740 resultados para Patient Safety


Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A elaboração da proposta da presente Norma teve o apoio científico de Anabela Graça e André Coelho.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background The quest for continuous improvement of the quality of provided care is the objective of nursing care. However, the insertion and permanence of a peripheral venous catheter has been associated to complications, thus making a systematic evaluation of the performance of professionals and the management of health services important. Objective: Analyse complications that caused removal of intravenous catheters. Methods A prospective study with 64 patients of a health service of Portugal, from July to September/2015. Included patients with age 18 years, with a peripheral venous catheter. Descriptive analysis using SPSS. Ethical requirements were met. Results Two hundred three (203) intravenous catheters, in 64 patients, most elderly (section 95.3 %), with mean age of 80 years were evaluated. The catheters remained inserted between one and 12 days (mean 2 days), 66 % of the devices were removed because of complications, such as: removal by the patient (17.7 %), obstruction (17.2 %), infiltration (14.8 %), phlebitis (9.4 %) and fluid exiting the insertion site (6.4 %). The prevalence of obstruction and infiltration per patient was respectively 36 % and 39 %. Conclusions Obstruction and infiltration were the complications of higher prevalence that led to the removal and reinsertion of a new peripheral venous catheter with the possibility of increased pain, infection and hospital costs. Faced with the risk of compromising patient safety and being able to contribute to the improvement of health care, we suggest the inclusion of obstruction and infiltration in the indicators of quality of care, in order to have systematic evaluation of results, (re)plan and implement preventive measures.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Introdução: A notificação de eventos tornou-se um importante instrumento para a melhoria da qualidade no sistema de saúde. Partilhar a ocorrência de eventos na área dos cuidados de saúde é fundamental para a implementação de mecanismos de prevenção que aumentem a segurança do doente. Objetivo: Conhecer a adesão dos enfermeiros à notificação de eventos nos serviços de internamento e unidades de cuidados intensivos de um hospital central. Metodologia: Estudo exploratório descritivo, com abordagem quantitativa. Resultados: Relativamente aos eventos em que o dano é trágico, a grande maioria das vezes são notificados. Em relação à queda, todos os profissionais com quem ocorreu este evento, notificaram. Os enfermeiros apontam como principais barreiras à notificação de eventos: o esquecimento decorrente do excesso de trabalho; a evolução do evento tornar desnecessária a notificação e a aplicação informática para notificação ser complicada, não ser intuitiva. Conclusões: Após a recolha de dados verificamos, que quando ocorrem eventos, os enfermeiros notificam-nos poucas vezes. Os resultados obtidos apontam algumas orientações para a melhoria da cultura de segurança na instituição, ressalvando-se a necessidade de formação na área da segurança e da notificação antes de o evento acontecer.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Wrongdoing in health care is harmful action that jeopardizes patient safety and can be targeted at the patient or employees. Wrongdoing can vary from illegal, unethical or unprofessional action to inappropriate behavior in the workplace. Whistleblowing can be considered as a process where wrongdoing is suspected or oberved in health care by health care professionals and disclosed to the party that can influence the wrongful action. Whistleblowing causes severe harm to the whistleblower and to the object of whistleblowing complaint, to their personnel life and working community. The aim of this study was to analyze whistleblowing process in Finnish health care. The overall goal is to raise concern about wrongdoing and whistleblowing in Finnish health care. In this cross-sectional descriptive study the data were collected (n = 397) with probability sampling from health care professionals and members of The Union of Health and Social Care Professionals in Finland Tehy. The data were collected with questionnaire: “Whistleblowing -väärinkäytösten paljastaminen terveydenhuollossa” developed for this study and by using Webropol questionnaire -software during 26.6.-17.7.2015. The data were analyzed statistically. According to the results of this study health care professionals had suspected (67 %) and observed (66 %) wrongdoing in health care, more often than once a month (30%). Mostly were suspected (37 %) and observed (36%) inadequacy of the personnel and least violence toward the patient (3 %). Wrongdoing was whistle blown (suspected 29 %, observed 40 %) primarily inside the organization to the closest supervisor (76 %), face-to-face (88 %). Mostly the whistle was blown on nurses’ wrongdoing (58 %). Whistleblowing act didn’t end the wrongdoing (52 %) and whistleblowing had negative consequences to the whistleblower such as discrimination by the manager (35 %). Respondents with work experience less than ten years (62 %), working in temporary position (75 %) or in management position (88 %) were, more unwilling to blow the whistle. Whistleblowing should be conducted internally, to the closest manager in writing and anonymously. Wrongdoing should be dealt between the parties involved, and written warning should ensue from wrongdoing. According to the results of this study whistleblowing on wrongdoing in health care causes negative consequences to the whistleblower. In future, attention in health care should be paid to preventing wrongdoing and enhancing whistleblowing in order to decrease wrongdoing and lessen the consequences that whistleblowers face after blowing the whistle.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Measuring and fulfilling user requirements during medical device development will result in successful products that improve patient safety, improve device effectiveness and reduce product recalls and modifications. Medical device users are an extremely heterogeneous group and for any one device the users may include patients, their carers as well as various healthcare professionals. There are a number of factors that make capturing user requirements for medical device development challenging including the ethical and research governance involved with studying users as well as the inevitable time and financial constraints. Most ergonomics research methods have been developed in response to such practical constraints and a number of these have potential for medical device development. Some are suitable for specific points in the device cycle such as contextual inquiry and ethnography, others, such as usability tests and focus groups may be used throughout development. When designing user research there are a number of factors that may affect the quality of data collected including the sample of users studied, the use of proxies instead of real end-users and the context in which the research is performed. As different methods are effective in identifying different types of data, ideally more than one method should be used at each point in development, however financial and time factors may often constrain this.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

