Portugal e a Revisão da Lei Eleitoral

Antes da realização do ciclo eleitoral que marcou a vida portuguesa em 2009, houve uma tentativa, que chegou a ser aprovada na generalidade, para alterar a Lei Eleitoral no que concerne às eleições autárquicas e surgiram estudos sobre as possíveis alterações da lei para a eleição da Assembleia da República. As dificuldades sentidas pelo Governo de maioria relativa, chefiada por José Sócrates, na sua ação governatiava, desde logo na aprovação do Orçamento para 2010, trouxera, de novo para a discussão a questão da estabilidade governativa. Este artigo procura mostrar para essa estabilidade - tanto a nível do Poder Central como do Poder Local - não resulta da alteração da Lei, mas da construção de uma consciência democrática.

De la fidelidad a la revolución: el proceso de la independencia de la antigua provincia de Guayaquil, 1809-1820 (Estudios)

Este articulo analiza las transformaciones políticas e ideológicas que tuvieron lugar en Guayaquil entre 1809 y 1820, período en el que la ciudad transitó de un marcado fidelismo hacia la autonomía e independencia. Se estudian las disputas entre los grupos de poder local y las reacciones del cabildo a las sucesivas coyunturas peninsulares y regionales. El ensayo muestra la relación entre las tensiones sociales internas y la dinámica, hasta ahora desconocida, de las diferentes elecciones ocurridas entre 1809 y 1813, as¡ como el impacto local de la vigencia y posterior supresión de la constitución gatidatana. El estudio concluye con una reconsideración de la independencia guayaquileña de 1820.

2005-2006, año electoral en los Andes, ¿El fin del ajuste político? (Coyuntura)

El artículo analiza, a la luz de la evidencia empírica, la hipótesis acerca de que la coyuntura política actual es, en efecto crítica, pero que no marca un giro hacia la izquierda, sino la culminación de un largo período de ajuste político en los Andes. Tomando como punto de partida la coyuntura electoral andina del 2006, el autor clasifica a los países de la región en dos grupos: aquellos en los que el proceso de ajuste ha culminado, produciendo nuevas configuraciones de actores político-electorales (partidos y/o movimientos), este conjunto incluye a Venezuela y Colombia. Y un segundo grupo de países en los que el ajuste estaría todavía en proceso: Ecuador, Perú y Bolivia.

Proceso electoral colombiano de 2010: entre el ajuste y la consolidación del uribismo (Coyuntura)

Este ensayo analítico tiene como fin realizar un análisis de coyuntura de las elecciones de 2010 y explicar las razones que llevaron al acenso a Juan Manuel Santos, que permita al lector una lectura del ajuste político sufrido en Colombia, de los nuevos parámetros de identidad política, la reestructuración del discurso “uribista” y los personalismos protagonistas de la contienda en esta nueva relación entre el candidato y el elector. Dicho en otras palabras la elección de Santos puede explicarse a partir de cuatro variables: un ajuste político institucional, un cambio en las lealtades políticas de los electores, un cambio en el proyecto político dominante y el protagonismo de los líderes políticos.

El legado de Cádiz: ciudadanía y cultura política en la Gobernación de Cuenca, 1812-1814 (Estudios)

Este trabajo analiza el legado de las Cortes de Cádiz y de la Constitución de 1812 en Cuenca entre 1812 y 1814. Estudia los principales cambios políticos relacionados con los derechos de diversos actores sociales, así como el rompimiento de antiguas formas de relación social. Los cambios políticos se relacionaron con la introducción de nuevos conceptos y prácticas como ciudadanía, soberanía, elección y representación, tanto en el mundo criollomestizo como en el indígena (población cañari) de la provincia. Se analiza la abolición del tributo indígena, el servicio personal y la mita, además se estudian algunos cambios administrativopolíticos como la creación de los ayuntamientos constitucionales, las diputaciones provinciales y nacionales.

Romanian politics: struggling with the grass roots and digging for democracy. EPIN Commentary No. 11, 29 August 2012

Romania was on a good trajectory to meet the European standards in democracy. This process began before the country’s accession to the EU in 2007 and has continued since thanks to the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM). The recent political turmoil has put in danger this trajectory. 2012 will continue to remain a very difficult year for Romania, economically and politically, especially in light of the referendum’s result invalidating the suspension of the President and the upcoming parliamentary elections due to take place at the end of this year. Now is time to restore the process of strengthening Romania’s democratic institutions and rule of law. There are important roles to be played in this process both by the Romanian political class and the European institutions.

