"Biggest Scandal in Canadian History": HRDC Audit Starts Probity War (Working Paper 23)

The article describes the nearly year-long political and media uproar that followed on the release in January, 2000 of a qualitative or soft “audit” of management control in the federal government department, Human Resources Development Canada, and analyses the contributing factors. The article argues that the auditors’ examination of project files for programs delivered by grants and contributions was so abstract and poorly executed that nothing whatever can be concluded from the work. Factors that favoured the “scandal” interpretation include across-government New Public Management reforms where accountability has not been re-theorized for Canada’s Westminster system of government; Canada’s electoral volatility that starves the country of experienced politicians and spurs the tradition of political compensation for electoral support; and the political role of the Office of the Auditor General. This paper has been accepted for publication by the journal Critical Perspectives on Accounting, which holds copyright.

Audit Tendering in the UK: A Review of Stakeholders’ Views

This study reports the results of a content analysis of the comment letters sent to the UK Financial Reporting Council (FRC), in response to its consultation document on the 2012 revisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code, concerning the proposal for mandatory audit tendering. The results indicate a general support for the FRC’s proposals with a number of key concerns related to audit quality, auditor independence and audit cost. There is also clear conflict of interests among some stakeholder groups such as audit firms and companies on one side and institutional investors on the other side. There is evidence of conflict of interest between Big 4 and non-Big 4 audit firms. Implications for future consultations and legislations are also discussed.

Exploring Auditors’ Perceptions of the Usage and Importance of Audit Information Technology

This study provides novel evidence on the extent to which auditors perceive the usage and importance of audit technology in an emerging market. It explores the types of audit technology tools used and factors influencing the use of these; it tests the association between the perceived use and importance of the tools and firm-specific/ auditor-specific characteristics. Using interviews and questionnaires from auditors at Big 4 and international non-Big 4 audit firms, the findings reflect the highly perceived importance of using audit technology in technical and administrative procedures, specifically to assess risk. We find that the perceived use and importance of audit technology is relatively higher for those in Big 4 firms, with less years of auditor experience and higher auditor technology expertise, and those in management positions. The results provide policy makers with guidance on the opportunities and challenges of using information technology in the audit process.

The role of the National Audit Office in Private Finance Initiative endurance

The Private Finance Initiative (PFI) has become one of the UK’s most contentious public policies. Despite New Labour’s advocacy of PFI as a means of achieving better value for money, criticisms of PFI have centred on key issues such as a lack of cost effectiveness, exaggerated pricing of risk transfers, excessive private sector profits, inflexibility and cumbersome administrative arrangements. Nevertheless, PFI has persisted as a key
infrastructure procurement method in the UK and has been supported as such by successive governments, as well as influencing policy in the Republic of Ireland and other European Nations. This paper explores this paradoxical outcome in relation to the role played in the UK by the National Audit Office (NAO). Under pressure to justify its support for PFI, the Blair government sought support for its policies by encouraging the NAO to investigate issues relating to PFI as well as specific PFI projects. It would have been expected that in fulfilling its role as independent auditor, the NAO would have examined whether PFI projects could have been delivered more efficiently, effectively or economically through other means. Yet, in line with earlier research, we find evidence that the NAO failed to comprehensively assess
key issues such as the value for money of PFI projects, and in so doing effectively acted as a legitimator of PFI policy. Using concepts relating to legitimacy theory and the idea of framing, our paper looks into 67 NAO private finance reports published between 1997 and 2011, with the goal of identifying the preferences, values and ideology underpinning the
NAO’s view on PFI during this period. Our analysis suggests that the NAO sought to legitimise existing PFI practices via a selective framing of problems and questions. Utilising a longitudinal approach, our analysis further suggests that this patterns of selective framing persisted over an extended time period during which fundamental parameters of the policy (such as contract length, to name one of the most important issues) were rarely addressed.
Overall the NAO’ supportive stance toward PFI seems to have relied on 1) a focused on positive aspects of PFI, such as on time delivery or lessons learned, and 2) positive comments on aspects of PFI that were criticised elsewhere, such as the lack of flexibility of underlying contractual arrangements. Our paper highlights the possibility that, rather than providing for a critical assessment of existing policies, national auditing bodies can
contribute to the creation of legitimatory environments. In terms of accounting research we would suggests that the objectivity and independence of accounting watchdogs should not be taken for granted, and that instead a critical investigation of the biases which can characterise these bodies can contribute to a deeper understanding of the nature of lobbying networks in the modern state.

