Argumentación, desplazamientos semánticos e imaginario cultural en Heródoto IX. 26-27

A partir de estrategias de análisis del discurso, el trabajo analiza la disputa erística que, según Heródoto, acaeció entre tegeatas y atenienses en las vísperas de la batalla de Platea (Hdt. IX. 26-7). Entendemos que la presunta simetría y regularidad en los dichos y contenidos de ambos discursos es en rigor engañosa en tanto que enmascara la contraposición de dos imaginarios culturales, representados por tegeatas y atenienses respectivamente. Dicho antagonismo se evidencia en un sutil proceso de desplazamientos semánticos por medio de los cuales Heródoto caracteriza de manera singular una y otra comunidad y el basamento ideológico-político sobre el que se sustentan.

La dinámica mercantil de las mujeres rioplatenses frente al resquebrajamiento del Antiguo Régimen (1806-1810)

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar la dinámica mercantil de las mujeres rioplatenses en el marco de los acontecimientos que se suscitaron entre 1806 y 1810. Explorar la mecánica de los comportamientos previos a esa etapa resulta fundamental para observar los cambios que se produjeron después. A fin de examinar tales cambios se recurre a una serie de variables: las formas de participación en la práctica mercantil, esto es, si cargaban los frutos y efectos a su cuenta y riesgo, y/o a través de terceros o experimentaban con las dos modalidades, el grado de inserción y permanencia en la actividad para definirlas en función de la mayor o menor regularidad en el ejercicio comercial, los rubros comercializados y la relación con las rutas del intercambio oceánico y regional

Las revistas académicas del campo de la educación (Argentina, 1990-2002)

El estudio de las revistas especializadas permite comprender aspectos importantes de la dinámica de los campos científicos y académicos. Entre ellos, los grados de institucionalización, diferenciación y especialización o las redes de intercambio. La cantidad, la calidad y la difusión de las revistas expresa, en buena medida, el poder relativo de las diversas comunidades académicas y su influencia en el nivel nacional e internacional. Este estudio realiza un análisis descriptivo de las revistas académicas argentinas especializadas en educación durante la década de 1990, como parte de una investigación más amplia sobre la producción de conocimientos en educación, desarrollada en la FLACSO entre 2002 y 2004. Se presentan los datos y conclusiones del análisis de 17 revistas que refieren exclusivamente a temas de educación y que declaran contar con algún mecanismo de referato científico-académico. La descripción toma como punto de partida las siguientes dimensiones: a) las agencias productoras; b) las referencias temporales (fecha de aparición, frecuencia y regularidad de las revistas); c) la distribución regional; d) la estructura de las publicaciones; d) la pertenencia institucional de los autores y e) los temas abordados en las publicaciones. Al final del artículo, se discuten los avances alcanzados en materia de publicaciones en la década pasada y las dificultades que persisten para consolidar una cantidad y diversidad de instancias de comunicación especializada en el campo de la educación en la Argentina.

El potencial de la agricultura familiar y los espacios protegidos : Lineamientos para el diseño de políticas públicas

Hay una cantidad de explotaciones familiares que aún perduran y se resisten a desaparecer, desplegando variadas y novedosas estrategias productivas, sociales y culturales. Precisamente, el objetivo de este artículo es presentar dos casos de explotaciones familiares en contextos muy diferentes: una ubicada en el Dpto. Banda de la provincia de Santiago del Estero y la otra en el Partido de Saladillo, provincia de Buenos Aires, donde la diversidad y regularidad de las estrategias adoptadas les han permitido persistir y desarrollar estrategias alternativas al modelo vigente. El despliegue del potencial productivo, ecológico y social de la agricultura familiar requiere de la construcción de espacios protegidos. Así, los espacios protegidos se presentan como un argumento sobre la potencialidad de la agricultura familiar y su capacidad de generar un desarrollo rural alternativo, en el que la pequeña producción tenga un rol activo en la construcción de este nuevo diseño. No obstante, en la actualidad, los espacios protegidos no son más que una hipótesis y una declaración de las posibilidades sobre la forma en la que el mundo agrario podría estructurarse con base en la pequeña producción. La sistematización de los casos comienza a mostrar caminos y pautas posibles de aprendizajes para esa construcción

La dinámica mercantil de las mujeres rioplatenses frente al resquebrajamiento del Antiguo Régimen (1806-1810)

