Clinical Perspectives from Randomized Phase 3 Trials on Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov Database

AbstractBackground It is not easy to overview pending phase 3 trials on prostate cancer (PCa), and awareness of these trials would benefit clinicians. Objective To identify all phase 3 trials on {PCa} registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database with pending results. Design and setting On September 29, 2014, a database was established from the records for 175 538 clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. A search of this database for the substring “prostat” identified 2951 prostate trials. Phase 3 trials accounted for 441 studies, of which 333 concerned only PCa. We selected only ongoing or completed trials with pending results, that is, for which the primary endpoint had not been published in a peer-reviewed medical journal. Results and limitations We identified 123 phase 3 trials with pending results. Trials were conducted predominantly in North America (n = 63; 51) and Europe (n = 47; 38). The majority were on nonmetastatic disease (n = 82; 67), with 37 (30) on metastatic disease and four trials (3) including both. In terms of intervention, systemic treatment was most commonly tested (n = 71; 58), followed by local treatment 34 (28), and both systemic and local treatment (n = 11; 9), with seven (6) trials not classifiable. The 71 trials on systemic treatment included androgen deprivation therapy (n = 34; 48), chemotherapy (n = 15; 21), immunotherapy (n = 9; 13), other systemic drugs (n = 9; 13), radiopharmaceuticals (n = 2; 3), and combinations (n = 2; 3). Local treatments tested included radiation therapy (n = 27; 79), surgery (n = 5; 15), and both (n = 2; 2). A limitation is that not every clinical trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Conclusion There are many {PCa} phase 3 trials with pending results, most of which address questions regarding systemic treatments for both nonmetastatic and metastatic disease. Radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are the interventions most commonly tested for local and systemic treatment, respectively. Patient summary This report describes all phase 3 trials on prostate cancer registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database with pending results. Most of these trials address questions regarding systemic treatments for both nonmetastatic and metastatic disease. Radiation therapy and androgen deprivation therapy are the interventions most commonly tested for local and systemic treatment, respectively.

A Specific Mapping Study Using Fluorescence Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Patients with Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection techniques have the potential to change the standard of surgical care for patients with prostate cancer. We performed a lymphatic mapping study and determined the value of fluorescence SLN detection with indocyanine green (ICG) for the detection of lymph node metastases in intermediate- and high-risk patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. A total of 42 patients received systematic or specific ICG injections into the prostate base, the midportion, the apex, the left lobe, or the right lobe. We found (1) that external and internal iliac regions encompass the majority of SLNs, (2) that common iliac regions contain up to 22% of all SLNs, (3) that a prostatic lobe can drain into the contralateral group of pelvic lymph nodes, and (4) that the fossa of Marcille also receives significant drainage. Among the 12 patients who received systematic ICG injections, 5 (42%) had a total of 29 lymph node metastases. Of these, 16 nodes were ICG positive, yielding 55% sensitivity. The complex drainage pattern of the prostate and the low sensitivity of ICG for the detection of lymph node metastases reported in our study highlight the difficulties related to the implementation of SNL techniques in prostate cancer. PATIENT SUMMARY There is controversy about how extensive lymph node dissection (LND) should be during prostatectomy. We investigated the lymphatic drainage of the prostate and whether sentinel node fluorescence techniques would be useful to detect node metastases. We found that the drainage pattern is complex and that the sentinel node technique is not able to replace extended pelvic LND.

