The impact of the war upon American education.

Bibliographical footnotes.

The reform of secondary education in France /

Includes index.

School of Nursing Class of 1975

Top Row: Kris Aasvved, Phyllis Askew, Stephanie Babboni, Carolyn Backus, Carol Bockeloo, Veronica Banks, Patte Barland, Sally Barling, Rowena Beebe, Ginger Behr, Bobbi Bergmooser, Clary Bestor, Terry A. Bilinski, Debbie Blauer, Kathleen Bly, Lois K. Boer, Aurelia boyer, Polly Bradley, Sue Brenkert, Sherry Brezina

Row 2: Andrea Brown, Phyllis Buchholz, Michele Bujak, Barbara Burcham, Carol Burg, Mary Ann Campbell, Nancy Cartwright, Sally Chin, Kathleen Christmas, Barbara Clark, Marlene Clarkson, Alma Cole, Judy Coltson, Donna Craig, Janet L. Davies, Catherine Davidson, Sandra Detrisac, Toni Doherty, Kathleen Dumas, Deretha Eddings

Row 3: Marcia Ferrand, Karen Finger, Carol Fischer, Susan Fischer, Suzanne M. Fleszar, Barbara Fritz, Lola Garland, Susan Goldstein, Pam Goltz, Diane Gorman, Debby Goudreau, Diane Greenfield, Debbie Gross, Joan Hamman, Cheryl Hauch, Michelle Hays, Betty Henderson, Christena Henson, Constance Hill, Linda Hill

Row 4: Pamela Hill, Marilyn Holland, Patricia Horvath, Lois Huissen, Nance J. Huston, Phyllis Isackson, Angela Janik, Kim Johnson, Marjorie Kelsey, Wanda Kent, Eugenie Kimura, Lesley Kinnard, Kathleen Klute, Peggy Koskela, Linda Ksiazkiewicaz, Barbara Lang, Karen C. Carson, Kathryn Linder, Kathleen Lipinski, Janie Locke

Row 5: Nancy Luth, Denise Lyons, Susan Malkewitz, Diane Mannino, Nancy Marsh, Denise M. McCann, Carol McVannel, Vicky Melancon, Darlene Mikolajczak, Jane Monroe, Pam Morris, Cari Mulholland, Sandra Muller, Jacqueline Murphy, Terri Murtland, Colleen Nash, Debbie Nichols, Nancy Nowacek, Denise D. O'Brien, Sue Olejniczak

Row 6: Susan Panozzo, Marty Parmelee, Nancy Parr, Alexandra Paul, Pam Pennington, Patricia Phelps, Helen Piggush, Jan Pinkham, Molly Power, Janet Primeau, Ilona Proskie, Gretel Quitmeyer, Vicki Jo Ray, Josephine Reed, Ruth Riley, Norine Rowe, Beata Rudnik, Pat Rutowski, Linda Sanders, Patricia Saran

Row 7: Judy Sayles, Janis Schlicker, Janice Schmidt, Janiece Selecky, Deborah Silverman, Susan K. Smith, Theresa Sobanski, Marcia Sosnowski, Joyce Stein, Cathie Stepien, Pam Stoeffler, Sharon Swann, Susan Truchan, Susan Turke, Susan Valentine, Delores Vander Wal, Mary Jane VanLoon, Pamela A. Van Riper, Jeanne M. Wade, Karen Warner

Row 8: Deborah White, Rebecca E. Wildgen, Karen Williams, Sharon Williams, Debra Wilson, KEn Wilson, Nancy Wiltz, Maribeth Wooldridge, Martha Zawacki, JoAnn Zlotnick

Row 9: Julie Sochalski, Norma Shumaker, Kristin Brawner, Susan Archambault, Lauralee Hess, Rita M. Gibes, Barbara Terrien, Laurie Cushman, Mary Markey

School of Nursing Class of 1976

Top Row: Peggy Alford, Anne Allen, Barbara Amann, Joann Baker, Elizabeth Bando, Sara Barnes, Mary Barz, Anne Bauer, Patricia Baxter, Gwendolyn Beaudette, Nancy Bidigare, Marian Bier, Susan Blaszczyk, Jacqueline bolin, Anne Bostwick, Heather Brendel, Theresa Brisker, Rosalyn Cage, Jeanne Calhoun

