Exploitative Abuses: Which Competition Policy, Which Public Policy? Research Papers in Law, 2/2007

As the final session of the day, my aim in this paper is to briefly outline the nature of exploitative abuses before turning to the question of the relationship between competition law and intellectual property law in the context of what Teubner calls the regulatory trilemma and from that draw a two-fold conclusion. First, the demands on law from the social phenomenon of markets are more acute when those demands raise issues across the different law domains of IP and competition. Second, where IP law and competition meet, the aim should be for both domains to internalise the values of the other. This however can only happen to the extent but only to the extent that there can be what Collins1 calls productive disintegration. Finally, in the specific context of exploitative abuses the overlap between IP law and competition law arises primarily in relation to claims of excessive pricing in licensing arrangements. Such claims could form the basis of a private action2 or can be made in the context of compulsory dealing decisions such as Microsoft.3 The involvement of competition agencies in pricing decisions goes to the heart of concerns about the nature of competition law and the role of competition agencies and highlights the need for the law to indirectly control rather than inappropriately attempt to directly control markets.

Patenting Strategies of the EU Pharmaceutical Industry -Crossroad between Patent Law and Competition Policy. Research Papers in Law, 1/2011

From the Introduction. The pharmaceutical sector inquiry carried out by the European Commission in 2008 provides a useful framework for assessing the relationship between the patent system on the one hand and competition policy and law on the other hand. The pharmaceutical market is not only specifically regulated. It is also influenced by the special characteristics of the patent system which enables pharmaceutical companies engaged in research activities to enter into additional arrangements to cope with the competitive pressures of early patent application and the delays in drug approval. Patents appear difficult to reconcile with the need for sufficient and adequate access to medicines, which is why competition expectations imposed on the pharmaceutical sector are very high. The patent system and competition law are interacting components of the market, into which they must both be integrated. This can result in competition law taking a very strict view on the pharmaceutical industry by establishing strict functional performance standards for the reliance on intellectual property rights protection granted by patent law. This is in particular because in this sector the potential welfare losses are not likely to be of only monetary nature. In brief, the more inefficiencies the patent system produces, the greater the risk of an expansive application of competition law in this field. The aim of the present study is to offer a critical and objective view on the use or abuse of patents and defensive strategies in the pharmaceutical industry. It shall also seek to establish whether patents as presently regulated offer an appropriate degree of protection of intellectual property held by the economic operators in the pharmaceutical sector and whether there is a need or, for that matter, scope for improvement. A useful starting point for the present study is provided by the pharmaceutical sector competition inquiry (hereafter ���the sector inquiry���) carried out by the European Commission during the first half of 2008. On 8 July 2008, the Commission adopted its Final Report pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003 EC, revealing a series of ���antitrust shortcomings��� that would require further investigation1.

The Legal Implications of Internet Marketing : Exploiting the Digital Marketplace Within the Boundaries of the Law

Au cours des derni��res ann��es, le domaine de la consommation a grandement ��volu��. Les agents de marketing ont commenc�� �� utiliser l���Internet pour influencer les consommateurs en employant des tactiques originales et imaginatives qui ont rendus possible l���atteinte d'un niveau de communication interpersonnelle qui avait pr��c��demment ��t�� insondable. Leurs interactions avec les consommateurs, en utilisant la technologie moderne, se manifeste sous plusieurs formes diff��rentes qui sont toutes accompagn��s de leur propre assortiment de probl��mes juridiques. D���abord, il n'est pas rare pour les agents de marketing d���utiliser des outils qui leur permettent de suivre les actions des consommateurs dans le monde virtuel ainsi que dans le monde physique. Les renseignements personnels recueillis d'une telle mani��re sont souvent utilis��s �� des fins de publicit�� comportementale en ligne ��� une utilisation qui ne respecte pas toujours les limites du droit �� la vie priv��e. Il est ��galement devenu assez commun pour les agents de marketing d���utiliser les m��dias sociaux afin de converser avec les consommateurs. Ces forums ont aussi servi �� la commission d���actes anticoncurrentiels, ainsi qu����� la diffusion de publicit��s fausses et trompeuses ��� deux pratiques qui sont interdites tant par la loi sur la concurrence que la loi sur la protection des consommateurs. Enfin, les agents de marketing utilisent diverses tactiques afin de joindre les consommateurs plus efficacement en utilisant diverses tactiques qui les rendent plus visible dans les moteurs de recherche sur Internet, dont certaines sont consid��r��s comme malhonn��tes et pourraient pr��senter des probl��mes dans les domaines du droit de la concurrence et du droit des marques de commerce. Ce m��moire offre une description d��taill��e des outils utilis��s �� des fins de marketing sur Internet, ainsi que de la mani��re dont ils sont utilis��s. Il illustre par ailleurs les probl��mes juridiques qui peuvent survenir �� la suite de leur utilisation et d��finit le cadre l��gislatif r��gissant l���utilisation de ces outils par les agents de marketing, pour enfin d��montrer que les lois qui entrent en jeu dans de telles circonstances peuvent, en effet, se r��v��ler b��n��fiques pour ces derniers d'un point de vue ��conomique.