New Clinical Indications for (18)F/(11)C-choline, New Tracers for Positron Emission Tomography and a Promising Hybrid Device for Prostate Cancer Staging: A Systematic Review of the Literature

CONTEXT Radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography has changed the management of prostate cancer patients. However, new emerging radiopharmaceutical agents, like radiolabelled prostate specific membrane antigen, and new promising hybrid imaging will begin new challenges in the diagnostic field. OBJECTIVE The continuous evolution in nuclear medicine has led to the improvement in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (PCa), particularly distant metastases. New horizons have been opened for radiolabelled choline positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) as a guide for salvage therapy or for the assessment of systemic therapies. In addition, new tracers and imaging tools have been recently tested, providing important information for the management of PCa patients. Herein we discuss: (1) the available evidence in literature on radiolabelled choline PET and their recent indications, (2) the role of alternative radiopharmaceutical agents, and (3) the advantages of a recent hybrid imaging device (PET/magnetic resonance imaging) in PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Data from recently published (2010-2015), original articles concerning the role of choline PET/CT, new emerging radiotracers, and a new imaging device are analysed. This review is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS In the restaging phase, the detection rate of choline PET varies between 4% and 97%, mainly depending on the site of recurrence and prostate-specific antigen levels. Both 68gallium (68Ga)-prostate specific membrane antigen and 18F-fluciclovine are shown to be more accurate in the detection of recurrent disease as compared with radiolabelled choline PET/CT. Particularly, Ga68-PSMA has a detection rate of 50% and 68%, respectively for prostate-specific antigen levels < 0.5ng/ml and 0.5-2ng/ml. Moreover, 68Ga- PSMA PET/magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a particularly higher accuracy in detecting PCa than PET/CT. New tracers, such as radiolabelled bombesin or urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor, are promising, but few data in clinical practice are available today. CONCLUSIONS Some limitations emerge from the published papers, both for radiolabelled choline PET/CT and also for new radiopharmaceutical agents. Efforts are still needed to enhance the impact of published data in the world of oncology, in particular when new radiopharmaceuticals are introduced into the clinical arena. PATIENT SUMMARY In the present review, the authors summarise the last evidences in clinical practice for the assessment of prostate cancer, by using nuclear medicine modalities, like positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.

Biology of Bone Metastases in Prostate Cancer

Advanced-stage prostate cancer (PCa) patients are often diagnosed with bone metastases. Bone metastases remain incurable and therapies are palliative. PCa cells prevalently cause osteoblastic lesions, characterized by an excess of bone formation. The prevailing concept indicates that PCa cancer cell secrete an excess of paracrine factors stimulating osteoblasts directly or indirectly, thereby leading to an excess of bone formation. The exact mechanisms by which bone formation stimulates PCa cell growth are mostly elusive. In this review, the mechanisms of PCa cancer cell osteotropism, the cancer cell-induced response within the bone marrow/bone stroma, and therapeutic stromal targets will be summarized.

Incorporation of tissue-based genomic biomarkers into localized prostate cancer clinics.

Localized prostate cancer (PCa) is a clinically heterogeneous disease, which presents with variability in patient outcomes within the same risk stratification (low, intermediate or high) and even within the same Gleason scores. Genomic tools have been developed with the purpose of stratifying patients affected by this disease to help physicians personalize therapies and follow-up schemes. This review focuses on these tissue-based tools. At present, four genomic tools are commercially available: Decipher™, Oncotype DX®, Prolaris® and ProMark®. Decipher™ is a tool based on 22 genes and evaluates the risk of adverse outcomes (metastasis) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Oncotype DX® is based on 17 genes and focuses on the ability to predict outcomes (adverse pathology) in very low-low and low-intermediate PCa patients, while Prolaris® is built on a panel of 46 genes and is validated to evaluate outcomes for patients at low risk as well as patients who are affected by high risk PCa and post-RP. Finally, ProMark® is based on a multiplexed proteomics assay and predicts PCa aggressiveness in patients found with similar features to Oncotype DX®. These biomarkers can be helpful for post-biopsy decision-making in low risk patients and post-radical prostatectomy in selected risk groups. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical benefit of these new technologies, the financial ramifications and how they should be utilized in clinics.

Non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a call for improved guidance on clinical management.

