Factors that determine the level of commitment of our teaching staff when the implementation of continuous evaluation system takes place

Comunicación presentada en CIDUI 2010, Congreso Internacional Docencia Universitaria e Innovación, Barcelona, 30 junio-2 julio 2010.

Standardized reporting using CODES (Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System).

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Manual for police traffic services personnel performance evaluation system. Supervisor's guide.

Mode of access: Internet.

Manual for police traffic services personnel performance evaluation system. Management and implementation. Volume I.

Mode of access: Internet.

The crash outcome data evaluation system (CODES).

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Report to Congress: benefits of safety belts and motorcycle helmets. Based on data from the Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES).

Mode of access: Internet.

Police traffic services personnel performance evaluation system. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Development of image algorithms for automated pavement distress evaluation system. Final report.

Texas Department of Transportation, Austin

Final report on environmental evaluation system for water resources planning /

"PB 208 822."

National-Regional Impact Evaluation System : structure, performance, and application of a bottom-up interregional econometric model /

At head of title: NRIES.

Evaluating state-financed, workplace-based retraining programs : a report on the feasibility of a business screening and performance outcome evaluation system /

"May 1990."

FIRES : Fire Information Retrieval and Evaluation System : a program for fire danger rating analysis /

"August 1997."

US Screening and Evaluation System of Inventions Utilized in Hungary

The commercialization of inventions is very complex and challenging therefore it requires the collaboration of several actors in an economy. Even when an invention possesses significant added value, its successful commercialization could only be executed in a stable macroeconomic and innovation environment and also if proper innovation management expertise is provided. ValDeal Innovations Zrt. was established to foster the commercialization of Hungarian, high business potential inventions by providing its business expertise. The company used an – already in various markets and countries probed – US innovation management method consisting of the tasks of technology evaluation as well as the commercialization of inventions. There were major changes necessary while probing the US method residing in the different macroeconomic circumstances and the attitudes for innovation in Hungary. The article details the above mentioned issues together with the conclusions the members of ValDeal have drawn during the innovation management process.

A study of the implementation of junior college *evaluation system in Taiwan

Since the establishment of the evaluation system in 1975, the junior colleges in the Republic of China (Taiwan), have gone through six formal evaluations. We know that evaluation in schooling, like quality control in businesses, should be a systematic, formal, and a continual process. It can doubtless serve as a strategy to refine the quality of education. The purpose of this research is to explore the current practice of junior college evaluation in Taiwan. This provides insight into the development of and quality of the current evaluation system. Moreover, this study also identified the source of problems with the current evaluation system and provided suggestion for improvements.^ In order to attain the above purposes, this research was undertaken in both theoretical and practical ways. First, theoretically, on the basis of a literature review, the theories of educational evaluation and, according to the course and principles of development, a view of the current practice in Taiwan. Secondly, in practice, by means of questionnaires, an analysis of the views of evaluation committeemen, junior college presidents, and administrators were obtained on evaluation models, methods, contents, organization, functions, criteria, grades reports, and others with suggestions for improvement. The summary of findings concludes that most evaluators and evaluatees think the purpose of evaluation can help the colleges explore their difficulties and problems. In addition, it was found that there is significant difference between the two groups regarding the evaluation methods, contents, organization, functions, criteria, grades reports and others, while analyzing these objective data forms the basis for an improved method of evaluation for Junior Colleges in Taiwan. ^