Row 2: Karen Caputo, Carolyn Carpenter, Laura Lewellen, Catherine Pearson, Pamela Carr, Lisa Clark

Row 3: Sarah Cleland, Kathy Collar, Ann Connors, Marian Coppo, Martha Coppo, Debra Wirth, Kathleen Coughlin, Mayble Craig, Jennifer Crittenden, Linda Dean, Ann Dika

Row 4: Shira Doneson, Valerie Dray, Lee Duffey, Mary Dunn, Nancy Edwards, Mildred Jett, Patricia Johnson, Jan Walters, Karen Dimitroff, Debra Walton, Moira Stein, Madi Ehrenreich, Paula Elliott, Claudia Evans, Jolaync Farrell, Karen Fierke

Row 5: Debra Finch, Nadine Furlong, Susan Gamerman, Anita Gardocki, Marcia Gerpheide, Roberta Gies, Deborah Glotzhober, Marlene Golabeck, Janet Goldberg, Rene Green, Diana Greer, Susan Gross, Vivian Hall, Jill Hallead

Row 6: Sharon Hamlett, Tamara Hanson, Jane Harper, Jesusa Heilig, Steinunn Hermannsson, Susan Hicks, Karen Hillebrand, Jomatia Hoff, Michelle Howey, Holly Howieson, Sandra Hubar, Kathleen Hughes, Shirley Jvery, Laura Johnson, Susan Johnson, Shirley Jones, Judith Kellermier, Lynda Kitchen, Susan Kleinbeck

Row 7: Nanette Kotz, Kathleen Kroh, Judith Krohn, Catherine Lahti, Mary Lange, Patti Larson, Susan Leach, Rebecca Linn, Lacy Loomis, Francene Lundy, Sue Lymperis, Robyn Main, Patricia McCleary, Theresa McGowan, Elizabeth Messiter, Mary Miller, Nancy Moffatt, Catherine Munn, Karen Munson

Row 8: Virginia Newman, Laura Novak, Thomas O'Connell, Julie O'Connor, Kaathleen O'Hara, Kimberly O'Loughlin, Karen Olsen, Marcy Ouellette, Gail Park, Georgiana Parsell, Mary Patchak, Linda Pearsall, Kathleen Poage, Shelly Ponte, Thomas Parter, Marilyn Pratt, Karen Prince, Kathryn Procter, Rebecca Raymond

Row 9: Jill remter, Cheryl Ricca, Brenda Robinson, Karen Rollins, Lisa Root, Audrey Ross, Barbara Rutherford, Linda Rykwalder, Margaret Sampson, Sherril Santo, Jeanne Scheer, Kathy Schlichter, Nancy Schuman, Debra Sihtala, Michele Smit, Donna Smith, Bonnic Smrcka, Janine Speck, Elizabeth Stainsby

Row 10: Grace Steinaway, Jennifer Stinson, Sally Stone, Anne Sullivan, Barbara Tonak, Linda Towers, Cindy Tremblay, Gregory Trowbridge, Sandra Tucker, Debbie Ullrich, Lee Ann Van Houten, Pamela Waggener, Martha Walker, Michele Wenderski, Catherine West, Harriet Wilkinson, Diane Willis, Jan Winslow, Karen Wismer

School of Nursing Class of 1982

Top Row: Joellyn M. Markey, Carol L. Kallewaard, Janet R. Sobel, Jacqueline L. Spatafora, Susan M. Tucker, Cynthia S. Gordon, Pamela J. Sanders, Carol M. Salinger, Marylou Rabaut, Connie R. Jarlsbers, Sylvia J. McKenney, Elizabeth A. Regan, Barabara S. Schelenker, Vandy L. Sherbin, Judy A. Srrbina, Susan K. Ginster, Lydia A. Robinson, Sandra L. Sprague, Beth A. Stegeman, Catherine T. Totte

Row 2: Kathleen M. Lahiff, Julia M. Markovich, Andra M. Rush, Darlene C. Ressler, Wendy K. Reigel, Beth L. Burch, Jewel E. Carpenter, Wendie L. Weber, Kay E. Jersey, karen D. Curl, Carol L. McGraw, Durene M. Elem, Linette perushi, Betty A. pulliams, Vicki E. Meffert, Harriettee Williams

