La literatura: una aproximació a Jaume I a través dels projectes

En aquest article analitzem les possibilitats de la metodologia del treball per projectes, vinculats a aspectes culturals per a l’ensenyament de la literatura. El nostre estudi parteix d’un projecte dut a terme en un centre de l’Horta Sud. El nostre objectiu és donar a conèixer la importància del rei Jaume I i aproximar la literatura als joves valencians a través de la festa del 9 d’Octubre. El nostre és un integral en què totes les àrees treballaran conjuntament durant dues setmanes i mitja en una franja horària determinada. Aquest treball és destinat al curs de segon d’ESO d’un centre amb un nivell socioeconòmic mitjà-alt i on la llengua vehicular és el valencià.

Letter book : manuscript, 1757-1759

Contains chiefly correspondence with Secretary of State William Pitt, including a letter, dated 22 Sept. 1759, describing the fall of Québec and the death of Wolfe.

The caged lion.

Second ed. published 1889; reprinted.

The progresses, processions, and magnificent festivities of King James the First, his royal consort, family, and court, collected from original manuscripts, scarce pamphlets, corporation records, parochial registers, ec. ec.; comprising forty masques and entertainments, ten civic pageants, numerous original letters and annotated lists of the peers, baronets, and knights who received those honours during the reign of King James. Illustrated with notes, historical, topographical, biographical, and bibliographical.

"First published London 1828."

The life of King James the First /

Has added, engraved series t.p.

Memoirs of the court of King James the First.

Mode of access: Internet.

History in Scott's novels; a literary sketch,

"The talisman": King Richard I.--"Ivanhoe": King Richard I.--"Fair maid of Perth": Robert III. in Scotland.--"Quentin Durward": Louis XI in France.--"Anne of Geierstein": Louis XI in France.--"The monastery": Mary Stuart in Scotland--"The abbot": The Earl of Murray's regency in Scotland.--"Kenilworth": Queen Elizabeth in England.--"Nigel": King James I. Great Britain--"Woodstock": The commonwealth, Great Britain.--"Peveril of the Peak": King Charles II.--"Old Mortality": Charles II. and William III.--"Rob Roy": King George I.--"Waverley": George II.--"Redgauntlet": George III.--Conclusion: Reception of George IV. in Scotland in 1822.

Musa latina aberdonensis.

Appended to v. 1, Fifth report by council of the New Spalding Club, 1891; to v. 2, Eighth report, 1894; to v. 3, Twenty-third report, 1909.

The court and times of James the First;

Mode of access: Internet.

Historia del rey de Aragon : don Jaime I, el conquistador, escrita en lemosin /

Mode of access: Internet.

The court and times of James the First : illustrated by authentic and confidential letters, from various public and private collections, ed. with an introduction and notes by Robert Folkstone Williams.

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Stream drying drives microbial ammonia oxidation and first-flush nitrate export

Funded by Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). Grant Number: CGL2012-32747 MINECO. Grant Numbers: CGL2012-32747, CGL2011-30590-CO2-02 EU Commission. Grant Number: 244121 FP7

A timely reminder of technical limitations

Peer reviewed

The Scottish Parliament in the 15th and 16th centuries

Earlier histories of the Scottish parliament have been somewhat constitutional in emphasis and have been exceedingly critical of what was understood to be parliament's subservience to the crown. Estimates by constitutional historians of the extreme weakness of parliament rested on an assessment of the constitutional system. The argument was that many of its features were not consistent with a reasonably strong parliament. Because the 'constitution' is apparently fragmented, with active roles played by bodies such as the lords of articles, the general council and the convention of estates, each apparently suggesting that parliament was inadequate, historians have sometimes failed to appreciate the positive role played by the estates in the conduct of national affairs. The thesis begins with a discussion of the reliability of the printed text of APS and proceeds to an examination of selected aspects of the work of parliament in a period from c 1424-c 1625. The belief of constitutional historians such as Rait that conditions In Scotland proved unfavourable to the interests and. effectiveness of parliament in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, is also examined. Chapter 1 concludes that APS is a less than reliable text, particularly for the reign of James I. Numerous statutes were excluded from the printed text and they are offered below for the first time. These statutes have been a useful addition to our understanding of the reign of James I. Chapter 2 analyses the motives behind the schemes for shire representation and concludes that neither constitutional theory nor political opportunism explains the support which James I and James VI gave to these measures. Both these monarchs were motivated by the realisation that their particular ambitions were dependent on winning the support of the estates whose ranks should include representatives from the shires. Chapter 3 examines the method of electing the lords of articles, the composition of this committee, and some aspects of its operation. The conclusion is that in the main the estates were the deciding force in the choice of the lords of articles. The committee's composition was more a reflection of a desire for a balance between representatives from north and south of the Forth and for the most important burghs and clergy to be selected than an attempt at electing government favourites. The articles did exercise a significant control over the items which came before parliament but this control was not absolute and applied to government as well as private legislation. Chapter 4 questions the traditional view that the general council and convention of estates were the same body. It is argued that they were two different institutions with different powers, but that they nevertheless worked within certain limits and were careful not to usurp the authority of parliament. Chapter 5 concedes that taxation was sometimes decided outside parliament; that the irregularity of taxation certainly weakened the bargaining power of the estates and that the latter did not appear to capitalise on these occasions when taxation was an issue. But the tendency was to ensure that, whether in or out of parliament, the decision to impose taxation was taken by a large number of each estate. The infrequency of taxation was a direct consequence of an unwillingness among the estates to agree to a regular taxation and their preference to ensure for the crown an alternative source of income. Moreover taxation was one issue, which more than any other, would be subject to contentious opposition by the estates, and could lead to the crown's defeat. Chapter 6 is concerned with ecclesiastical representation after the Reformation and the church's attitudes to the possibility of ministerial representation. Some ministers had doctrinal misgivings but the majority came to believe that the church's absence from parliament bad severely reduced. the influence of the church. That no agreement was forthcoming on a system of ministerial representation, particularly after 1597, is attributable to the estates' unwillingness to compromise and, not to the strength of opposition in the church. Chapter 7 examines the institutions which are sometime seen as 'rivals' of parliament and concludes that institutions such as the privy council were generally very careful in matters which needed the approval of parliament, and seemed aware of the greater authority of parliament. Chapter 8 which illustrates how parliament had the right to be consulted in all important matters of state, brings together the main points of the earlier chapters and offers further illustrations of the essential role which parliament played in the conduct of national affairs. Whether or not the system can be regarded as constitutionally sound, the estates in Scotland could observe parliament's day-to-day operation with some satisfaction. All in all, there is little convincing evidence that parliament was as weak as some historians would have us believe.