Kinetics of the hydrolysis of N-trifluoroacetylamino acids /

"September 23, 1955."

The hydrolysis of Iodine and a reaction with "Propanol".

Mode of access: Internet.

Investigating responses of calcium carbonate nucleation rates in artificial seawater to changes in saturation states due to ocean acidification

Senior thesis written for Oceanography 445

Reactions of fac-[PtMe2(OMe)(H2O)3]+ with halide ions: effect of halide trans effect on methoxide hydrolysis

A solution of fac-[PtMe2(OMe)(H2O)(3)](+) (1) in aqueous perchloric acid underwent very slow hydrolysis of the Pt-OMe bond, over many, weeks. When chloride was added to a solution of 1, two interconverting isomers of [PtMe2(OMe)Cl(H2O)(2)] (with chloride trans to methyl) were formed, and with excess chloride, [PtMe2(OMe)Cl-2(H2O)](-) (both chloride ligands trans to methyl). This solution was stable at ambient temperature, but on heating, methanol was formed and [PtMe2Cl2(H2O)(2)] (both chloride ligands cis to methyl) was produced in the solution. It is proposed that this reaction proceeds via an intermediate complex with chloride bound trans to methoxide. Concentration gave solid [{PtMe2Cl2}n], whose identity was confirmed by conversion to [PtMe(2)Cl(2)py(2)] (pyridine, py, trans to methyl). With bromide and iodide, methoxide hydrolysis occurred at ambient temperature, more slowly with bromide than with iodide, to form solid [{PtMe2X2}(n)] without significant concentrations of [PtMe2X2(H2O)(2)] formed as an intermediate. The greater tendency for Pt-OMe bond to hydrolyse trans to halide compared with 1 was ascribed to the higher trans effect of the halide ligand compared with that of water. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Development of esophageal hypersensitivity following experimental duodenal acidification

OBJECTIVES: As visceral afferents from different regions of the gastrointestinal tract converge at the level of the spinal cord, we hypothesized that sensitization of one gut organ would induce visceral hypersensitivity in another gut organ, remote to the sensitizing stimulus. METHODS: Protocol 1: Eight healthy male volunteers, age 30 +/- 8.2 yr, underwent three studies on different days. Esophageal pain thresholds (PT) were recorded at 10-min intervals prior to and for 2 h following a 30-min duodenal infusion of either 0.15 M hydrochloric acid (HCl), saline, or no infusion. Five subjects repeated the study to demonstrate reproducibility. Protocol 2: Esophageal evoked potentials (EEP) were studied in six subjects on two occasions prior to and 1 h after a 30-min duodenal infusion of 0.15 M HCl or saline. RESULTS: Protocol 1: After acid infusion, there were reproducible reductions in esophageal PT (ICC = 0.88), which were maximal at 110 min (15.05 +/- 2.25 mA) (p < 0.002). Following saline infusion there was an increase in esophageal PT (ICC = 0.71), which was similar to the no-infusion condition (6.21 +/- 1.54 mA vs 8.5 + 7.6 mA; p > 0.05). Protocol 2: Esophageal sensation scores increased (p= 0.02) after acid, but not after saline infusion (p= 0.1). A comparison of the latencies of EEP components prior to and following acid and saline infusion revealed a reduction in the N1 (p= 0.02) and P2 components (p= 0.04). CONCLUSION: This study provides the first objective evidence that duodenal acidification can induce esophageal hypersensitivity associated with changes in sensitivity of the central visceral pain pathway. As the esophagus was remote from the sensitizing stimulus, central sensitization of spinal dorsal horn neurons is likely to have contributed to these changes.