Row 3: Beth A. Hoatlin, Rhonda C. Tolbert, Michelle R. Robertson, Lori A. Wissman, Marilyn S. Dietrich, Jayne E. Taylor, Jill M. Smith, Barbara J. House, Siobhan Gorman, Madeline L. Mobley, Joyce A. Williamson, Fay M. Wright

Row 4: Rosanne M. Hrqamiec, karen S. Nowak, Peggy J. Cameron, Mary V. Morris-Tucker, Frances L. Righmond, Marlene A. Baker, Karen J. Worden, Kathleen M. McGillivary, Janet L. wylie, Sandra K. Thompson

Row 5: Karen A. Cruickshank, Irene M. Dery, Ann M. Ignatowski, Elizabeth A. Peklo, Anne K. Waters, Laura E. Harvey, Mary M. Eggenberger, Wendy K. Kenyon, Kathleen M. Jordan, Elaine J. Zeilke, Barbara J. Waxman, Jolie A. Laker

Row 6: Velria M. Brown, Jane A. Burke, Marv A. Damken, Leau M. Stein, Cheryl Lumm Truzz, Deborah G. Thomas, Charlene L. Davis, Carol A. Zuber, Susan G. Toler, Betty M. Jones, Linda L. Kouba, Cynthia A. Lovell

Row 7: Kathy A. Churches, Dana L. Garrett, Mary E. Cella, Sarah E. Newton, Judy L. Benkeser, Lori J. Googel, Nancy H. Jenson, Helen I. Erickson, Rhetaugh G. Dumas, Norma K. Marshall, Karen M. Walker, Deborau D. Barrett, Janice M. Sinsabaugh, Vickie M. Rodla, Bonnie M. Mann, Cynthia R. Matthews, Karen L. Heithecker

Row 8: Judith Gniewek, Valerie A. Filkins, Mable A. Glass, Kathleen M. Dwyer, Diane M. Fritz, Susan D. Cook, Evon J. Goyer, Kathryn Greenleaf, Laurie Haan Abraham, Sharon Gwozdec, Karen J. Douglas, Claudette P. Bryan, Kathy L. Deniston, Carol A. Garon, Maureen goode, Jennifer A. Gegenheimer, Colette White, Mary C. Kuckuc, Mary S. Craft

Row 9: Joan M. Garbarino, Linda S. Farwell, Julie A. Cook, Susan M. Bolohan, Sharon A. Bailey, Deborah Babala, Kathleen M. Oldani, Mary E. Grace, Mary A. Moriarty, Marybeth Annessa, Martha A. Beaudry, Jamie M. Ashley, Sue Bohnet, Janice J. Bishop, Diana L. Beveridge, Catherine A. Belski, Debra R. Surdyk, Maureen A. Flaherty, Lisa M. Barron, Carole A. Fanelli

School of Nursing Class of 1987

Top Row: Douglas G. Pointon, Anne M. Laliberte, Anne T. Reaume, Karen R. Anderson, Margaret A. Mehall, Laura Meintel(Cepko), Sharon M. Milberger, Felicia I. Kle??, Pamela J. DcKeyser, Kathryn G. Maudlin, Mary C. Downey, Julie A. Gergen, Anne K. Hubling, Helen Mourao, Deborah L. Dubrul, Sarah E. Whorf

Row 2: Andrea Mitchell, Karen E. Grost, Paula V. Nersesian, Kelly A. Fleming, Mary Beth Morton, Lynda L. Cooley, Cynthia A. Wandzel, Deborah L. Bach, Karen A. Schwartz, Rhonda G. Pasma, Lesley M. Shafer, Michelle A. Kauer, Mary Jo Raftery, Carol A. Hammell, Josephine G. Ratcliffe

Row 3: Shon A. Pilarski, Julie S. Peritz, Terri L. McPherson, Tina T. chandler, Janet C. Pinkerton, Rosanna M. Knapp, Lisa A. Krukowski, Madelyn L. Nichols, Jaleh Shafii, Elizabeth A. Beer, Molly A. Finn, Dyann E. Botsford, Kathryn J. Meier, Angela L. Bruder (Crane), Herlinda Olive-Downs, Laura B. Bailey