BACKGROUND Guidelines on the clinical management of non-metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) generally focus on the need to continue androgen deprivation therapy and enrol patients into clinical trials of investigational agents. This guidance reflects the lack of clinical trial data with established agents in the nmCRPC patient population and the need for trials of new agents. AIM To review the evidence base and consider ways of improving the management of nmCRPC. CONCLUSION Upon the development of castrate resistance, it is essential to rule out the presence of metastases or micrometastases by optimising the use of bone scans and possibly newer procedures and techniques. When nmCRPC is established, management decisions should be individualised according to risk, but risk stratification in this diverse population is poorly defined. Currently, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and PSA doubling time remain the best method of assessing the risk of progression and response to treatment in nmCRPC. However, optimising imaging protocols can also help assess the changing metastatic burden in patients with CRPC. Clinical trials of novel agents in nmCRPC are limited and have problems with enrolment, and therefore, improved risk stratification and imaging may be crucial to the improved management. The statements presented in this paper, reflecting the views of the authors, provide a discussion of the most recent evidence in nmCRPC and provide some advice on how to ensure these patients receive the best management available. However, there is an urgent need for more data on the management of nmCRPC.

Older patients with low Charlson score and high-risk prostate cancer benefit from radical prostatectomy

INTRODUCTION The aim of the study was to identify the appropriate level of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in older patients (>70 years) with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) to achieve survival benefit following radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 1008 older patients (>70 years) who underwent RP with pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk prostate cancer (preoperative prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL or clinical stage ≥T2c or Gleason ≥8) from 14 tertiary institutions between 1988 and 2014. The study population was further grouped into CCI < 2 and ≥2 for analysis. Survival rate for each group was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method and competitive risk Fine-Gray regression to estimate the best explanatory multivariable model. Area under the curve (AUC) and Akaike information criterion were used to identify ideal 'Cut off' for CCI. RESULTS The clinical and cancer characteristics were similar between the two groups. Comparison of the survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier curve between two groups for non-cancer death and survival estimations for 5 and 10 years shows significant worst outcomes for patients with CCI ≥ 2. In multivariate model to decide the appropriate CCI cut-off point, we found CCI 2 has better AUC and p value in log rank test. CONCLUSION Older patients with fewer comorbidities harboring high-risk PCa appears to benefit from RP. Sicker patients are more likely to die due to non-prostate cancer-related causes and are less likely to benefit from RP.

The localization and identification of candidate tumor suppressor genes involved in prostate cancer

Frequent loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at specific chromosomal regions are highly associated with the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) (Weinberg, 1991; Bishop, 1989). Chromosome 8p is the most frequently reported site of LOH (∼60%) in prostate cancer (PC), suggesting that there may be inactivated TSG(s) involved in PC on chromosome 8p. (Bergerheim et. al., 1991; Kagan et. al., 1995). In order to identify the smallest common regions of frequent LOH (SCLs) on chromosome 8, we screened 52 PC patient/tumor samples with 39 polymorphic markers in successive screenings. In the course of refining the SCLs, we identified 3 tumors with >6 Mb homozygous deletions (HZDs) at 8p22 and 8p21, suggesting the presence of candidate TSGs at both loci. These HZDs spanned the two SCLs at 8p22 (46%) and 8p21 (45%). The SCLs were narrowed to 3.2 cM at 8p22 and less than 3 cM at 8p21. ^ In order to identify candidate TSGs within the SCLs on 8p, two approaches were used. In the candidate gene approach, thirty genes that mapped to the SCLs were evaluated for expression in normal prostate and in PC cell lines. One of the candidate genes, Clusterin, showed decreased expression in 4/7 (57%) prostate cancer cell lines by Northern blot analysis. Clusterin will be further examined as a candidate TSG. ^ The second approach involved utilizing subtractive hybridization and hybrid affinity capture to generate pools of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) enriched for genes that are downregulated or deleted in PC and that map to specific regions of interest. We took advantage of a prostate cancer cell line (PC3) with a known HZD of a candidate TSG, CTNNA1 on 5q31, to develop and validate a model system. We then developed subtracted libraries enriched for 8p22 and 8p21 ESTs by this method, using two cell lines, MDAPCa-2b and PC3. The ESTs were cloned, and 40 were sequenced and evaluated for expression in normal prostate and PC cell lines. Three ESTs from the subtracted libraries, C2, C17 and F12, showed decreased expression in 29–57% of the prostate tumor cell lines studied, and will be further examined as candidate TSGs. ^

