South Carolina/Family Court Circuits Meeting Benchmark : 80% of Pending Docket 365 Days or Less as of June 30, 2016

This is a diagram broken down by circuits of the percentage of family courts meeting the benchmark of 80% of disposing of cases within a year. Seven out of the 16 circuits met the standard.

The inherent equitable jurisdiction and the plenary power of the Supreme Court of New South Wales to order the winding up of companies

Not all companies in Australia are amenable to a winding up order pursuant to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The Supreme Court of New South Wales has previously dealt with such winding up applications by apparently focusing on the inherent jurisdiction of the court to consider whether the court has jurisdiction to firstly consider the winding up application. This article proposes an original alternative paradigm: the plenary power provided to the court by s 23 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) can be utilised to initially attract the jurisdiction of the court and subsequently the inherent jurisdiction specifically utilising the equitable “just and equitable” ground is available to the court to consider and make such a winding up order if appropriate. Variation of such a paradigm may also be available to the court when considering the inherent jurisdiction in relation to corporation matters more generally.

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

Reports cover cases from 1862 to 1876.

Reports of cases decided in the Supreme Court of the South African Republic /

v. 4. 1891-1892.

Equity cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, from June term, 1828 [i.e. December term, 1826], to [June term, 1834],

Issued in pamphlet parts. cf. Soule, Lawyer's ref. manual, 1884.

Reports of cases argued and adjudged in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, from the year 1804 to the year [1819] ... inclusive,

Vol. 1, 1822; v. 2, 1826; v. 3, 1821.

Reports of judicial decisions in the Constitutional court, of the state of South-Carolina; held at Charleston and Columbia, during the years 1812, 13, 14, 15, and 16. To which is added, two cases determined in the Court of equity in the year eighteen hundred & twenty-two.

Mode of access: Internet.

Reports of cases determined in the Constitutional Court of South Carolina.

"Appendix. Note A. On the subject of nudum pactum, in connexion with the Statute of frauds ... " v. 3, p. [569]-595.

Reports of cases determined in the Constitutional Court of South-Carolina /

Includes cases from 1823-1824.

Reports of cases in equity, argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, from December term, 1834, to December term [1839], both inclusive,

Binder's title: N. Carolina reports, v. 21-22.

Reports of cases at law, argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, from December term, 1834, to [December term, 1839], both inclusive,

"Vols. 3 and 4 ... are always bound together with one title and one index. The preface explains that this is in consequence of a printer's error. The paging runs from 1 to 132 (intended to be vol. 3), and then, with only a sub-title, from 9 to 607 (vol. 4), including an index to both volumes."--Soule, Lawyer's ref. manual, 1884.

Reports of cases at law argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina, from June term, 1840, to [August term, 1852], both inclusive,

Publisher varies: v. 6-7, W. R. Gales; v. 8-12, S. Gales; v. 13, Printed by S. Gales and W. D. Cooke.

Reports of cases in equity argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina /

Covers the period June 1840 to Aug. 1852.

North Carolina reports : cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Vols. 1-62 reprinted by the State with consecutive numbering and title: North Carolina reports.

Reports of cases and matters determined by the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Mode of access: Internet.