Legal and economic interfaces between antidumping and competition policy

Includes bibliography

The effectiveness of technical assistance, socio-economic development and the absorptive capacity of competition authorities

Includes bibliography

Best practices in defence of competition in Argentina and Brazil: useful aspects for Central America

Includes bibliography

The abuse of intellectual property rights and regulations in China: a law and economic analysis

From the institutional point of view, the legal system of IPR (intellectual property right, hereafter, IPR) is one of incentive institutions of innovation and it plays very important role in the development of economy. According to the law, the owner of the IPR enjoy a kind of exclusive right to use his IP(intellectual property, hereafter, IP), in other words, he enjoys a kind of legal monopoly position in the market. How to well protect the IPR and at the same time to regulate the abuse of IPR is very interested topic in this knowledge-orientated market and it is the basic research question in this dissertation. In this paper, by way of comparing study and by way of law and economic analyses, and based on the Austrian Economics School���s theories, the writer claims that there is no any contradiction between the IPR and competition law. However, in this new economy (high-technology industries), there is really probability of the owner of IPR to abuse his dominant position. And with the characteristics of the new economy, such as, the high rates of innovation, ���instant scalability���, network externality and lock-in effects, the IPR ���will vest the dominant undertakings with the power not just to monopolize the market but to shift such power from one market to another, to create strong barriers to enter and, in so doing, granting the perpetuation of such dominance for quite a long time.���1 Therefore, in order to keep the order of market, to vitalize the competition and innovation, and to benefit the customer, in EU and US, it is common ways to apply the competition law to regulate the IPR abuse. In Austrian Economic School perspective, especially the Schumpeterian theories, the innovation/competition/monopoly and entrepreneurship are inter-correlated, therefore, we should apply the dynamic antitrust model based on the AES theories to analysis the relationship between the IPR and competition law. China is still a developing country with relative not so high ability of innovation. Therefore, at present, to protect the IPR and to make good use of the incentive mechanism of IPR legal system is the first important task for Chinese government to do. However, according to the investigation reports,2 based on their IPR advantage and capital advantage, some multinational companies really obtained the dominant or monopoly market position in some aspects of some industries, and there are some IPR abuses conducted by such multinational companies. And then, the Chinese government should be paying close attention to regulate any IPR abuse. However, how to effectively regulate the IPR abuse by way of competition law in Chinese situation, from the law and economic theories��� perspective, from the legislation perspective, and from the judicial practice perspective, there is a long way for China to go!

European Community Communications Law : An Introduction

The present article is an abridged version of a chapter to the book EC Electronic Communications and Competition Law (London: Cameron May, 2007). It provides an introduction to the rules at the European Community level governing the electronic communications sector (previously and more traditionally referred to as telecommunications). Such an introduction encompasses essentially an enquiry into the relevant competition law rules, of which here particular attention is paid to abuse of dominant position and the essential facilities doctrine, as well as an analysis of the EC sector specific regulatory framework, which has substantially evolved since the liberalisation of the telecommunications sector back in the beginning of the 1990s. It is the objective of the article to explore to what extent both regulatory tools could deal with the specificities of communications markets, and where they may fail to do so.