Expression cloning of a candidate prostate cancer oncogene

Genetic analysis, both karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization, of prostate cancer cell lines and specimens have revealed multiple areas of concordant increases in DNA content. An increase of DNA in specific regions of the genome in cancer is often associated with the amplification of oncogenes. Based on these observations we have hypothesized that oncogenes are involved in the initiation or progression of prostate cancer. An expression cloning approach was utilized to identify candidate oncogenes in prostate cancer. ^ A full-length, unidirectional cDNA expression library was constructed from DU145 prostate cancer cells. The cDNA library was screened using CP12, a rat prostate epithelial cell line. In soft agarose assays, CP12 (parental or vector transfected) do not form colonies. However, upon the introduction of a number of known oncogenes CP12 becomes anchorage independent in soft agarose. Based on this in-vitro phenotypic shift, a DU145 cDNA library was stably transfected into CP12, and selected for anchorage independence. Two hundred fifty nine anchorage independent clones were isolated. Some colonies contained more than one insert, bringing the candidate oncogene pool to approximately 400. Seven inserts were sequenced at random. Using the sequences obtained, GenBank was screened, and matches were found with p53, PARG1, a mitochondrial ATPase, RNF6, and three unknown genes that mapped to Unigene clusters. As the pool of cDNA inserts appeared promising, overexpressed genes were further selected. From 259 clones, 17 clones were overexpressed more than 6-fold in DU145 compared to Normal Prostate. From the 17 clones, 12 cDNA inserts were strongly expressed in DU145 and were isolated for sequencing. ^ Two of the sequences, 1G6 and 3E9, were identical. Expression of 1G6/2G9/3E9 was tested by RT-PCR. 1G6/2G9/3E9 was not expressed in normal prostate, but was expressed in all prostate cancer cell lines tested as well as six prostate cancer samples. When retransfected into CP12, 1G6/2G9/3E9 induced the formation of foci and anchorage independent colonies. Thus, functional and expression data suggest that 1G6/2G9/3E9 may be a prostate cancer oncogene. ^

Genetic alterations associated with prostate cancer progression

Prostate cancer is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer among men in the United States. In this study, evidence is presented to support the hypothesis that specific chromosomal aberrations (involving one or more chromosomal regions) are associated with prostate cancer progression from organ-confined to locally advanced tumors and that some aberrations seen in high frequency in metastatic tumors may also be present in a subset of primary tumors. To determine the appropriate approach to address this hypothesis, I have established a modified CGH protocol by microdissection and DOP-PCR for use in detecting chromosomal changes in clinical prostate tumor specimens that is more sensitive and accurate than conventional CGH methods. I have successfully performed the improved CGH protocol to screen for genetic changes of 24 organ confined (pT2) and 21 locally advanced (pT3b) clinical prostate cancer specimens without metastases (N0M0). Comparisons of tumors by stage or Gleason scores following contingency table analysis showed that seven regions of the genome differed significantly between pT2 and pT3b tumors or between low and high Gleason tumors suggesting that these regions may be important in local prostate cancer progression. These included losses on 6p21–25, 6q24–27, 8p, 10q25–26, 15q22–26, and 18cen–q12 as well as gain of 3p13–q13. Multivariate analyses showed that loss of 8p (step1) and loss of 6q25–26 (or 6p21–25 or 10q25–26) (step 2) were predictive of pathologic stage or Gleason groups with 80% accuracy. Additional 5–7 steps in the multivariate model increased the predictive value to 91–95%. Comparison of the CGH data from the primary prostate tumors of this study with those obtained from published literature on metastases and recurrent tumors showed that the clinically more aggressive stage pT3b tumors shared more abnormalities in high frequency with metastases and recurrent tumors than less aggressive stage pT2 tumors. Furthermore, loss of 11cen–q22 was shared only between the primary tumors and metastases while gain of Xcen–q13 and loss of 18cen–q12 were in common between primary and recurrent tumors. These analyses suggest that the multistage model of prostate cancer progression is not linear and that some early primary tumors may be predisposed to metastasize or evolve into recurrent tumors due to the presence of specific genetic alterations. ^