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar la dinámica mercantil de las mujeres rioplatenses en el marco de los acontecimientos que se suscitaron entre 1806 y 1810. Explorar la mecánica de los comportamientos previos a esa etapa resulta fundamental para observar los cambios que se produjeron después. A fin de examinar tales cambios se recurre a una serie de variables: las formas de participación en la práctica mercantil, esto es, si cargaban los frutos y efectos a su cuenta y riesgo, y/o a través de terceros o experimentaban con las dos modalidades, el grado de inserción y permanencia en la actividad para definirlas en función de la mayor o menor regularidad en el ejercicio comercial, los rubros comercializados y la relación con las rutas del intercambio oceánico y regional

Las revistas académicas del campo de la educación (Argentina, 1990-2002)

El estudio de las revistas especializadas permite comprender aspectos importantes de la dinámica de los campos científicos y académicos. Entre ellos, los grados de institucionalización, diferenciación y especialización o las redes de intercambio. La cantidad, la calidad y la difusión de las revistas expresa, en buena medida, el poder relativo de las diversas comunidades académicas y su influencia en el nivel nacional e internacional. Este estudio realiza un análisis descriptivo de las revistas académicas argentinas especializadas en educación durante la década de 1990, como parte de una investigación más amplia sobre la producción de conocimientos en educación, desarrollada en la FLACSO entre 2002 y 2004. Se presentan los datos y conclusiones del análisis de 17 revistas que refieren exclusivamente a temas de educación y que declaran contar con algún mecanismo de referato científico-académico. La descripción toma como punto de partida las siguientes dimensiones: a) las agencias productoras; b) las referencias temporales (fecha de aparición, frecuencia y regularidad de las revistas); c) la distribución regional; d) la estructura de las publicaciones; d) la pertenencia institucional de los autores y e) los temas abordados en las publicaciones. Al final del artículo, se discuten los avances alcanzados en materia de publicaciones en la década pasada y las dificultades que persisten para consolidar una cantidad y diversidad de instancias de comunicación especializada en el campo de la educación en la Argentina.

El potencial de la agricultura familiar y los espacios protegidos : Lineamientos para el diseño de políticas públicas

Hay una cantidad de explotaciones familiares que aún perduran y se resisten a desaparecer, desplegando variadas y novedosas estrategias productivas, sociales y culturales. Precisamente, el objetivo de este artículo es presentar dos casos de explotaciones familiares en contextos muy diferentes: una ubicada en el Dpto. Banda de la provincia de Santiago del Estero y la otra en el Partido de Saladillo, provincia de Buenos Aires, donde la diversidad y regularidad de las estrategias adoptadas les han permitido persistir y desarrollar estrategias alternativas al modelo vigente. El despliegue del potencial productivo, ecológico y social de la agricultura familiar requiere de la construcción de espacios protegidos. Así, los espacios protegidos se presentan como un argumento sobre la potencialidad de la agricultura familiar y su capacidad de generar un desarrollo rural alternativo, en el que la pequeña producción tenga un rol activo en la construcción de este nuevo diseño. No obstante, en la actualidad, los espacios protegidos no son más que una hipótesis y una declaración de las posibilidades sobre la forma en la que el mundo agrario podría estructurarse con base en la pequeña producción. La sistematización de los casos comienza a mostrar caminos y pautas posibles de aprendizajes para esa construcción

La dinámica mercantil de las mujeres rioplatenses frente al resquebrajamiento del Antiguo Régimen (1806-1810)

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar la dinámica mercantil de las mujeres rioplatenses en el marco de los acontecimientos que se suscitaron entre 1806 y 1810. Explorar la mecánica de los comportamientos previos a esa etapa resulta fundamental para observar los cambios que se produjeron después. A fin de examinar tales cambios se recurre a una serie de variables: las formas de participación en la práctica mercantil, esto es, si cargaban los frutos y efectos a su cuenta y riesgo, y/o a través de terceros o experimentaban con las dos modalidades, el grado de inserción y permanencia en la actividad para definirlas en función de la mayor o menor regularidad en el ejercicio comercial, los rubros comercializados y la relación con las rutas del intercambio oceánico y regional

El potencial de la agricultura familiar y los espacios protegidos : Lineamientos para el diseño de políticas públicas

Hay una cantidad de explotaciones familiares que aún perduran y se resisten a desaparecer, desplegando variadas y novedosas estrategias productivas, sociales y culturales. Precisamente, el objetivo de este artículo es presentar dos casos de explotaciones familiares en contextos muy diferentes: una ubicada en el Dpto. Banda de la provincia de Santiago del Estero y la otra en el Partido de Saladillo, provincia de Buenos Aires, donde la diversidad y regularidad de las estrategias adoptadas les han permitido persistir y desarrollar estrategias alternativas al modelo vigente. El despliegue del potencial productivo, ecológico y social de la agricultura familiar requiere de la construcción de espacios protegidos. Así, los espacios protegidos se presentan como un argumento sobre la potencialidad de la agricultura familiar y su capacidad de generar un desarrollo rural alternativo, en el que la pequeña producción tenga un rol activo en la construcción de este nuevo diseño. No obstante, en la actualidad, los espacios protegidos no son más que una hipótesis y una declaración de las posibilidades sobre la forma en la que el mundo agrario podría estructurarse con base en la pequeña producción. La sistematización de los casos comienza a mostrar caminos y pautas posibles de aprendizajes para esa construcción