Im Interesse der Macht: Ungarns neues Wahlsystem

Until December 2011, Hungary had the most stable electoral system in Eastern Europe: except for an increase in the electoral threshold in 1994, no significant change had taken place since the transition from communism in 1989. On 23rd December 2011, however, Parliament passed a wholly new electoral law, which will first be used in the elections due in 2014. The purposes of this article are twofold. The first is to outline the change of electoral system that took place. The previous electoral law was, famously, one of the most complex in the world. The new law is somewhat simpler, but nevertheless retains many of the old law’s features. The second purpose is to analyse the origins and implications of the new law. Did it simply reflect the interests of those in power or did it also respond to public concerns? Can it be expected to enhance or detract from the quality of Hungarian democracy?

Surviving without leading: Jacques Chirac

The presidency of Jacques Chirac in France (1995-2007) was scarred by two crushing defeats: the parliamentary elections of 25 May and 1 June 1997, and the referendum on the European Constitution of 29 May 2005. As both were highly personal setbacks, since both votes were taken at Chirac’s initiative they suggest that a dominant presidential position, twice won, was twice squandered owing to a failure of leadership. This chapter argues, firstly, that the weaknesses of the presidency arose chiefly from the three decades of Chirac’s career before the 1995 election – and, secondly, that Chirac’s record of presidential leadership, though limited, is more substantial than these two major failures suggest.

In the shadow of Grexit: the Greek election of 17 June 2012

This article provides an overview and analysis of the Greek June 2012 elections. Placing the elections within the broader framework of the Greek socio-political and economic context, it discusses the electoral campaign and results, juxtaposing them to the 6 May electoral round. The election results confirmed many of the trends of the previous round, including electoral volatility, the fragmentation of the party system and the rise of anti-establishment forces. The main difference was the entrenchment of the pro- versus anti- bailout division and the prominence of the question of Greece’s continued Eurozone membership.

The UK's Electoral Reform Referendum of May 2011

The UK’s second nationwide referendum, held in May 2011, offers rich opportunities for analysing the dynamics of a referendum campaign. The articles gathered together in this symposium address three themes. The first concerns the determinants and dynamics of public opinion during a referendum campaign, the second relates to the potential for interaction between the referendum and simultaneous elections, and the third focuses on coverage of the referendum in the media. Following a brief outline of the background to the referendum, this paper introduces the contribution that each article makes to these themes.

Don’t trust your poll lead: how public opinion changes during referendum campaigns

Politicians call (or call for) referendums with increasing frequency. But how can they know they will win? Looking at the polls is not enough: opinion during referendum campaigns is often volatile. But this chapter shows that there are nevertheless some recurring patterns that allow us to make reasonable predictions in most cases.

En attendant Sarko? France’s mainstream Right and Centre, 2012-2014

In winning the municipal elections of March 2014, France’s mainstream opposition – the Centrists and the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP) – benefited not only from the unpopularity of the Left in power, but also from its own (partial) reconstruction. The Centrists had reorganised; the UMP had reaffirmed its right-wing programme and drawn strength from the opposition social movements launched in 2013. The European elections of 2014, however, demonstrated the limitations of this reconstruction. Their weak institutionalisation – the original sin of France’s Right and centre-Right – left internal ideological differences and (above all) personal rivalries unchecked within both forces. These tensions were compounded, in the UMP, by a series of financial scandals. At their heart was former president Nicolas Sarkozy, still the activists’ darling, ever more clearly a candidate for 2017, but also more hobbled by judicial investigations.

Voting rights of refugees

The book develops a novel legal argument about the voting rights of recognised 1951 Geneva Convention Refugees. The main normative contention is that such refugees should have the right to vote in the political community where they reside, assuming that the political community is a democracy and that its citizens have the right to vote. The basis of this contention is that the right to political participation in some political community is a basic right from the point of view of dignity and the protection of one’s interests. Due to their unique political predicament, 1951 Geneva Convention Refugees are a special category of non-citizen residents. They are unable to participate in elections of their state of origin, do not enjoy its diplomatic protection and consular assistance abroad, and – most fundamentally – are unable or unwilling, owing to a well-founded fear of persecution, to return to it; thus, they are in limbo for a potentially protracted period. Refugees, too, deserve to have a place in the world in the Arendtian sense, where their opinions are significant and their actions are effective. Their state of asylum is, for the time being, the only community in which there is any realistic prospect of political participation on their part.