Alteration of CEACAM1 gene transcription in prostate cancer cells: The role of AR, Sp2, and HDAC

Cell to cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM1), a type II tumor suppressor, has been found to be down-regulated in prostate cancer cells. The mechanism that causes CEACAM1's down-regulation in tumorigenesis is unknown. Here we show that the transcriptional activity of CEACAM1 is decreased in prostate cancer cells. This decrease is not due to methylation of the CEACAM1's promoter, but rather to the alteration of transcription factors regulating CEACAM1 expression. ^ Since androgen/androgen receptors (AR) are potent regulators of prostate growth and differentiation, their role on CEACAM1 gene transcription was examined. The androgen receptor could directly increase CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in a ligand dependent manner by interacting with an AR consensus element that resides in the CEACAM1 promoter. However, AR binding to the CEACAM1 promoter is not related to the loss of CEACAM1 during prostate cancer progression. ^ Further analysis enabled us to determine the particular region in the CEACAM1 promoter that mediates a decrease in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells. Upon further examination, we found that this CEACAM1 promoter region interacts with the Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 transcription factors. However, only Sp2 expression was found to increase in prostate cancer cells. Inhibiting Sp2 from binding to the CEACAM1 promoter caused an increase in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells. In addition, over-expressing Sp2 in normal prostate cells resulted in a decrease in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity and endogenous protein expression. These observations suggest that Sp2 is a transcription repressor of CEACAM1. Furthermore, prostate cancer cells treated with trichostatin A (TSA), a specific histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, activated CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. This implies that HDACs are involved in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. Mutation of the Sp2 DNA binding region on the CEACAM1 promoter inhibited TSA activation of CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. This indicates that HDACs inhibit CEACAM1 transcriptional activity through Sp2. Base on these results, we propose that Sp2 is critical for down-regulating CEACAM1 expression, and one mechanism by which Sp2 represses CEACAM1 expression is by recruiting HDAC to the CEACAM1 promoter in prostate cancer cells. Collectively, these findings provide novel insights into mechanisms that cause the down-regulation of CEACAM1 expression in prostate cancer cells. ^

Cleavage and activation of calpain and its substrate caspase-7 in prostate cancer cells: Evidence for a role in apoptotic sensitization