Las revistas académicas del campo de la educación (Argentina, 1990-2002)

El estudio de las revistas especializadas permite comprender aspectos importantes de la dinámica de los campos científicos y académicos. Entre ellos, los grados de institucionalización, diferenciación y especialización o las redes de intercambio. La cantidad, la calidad y la difusión de las revistas expresa, en buena medida, el poder relativo de las diversas comunidades académicas y su influencia en el nivel nacional e internacional. Este estudio realiza un análisis descriptivo de las revistas académicas argentinas especializadas en educación durante la década de 1990, como parte de una investigación más amplia sobre la producción de conocimientos en educación, desarrollada en la FLACSO entre 2002 y 2004. Se presentan los datos y conclusiones del análisis de 17 revistas que refieren exclusivamente a temas de educación y que declaran contar con algún mecanismo de referato científico-académico. La descripción toma como punto de partida las siguientes dimensiones: a) las agencias productoras; b) las referencias temporales (fecha de aparición, frecuencia y regularidad de las revistas); c) la distribución regional; d) la estructura de las publicaciones; d) la pertenencia institucional de los autores y e) los temas abordados en las publicaciones. Al final del artículo, se discuten los avances alcanzados en materia de publicaciones en la década pasada y las dificultades que persisten para consolidar una cantidad y diversidad de instancias de comunicación especializada en el campo de la educación en la Argentina.

Chemical and isotopic compositions of authigenic carbonates from bottom sediments of Northwest Pacific marginal seas

The paper presents data on authigenic carbonate distribution in Holocene - Upper Pleistocene deposits of the Okhotsk, Japan, East China, Philippine and South China Seas. Description of carbonate samples, their chemical and isotope compositions are given. Chemical analysis of the samples indicates that almost all authigenic carbonates are composed of calcite or magnesian calcite; and only in one case, of siderite. Oxygen isotopic composition (d18O) ranges from +37.7 to +26.1 per mil (SMOW); it is, probably, connected with different temperatures of carbonate formation. A distinct geographic regularity is traced. Decrease in d18O values is observed from the cold Okhotsk Sea to the warm South China Sea. A very wide range of carbon isotopic composition (d13C from -42 to +3.8 per mil) indicates different sources of carbonic acid required for formation of these carbonates. As a basis for carbon isotopic composition we can distinguish three sources of carbonic acid in the studied sediments: microbiological methane oxidation, organic matter destruction during sediment diagenesis, and dissolved organogenic limestone. Thus, formation of authigenic carbonates in sediments from the marginal seas of the Northwest Pacific results from: 1) sediment diagenesis, 2) methane oxidation in zones of gas anomalies, 3) their precipitation from the supersaturated by carbonates sea shoal waters of tropical sea lagoons.

Upper Cretaceous sediments of ODP Hole 122-762C

Well-developed Campanian to Maestrichtian pelagic cyclic sediments were recovered from Hole 762C on the Exmouth Plateau, off northwest Australia, during Ocean Drilling Program Leg 122. The cycles consist of nannofossil chalk (light beds) and clayey nannofossil chalk (dark beds). Both light and dark beds are strongly to moderately bioturbated, alternate on a decimeter scale, and exhibit gradual boundaries. Bioturbation introduces materials from a bed of one color into an underlying bed of another color, indicating that diagenesis is not responsible for the cyclicity. Differences in composition between the light and dark beds, revealed by calcium carbonate measurement and X-ray diffraction analysis, together with trace fossil evidence, indicate that the cycles in the sediments are a depositional feature. Diagenetic processes may have intensified the appearance of the cycles. Spectral analysis was applied to the upper Campanian to lower Maestrichtian cyclic sediments to examine the regularity of the cycles. Power spectra were calculated from time series using Walsh spectral analysis. The most predominant wavelengths of the color cycles are 34-41 cm and 71-84 cm. With an average sedimentation rate of 1.82 cm/k.y. in this interval, we found the time durations of the cycles to be around 41 k.y. and 21 k.y., respectively, comparable to the obliquity and precession periods of the Earth's rotation, which strongly suggests an orbital origin for the cycles. On the basis of sedimentological evidence and plate tectonic reconstruction, we propose the following mechanism for the formation of the cyclic sediments from Hole 762C. During the Late Cretaceous, when there was no large-scale continental glaciation, the cyclic variations in insolation, in response to cyclic orbital changes, controlled the alternation of two prevailing climates in the area. During the wetter, equable, and warmer climatic phases under high insolation, more clay minerals and other terrestrial materials were produced on land and supplied by higher runoff to a low bioproductivity ocean, and the dark clayey beds were deposited. During the drier and colder climatic phases under low insolation, fewer clay minerals were produced and put into the ocean, where bioproductivity was increased and the light beds were deposited.

