Biomarker responses to folic acid intervention in healthy adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: The task of revising dietary folate recommendations for optimal health is complicated by a lack of data quantifying the biomarker response that reliably reflects a given folate intake.

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a dose-response meta-analysis in healthy adults to quantify the typical response of recognized folate biomarkers to a change in folic acid intake.

DESIGN: Electronic and bibliographic searches identified 19 randomized controlled trials that supplemented with folic acid and measured folate biomarkers before and after the intervention in apparently healthy adults aged ≥18 y. For each biomarker response, the regression coefficient (β) for individual studies and the overall pooled β were calculated by using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS: Folate biomarkers (serum/plasma and red blood cell folate) increased in response to folic acid in a dose-response manner only up to an intake of 400 μg/d. Calculation of the overall pooled β for studies in the range of 50 to 400 μg/d indicated that a doubling of folic acid intake resulted in an increase in serum/plasma folate by 63% (71% for microbiological assay; 61% for nonmicrobiological assay) and red blood cell folate by 31% (irrespective of whether microbiological or other assay was used). Studies that used the microbiological assay indicated lower heterogeneity compared with studies using nonmicrobiological assays for determining serum/plasma (I(2) = 13.5% compared with I(2) = 77.2%) and red blood cell (I(2) = 45.9% compared with I(2) = 70.2%) folate.

CONCLUSIONS: Studies administering >400 μg folic acid/d show no dose-response relation and thus will not yield meaningful results for consideration when generating dietary folate recommendations. The calculated folate biomarker response to a given folic acid intake may be more robust with the use of a microbiological assay rather than alternative methods for blood folate measurement.

The effect of statins on intraocular pressure and on the incidence and progression of glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to evaluate the effect of oral statins on intraocular pressure (IOP) and the incidence and progression of glaucoma. Methods: This was a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Searches of PubMed/Medline and Embase were conducted to include all types of studies. Gray literature abstracts were also considered for inclusion. Last search date was February 2016. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale independently by two reviewers. Odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were extracted from each study. Pooled ORs for incidence of glaucoma were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: We identified seven cohort studies, three case–control studies, and one cross-sectional study with a total number of 583,615 participants. No randomized controlled trials were retrieved. Pooled ORs demonstrated a statistically significant association between short-term statin use (≤2 years) and reduced incidence of glaucoma (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.94, 0.99). Pooled ORs of long-term statin use (>2 years) did not demonstrate statistically significant reduction in incidence of glaucoma (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.46, 1.06). There was inconsistent evidence for the protective effect of statins against the progression of glaucoma, although there was no standard definition for progression across studies. There was no significant difference in IOP associated with statin use. Conclusions: Short-term statin use is associated with a reduced incidence of glaucoma. The effect of statins on glaucoma progression and IOP is uncertain.

Quantification of the smoking-associated cancer risk with rate advancement periods: meta-analysis of individual participant data from cohorts of the CHANCES consortium

BACKGROUND: Smoking is the most important individual risk factor for many cancer sites but its association with breast and prostate cancer is not entirely clear. Rate advancement periods (RAPs) may enhance communication of smoking related risk to the general population. Thus, we estimated RAPs for the association of smoking exposure (smoking status, time since smoking cessation, smoking intensity, and duration) with total and site-specific (lung, breast, colorectal, prostate, gastric, head and neck, and pancreatic) cancer incidence and mortality.

METHODS: This is a meta-analysis of 19 population-based prospective cohort studies with individual participant data for 897,021 European and American adults. For each cohort we calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of smoking exposure with cancer outcomes using Cox regression adjusted for a common set of the most important potential confounding variables. RAPs (in years) were calculated as the ratio of the logarithms of the HRs for a given smoking exposure variable and age. Meta-analyses were employed to summarize cohort-specific HRs and RAPs.

RESULTS: Overall, 140,205 subjects had a first incident cancer, and 53,164 died from cancer, during an average follow-up of 12 years. Current smoking advanced the overall risk of developing and dying from cancer by eight and ten years, respectively, compared with never smokers. The greatest advancements in cancer risk and mortality were seen for lung cancer and the least for breast cancer. Smoking cessation was statistically significantly associated with delays in the risk of cancer development and mortality compared with continued smoking.

