US Food and Drug Administration approval of generic versions of complex biologics: implications for the practicing physician using low molecular weight heparins

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have shown equivalent or superior efficacy and safety to unfractionated heparin as antithrombotic therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Each approved LMWH is a pleotropic biological agent with a unique chemical, biochemical, biophysical and biological profile and displays different pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. As a result, LMWHs are neither equipotent in preclinical assays nor equivalent in terms of their clinical efficacy and safety. Previously, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cautioned against using various LMWHs interchangeably, however recently, the FDA approved generic versions of LMWH that have not been tested in large clinical trials. This paper highlights the bio-chemical and pharmacological differences between the LMWH preparations that may result in different clinical outcomes, and also reviews the implications and challenges physicians face when generic versions of the original/innovator agents are approved for clinical use.

Untersuchung zur Therapie akuter venöser Thromboembolien mit niedermolekularen Heparinen (NMH)

Über einen Zeitraum von 14 Monaten wurden Patienten mit akuter, duplexsonographisch nachgewiesener tiefer Beinvenenthrombose erfasst und im initialen Behandlungszeitraum mit niedermolekularem Heparin (Enoxaparin) sowie im weiteren Verlauf überlappend mit Marcumar® therapiert. Erhoben wurden eine ausführliche, standardisierte Eigen- sowie Familienanamnese und die Risikofaktoren für eine TVT. Desweiteren wurde eine klinische Untersuchung inklusive Duplexsonographie der Venen und eine Thrombophiliediagnostik durchgeführt. Täglich erfolgte die Bestimmung diverser Laborparameter (INR, APTT, D-Dimere, CRP, kleines Blutbild). Am ersten und fünften Tag wurden zusätzlich die Transaminasen bestimmt. Nach 30 Tagen erfolgte eine klinische Verlaufskontrolle, nach drei Monaten eine ambulante Kontrollduplexsonographie. Diskutiert werden Enoxaparin-Nebenwirkungen, Verläufe der duplexsonographisch erhobenen Befunde und klinischen Symptome, die Thrombophiliediagnostik sowie Laborverläufe der Infekt- und Gerinnungsparameter (APTT, INR, D-Dimere). Die D-Dimerverläufe und die Bedeutung der sinnvollen D-Dimerbestimmung wurden bereits auf mehreren Tagungen vorgestellt.

Evaluierung der Prothrombinase-induzierten Gerinnungszeit zum Monitoring der Antikoagulation mit niedermolekularen Heparinen und Heparinoiden

Da der gemeinsame Endpunkt vieler Erkrankungen ein thrombotisches Ereignis ist, spielt eine effiziente Antikoagulation eine zentrale Rolle in der heutigen Medizin. Jedoch sind die gängigen Tests zum Monitoring der Gerinnungshemmung nicht ideal. Neue Tests, wie z.B. die Prothrombinase-induzierte Gerinnungszeit (PiCT), sollen die bestehenden Nachteile ausräumen und somit eine bessere Therapieüberwachung gewährleisten.rnDie vorliegende Arbeit untersucht dieses neue Verfahren beim Monitoring von Heparinen und Heparinoiden im Vergleich zu zwei gängigen anti-Faktor Xa-Aktivität(aXa)-Tests bei Patienten mit unterschiedlichem Thromboserisiko (z.B. Schwangere, Adipöse, Niereninsuffiziente).rnDazu wurde bei 175 Proben von 102 Patienten (53 männlich, 49 weiblich, medianes Alter 64 Jahre) die gerinnungshemmende Aktivität des verabreichten Medikaments (UFH, Enoxaparin, Dalteparin oder Danaparoid) mit zwei chromogenen Assays und dem PiCT-Test gemessen.rnHierbei ließen sich insgesamt Werte von 0 bis 1,36 IE/ml aXa feststellen. Im Vergleich lieferten die aXa-Tests höhere Messwerte als PiCT bei allen Medikamenten außer UFH. Während die Ergebnisse der chromogenen Verfahren insgesamt sehr stark korrelierten (r = 0,86), war die Übereinstimmung mit den PiCT-Ergebnissen schwach bis deutlich (r = 0,40 bzw. r = 0,66). Die Faktoren Schwangerschaft, Adipositas und Niereninsuffizienz zeigten auf die Gesamtergebnisse keinen nennenswerten Einfluss. rnZusammenfassend kann gesagt werden, dass PiCT dennoch ein brauchbarer Test zum Monitoring der Antikoagulation sein könnte. Um den Nutzen des Tests v.a. in Bezug auf seine Aussagekraft bei Komplikationen zu beweisen, sind aber weitere klinische Studien notwendig.rn