Why do oil importers diversify their import sources politically? : evidence from U.S. firm-level data

International politics affects oil trade. But why? We construct a firm-level dataset for all U.S. oil-importing companies over 1986-2008 to examine what kinds of firms are more responsive to change in "political distance" between the U.S. and her trading partners, measured by divergence in their UN General Assembly voting patterns. Consistent with previous macro evidence, we first show that individual firms diversify their oil imports politically, even after controlling for unobserved firm heterogeneity. We conjecture that the political pattern of oil imports from these individual firms is driven by hold-up risks, because oil trade is often associated with backward vertical FDI. To test this hold-up risk hypothesis, we investigate heterogeneity in responses by matching transaction-level import data with firm-level worldwide reserves. Our results show that long-run oil import decisions are indeed more elastic for firms with oil reserves overseas than those without, although the reverse is true in the short run. We interpret this empirical regularity as that while firms trade in the spot market can adjust their imports immediately, vertically-integrated firms with investment overseas tend to commit to term contracts in the short run even though they are more responsive to changes in international politics in the long run.

OntoTag - A Linguistic and Ontological Annotation Model Suitable for the Semantic Web

OntoTag - A Linguistic and Ontological Annotation Model Suitable for the Semantic Web 1. INTRODUCTION. LINGUISTIC TOOLS AND ANNOTATIONS: THEIR LIGHTS AND SHADOWS Computational Linguistics is already a consolidated research area. It builds upon the results of other two major ones, namely Linguistics and Computer Science and Engineering, and it aims at developing computational models of human language (or natural language, as it is termed in this area). Possibly, its most well-known applications are the different tools developed so far for processing human language, such as machine translation systems and speech recognizers or dictation programs. These tools for processing human language are commonly referred to as linguistic tools. Apart from the examples mentioned above, there are also other types of linguistic tools that perhaps are not so well-known, but on which most of the other applications of Computational Linguistics are built. These other types of linguistic tools comprise POS taggers, natural language parsers and semantic taggers, amongst others. All of them can be termed linguistic annotation tools. Linguistic annotation tools are important assets. In fact, POS and semantic taggers (and, to a lesser extent, also natural language parsers) have become critical resources for the computer applications that process natural language. Hence, any computer application that has to analyse a text automatically and ‘intelligently’ will include at least a module for POS tagging. The more an application needs to ‘understand’ the meaning of the text it processes, the more linguistic tools and/or modules it will incorporate and integrate. However, linguistic annotation tools have still some limitations, which can be summarised as follows: 1. Normally, they perform annotations only at a certain linguistic level (that is, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics, etc.). 2. They usually introduce a certain rate of errors and ambiguities when tagging. This error rate ranges from 10 percent up to 50 percent of the units annotated for unrestricted, general texts. 3. Their annotations are most frequently formulated in terms of an annotation schema designed and implemented ad hoc. A priori, it seems that the interoperation and the integration of several linguistic tools into an appropriate software architecture could most likely solve the limitations stated in (1). Besides, integrating several linguistic annotation tools and making them interoperate could also minimise the limitation stated in (2). Nevertheless, in the latter case, all these tools should produce annotations for a common level, which would have to be combined in order to correct their corresponding errors and inaccuracies. Yet, the limitation stated in (3) prevents both types of integration and interoperation from being easily achieved. In addition, most high-level annotation tools rely on other lower-level annotation tools and their outputs to generate their own ones. For example, sense-tagging tools (operating at the semantic level) often use POS taggers (operating at a lower level, i.e., the morphosyntactic) to identify the grammatical category of the word or lexical unit they are annotating. Accordingly, if a faulty or inaccurate low-level annotation tool is to be used by other higher-level one in its process, the errors and inaccuracies of the former should be minimised in advance. Otherwise, these errors and inaccuracies would be transferred to (and even magnified in) the annotations of the high-level annotation tool. Therefore, it would be quite useful to find a way to (i) correct or, at least, reduce the errors and the inaccuracies of lower-level linguistic tools; (ii) unify the annotation schemas of different linguistic annotation tools or, more generally speaking, make these tools (as well as their annotations) interoperate. Clearly, solving (i) and (ii) should ease the automatic annotation of web pages by means of linguistic tools, and their transformation into Semantic Web