The Jewish Law Firm: Past and Present

The rise and growth of large Jewish law firms in New York City during the second half of the twentieth century was nothing short of an astounding success story. As late as 1950, there was not a single large Jewish law firm in town. By the mid-1960s, six of the largest twenty law firms were Jewish, and by 1980, four of the largest ten prestigious law firms were Jewish firms. Moreover, the accomplishment of the Jewish firms is especially striking because, while the traditional large White Anglo-Saxon Protestant law firms grew at a fast rate during this period, the Jewish firms grew twice as fast, and they did so in spite of experiencing explicit discrimination. What happened? This book chapter is a revised, updated study of the rise and growth of large New York City Jewish law firms. It is based on the public record, with respect to both the law firms themselves and trends in the legal profession generally, and on over twenty in-depth interviews with lawyers who either founded and practiced at these successful Jewish firms, attempted and failed to establish such firms, or were in a position to join these firms but decided instead to join WASP firms. According to the informants interviewed in this chapter, while Jewish law firms benefited from general decline in anti-Semitism and increased demand for corporate legal services, a unique combination of factors explains the incredible rise of the Jewish firms. First, white-shoe ethos caused large WASP firms to stay out of undignified practice areas and effectively created pockets of Jewish practice areas, where the Jewish firms encountered little competition for their services. Second, hiring and promotion discriminatory practices by the large WASP firms helped create a large pool of talented Jewish lawyers from which the Jewish firms could easily recruit. Finally, the Jewish firms benefited from a flip side of bias phenomenon, that is, they benefited from the positive consequences of stereotyping. Paradoxically, the very success of the Jewish firms is reflected in their demise by the early twenty-first century: because systematic large law firm ethno-religious discrimination against Jewish lawyers has become a thing of the past, the very reason for the existence of Jewish law firms has been nullified. As other minority groups, however, continue to struggle for equality within the senior ranks of Big Law, can the experience of the Jewish firms serve as a ���separate-but-equal��� blueprint for overcoming contemporary forms of discrimination for women, racial, and other minority attorneys? Perhaps not. As this chapter establishes, the success of large Jewish law firms was the result of unique conditions and circumstances between 1945 and 1980, which are unlikely to be replicated. For example, large law firms have become hyper-competitive and are not likely to allow any newcomers the benefit of protected pockets of practice. While smaller ���separate-but-equal��� specialized firms, for instance, ones exclusively hiring lawyer-mothers occasionally appear, the rise of large ���separate-but-equal��� firms is improbable.

European Criminal Law and General Principles of Union Law. Research Papers in Law, 5/2005

From the Introduction. The European Court of Justice, partly followed in this by the European legislator, has regulated Community law and policy through a set of general principles of law. For the Community legal order in the first pillar, general legal principles have developed from functional policy areas such as the internal market, the customs union, the monetary union, the common agricultural policy, the European competition policy, etc., which are of great importance for the quality and legitimacy of Community law. The principles in question are not so much general legal principles of an institutional character, such as the priority of Community law, direct effect or Community loyalty, but rather principles of law which shape the fundamental rights and basic rights of the citizen. I refer to the principle of legality, of nulla poena, the inviolability of the home, the nemo tenetur principle, due process, the rights of the defence, etc. Many of these legal principles have been elevated to primary Community law status by the European Court of Justice, often as a result of preliminary questions. Nevertheless, a considerable number of them have also been elaborated in the context of contentious proceedings before the Court of Justice, such as in the framework of European competition law and European public servants law.

The Regulation of Competition and Innovation in the European Union and Spain: Opportunities for the Philippines and the ASEAN

The Philippines are currently facing a process of regional economic integration inside the ASEAN, in some way similar to the process undertaken by Spain and the European Union decades ago. Since January 2016, the ASEAN has become a Common Market, for whose effective achievement Competition and Innovation Law and Policies may play a crucial role. The scope of these pages is to overview the importance of the regulation in these issues and the promotion of competition within the member States throughout the process of regional economic integration. Then, we will consider the role that Competition and Intellectual Property Law and Policies have played in the construction of the European Union, and we will point out some current challenges that are still to be faced. Finally, we will offer some comparative conclusions considering the importance that these norms and policies will have in the construction of the ASEAN as an economic integrated area, and the way the ASEAN might follow the footsteps set by the European Union in its integration process.