Changes in the levels of intracellular calcium mediate multiple biological effects, including apoptosis, in some tumor cells. Early studies demonstrated that prostate cancer cells are highly sensitive to alterations in the levels of their intracellular calcium pools. Furthermore, it has been established that apoptosis in prostate cancer could be initiated through calcium-selective ionophores, or inhibitors of intracellular calcium pumps. High sensitivity to changes in intracellular calcium levels may therefore be exploited as a novel mechanism for controlling prostate cancer apoptotic thresholds; however, the mechanisms associated with this process are poorly understood. To investigate the role of calcium as a mediator of prostate cancer cell death and its effects on caspase activation, LNCaP and PC-3 cell response to the calcium ionophore A23187, were examined. LNCaP cells were highly sensitive to changes in intracellular calcium, and subtoxic concentrations of A23187 facilitated apoptosis initiated by cytokines (TNF or TRAIL). In contrast, PC-3 cell death was not affected by A23187 or cytokines. A23187 caused rapid and concentration-dependent activation of calpain in LNCaP (but not PC-3 cells) which correlated with cleavage of calpain substrates caspase-7 and PTP1B. Cleavage of PTP1B from a 50 kDa to 42 kDa protein correlated with its translocation from the endoplasmic reticulum to the cytosol and with inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation. Caspase-7 was cleaved from a 35 kDa to 30 kDa protein in response to A23187 in LNCaP (but not PC-3) cells and correlated with activation of both upstream and downstream caspases. Extracts from A23187-treated LNCaP cells, or PC-3 cells transiently transfected with calpain, mediated similar processing of in vitro transcribed and translated (TNT) caspase-7. In vitro processing of caspase-7 correlated with its proteolytic activation, which was inhibited by calpain inhibitor (calpeptin) and to some degree, by caspase inhibitors (zVAD, DEVD). Together, these results suggest that calpain is directly involved in calcium-mediated apoptosis of prostate cancer cells through activation and cleavage of caspase-7 and other substrates. Loss of calpain activation may therefore play a critical role in apoptotic resistance of some prostate cancer cells. ^

Preclinical evaluation of proteasome inhibition for the treatment of prostate cancer

Prostatic carcinoma is the most prevalent cancer detected in men. Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor to undergo clinical trials for several forms of cancer. Although we know this class of agent preferentially kills cancer cells, our knowledge of proteasome inhibition mechanisms of induced death is far from complete. We investigated the effects of bortezomib on the LNCaP-Pro5 (Pro5) and PC-3-Pro4 (Pro4) human prostatic adenocarcinoma cells lines. We showed a reduction in proliferation and an increase in DNA fragmentation, caspase 3 activity, and cell surface phosphatidyl serine exposure. The bortezomib-treated tumors from both cell lines were dramatically reduced, and apoptosis was induced. There was also a reduction in proliferation in the treated tumors from both cells lines. We looked at changes in the levels of the proangiogenic factors VEGF, IL-8 and bFGF in vitro and in vivo. Although there was a reduction in the levels of VEGF produced by the Pro5 cell line and tumor due to bortezomib, no similar observations were made for the other angiogenic factors or in the Pro4 cells. We investigated the effects of bortezomib on p53 in the Pro5 cell line. Bortezomib induced strong stabilization of p53. It did not promote phosphorylation on serines 15 and 24 and p53 remained bound to its inhibitor, mdm2. Nonetheless, confocal microscopy revealed that bortezomib stimulated p53 translocation to the nucleus and enhanced p53 DNA binding, accumulation of p53-dependant transcripts, and activation of a p53-responsive reporter gene. Furthermore, stable transfectants of LNCaP-Pro5 expressing the p53 inhibitor, HPV-E6, displayed reduced bortezomib-induced p53 activation and cell death. Our data shows bortezomib to induce antitumor effects in the human Pro4 and Pro5 prostatic adenocarcinoma cell lines by the direct induction of apoptosis. The drug also causes a reduction in cell proliferation and mean vessel density while modulating the secretion of proangiogenic factors. Although we show that proteasome inhibition stimulates p53 activation via a novel mechanism in Pro5 cells, it is also toxic to p53 null cells as is seen in the Pro4 line. ^