pages (Berners-Lee, Hendler and Lassila, 2001). Yet, as stated above, (ii) is a type of interoperability problem. There again, ontologies (Gruber, 1993; Borst, 1997) have been successfully applied thus far to solve several interoperability problems. Hence, ontologies should help solve also the problems and limitations of linguistic annotation tools aforementioned. Thus, to summarise, the main aim of the present work was to combine somehow these separated approaches, mechanisms and tools for annotation from Linguistics and Ontological Engineering (and the Semantic Web) in a sort of hybrid (linguistic and ontological) annotation model, suitable for both areas. This hybrid (semantic) annotation model should (a) benefit from the advances, models, techniques, mechanisms and tools of these two areas; (b) minimise (and even solve, when possible) some of the problems found in each of them; and (c) be suitable for the Semantic Web. The concrete goals that helped attain this aim are presented in the following section. 2. GOALS OF THE PRESENT WORK As mentioned above, the main goal of this work was to specify a hybrid (that is, linguistically-motivated and ontology-based) model of annotation suitable for the Semantic Web (i.e. it had to produce a semantic annotation of web page contents). This entailed that the tags included in the annotations of the model had to (1) represent linguistic concepts (or linguistic categories, as they are termed in ISO/DCR (2008)), in order for this model to be linguistically-motivated; (2) be ontological terms (i.e., use an ontological vocabulary), in order for the model to be ontology-based; and (3) be structured (linked) as a collection of ontology-based triples, as in the usual Semantic Web languages (namely RDF(S) and OWL), in order for the model to be considered suitable for the Semantic Web. Besides, to be useful for the Semantic Web, this model should provide a way to automate the annotation of web pages. As for the present work, this requirement involved reusing the linguistic annotation tools purchased by the OEG research group (http://www.oeg-upm.net), but solving beforehand (or, at least, minimising) some of their limitations. Therefore, this model had to minimise these limitations by means of the integration of several linguistic annotation tools into a common architecture. Since this integration required the interoperation of tools and their annotations, ontologies were proposed as the main technological component to make them effectively interoperate. From the very beginning, it seemed that the formalisation of the elements and the knowledge underlying linguistic annotations within an appropriate set of ontologies would be a great step forward towards the formulation of such a model (henceforth referred to as OntoTag). Obviously, first, to combine the results of the linguistic annotation tools that operated at the same level, their annotation schemas had to be unified (or, preferably, standardised) in advance. This entailed the unification (id. standardisation) of their tags (both their representation and their meaning), and their format or syntax. Second, to merge the results of the linguistic annotation tools operating at different levels, their respective annotation schemas had to be (a) made interoperable and (b) integrated. And third, in order for the resulting annotations to suit the Semantic Web, they had to be specified by means of an ontology-based vocabulary, and structured by means of ontology-based triples, as hinted above. Therefore, a new annotation scheme had to be devised, based both on ontologies and on this type of triples, which allowed for the combination and the integration of the annotations of any set of linguistic annotation tools. This annotation scheme was considered a fundamental part of the model proposed here, and its development was, accordingly, another major objective of the present work. All these goals, aims and objectives could be re-stated more clearly as follows: Goal 1: Development of a set of ontologies for the formalisation of the linguistic knowledge relating linguistic annotation. Sub-goal 1.1: Ontological formalisation of the EAGLES (1996a; 1996b) de facto standards for morphosyntactic and syntactic annotation, in a way that helps respect the triple structure recommended for annotations in these works (which is isomorphic to the triple structures used in the context of the Semantic Web). Sub-goal 1.2: Incorporation into this preliminary ontological formalisation of other existing standards and standard proposals relating the levels mentioned above, such as those currently under development within ISO/TC 37 (the ISO Technical Committee dealing with Terminology, which deals also with linguistic resources and annotations). Sub-goal 1.3: Generalisation and extension of the recommendations in EAGLES (1996a; 1996b) and ISO/TC 37 to the semantic level, for which no ISO/TC 37 standards have been developed yet. Sub-goal 1.4: Ontological formalisation of the generalisations and/or extensions obtained in the previous sub-goal as generalisations and/or extensions of the corresponding ontology (or ontologies). Sub-goal 1.5: Ontological formalisation of the knowledge required to link, combine and unite the knowledge represented in the previously developed ontology (or ontologies). Goal 2: Development of OntoTag’s annotation scheme, a standard-based abstract scheme for the hybrid (linguistically-motivated and ontological-based) annotation of texts. Sub-goal 2.1: Development of the standard-based