a departure from traditional legal and juridical methods of governing. I argue, however, that the features of governance represent technologies of government(ality), a new form of both being governed through rights and of governing rights. The governance feature that this article is most interested in is experts. The article aims to show, first and foremost, how rights operate as technologies of governmentality via a new relation to expertise. Second, it considers the significant implications that this reading of rights has for rights as a regulatory and normalising discourse. Finally, it highlights how the overlap between rights and governance discourses can be problematic because (as the EU model illustrates) governance conceals the power relations of governmentality, allowing, for instance, the unproblematic representation of the EU as an international human rights actor

Food webs: Experts consuming families of experts

Food webs of habitats as diverse as takes or desert valleys are known to exhibit common

Clinical agreement among glaucoma experts in the detection of glaucomatous changes of the optic disk using simultaneous stereoscopic photographs

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical agreement in the detection of optic disk changes in patients with glaucoma using simultaneous stereophotographs. DESIGN: Masked-observer variability study. METHODS: Ten glaucoma specialists examined pairs of simultaneous stereophotographs of glaucomatous and control optic disks to determine whether there were changes compatible with progression of glaucomatous damage. RESULTS: Intraobserver agreement had a kappa value ranging from 0.55 to 0.78. Interobserver agreement among the glaucoma specialists had a kappa value ranging from 0.34 to 0.68. CONCLUSION: Clinical examination of stereophotographs to detect optic disk changes in glaucoma patients has limitations associated with suboptimal reproducibility. © 2003 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Budget 2016: experts respond

Fairness

Contribution d'experts, à l'aide de l'Internet, au développement des compétences discursives d'élèves de 6e année

Ce projet de recherche de type quasi-expérimental visait à favoriser le développement de compétences discursives chez des élèves de 6e année par l'application d'une démarche d'écriture associée à l'échange entre pairs et avec des experts. Les éléments discursifs d'un texte font référence à la capacité de juger la qualité d'un texte à partir de critères de cohérence, de structure et d'organisation des idées ainsi qu'à partir de composantes liées au respect du lecteur et de l'intention d'écriture. Trente-neuf élèves provenant d'un milieu socio-économique moyen ont participé à l'expérimentation alors que quarante-trois élèves composaient le groupe témoin. Tous les groupes d'élèves présentaient un niveau académique faible à moyen en français écrit. Dans le cadre de cette expérimentation, trois situations d'écriture ont été réalisées au cours d'une même année scolaire. Pour chacune de ces situations d'écriture, les élèves du groupe expérimental devaient écrire un texte et utiliser les questions-guides de la démarche proposée pour diriger leur attention sur les aspects discursifs du texte. Au cours de la démarche, les élèves participaient à des échanges de commentaires avec leurs pairs quant à la qualité de leur texte. Douze experts provenant des domaines du journalisme, de l'enseignement et de la littérature fournissaient des rétroactions aux élèves quant à la qualité de leur texte sur le plan discursif.

Transposition didactique : des savoirs experts d'un programme technique vers les savoirs à enseigner en physique.

Par expérience, les étudiantes et étudiants du collégial sont beaucoup plus motivés lorsque les activités d'apprentissage proposées dans le cours sont en lien direct avec leur programme, surtout lorsqu'il s'agit d'un cours d'une discipline contributive. Comme il y a seize cours de physique offerts dans neuf programmes techniques au cégep de Trois-Rivières, les applications pertinentes de chaque programme ne sont pas toujours connues du département de physique et il n'y a que peu de sources d'informations vulgarisées qui expliquent le fonctionnement de ces systèmes ou qui font des liens explicites avec la physique. Cet essai vise à élaborer une démarche permettant d'obtenir les informations pertinentes sur les systèmes utilisés dans les programmes de techniques physiques afin d'organiser les savoirs à enseigner de façon cohérente et pertinente dans les cours de physique. Cette démarche générale sera ensuite appliquée au cours de mécanique appliquée du programme de génie civil afin de la valider concrètement. Tout en s'appuyant sur les sources didactiques comme les savoirs disciplinaires, les savoirs à enseigner et le rapport des élèves aux savoirs, le cadre de référence propose un processus de transposition didactique pour déterminer et organiser les contenus du cours de physique en fonction des applications concrètes reliées au programme. Le cadre méthodologique de cette recherche-intervention propose une démarche cyclique permettant d'abord d'identifier les systèmes techniques pertinents et leurs liens avec la physique puis de modéliser le fonctionnement de ce système. Enfin, le processus de transposition didactique sera appliqué aux résultats et vérifié par des enseignantes et enseignants du département de physique.

Expert Insight into the Assessment of Competence in Cognitive–behavioural Therapy: a Qualitative Exploration of Experts' Experiences, Opinions and Recommendations

To offer insight into how cognitive–behavioural therapy (CBT) competence is defined, measured and evaluated and to highlight ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved, the current study utilizes a qualitative methodology to examine CBT experts’ (N = 19) experiences of conceptualizing and assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore participants’ experiences of assessing the competence of CBT therapists. Interview transcripts were then analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis in order to identify commonalities and differences in the way CBT competence is evaluated. Four superordinate themes were identified: (i) what to assess, the complex and fuzzy concept of CBT competence; (ii) how to assess CBT competence, selecting from the toolbox of assessment methods; (iii) who is best placed to assess CBT competence, expertise and independence; and (iv) pitfalls, identifying and overcoming assessment biases. Priorities for future research and ways in which the assessment of CBT competence could be further improved are discussed in light of these findings.

Death Caused by Cardioinhibitory Reflex: What Experts Believe.

The danger of neck compression without restriction of the arterial flow remains unresolved in forensic medicine. There is an ongoing debate concerning life endangerment due to the cardioinhibitory reflex. The aim of this study was to determine what forensic medical experts believe and how they deal with this reflex. An anonymous electronic questionnaire was sent to 1429 forensic medical experts all over the world. We asked them about their opinion on the cardioinhibitory reflex, its role in causing death, and what their diagnostic criteria were.A total of 182 questionnaires were returned. The experts who answered were from 32 different countries. Our survey showed that 80.2% of experts believe that the cardioinhibitory reflex can theoretically cause death. In the practical application opinions diverge though. Apparently, the practical application mainly depends on the habit of the individual expert. We observed no consensus on the diagnostic criteria to be used. Given the potentially frequent use of the concept of the cardioinhibitory reflex in forensic practice and its judicial impact it would be important to reach a consensus.

The analysis of knowledge retention mechanisms for leaving experts

The goal of this thesis is studying knowledge retention mechanisms used in cases of single experts’ leaving in the case company, analyzing the reason for the mechanisms choice and successfulness of knowledge retention process depending of that choice. The theoretical part discusses the origins of knowledge retention processes in the theoretical studies, the existing knowledge retention mechanisms and practical issues of their implementation. The empirical part of the study is designed as employees’ interview with later discussion of the findings. The empirical findings indicate the following reasons for knowledge retention mechanisms choice: type of knowledge retained, specialty of leaving experts and time and distance issues of a particular case. The following factors influenced the success of a retention process: choice of knowledge retention mechanisms, usage of combination of mechanisms and creation of knowledge retention plans. The results might be useful for those interested in factors influencing knowledge retention processes in cases of experts’ departure.

Spa, [villa Fraineuse, lieu de la conférence de juillet 1920] les experts militaires interalliés, maréchal Foch : [photographie de presse] / [Agence Rol]

Référence bibliographique : Rol, 59952