Prostate cancer in Texas: Addressing racial and ethnic disparities

Racial disparities in prostate cancer are of public health concern. This dissertation used Texas Cancer Registry data to examine racial disparities in prostate cancer incidence for Texas over the period 1995–1998 and subsequent mortality through the year 2001. Incidence, mortality, treatment, and risk factors for survival were examined. It was found that non-Hispanic blacks have higher incidence and mortality from prostate cancer than non-Hispanic whites, and that Hispanics and non-Hispanic Asians are roughly similar to non-Hispanic whites in cancer survival. The incidence rates in non-Hispanic whites were spread more evenly across the age spectrum compared to other racial and ethnic groups. Non-Hispanic blacks were more often diagnosed at a higher stage of disease. All racial and ethnic groups in the Registry had lower death rates from non-prostate cancer causes than non-Hispanic whites. Age, stage and grade all conferred about the same relative risks of all-cause and prostate cancer survival within each racial and ethnic group examined. Radiation treatment for non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics did not confer a relative risk of survival statistically significantly different from surgery, whereas it conferred greater survival in non-Hispanic whites. However, non-Hispanic blacks were statistically significantly less likely to have received radiation treatment, while controlling for age, stage, and grade. Among only those who died of prostate cancer, non-Hispanic blacks were less likely to have received radiation than were non-Hispanic whites, whereas among those who had not died, non-Hispanic blacks were more likely to have received this treatment. Hispanics were less likely to have received radiation whether they died from prostate cancer or not. All racial and ethnic groups were less likely than Non-Hispanic whites to have received surgery. Non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics were more likely than non-Hispanic whites to have received hormonal treatment. The findings are interpreted with caution with regard to the limitations of data quality and missing information. Results are discussed in the context of previous work, and public health implications are pondered. This study confirms some earlier findings, identifies treatment as one possible source of disparity in prostate cancer mortality, and contributes to understanding the epidemiology of prostate cancer in Hispanics. ^

The characterization of PKC-isozyme specific EGFR-dependent Erk1/2 activation in androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines

One growth factor receptor commonly altered during prostate tumor progression is the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). EGFR signaling regulates Erk1/2 phosphorylation through multiple mechanisms. We hypothesized that PKC isozymes play a role in EGFR-dependent signaling, and that through PKC isozyme selective inhibition, EGFR-dependent Erk1/2 activation can be attenuated in AICaP cells. ^ To test the hypothesis, PKC activation was induced by 12-O-tetradecanoyi-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA) in PC-3 cells. As a result, Erk1/2 was activated similarly to what was observed upon EGF stimulation. EGF-induced Erk1/2 activation in PC-3 cells was PKC-dependent, as demonstrated through use of a selective PKC inhibitor, GF109203X. This provides evidence for PKC regulatory control over Erk1/2 signaling downstream of EGFR. Next, we demonstrated that when PKC was inhibited by GF109203X, EGF-stimulated Erk1/2 activation was inhibited in PC-3, but not DU145 cells. TPA-stimulated Erk1/2 activation was EGFR-dependent in both DU145 and PC-3 cells, demonstrated through abrogation of Erk1/2 activation by a selective EGFR inhibitor AG1478. These data support PKC control at or upstream of EGFR in AICaP cells. We observed that interfering with ligand/EGFR binding abrogated Erk1/2 signaling in TPA-stimulated cells, revealing a role for PKC upstream of EGFR. ^ Next, we determined which PKC isozymes might be responsible for Erk1/2 regulation. We first determined that human AICaP cell lines express the same PKC isozymes as those observed in clinical prostate cancer specimens (α, ϵ, &zgr;, ι and PKD). Isozyme-selective methods were employed to characterize discrete PKC isozyme function in EGFR-dependent Erk1/2 activation. Pharmacologic inhibitors implicated PKCα in TPA-induced EGFR-dependent Erk1/2 activation in both PC-3 and DU145 cells. Further, the cPKC-specific inhibitor, Gö6976 decreased viablilty of DU145 cells, providing evidence that PKCα is necessary for growth and survival. Finally, resveratrol, a phytochemical with strong cancer therapeutic potential inhibited Erk1/2 activation, and this correlated with selective inhibition of PKCα. These results demonstrate that PKC regulates pathways critical to progression of CaP cells, including those mediated by EGFR. Thus, PKC isozyme-selective targeting is an attractive therapeutic strategy, and understanding the role of specific PKC isozymes in CaP cell growth and survival may aid in development of effective, non-toxic PKC-targeted therapies. ^