morphosyntactic annotation level of OntoTag’s scheme. This level should include, and possibly extend, the recommendations of EAGLES (1996a) and also the recommendations included in the ISO/MAF (2008) standard draft. Sub-goal 2.2: Development of the standard-based syntactic annotation level of the hybrid abstract scheme. This level should include, and possibly extend, the recommendations of EAGLES (1996b) and the ISO/SynAF (2010) standard draft. Sub-goal 2.3: Development of the standard-based semantic annotation level of OntoTag’s (abstract) scheme. Sub-goal 2.4: Development of the mechanisms for a convenient integration of the three annotation levels already mentioned. These mechanisms should take into account the recommendations included in the ISO/LAF (2009) standard draft. Goal 3: Design of OntoTag’s (abstract) annotation architecture, an abstract architecture for the hybrid (semantic) annotation of texts (i) that facilitates the integration and interoperation of different linguistic annotation tools, and (ii) whose results comply with OntoTag’s annotation scheme. Sub-goal 3.1: Specification of the decanting processes that allow for the classification and separation, according to their corresponding levels, of the results of the linguistic tools annotating at several different levels. Sub-goal 3.2: Specification of the standardisation processes that allow (a) complying with the standardisation requirements of OntoTag’s annotation scheme, as well as (b) combining the results of those linguistic tools that share some level of annotation. Sub-goal 3.3: Specification of the merging processes that allow for the combination of the output annotations and the interoperation of those linguistic tools that share some level of annotation. Sub-goal 3.4: Specification of the merge processes that allow for the integration of the results and the interoperation of those tools performing their annotations at different levels. Goal 4: Generation of OntoTagger’s schema, a concrete instance of OntoTag’s abstract scheme for a concrete set of linguistic annotations. These linguistic annotations result from the tools and the resources available in the research group, namely • Bitext’s DataLexica (http://www.bitext.com/EN/datalexica.asp), • LACELL’s (POS) tagger (http://www.um.es/grupos/grupo-lacell/quees.php), • Connexor’s FDG (http://www.connexor.eu/technology/machinese/glossary/fdg/), and • EuroWordNet (Vossen et al., 1998). This schema should help evaluate OntoTag’s underlying hypotheses, stated below. Consequently, it should implement, at least, those levels of the abstract scheme dealing with the annotations of the set of tools considered in this implementation. This includes the morphosyntactic, the syntactic and the semantic levels. Goal 5: Implementation of OntoTagger’s configuration, a concrete instance of OntoTag’s abstract architecture for this set of linguistic tools and annotations. This configuration (1) had to use the schema generated in the previous goal; and (2) should help support or refute the hypotheses of this work as well (see the next section). Sub-goal 5.1: Implementation of the decanting processes that facilitate the classification and separation of the results of those linguistic resources that provide annotations at several different levels (on the one hand, LACELL’s tagger operates at the morphosyntactic level and, minimally, also at the semantic level; on the other hand, FDG operates at the morphosyntactic and the syntactic levels and, minimally, at the semantic level as well). Sub-goal 5.2: Implementation of the standardisation processes that allow (i) specifying the results of those linguistic tools that share some level of annotation according to the requirements of OntoTagger’s schema, as well as (ii) combining these shared level results. In particular, all the tools selected perform morphosyntactic annotations and they had to be conveniently combined by means of these processes. Sub-goal 5.3: Implementation of the merging processes that allow for the combination (and possibly the improvement) of the annotations and the interoperation of the tools that share some level of annotation (in particular, those relating the morphosyntactic level, as in the previous sub-goal). Sub-goal 5.4: Implementation of the merging processes that allow for the integration of the different standardised and combined annotations aforementioned, relating all the levels considered. Sub-goal 5.5: Improvement of the semantic level of this configuration by adding a named entity recognition, (sub-)classification and annotation subsystem, which also uses the named entities annotated to populate a domain ontology, in order to provide a concrete application of the present work in the two areas involved (the Semantic Web and Corpus Linguistics). 