997 resultados para Ridinger, Johann Elias, 1698-1767
Resumo:
von Johann Jacob Kromm
Resumo:
wobey ein Anhang von den Anfangsgründen der chaldäischen Sprache
Resumo:
Vorbesitzer: Johann Hieronymus Zum Jungen;
Resumo:
Handschrift
Resumo:
Handschrift
Resumo:
u.a.: Suche nach einem Verleger; spanisches Zitat aus einer Ausgabe der "Historia de la literatura espanola"; Bekanntmachung eigener Übersetzung von Baltasar Graciáns "Criticon" ins Deutsche; Johann Gottlob von Quandt;
Resumo:
von Benjamin Willstätter, Rabbinatsverweser in Karlsruhe
Resumo:
German words.
Resumo:
27. Motette: Unser keiner lebet ihm selber.--28. Dialog: Wer ist der, so von Edom kommet.--29. Ich hab's gewagt.--30. Fürchtet euch nicht.--31. Auf das fest der himmelfahrt.--32. Auf das fest des erzengels Michael.--33. Communion-andacht.--34. Von gnad' und recht. Ps. 101.--35. Cum Maria diluculo.--36. Wir glauben all' an einen Gott.--37. Magnificat.--38. Merk auf mein herz.--39. Zwingt die saiten in cithara.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
von Moses Buttenwieser, Dr.phil.
Resumo:
The development of botanical Finnish: Elias Lönnrot as the creator of new terminology In the 19th century the Finnish language was intentionally developed to meet the demands of civilised society and Finnish-language science. The development of the language involved several people from different fields of science. This study examines this enormous project in the field of botany. By which methods were scientific terms formed, and for which reasons were those terms used? Why has a certain word been chosen to represent a particular concept? The material of this study is the terminology of plant morphology in Finnish that Elias Lönnrot developed in the middle of the 19th century. The terms of plant morphology denote and describe the parts of the plant and the relationships between those parts. For instance, the terms emi pistill , hede stamen , terälehti petal and verholehti sepal , which are nowadays familiar in the general language, were used for the first time in Lönnrot s texts. The study integrates the methods of lexicology and terminology. In lexicology, the word and its various meanings serve as the focus, whereas the theory of terminology focuses on the concept and concept systems. A new, consciously developed terminology can be understood through the old, familiar vocabulary and structures as well as through the new, logical term system. Lönnrot s botanical terminology can be divided into three groups depending on their origin: 1) 19% of all terms have been accepted from the existing vocabulary and used in their original meanings, 2) 11% of all terms have been chosen from the existing vocabulary and used in the new, specific botanical meanings, and 3) 70% of all terms have been created on the basis of the existing vocabulary and used in the new, specific botanical meanings. Therefore, the study reveals that domestic materials primarily morphosemantic neologisms form the Finnish terminology of plant morphology. Characteristic of Lönnrot s botanical terms is the utilisation of the vocabulary of various Finnish dialects and particular repeating elements. Repeating elements include, for example, the prefixes that come from botanical Latin or Swedish as well as the particular Finnish derivation types. Such structures form term systems that reflect scientific concept systems. Two thirds of the created new words are formed loosely or precisely according to either Latin or Swedish terms; one third is formed completely differently from its equivalents in the foreign languages. Approximately half of the chosen terms are formed differently from the Latin and Swedish terms. It is worth noting that many loan translations use rare vocabulary from Finnish dialects as equivalents to foreign parts of terms. Lönnrot aimed to inspire scientific terminology with Finland s own language, thus making scientific text accessible to the Finnish agricultural population.
Resumo:
Digital Image
Resumo:
Digital Image