CONCLUSIONS: This investigation shows that smoking, even among older adults, considerably advances, and cessation delays, the risk of developing and dying from cancer. These findings may be helpful in more effectively communicating the harmful effects of smoking and the beneficial effect of smoking cessation.

The value of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival and recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 5,507 patients

BACKGROUND: The value of adjuvant radiotherapy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in TNBC patients to assess survival and recurrence outcomes associated with radiotherapy following either breast conserving therapy (BCT) or post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). METHODS: Four electronic databases were searched from January 2000 to November 2015 (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science). Studies investigating overall survival and/or recurrence in TNBC patients according to radiotherapy administration were included. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted using mastectomy only patients as the reference.  RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for locoregional recurrence comparing BCT and PMRT to mastectomy only was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.90) and 0.62 (95% CI 0.44-0.86), respectively. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not significantly associated with distant recurrence. The pooled HR for overall survival comparing BCT and PMRT to mastectomy only was 0.57 (95% CI 0.36-0.88) and HR 1.12 (95% CI 0.75, 1.69). Comparing PMRT to mastectomy only, tests for interaction were not significant for stage (p=0.98) or age at diagnosis (p=0.85). However, overall survival was improved in patients with late-stage disease (T3-4, N2-3) pooled HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.32-0.86), and women <40 years, pooled HR 0.30 (95% CI 0.11-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of locoregional recurrence in TNBC patients, irrespective of the type of surgery. While radiotherapy was not consistently associated with an overall survival gain, benefits may be obtained in women with late-stage disease and younger patients. 

The relationship between rapid automatized naming and reading performance: a meta-analysis