3. MAIN RESULTS: ASSESSMENT OF ONTOTAG’S UNDERLYING HYPOTHESES The model developed in the present thesis tries to shed some light on (i) whether linguistic annotation tools can effectively interoperate; (ii) whether their results can be combined and integrated; and, if they can, (iii) how they can, respectively, interoperate and be combined and integrated. Accordingly, several hypotheses had to be supported (or rejected) by the development of the OntoTag model and OntoTagger (its implementation). The hypotheses underlying OntoTag are surveyed below. Only one of the hypotheses (H.6) was rejected; the other five could be confirmed. H.1 The annotations of different levels (or layers) can be integrated into a sort of overall, comprehensive, multilayer and multilevel annotation, so that their elements can complement and refer to each other. • CONFIRMED by the development of: o OntoTag’s annotation scheme, o OntoTag’s annotation architecture, o OntoTagger’s (XML, RDF, OWL) annotation schemas, o OntoTagger’s configuration. H.2 Tool-dependent annotations can be mapped onto a sort of tool-independent annotations and, thus, can be standardised. • CONFIRMED by means of the standardisation phase incorporated into OntoTag and OntoTagger for the annotations yielded by the tools. H.3 Standardisation should ease: H.3.1: The interoperation of linguistic tools. H.3.2: The comparison, combination (at the same level and layer) and integration (at different levels or layers) of annotations. • H.3 was CONFIRMED by means of the development of OntoTagger’s ontology-based configuration: o Interoperation, comparison, combination and integration of the annotations of three different linguistic tools (Connexor’s FDG, Bitext’s DataLexica and LACELL’s tagger); o Integration of EuroWordNet-based, domain-ontology-based and named entity annotations at the semantic level. o Integration of morphosyntactic, syntactic and semantic annotations. H.4 Ontologies and Semantic Web technologies (can) play a crucial role in the standardisation of linguistic annotations, by providing consensual vocabularies and standardised formats for annotation (e.g., RDF triples). • CONFIRMED by means of the development of OntoTagger’s RDF-triple-based annotation schemas. H.5 The rate of errors introduced by a linguistic tool at a given level, when annotating, can be reduced automatically by contrasting and combining its results with the ones coming from other tools, operating at the same level. However, these other tools might be built following a different technological (stochastic vs. rule-based, for example) or theoretical (dependency vs. HPS-grammar-based, for instance) approach. • CONFIRMED by the results yielded by the evaluation of OntoTagger. H.6 Each linguistic level can be managed and annotated independently. • REJECTED: OntoTagger’s experiments and the dependencies observed among the morphosyntactic annotations, and between them and the syntactic annotations. In fact, Hypothesis H.6 was already rejected when OntoTag’s ontologies were developed. We observed then that several linguistic units stand on an interface between levels, belonging thereby to both of them (such as morphosyntactic units, which belong to both the morphological level and the syntactic level). Therefore, the annotations of these levels overlap and cannot be handled independently when merged into a unique multileveled annotation. 4. OTHER MAIN RESULTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS First, interoperability is a hot topic for both the linguistic annotation community and the whole Computer Science field. The specification (and implementation) of OntoTag’s architecture for the combination and integration of linguistic (annotation) tools and annotations by means of ontologies shows a way to make these different linguistic annotation tools and annotations interoperate in practice. Second, as mentioned above, the elements involved in linguistic annotation were formalised in a set (or network) of ontologies (OntoTag’s linguistic ontologies). • On the one hand, OntoTag’s network of ontologies consists of − The Linguistic Unit Ontology (LUO), which includes a mostly hierarchical formalisation of the different types of linguistic elements (i.e., units) identifiable in a written text; − The Linguistic Attribute Ontology (LAO), which includes also a mostly hierarchical formalisation of the different types of features that characterise the linguistic units included in the LUO; − The Linguistic Value Ontology (LVO), which includes the corresponding formalisation of the different values that the attributes in the LAO can take; − The OIO (OntoTag’s Integration Ontology), which  Includes the knowledge required to link, combine and unite the knowledge represented in the LUO, the LAO and the LVO;  Can be viewed as a knowledge representation ontology that describes the most elementary vocabulary used in the area of annotation. • On the other hand, OntoTag’s ontologies incorporate the knowledge included in the different standards and recommendations for linguistic annotation released so far, such as those developed within the EAGLES and the SIMPLE European projects or by the ISO/TC 37 committee: − As far as morphosyntactic annotations are concerned, OntoTag’s ontologies formalise the terms in the EAGLES (1996a) recommendations and their corresponding terms within the ISO Morphosyntactic Annotation Framework (ISO/MAF, 2008) standard; − As for syntactic annotations, OntoTag’s ontologies incorporate the terms in the EAGLES (1996b) recommendations and their corresponding terms within the ISO Syntactic Annotation Framework (ISO/SynAF, 2010) standard draft; − Regarding semantic annotations, OntoTag’s ontologies generalise and extend the recommendations in EAGLES (1996a; 1996b) and, since no stable standards or standard drafts have been released for semantic annotation by ISO/TC 37 yet, they incorporate the terms in SIMPLE (2000) instead; − The terms coming from all these recommendations and standards were supplemented by those within the ISO Data Category Registry (ISO/DCR, 2008) and also of the ISO Linguistic Annotation Framework (ISO/LAF, 2009) standard draft when developing OntoTag’s ontologies. Third, we showed that the combination of the results of tools annotating at the same level can yield better results (both in precision and in recall) than each tool separately. In particular, 1. OntoTagger clearly outperformed two of the tools integrated into its configuration, namely DataLexica and FDG in all the combination sub-phases in which they overlapped (i.e. POS tagging, lemma annotation and morphological feature annotation). As far as the remaining tool is concerned, i.e. LACELL’s tagger, it was also outperformed by OntoTagger in POS tagging and lemma annotation, and it did not behave better than OntoTagger in the morphological feature annotation layer. 