Li����es de Direito Econ��mico e Financeiro, 1�� Ano

I ��� O ���DIREITO ECON��MICO���: O ESTADO COMO PRODUTOR DE BENS E SERVI��OS E O ESTADO COMO REGULADOR DA ECONOMIA: O PLANEAMENTO E AS MEDIDAS DE EST��MULO OU FOMENTO; O ACESSO �� ACTIVIDADE ECON��MICA; II ��� CONCEITO E TIPOLOGIA DAS EMPRESAS; III ��� ALGUMAS EMPRESAS EM ESPECIAL; IV ��� DIREITO PENAL ECON��MICO E DE EMPRESA; V ��� ���CONTENCIOSO DAS EMPRESAS���; VI ��� DIREITO DO CONSUMO, DIREITO DAS EMPRESAS E DIREITO PENAL ECON��MICO; VII ��� DIREITO DA CONCORR��NCIA E DOS PRE��OS; VIII ��� DIREITO MONET��RIO, FINANCEIRO E DOS MERCADOS DE VALORES MOBILI��RIOS: INSTRUMENTOS E MERCADOS FINANCEIROS; IX - REGULA����O DO AMBIENTE E DA ACTIVIDADE ECON��MICA; X - REGULA����O DA QUALIDADE; XI ��� DIREITO FINANCEIRO P��BLICO. ��I - "ECONOMIC LAW": THE STATE AS PRODUCER OF GOODS AND SERVICES AND THE STATE AS A ECONOMY REGULATOR: PLANNING AND MEASURES OF STIMULUS OR PROMOTION; ACCESS TO ECONOMIC ACTIVITY II - CONCEPT AND TYPE OF COMPANIES III - SOME SPECIAL COMPANIES IV - ECONOMIC AND CRIMINAL LAW COMPANY, V ��� ���LITIGATION IN COMPANIES���; VI - LAW CONSUMER, LAW OF COMPANIES AND ECONOMIC CRIMINAL LAW; VII - COMPETITION LAW AND PRICES; VIII - MONETARY LAW, FINANCIAL AND SECURITIES MARKETS: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND MARKETS; X - REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITY: X - ADJUSTMENT OF QUALITY; XI - PUBLIC FINANCIAL LAW.

���Nova��� lei da concorr��ncia de 2012 �� mais justi��a?

Quando foi publicado o ���novo��� Regime Jur��dico da Concorr��ncia (RJC) no D.R. de 8/5/12, logo se falou de ���grande reforma no sector da concorr��ncia��� por ���iluminados���. Acontece que de acordo com o art. 101�� do RJC, a lei s�� entraria em vigor passados 60 dias. At�� aqui tudo normal. �� preciso uma ���vacatio legis��� para a adapta����o dos destinat��rios, incluindo a Autoridade da Concorr��ncia (AdC). Abstract: When published the "new" Legal Framework for Competition (RJC) in DR 05.08.12, soon spoke of "major reform in the competitive sector" by "enlightened". It turns out that according to art. 101 of the RJC, the law would only enter into force after 60 days. So far so normal. It takes a "vacatio legis" to adapt the recipients, including the Competition Authority (CA).

WAML World Congress: Direito M��dico Mundial em Portugal

Eis que existem boas not��cias cient��ficas em Portugal. O WAML World Congress �� o maior e mais prestigiado congresso mundial de direito m��dico. E, desta vez, vai ter lugar em Portugal, mais em concreto na Cidade capital do Mondego, Coimbra, entre os pr��ximos dias 2 e 7 de Agosto de 2015. O seu Presidente ou Chairman, ser�� o especialista portugu��s em direito m��dico, professor da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra, Doutor Andr�� Gon��alo Dias Pereira. Especialista que j�� esteve a fazer um excelente Semin��rio em Barcelos, Escola Superior de Gest��o do Instituto Polit��cnico do C��vado e do Ave, no dia 26 de Maio de 2014, com o t��tulo de ���O Direito da Concorr��ncia: an��lise de um caso real���. Tema que relacionou com a poderosa ind��stria farmac��utica, entre outros aspectos conexos. �� Behold, there are good scientific news in Portugal. The WAML World Congress is the largest and most prestigious world congress of medical law. And this time, will take place in Portugal, more specifically in the Mondego capital city, Coimbra, between 2nd and August 7, 2015. The President or Chairman, will be the Portuguese expert in medical law professor Faculty of Law, University of Coimbra, Doctor Andr�� Gon��alo Dias Pereira. Specialist who has been doing an excellent Seminar in Barcelos, School of Management C��vado Polytechnic Institute and Ave, on May 26, 2014, with the title "The Competition Law: analysis of a real case." Theme related to the powerful pharmaceutical industry, and other related aspects.