O estudo científico dos correlatos cognitivos da aquisição e desenvolvimento da competência de leitura é um assunto de grande relevância quer teórica quer prática, no sentido em que pode ajudar a compreender os processos cognitivos básicos envolvidos na leitura e, em última instância, a delinear os seus preditores e a predizer dificuldades na sua aquisição. A par da consciência fonológica – capacidade para perceber e manipular as unidades de som –, um dos construtos que frequentemente tem sido associado ao desenvolvimento da competência de leitura é a velocidade de nomeação de estímulos visuais (também conhecida como nomeação rápida automatizada ou velocidade de acesso ao léxico). Tradicionalmente, esta capacidade tem sido avaliada recorrendo ao paradigma clássico das provas de nomeação rápida automatizada (RAN) desenvolvidas por Denckla e Rudel (1976), nas quais é pedido ao sujeito que nomeie o mais rapidamente possível um conjunto de estímulos familiares apresentados serialmente. Nas últimas décadas, inúmeros estudos vieram demonstrar que a nomeação rápida é um importante preditor da competência de leitura, sobretudo da fluência da leitura, e um défice central em perturbações de leitura como a dislexia. O desempenho numa tarefa de nomeação rápida apela à sincronização e integração de vários processos, incluindo: (a) atenção ao estímulo, (b) integração da informação visual com representações visuais ou ortográficas arquivadas em memória, (c) recuperação de uma etiqueta verbal, e a (d) ativação da representação articulatória (Wolf & Bowers, 1999). Uma vez que a leitura e a nomeação rápida envolvem processos cognitivos semelhantes, não parece surpreendente que ambas as competências estejam associadas. No entanto, os estudos têm variado consideravelmente no que respeita à magnitude da associação entre a nomeação rápida e a leitura, encontrando-se resultados nulos ou negligenciáveis do valor preditivo da nomeação rápida na explicação da variância do desempenho de leitura. Vários fatores podem contribuir para as discrepâncias observadas na literatura, entre os quais as medidas utilizadas para avaliar o desempenho de nomeação rápida (por exemplo, medidas que utilizam estímulos ortográficos ou não-ortográficos) e de leitura (por exemplo, medidas de fluência ou de acuidade). A importância da natureza das medidas quer de nomeação rápida quer de leitura tem sido reconhecida por vários autores (para uma revisão, ver Norton & Wolf, 2011). Paralelamente, as amostras estudadas, que têm variado quanto à idade/escolaridade dos participantes e à sua competência de leitura (leitores normais ou fracos leitores ou leitores disléxicos), poderão estar a contribuir para a heterogeneidade dos resultados publicados. A literatura recente tem salientado a relevância destes fatores na aquisição e desenvolvimento da leitura, embora a direccionalidade do seu efeito seja ainda pouco clara. Por exemplo, a transição de um procedimento de leitura baseado em estratégias de descodificação fonológica para uma leitura automática, à medida que o sujeito se torna um leitor fluente, parece ser acompanhada por uma mudança no peso relativo das capacidades cognitivas subjacentes à leitura (ex., Reis, Faísca, Castro, & Petersson, in press). Outro fator importante que tem dificultado a interpretação dos dados publicados sobre os construtos envolvidos na leitura, e em particular sobre a nomeação rápida, relaciona-se com a consistência ortográfica do sistema de escrita nos quais os estudos são conduzidos. Estudos trans-linguísticos sugerem que a consistência ortográfica influencia a facilidade com que se aprende a ler nas escritas alfabéticas, bem como o tipo de processamento de leitura predominantemente adotado pelos leitores (Seymour, Aro, & Erskine, 2003). No seio deste enquadramento, nesta tese procurámos clarificar as divergências encontradas na literatura relativamente à relação entre a nomeação rápida e o desempenho de leitura. Através de um estudo de meta-análise 1 é nosso objetivo realizar uma síntese objetiva do estado da arte sobre a relação entre a nomeação rápida e a leitura, e avaliar a influência de potenciais fatores moderadores da magnitude desta relação, nomeadamente: (a) a natureza da tarefa de nomeação (tipo de estímulo nomeado, número total de itens, e número de itens diferentes); (b) a natureza da tarefa de leitura (subcomponente de leitura, e medida de resposta usada para avaliar o desempenho); (c) características da amostra (escolaridade e nível de leitura); e (d) ortografia (sistema de escrita, e consistência ortográfica). Para tal, foi realizada uma procura de artigos científicos nas bases de dados PubMed, PsycINFO, e Web of Knowledge, tendo sido incluídas na meta-análise um total de 154 experiências independentes, compreendendo 21,706 participantes. Os resultados indicam uma relação moderada-a-forte entre a nomeação rápida e o desempenho de leitura (r =.44, I2 = 71.19). Nas análises seguintes procurou-se avaliar o contributo de potenciais variáveis moderadoras que possam explicar a heterogeneidade observada entre os tamanhos dos efeitos. Verificou-se que a nomeação rápida se associa significativamente e em magnitude semelhante com todas as medidas de leitura, i.e., quer estas apelem preferencialmente a um processamento de descodificação fonológica ou de reconhecimento de padrões ortográficos da palavra. Os resultados sugerem ainda que a magnitude das correlações é inflacionada nos estudos em que o desempenho de leitura é baseado na velocidade/fluência de leitura, em particular nos níveis de escolaridade mais avançados, e que utilizam tarefas de nomeação com estímulos alfanuméricos ao invés de estímulos não-alfanuméricos. Adicionalmente, verificou-se que a força da associação entre a nomeação rápida e a acuidade de leitura varia de forma não linear durante a evolução da leitura, sendo que a correlação é maior nos leitores escolarizados mais novos e decresce à medida que a escolaridade aumenta. O papel atribuível à proficiência dos leitores, i.e., fracos leitores/leitores disléxicos ou leitores normais, foi menos claro; no entanto, houve uma tendência para a relação ser mais forte nas amostras de fracos leitores/leitores disléxicos. Os resultados das comparações trans-linguísticas, por sua vez, sugerem que a nomeação rápida tem um papel importante para o desempenho da leitura independentemente das características da ortografia, ainda que as correlações tenham sido maiores nas ortografias opacas, e em particular nas línguas não-alfabéticas. Em suma, a presente meta-análise fornece resultados convincentes de que o desempenho em tarefas de nomeação rápida refletirá processos cognitivos subjacentes que são também relevantes para a aquisição/desenvolvimento da leitura. Consequentemente, pode dizer-se que estas medidas serão um preditor útil da competência de leitura. Os resultados são também discutidos no contexto das teorias atuais que procuram explicar através de que processos cognitivos se associam a nomeação rápida e a leitura, com ênfase nas hipóteses fonológica versus ortográfica. 1 Uma meta-análise permite a integração quantitativa de resultados de diversos estudos, recorrendo para isso à noção de magnitude do efeito.

