Resolución 630(XXXI): Respaldo a la labor del Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES)

Error en símbolo en tapa y contraportada (S/2006/20)

Resolución 636(XXXII): Respaldo a la labor del Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social ILPES)

Incluye Bibliografía

Resolución 652(XXXIII): Respaldo a la labor del Instituto Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES)

Incluye Bibliografía

Resolución 671(XXXIV): Respaldo a la labor del Instituto Latinoamericano de Planificación Económica y Social (ILPES)

Versión en inglés disponible en Biblioteca

Evaluating interaction with websites: Case study of a government website of the Brazilian Ministry of labor and employment

This paper presents a usability evaluation of the MTE (Ministry of Labor e Employment) website in order to measure the effectiveness, efficiency and user satisfaction regarding the website. The participants were 12 users (07 users were female and 05 male). The results indicate that although the education level of all participants and computing experience, many of them have had difficulty in finding information and do not recommend the site. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: What about in 2011? the next appeal for the evidence-based medicine age

Rationale and aim The aims of the Cochrane systematic reviews are to make readily available and up-to-date information for clinical practice, offering consistent evidence and straightforward recommendations. In 2004, we evaluated the conclusions from Cochrane systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in terms of their recommendations for clinical practice and found that 47.83% of them had insufficient evidence for use in clinical practice. We proposed to reanalyze the reviews to evaluate whether this percentage had significantly decreased. Methods A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library (Issue 7, 2011) was conducted. We randomly selected reviews across all 52 Cochrane Collaborative Review Groups. Results We analyzed 1128 completed systematic reviews. Of these, 45.30% concluded that the interventions studied were likely to be beneficial, of which only 2.04% recommended no further research. In total, 45.04% of the reviews reported that the evidence did not support either benefit or harm, of which 0.8% did not recommend further studies and 44.24% recommended additional studies; the latter has decreased from our previous study with a difference of 3.59%. Conclusion Only a small number of the Cochrane collaboration's systematic reviews support clinical interventions with no need for additional research. A larger number of high-quality randomized clinical trials are necessary to change the 'insufficient evidence' scenario for clinical practice illustrated by the Cochrane database. It is recommended that we should produce higher-quality primary studies in active collaboration and consultation with global scholars and societies so that this can represent a major component of methodological advance in this context. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

La labor de las organizaciones sin fines de lucro en Guatemala

Incluye Bibliografía

La labor de las organizaciones sin fines de lucro en Guatemala

Incluye Bibliografía

Labor preparatoria relativa a la documentación básica que habrá de presentarse a la Conferencia Mundial

Propone un criterio para la formulacion de estrategias para el adelanto de la mujer hasta el ano 2000 en el contexto de las metas y objetivos y subtemas del Decenio de las NU para la mujer. Sugiere un esbozo del informe que se ha de presentar al organo preparatorio de la Conferencia Mundial, en su tercer periodo de sesiones en 1985, incluidas las principales cuestiones que se han de abordar.

Unemployment, macroeconomic policy and labor market flexibility: Argentina and Mexico in the 1990s

Includes bibliography