Greater TTIP Ambition in Chemicals: Why and how. CEPS Special Report, 28 July 2015. Paper No. 10 in the CEPS-CTR project ‘TTIP in the Balance’ and CEPS Special Report No. 114/July 2015.

To date, the negotiations over chemicals in the Translatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) have not shown sufficient ambition. The talks have focused too much on the differences in the two ‘systems’, rather than on the actual levels of health and environmental protection for substances regulated by both the US and the EU. Given the accomplishments within the OECD and the UN Globally Harmonised System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), the question is whether TTIP can be any more ambitious in the area of chemicals? We find that there is no detailed or systematic knowledge about how the two levels of protection in chemicals compare, although caricatures and stereotypes abound. This is partly due to an obsessive focus on a single US federal law, the Toxic Subtances Control Act (TSCA), whereas in practice US protection depends on many statutes and regulations, as well as on voluntary withdrawals (under pressure from the Environmental Protection Agency) and severe common law liability. This paper makes the economic case for firmly addressing the regulatory barriers, discusses the EU’s proposals, finds that the European Parliament’s Resolution on TTIP of July 2015 lacks a rationale (for chemicals), argues that both TSCA and REACH ought to be improved (based on ‘better regulation’), discusses the link with a global regime, advocates significant improvement of market access where equivalence of health and environmental objectives is agreed and, finally, proposes to lower the costs for companies selling in both markets by allowing them to opt into the other party’s more stringent rules, thereby avoiding duplication while racing-to-the-top. The ‘living agreement’ on chemicals ought to be led by a new TTIP institution authorised to establish the level of health and environmental protection on both sides of the Atlantic for substances regulated on both sides. These findings will lay the foundation for a highly beneficial lowering of trading costs without in any way affecting the level of protection. Indeed, this is exactly what TTIP is, or should be, all about.This paper is the 10th in a series produced in the context of the “TTIP in the Balance” project, jointly organised by CEPS and the Center for Transatlantic Relations (CTR) in Washington, D.C. It is published simultaneously on the CEPS (www.ceps.eu) and CTR websites (http://transatlantic.sais-jhu.edu).

Chlorophyll catabolism and gene expression in the peel of ripening banana fruits

The biochemical and molecular basis of chlorophyll (Chl) catabolism in bananas was investigated during ripening at 20°C and at an elevated temperature (35°C) where degreening is inhibited. Biochemical analysis showed that Chl breakdown products could be isolated from fruit ripened at both temperatures. The coloured breakdown products, chlorophyllide and pheophorbide, were not detected at any stage of ripening in the two treatments; however, a non-fluorescent Chl catabolite accumulated to a higher concentration at 20 than at 35°C. To investigate the ripening-related gene expression associated with these changes, a cDNA library was generated from the peel of fruit ripened at 20°C. Differential screening of this library produced 20 non-redundant families of clones including those encoding enzymes involved in ethylene biosynthesis, respiration, starch metabolism, cell wall degradation and other metabolic events. The expression of these genes was followed by northern analysis in fruit ripened at 20 and 35°C.

Efficacy of a Nasal Spray from Citrus limon and Cydonia oblonga for the Treatment of Hay Fever Symptoms - A Randomized, Placebo Controlled Cross-Over Study

Nasal spray from lemon and quince (LQNS) is used to treat hay fever symptoms and has been shown to inhibit histamine release from mast cells in vitro. Forty-three patients with grass pollen allergy (GPA) were randomized to be treated either with placebo or LQNS for one week, respectively, in a cross-over study. At baseline and after the respective treatments patients were provoked with grass pollen allergen. Outcome parameters were nasal flow measured with rhinomanometry (primary), a nasal symptom score, histamine in the nasal mucus and tolerability. In the per protocol population absolute inspiratory nasal flow 10 and 20 min after provocation was higher with LQNS compared to placebo (-37 ± 87 mL/s; p = 0.027 and -44 ± 85 mL/s; p = 0.022). The nasal symptom score showed a trend (3.3 ± 1.8 in the placebo and 2.8 ± 1.5 in the LQNS group; p = 0.070) in favor of LQNS; the histamine concentration was not significantly different between the groups. Tolerability of both, LQNS and placebo, was rated as very good. LQNS seems to have an anti-allergic effect in patients with GPA. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Status assessment of toxic chemicals : vinylidene chloride /

Mode of access: Internet.

Design and evaluation of a terrestrial model ecosystem for evaluation substitute pesticide chemicals /

Mode of access: Internet.

Status assessment of toxic chemicals : tricholorethylene /

Mode of access: Internet.

Hazardous chemicals in fish : Wisconsin power plant impact study /

Mode of access: Internet.

Fertilizer and pesticide movement from citrus groves in Florida flatwood soils /

Mode of access: Internet.

Status assessment of toxic chemicals : cadmium /

Mode of access: Internet.

Status assessment of toxic chemicals : lead /

Mode of access: Internet.

Source assessment : major barium chemicals /

Mode of access: Internet.