Diabetes and acute coronary syndromes

Diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) are at a high risk for subsequent cardiovascular events but derive, at the same time, greater benefit from evidence-based therapy than non-diabetic individuals. State-of-the-art anti-thrombotic therapy includes a triple anti-platelet combination - aspirin, clopidogrel and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors - and unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin. For low- or medium-risk individuals, a treatment based on aspirin, clopidogrel and bivalirudin is a valuable alternative. Prasugrel, a new and more potent inhibitor of the platelet P2Y(12) receptor, has to be regarded as the most promising anti-thrombotic agent for diabetic patients with ACS. This agent may replace clopidogrel - and possibly GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors - in the future. In addition to aggressive anti-thrombotic therapy, diabetic patients should undergo systematic early invasive angiography if presenting with non-ST-segment elevation ACS, and immediate percutaneous coronary intervention if presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Indeed, the benefit derived from these strategies appears to be more pronounced in the diabetic population than in non-diabetic individuals. Despite the benefit, multiple surveys have demonstrated that, in the setting of ACS, diabetic patients receive evidence-based therapy less frequently than non-diabetic counterparts.

Developing drugs for use before, during and soon after percutaneous coronary intervention.

INTRODUCTION Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a milestone for treating coronary artery disease (CAD). Antithrombotic therapy is essential to prevent ischemic complications, including the microvascular no-reflow, while minimizing bleeding events. Areas covered: This overview discusses available and developing drugs for PCI including anticoagulants, antiplatelets and treatment of no-reflow. Expert opinion: For years unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the unique anticoagulant to be used before and during PCI. Enoxaparin showed similar efficacy and safety, yet, based on recent trials, bivalirudin has been shown to have some benefits, particularly for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The evidence concerning new anticoagulants is still preliminary, except for new oral anticoagulants, particularly rivaroxaban that showed intriguing findings and is currently under investigation. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is the standard of care after PCI, but new developments have recently emerged. Indeed, ticagrelor and prasugrel are currently recommended over clopidogrel due to their significant reduction of ischemic events in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) whereas clopidogrel remains the choice in stable CAD. Among new agents, vorapaxar and cangrelor showed positive but limited evidence and might be considered at least in selected patients. Conversely, evidence on effective treatments for no-reflow remains limited and would require future dedicated research.

A hipertensão pulmonar como consequência de lúpus na gravidez : caso clínico

Trabalho Final do Curso de Mestrado Integrado em Medicina, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 2014

Prospective evaluation of a D-optimal designed population pharmacokinetic study

Recently, methods for computing D-optimal designs for population pharmacokinetic studies have become available. However there are few publications that have prospectively evaluated the benefits of D-optimality in population or single-subject settings. This study compared a population optimal design with an empirical design for estimating the base pharmacokinetic model for enoxaparin in a stratified randomized setting. The population pharmacokinetic D-optimal design for enoxaparin was estimated using the PFIM function (MATLAB version 6.0.0.88). The optimal design was based on a one-compartment model with lognormal between subject variability and proportional residual variability and consisted of a single design with three sampling windows (0-30 min, 1.5-5 hr and 11 - 12 hr post-dose) for all patients. The empirical design consisted of three sample time windows per patient from a total of nine windows that collectively represented the entire dose interval. Each patient was assigned to have one blood sample taken from three different windows. Windows for blood sampling times were also provided for the optimal design. Ninety six patients were recruited into the study who were currently receiving enoxaparin therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to either the optimal or empirical sampling design, stratified for body mass index. The exact times of blood samples and doses were recorded. Analysis was undertaken using NONMEM (version 5). The empirical design supported a one compartment linear model with additive residual error, while the optimal design supported a two compartment linear model with additive residual error as did the model derived from the full data set. A posterior predictive check was performed where the models arising from the empirical and optimal designs were used to predict into the full data set. This revealed the optimal'' design derived model was superior to the empirical design model in terms of precision and was similar to the model developed from the full dataset. This study suggests optimal design techniques may be useful, even when the optimized design was based on a model that was misspecified in terms of the structural and statistical models and when the implementation of the optimal designed study deviated from the nominal design.

Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data using NONMEM and WinBUGS

The aim of this report is to describe the use of WinBUGS for two datasets that arise from typical population pharmacokinetic studies. The first dataset relates to gentamicin concentration-time data that arose as part of routine clinical care of 55 neonates. The second dataset incorporated data from 96 patients receiving enoxaparin. Both datasets were originally analyzed by using NONMEM. In the first instance, although NONMEM provided reasonable estimates of the fixed effects parameters it was unable to provide satisfactory estimates of the between-subject variance. In the second instance, the use of NONMEM resulted in the development of a successful model, albeit with limited available information on the between-subject variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters. WinBUGS was used to develop a model for both of these datasets. Model comparison for the enoxaparin dataset was performed by using the posterior distribution of the log-likelihood and a posterior predictive check. The use of WinBUGS supported the same structural models tried in NONMEM. For the gentamicin dataset a one-compartment model with intravenous infusion was developed, and the population parameters including the full between-subject variance-covariance matrix were available. Analysis of the enoxaparin dataset supported a two compartment model as superior to the one-compartment model, based on the posterior predictive check. Again, the full between-subject variance-covariance matrix parameters were available. Fully Bayesian approaches using MCMC methods, via WinBUGS, can offer added value for analysis of population pharmacokinetic data.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: recent experience in a large teaching hospital

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially serious adverse reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies. Aim: To describe experience with HIT. Methods: Twenty-two patients identified by laboratory records of heparin-associated antibodies with a 50% or greater decrease in platelet count were reviewed in our 600-bed metropolitan teaching hospital from 1999 to April 2005. Results: There was an increase in the frequency of HIT diagnosed during the review period, which was associated with a rise in the number of requests for HIT antibodies. Thrombotic complications were identified in 14 of 22 patients with HIT. Mean age was 65 years, and 11 patients were men. Seven patients died and HIT was considered contributory in four. One patient required mid-forearm amputation. Unfractionated heparin was used in all cases and five patients also received enoxaparin. Mean time to HIT screen, reflecting when the diagnosis was first suspected, was 14 days. Platelet nadir ranged from 6 x 10(9)/L to 88 x 10(9)/L, with a percentage drop in platelet count of 67-96%. Alternative anticoagulation (danaparoid) was not used in three patients, two of whom died. Conclusions: HIT is a potentially life-threatening complication of heparin therapy, associated with a fall in platelet count and a high incidence of thromboembolic complications. It is most frequently seen using unfractionated heparin therapy. The increase in frequency of HIT diagnosed in our hospital appears to be associated with a greater awareness of the entity, although detection is often delayed. Platelet count should be monitored in patients on heparin and the presence of antiplatelet antibodies determined if HIT is suspected. Treatment involves both discontinuation of heparin and the use of an alternative anticoagulant such as danaparoid because of the persisting risk of thrombosis.

Primary Joint Arthroplasty Surgery: Is the Risk of Major Bleeding Higher in Elderly Patients? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Increased risk of bleeding after major orthopedic surgery (MOS) has been widely documented in general population. However, this complication has not been studied in elderly patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the risk of major bleeding after MOS is higher in elderly patients, compared with those operated at a younger age. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients operated during 5 consecutive years. The main outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding. Patients with other causes of bleeding were excluded. Relative risks (RRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, anda multivariate analysis was performed. Results: A total of 1048 patients were included, 56% of patients were hip arthroplasties. At the time of surgery, 553 (53%) patients were older than 70 years. Patients aged >70 years showed an increased risk of major bleeding (RR: 2.42 [95% CI: 1.54-3.81]). For hip arthroplasty, the RR of bleeding was 2.61 (95%CI: 1.50-4.53) and 2.25 (95% CI: 1.03-4.94) for knee arthroplasty. After multivariate analysis, age was found to be independently associated with higher risk of major bleeding. Conclusion: According to European Medicines Agency criteria, patients aged 70 years are at a higher risk of major bleeding after MOS, result of a higher frequency of blood transfusions in this group of patients. Standardized protocols for blood transfusion in these patients are still required.