Audit report on Fremont County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Audit report on Fremont County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Audit report on Butler County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Audit report on Butler County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Reaudit report on the Bettendorf Community School District for the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014

Reaudit report on the Bettendorf Community School District for the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014

Revision i små aktiebolag : En kvalitativ studie om varför små aktiebolag väljer att revidera sina räkenskaper trots att de inte omfattas av revisionsplikten

Bakgrund Revisionsplikten avskaffades 1 november 2010 i Sverige. Detta innebar att cirka 250,000 små aktiebolag inte längre var tvingade till revision. Idag har det gått drygt fem år sedan beslutet togs om att avskaffa revisionsplikten och trots detta väljer en del små aktiebolag att revidera sina räkenskaper. Syfte Syftet med studien var att få en djupare förståelse för varför små aktiebolag, som inte omfattas av revisionsplikten, väljer att revidera sina räkenskaper. Metod Vi har använt oss av en kvalitativ metod och genomfört semistrukturerade intervjuer med företagsrepresentanter för små aktiebolag. Det empiriska materialet har analyserats genom en innehållsanalys. Slutsats Vår studie visar att små aktiebolag efterfrågar frivillig revision främst av fyra anledningar. Dessa är:  Spritt delägarskap  Försäkran om att den interna bokföringen är korrekt  Rutinmässigt av företagsledning med erfarenhet från revisionspliktade företag  Önskan om att uppfattas som legitima

Avskaffandet av revisionsplikten : Ränteeffekter på företag inom fastighetsbranschen efter avskaffandet av revisionsplikten

Bakgrund: År 2010 avskaffades revisionsplikten för mindre aktiebolag i Sverige. Anledningen till avskaffandet var att minska kostnaderna för mindre företag. Tidigare forskning har kommit fram till att företag som valt bort revisor får en högre kreditkostnad när de till exempel tar lån. Den tidigare forskningen menar att detta kan bero på att banker och andra kreditinstitut anser att oreviderade finansiella rapporter har en sämre kvalitet än reviderade rapporter vilket leder till en högre risk för kreditgivarna. Denna uppsats kommer att undersöka om det finns någon skillnad på låneräntan mellan företag som valt att ha kvar revisor och företag som valt bort revisor. Syfte: Syftet med denna uppsats är att undersöka, jämföra samt analysera låneräntan hos mindre aktiebolag inom fastighetsbranschen som inte är revisionspliktiga. Metod: Kvantitativ metod, multipel regressionsanalys. Resultat: Resultaten i denna studie visar på att företag med revisor har en lägre ränta i genomsnitt jämfört med företag utan revisor. Vi har även fått fram att revision har en negativ påverkan på företags ränta, men detta resultat är inte signifikant. Därför kan vi inte uttala oss om att revision har en negativ påverkan på företags ränta, trots att tidigare forskning har visat det. Slutsats: Företags val av revisor eller ej är inte det viktigaste för kreditgivare när det kommer till vilken ränta företagen skall få på sina lån. Det finns andra faktorer som har en större påverkan på räntan. I denna studie är det företags storlek samt andelen materiella tillgångar i förhållande till totala tillgångar som har den största negativa påverkan på företags ränta. Detta indikerar att banker och andra kreditinstitut ser dessa företag som en lägre risk.

Report on a special investigation of the City of Corning Volunteer Fire Department for the period July 1, 2013 through April 30, 2015

Report on a special investigation of the City of Corning Volunteer Fire Department for the period July 1, 2013 through April 30, 2015

Audit report on Madison County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Audit report on Madison County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Palo, Iowa for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015

Agreed-upon procedures report on the City of Palo, Iowa for the period July 1, 2014 through June 30, 2015

Audit report on the Corridor Metropolitan Planning Organization for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Audit report on the Corridor Metropolitan Planning Organization for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

Audit report on Harrison County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Audit report on Harrison County, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Audit report on the City of West Branch, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015

Audit report on the City of West Branch, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2015