Notae historicae in universum jus canonicum: rationibus consentaneisadserta, quastionibus historico-critico-dogmatico-scholasticis illustrata, munita, atque in usum cupide legum sacratiorum juventutis pracipue directa

UANL

Commentaria in jus ecclesiasticum universum

UANL

Jus canonicum universum : clara methodo juxta titulos quinque librorum decretalium in quaestiones distributum, solidisque responsionibus, & objectionum solutionibus dilucidatum.

UANL

Jurisprudentia canonico-civilis : seu, Jus canonicum universum, juxta V. libros decretalium. in tres tomos distinctum.

UANL

Jus canonicum, sive commentaria

UANL

Jus ecclesiasticum in epitomen redactum A. D. P. Benedicto Oberhauser,J. U. D. Reverendissimi ac Celsissimi S. R. I. principis ac Archiepiscpi Salisburgensis Consiliario Ecclessiastico, additis brevibus ss. patrum sententiis, aliisque ad novissimos mores, ac praxin spectantibus.

UANL

Histoire chronologique et dogmatique des conciles de la chrétiente depuis le concile de Jerusalem, tenu par les apotres l'an 50, jus qu'audernier concile Tenu de nos jous

UANL

Jus canonicum universum complectens : tractatum de regulis juris

UANL

Jus ecclesiasticum universum hodiernae disciplinae, praesertim Belgii, Galliae German, et vicinarum provinciarum accommodatum...

UANL

Jus civitas, direito urbano

O direito urbano é perspectivado numa lógica de direito público, pois que, como afirma Fernández “o urbanismo, em todas as suas facetas, deve ser uma função pública indeclinável e não uma simples derivação de um poder de disposição correlativo à titularidade dominial dos terrenos” (cit. in Normas urbanísticas, III).

The regulation of cyber warfare under the jus ad bellum

This chapter evaluates the potential for legal regulation of the resort to cyber warfare between states under the ‘jus ad bellum’ (the law on the use of force). Debate in the literature has largely concerned whether cyber warfare falls within the scope of Article 2(4) UNC. The first part of this chapter sets out this debate. It then goes on to argue that the ‘Article 2(4) debate’ often misses the fact that an act of cyber warfare can be considered a breach of a different legal rule: the principle of non-intervention. The chapter further considers some of the issues in applying either the prohibition of the use of force or the principle of non-intervention to cyber warfare, and then concludes by arguing that the debate should be reoriented to focus on another existing international legal obligation: the duty to prevent cyber-attacks.