Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Impala-to-Volare, test no. 11. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 60 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 6. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 60 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 7. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Impact test of compact vehicle with modified side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 8. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Baseline test of compact vehicle side structure, 35 mph, 90 degree impact, Torino-to-Volare, test no. 9. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Crash testing of experimental safety vehicles. Volume I - British Leyland Marina Safety Research Vehicle. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Pickup and van side structure baseline assessment test no. 4 - vehicle-to-vehicle 60 degree right side impact. Task 3. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Proposed vehicle impact speed: Severe injury probability relationships for selected crash types

Speed is recognised as a key contributor to crash likelihood and severity, and to road safety performance in general. Its fundamental role has been recognised by making Safe Speeds one of the four pillars of the Safe System. In this context, impact speeds above which humans are likely to sustain fatal injuries have been accepted as a reference in many Safe System infrastructure policy and planning discussions. To date, there have been no proposed relationships for impact speeds above which humans are likely to sustain fatal or serious (severe) injury, a more relevant Safe System measure. A research project on Safe System intersection design required a critical review of published literature on the relationship between impact speed and probability of injury. This has led to a number of questions being raised about the origins, accuracy and appropriateness of the currently accepted impact speed–fatality probability relationships (Wramborg 2005) in many policy documents. The literature review identified alternative, more recent and more precise relationships derived from the US crash reconstruction databases (NASS/CDS). The paper proposes for discussion a set of alternative relationships between vehicle impact speed and probability of MAIS3+ (fatal and serious) injury for selected common crash types. Proposed Safe System critical impact speed values are also proposed for use in road infrastructure assessment. The paper presents the methodology and assumptions used in developing these relationships. It identifies further research needed to confirm and refine these relationships. Such relationships would form valuable inputs into future road safety policies in Australia and New Zealand.

Effects of ethanol on vehicle energy efficiency and implications on ethanol life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis.

Bioethanol is the world's largest-produced alternative to petroleum-derived transportation fuels due to its compatibility within existing spark-ignition engines and its relatively mature production technology. Despite its success, questions remain over the greenhouse gas (GHG) implications of fuel ethanol use with many studies showing significant impacts of differences in land use, feedstock, and refinery operation. While most efforts to quantify life-cycle GHG impacts have focused on the production stage, a few recent studies have acknowledged the effect of ethanol on engine performance and incorporated these effects into the fuel life cycle. These studies have broadly asserted that vehicle efficiency increases with ethanol use to justify reducing the GHG impact of ethanol. These results seem to conflict with the general notion that ethanol decreases the fuel efficiency (or increases the fuel consumption) of vehicles due to the lower volumetric energy content of ethanol when compared to gasoline. Here we argue that due to the increased emphasis on alternative fuels with drastically differing energy densities, vehicle efficiency should be evaluated based on energy rather than volume. When done so, we show that efficiency of existing vehicles can be affected by ethanol content, but these impacts can serve to have both positive and negative effects and are highly uncertain (ranging from -15% to +24%). As a result, uncertainties in the net GHG effect of ethanol, particularly when used in a low-level blend with gasoline, are considerably larger than previously estimated (standard deviations increase by >10% and >200% when used in high and low blends, respectively). Technical options exist to improve vehicle efficiency through smarter use of ethanol though changes to the vehicle fleets and fuel infrastructure would be required. Future biofuel policies should promote synergies between the vehicle and fuel industries in order to maximize the society-wise benefits or minimize the risks of adverse impacts of ethanol.

Research MIV (modified intefrated vehicle). Volume II/1 - side impact. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Research MIV (modified integrated vehicle). Volume II/2 - side impact. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Research MIV (modified integrated vehicle). Volume II/7 - side impact. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington,D.C.

Research MIV (modified integrated vehicle). Volume II/8 - side impact. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Research MIV (modified integrated vehicle). Volume II/10 - side impact. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.