Row 4: Laura L. Brooks, Lisa K. Feezell

Row 5: Cindy L. Harvey, Kerri A. Bacsanyi, Diane R. Cepko, Sheila E. Falk, Marylin A. Jeromin, Marianne Gerard, Sharon L. Podeszwa, Lynette A. LaPratt, Mary Ann Williams, Diana L. Faulk, Christine L. Henriksen, Sharon M. LaMacchia

Row 6: Deborah A. ranazzi (Maxim), Debra J. Mitchell, Holly B. O'Brien, Elaine K. Hebda, Jeanne L. Bruff, Crystal M. Emery, Cleola Hinton, Kathleen T. Hutton, Holly L. Nelson, Karen F. Kraker

Row 7: Meghan A. Sweeney, Christine M. Olree, Marlynn J. Marroso, Toni L. Lowery, Catherine L. Carroll, Elisabeth A. Pennington, Shake Ketefian, Rhetaugh G. Dumas, Janice B. Lindberg, Marlene Rutledge, Kimberley A. Vnuk, Anne M. Walsh, Rae Ann Vander Weide, Cheryl L. Boyd

Row 8: Renee M. Marks, Janine M. Simon, Renee A. Bowles, Linda Kurpinski-Nabozny, Teresa E. Ohman, Joanna E. Bok, Jodi F. Siegel, Janeen M. Chebli, Susan M. Williamson, Mary M. Fedewa, Rose Marie Stacey, Angela J. DeWitt, Kim E. Whelan, Lyndall P. Miller

Row 9: Jean M. Dziurgot, Amy J. Elwart, Lorrie A. Sheck, Amy A. Plasman, Mary L. Schuette, Susan K. Bowen, Heather A. Woodward, Luann N. Richert, Laurie J. Schlukebir, Linda L. Stevenson(Said), Carolyn N. Hartke, Rebecca L. Evans, Kathryn A. Savage, Kathryn A. Sailus (Linden), Heidi Deininger, Jennifer J. Eppley

Evaluation of the EDWAA job creation demonstration /

Includes bibliographical references.

Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education.

Published: New York, NY : Teachers College, Columbia University, 2010-

FORMAÇÃO DE PROFESSORES EM SERVIÇO: UMA EXPERIÊNCIA DA REDE MUNICIPAL DE EDUCAÇÃO DE SÃO PAULO INICIADA NO GOVERNO ERUNDINA

Este trabalho de pesquisa trata da política voltada para a formação continuada em serviço docente cujo período de implantação aconteceu entre 1989 e 1992 na cidade de São Paulo, durante a administração da prefeita Luíza Erundina, que teve à frente da Secretaria Municipal de Educação, nos anos iniciais de sua gestão, o professor Paulo Freire. Tal política marcou o início do processo de consolidação de conquistas, como resultado de longa luta de muitos educadores brasileiros por mudanças na educação. Erundina e Freire representaram a possibilidade da concretização de transformações estruturais na educação em um período de grande efervescência política da sociedade brasileira. A conquista de um espaço para formação na escola, de forma democrática e com a participação dos docentes representava uma das grandes bandeiras desta luta. Para melhor compreensão do processo de implantação desta política de formação docente em serviço, optamos por realizar uma pesquisa qualitativa a partir de documentos e estudo bibliográfico seguida de uma pesquisa de campo a partir de um pequeno roteiro de questões que serviram como ponto de partida para a realização de um círculo epistemológico, envolvendo educadores que de alguma forma participaram desta política; buscando compor, dessa maneira, um panorama das concepções que deram sustentação a esta política pública possibilitando uma análise das ações que foram desenvolvidas.