2. As an immediate result, this implies that a) This type of combination architecture configurations can be applied in order to improve significantly the accuracy of linguistic annotations; and b) Concerning the morphosyntactic level, this could be regarded as a way of constructing more robust and more accurate POS tagging systems. Fourth, Semantic Web annotations are usually performed by humans or else by machine learning systems. Both of them leave much to be desired: the former, with respect to their annotation rate; the latter, with respect to their (average) precision and recall. In this work, we showed how linguistic tools can be wrapped in order to annotate automatically Semantic Web pages using ontologies. This entails their fast, robust and accurate semantic annotation. As a way of example, as mentioned in Sub-goal 5.5, we developed a particular OntoTagger module for the recognition, classification and labelling of named entities, according to the MUC and ACE tagsets (Chinchor, 1997; Doddington et al., 2004). These tagsets were further specified by means of a domain ontology, namely the Cinema Named Entities Ontology (CNEO). This module was applied to the automatic annotation of ten different web pages containing cinema reviews (that is, around 5000 words). In addition, the named entities annotated with this module were also labelled as instances (or individuals) of the classes included in the CNEO and, then, were used to populate this domain ontology. • The statistical results obtained from the evaluation of this particular module of OntoTagger can be summarised as follows. On the one hand, as far as recall (R) is concerned, (R.1) the lowest value was 76,40% (for file 7); (R.2) the highest value was 97, 50% (for file 3); and (R.3) the average value was 88,73%. On the other hand, as far as the precision rate (P) is concerned, (P.1) its minimum was 93,75% (for file 4); (R.2) its maximum was 100% (for files 1, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10); and (R.3) its average value was 98,99%. • These results, which apply to the tasks of named entity annotation and ontology population, are extraordinary good for both of them. They can be explained on the basis of the high accuracy of the annotations provided by OntoTagger at the lower levels (mainly at the morphosyntactic level). However, they should be conveniently qualified, since they might be too domain- and/or language-dependent. It should be further experimented how our approach works in a different domain or a different language, such as French, English, or German. • In any case, the results of this application of Human Language Technologies to Ontology Population (and, accordingly, to Ontological Engineering) seem very promising and encouraging in order for these two areas to collaborate and complement each other in the area of semantic annotation. Fifth, as shown in the State of the Art of this work, there are different approaches and models for the semantic annotation of texts, but all of them focus on a particular view of the semantic level. Clearly, all these approaches and models should be integrated in order to bear a coherent and joint semantic annotation level. OntoTag shows how (i) these semantic annotation layers could be integrated together; and (ii) they could be integrated with the annotations associated to other annotation levels. Sixth, we identified some recommendations, best practices and lessons learned for annotation standardisation, interoperation and merge. They show how standardisation (via ontologies, in this case) enables the combination, integration and interoperation of different linguistic tools and their annotations into a multilayered (or multileveled) linguistic annotation, which is one of the hot topics in the area of Linguistic Annotation. And last but not least, OntoTag’s annotation scheme and OntoTagger’s annotation schemas show a way to formalise and annotate coherently and uniformly the different units and features associated to the different levels and layers of linguistic annotation. This is a great scientific step ahead towards the global standardisation of this area, which is the aim of ISO/TC 37 (in particular, Subcommittee 4, dealing with the standardisation of linguistic annotations and resources).

Application of global numerical procedures to the analysis of shells

Examples of global solutions of the shell equations are presented, such as the ones based on the well known Levy series expansion. Also discussed are some natural extensions of the Levy method as well as the inherent limitations of these methods concerning the shell model assumptions, boundary conditions and geometric regularity. Finally, some open additional design questions are noted mainly related to the simultaneous use in analysis of these global techniques and the local methods (like the finite elements) to finding the optimal shell shape, and to determining the reinforcement layout.