Avaliação de websites segundo as heurísticas de Nielsen : uma prática de ensino com alunos do ensino profissional

Relatório da prática de ensino supervisionada, Mestrado em Ensino de Informática, Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Educação, 2014

Utilidade dos exames de ressonância magnética no diagnóstico da doença de Parkinson : revisão sistemática e meta análise

Tese de mestrado, Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 2014

New methods for meta-analysis under a fixed effects framework, with frequentist and Bayesian estimation.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2015

A Meta-Heuristic Load Balancer for Cloud Computing Systems

This paper introduces a strategy to allocate services on a cloud system without overloading the nodes and maintaining the system stability with minimum cost. We specify an abstract model of cloud resources utilization, including multiple types of resources as well as considerations for the service migration costs. A prototype meta-heuristic load balancer is demonstrated and experimental results are presented and discussed. We also propose a novel genetic algorithm, where population is seeded with the outputs of other meta-heuristic algorithms.

Multi-apprentice learning for meta-heuristics parameter tuning in a multi agent scheduling system

The scheduling problem is considered in complexity theory as a NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem. Meta-heuristics proved to be very useful in the resolution of this class of problems. However, these techniques require parameter tuning which is a very hard task to perform. A Case-based Reasoning module is proposed in order to solve the parameter tuning problem in a Multi-Agent Scheduling System. A computational study is performed in order to evaluate the proposed CBR module performance.

Meta-heuristics tunning using CBR for dynamic scheduling

This paper addresses the problem of Biological Inspired Optimization Techniques (BIT) parameterization, considering the importance of this issue in the design of BIT especially when considering real world situations, subject to external perturbations. A learning module with the objective to permit a Multi-Agent Scheduling System to automatically select a Meta-heuristic and its parameterization to use in the optimization process is proposed. For the learning process, Casebased Reasoning was used, allowing the system to learn from experience, in the resolution of similar problems. Analyzing the obtained results we conclude about the advantages of its use.

Cooperation mechanism for team-work based multi-agent system in dynamic scheduling through meta-heuristics

This paper describes a Multi-agent Scheduling System that assumes the existence of several Machines Agents (which are decision-making entities) distributed inside the Manufacturing System that interact and cooperate with other agents in order to obtain optimal or near-optimal global performances. Agents have to manage their internal behaviors and their relationships with other agents via cooperative negotiation in accordance with business policies defined by the user manager. Some Multi Agent Systems (MAS) organizational aspects are considered. An original Cooperation Mechanism for a Team-work based Architecture is proposed to address dynamic scheduling using Meta-Heuristics.

Is mental practice an effective adjunct therapeutic strategy for upper limb motor restoration after stroke? A systematic review and meta- analysis

Stroke is one of the most common conditions requiring rehabilitation, and its motor impairments are a major cause of permanent disability. Hemiparesis is observed by 80% of the patients after acute stroke. Neuroimaging studies showed that real and imagined movements have similarities regarding brain activation, supplying evidence that those similarities are based on the same process. Within this context, the combination of mental practice (MP) with physical and occupational therapy appears to be a natural complement based on neurorehabilitation concepts. Our study seeks to investigate if MP for stroke rehabilitation of upper limbs is an effective adjunct therapy. PubMed (Medline), ISI knowledge (Institute for Scientific Information) and SciELO (Scientific Electronic Library) were terminated on 20 February 2015. Data were collected on variables as follows: sample size, type of supervision, configuration of mental practice, setting the physical practice (intensity, number of sets and repetitions, duration of contractions, rest interval between sets, weekly and total duration), measures of sensorimotor deficits used in the main studies and significant results. Random effects models were used that take into account the variance within and between studies. Seven articles were selected. As there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (MP vs control), showed a - 0.6 (95% CI: -1.27 to 0.04), for upper limb motor restoration after stroke. The present meta-analysis concluded that MP is not effective as adjunct therapeutic strategy for upper limb motor restoration after stroke.