Uma Nova Abordagem à Joalharia Tradicional Portuguesa numa Perspetiva do Eco Design

O design de joias apresenta grandes possibilidades de inserção no mercado atual, devido à grande procura por parte do consumidor, de um acessório que seja revelador de um significado especial e que esteja em perfeita sintonia com as mais recentes tendências do mercado. O Designer de joias além das tendências, necessita conhecer em profundidade as distintas técnicas de produção, os diferentes materiais, para assim responder aos mais variados requisitos. Deve ainda revelar a sua marca pessoal, demonstrando assim a sua criatividade e o domínio dos processos exigidos para a produção de joias. A joia sendo um artefacto que utiliza como referência o corpo e que além disso, reflete o tempo em que foi concebido, é um objeto pessoal que carrega uma mensagem simbólica e emocional. Deste modo, tendo como ponto de partida a simbiose da Joalharia Tradicional Portuguesa e o Traje Popular, anterior ao séc. XX, foi nossa intenção desenvolver este estudo, visando a compreensão da simbologia e função destas duas áreas, bem como, compreender o seu papel perante a sociedade, no que diz respeito aos materiais e técnicas utilizados no período anterior ao Séc. XX comparativamente com o que se produz na nossa contemporaneidade. Ambiciona-se nesta dissertação, desenvolver um projeto ecológico na joalharia, guiado pelos princípios do eco design e pela tecnologia da prototipagem rápida. É nossa intenção demostrar que esta junção potencia a inserção de novas técnicas, como a prototipagem rápida na confeção de novos conceitos na joalharia, desta vez, idealizados para uma abordagem contemporânea

Globalization of the Internet: Convergence or a multicultural community?

The purpose of this dissertation was to investigate cross-cultural differences in the use of the Internet. Hofstede's model of national culture was employed as the theoretical foundation for the analysis of cross-cultural differences. Davis's technology acceptance model was employed as the theoretical foundation for the analysis of Internet use. ^ Secondary data from an on-line survey of Internet users in 22 countries conducted in April 1997 by the Georgia Tech Research Corporation measured the dependent variables of Internet use and the independent variables of attitudes toward technology. Hofstede's stream of research measured the independent variables of the five dimensions of national culture. ^ Contrary to expectations, regression analyses at the country level of analysis did not detect cultural differences. As expected, regression analyses at the individual level of analysis did detect cultural differences. The results indicated that perceived usefulness was related to the frequency of Internet shopping in the Germanic and Anglo clusters, where masculinity was high. Perceived ease of use was related to the frequency of Internet shopping in the Latin cluster, where uncertainty avoidance was high. Neither perceived usefulness nor perceived ease of use was related to the frequency of Internet shopping in the Nordic cluster, where masculinity and uncertainty avoidance were low. ^ As expected, analysis of variance at the cluster level of analysis indicated that censorship was a greater concern in Germany and Anglo countries, where masculinity was high. Government regulation of the Internet was less preferred in Germany, where power distance was low. Contrary to expectations, concern for transaction security. was lower in the Latin cluster, where uncertainty avoidance was high. Concern for privacy issues was lower in the U.S., where individualism was high. ^ In conclusion, results suggested that Internet users represented a multicultural community, not a standardized virtual community. Based on the findings, specific guidance was provided on how international managers and marketers could develop culturally sensitive strategies for training and promoting Internet services. ^

Parental Involvement between Two Different Urban Communities

Parent involvement is an integral part of a child’s educational progress. In some cases, students’ academic achievement can be directly related to the level of parental involvement exhibited in schools. Families’ perception of roles toward parental involvement in schools may vary among groups from diverse cultures. In today’s urban schools, the increasing diversity of cultures may contribute to differences in levels of parental involvement. The purpose of this research is to address the need to promote parental participation in the educational process of their children. This study will focus on three research questions: Are there differences in levels of parental involvement after participating in a program designed to assist them with their children’s reading skills? Are there changes in the attitudes of families towards parental involvement after participating in the instructional cycle? Is there a relationship between the level of parental involvement and student academic achievement?

Parents Acquiring Learning Strategies (PALS): How Empowering Hispanic Parents Increases Parental Involvement and Student Achievement

Some Hispanic parents in Miami-Dade County show limited involvement in the educational process of their children. Currently, Miami-Dade County Public schools consists of an increasingly high number of language minority students who come from homes where parents are limited in their English proficiency. Consequently, these parents have difficulty assisting their children with schoolwork and often feel they lack adequate skills to involve themselves in school curricula. The lack of parental involvement by this population has a negative impact on students’ learning and their academic achievement. The purpose of this study is to impact the level of participation of these families and to study its ultimate effect on students’ academic achievement.