MATCH (Multidisciplinary Assessment of Technology Centre for Healthcare) is a new collaboration in the UK that aims to support the healthcare sector by creating methods to assess the value of medical devices from concept through to mature product. A major aim of MATCH is to encourage the inclusion of the user throughout the product lifecycle in order to achieve devices that truly meet the requirements of their users. A review of the published literature indicates that user requirements are mainly collected during the design and evaluation stage of the product lifecycle whilst other areas, including the concept stage, have less user involvement. Complementing the literature review is an in-depth consultation with the medical device industry, which has identified a number of barriers encountered by companies when attempting to capture user requirements. These will be addressed by a number of case study projects, performed in collaboration with our industrial partners, that will examine the application and utility of different approaches to collecting and analysing data on user requirements. MATCH is focused on providing advice to device developers on how to select and apply methods that have maximum theoretical strength, practical application, cost-effectiveness and likelihood of wide sector acceptance. Feedback will be sought in order to ensure that the needs of the diverse medical device sector are met.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Abstract Health institutions have an increased risk of occurrence of errors due to their diversity, specificity and volume of services, representing a great concern for health professionals whose main function is to protect the health and lives of their patients. We intend to identify a body of evidence, that shows what the most common adverse events are and what adverse events potentially arise from clinical miscommunications. An integrative literature review using the keywords "Adverse Events", "Patient Safety", "Communication". An inquiry was made on databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scielo and CINAHL, in articles published between January 2010 and March 2016, available in Portuguese and English. Of the 216 articles that emerged were selected eight articles that answered the research questions: what are the most common adverse events that have their origin in communication errors? Analyzing the selected studies, it appears that the most common adverse events arise in the context of obstetrics and pediatrics, in surgical contexts, in the continuity of care and related medication. Patient safety should be seen as a key component of quality in health care, with good management of the risk of fundamental error for the promotion of this security. The knowledge and understanding that communication failures are one of the main factors contributing to the occurrence of errors in the context of health care, allows the subsequent development of strategies to improve this process and thus ensure safer healthcare.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

A segurança é um princípio fundamental nos cuidados prestados e exige um complexo sistema de sinergias e um amplo leque de ações para a melhoria da qualidade. É indiscutível que a ocorrência de erros cria uma preocupação constante para os profissionais, sendo primordial fomentar uma cultura de segurança. Este artigo tem por objetivo identificar os fatores determinantes na segurança e qualidade dos cuidados de Enfermagem. Realizou-se uma revisão da literatura, utilizando descritores “Segurança do doente”, “Cultura de Segurança”, “Enfermagem”, “Qualidade dos Cuidados”, emergindo 309 artigos. Efetou-se uma pesquisa na PubMed, SciELO, Web of Science, com artigos publicados entre janeiro de 2010 e março de 2016. Foram selecionados 11 artigos que respondiam à questão de investigação “Quais os fatores determinantes da segurança e qualidade dos cuidados de Enfermagem?“. Dos 11 artigos seleccionados emergiram duas temáticas: a consciencialização do erro e a criação de uma cultura de segurança nas organizações. Este estudo evidencia que a ocorrência de erros constitui uma ameaça à qualidade dos cuidados e segurança dos utentes, contudo, a consciencialização dos riscos e a aplicação de medidas para o desenvolvimento de uma cultura de segurança contribui para a diminuição da frequência e severidade dos erros nas instituições de saúde.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Introduktion: Vårdorganisationer ska tillgodose patientsäker vård av hög kvalitet på ett så effektivt sätt som möjligt. Patienter drabbas dock i stor omfattning av vårdskador som skulle kunna undvikits om adekvata åtgärder vidtagits vid deras kontakt med hälso- och sjukvården. Sjuksköterskorna utför omvårdnadshandlingar med de givna resurser som vårdorganisationen tillhandahåller. Syfte: Att belysa betydelsen av sjuksköterskors omvårdnadskompetens för patientsäkerheten ur ett organisatoriskt perspektiv. Metod: Polit och Becks (2017) niostegsmodell har använts med ett deduktivt arbetssätt. Ramverket har varit förutbestämda patientsäkerhetsindikatorer (trycksår, fall, nosokomiala infektioner, misslyckande att rädda och mortalitet) samt Donabedians (1988) begreppsmodell. Tio kvantitativa artiklar har använts till resultatet. Resultat: Sjuksköterskors omvårdnadskompetens har visat sig genom procentandelen sjuksköterskor i omvårdnadsgruppen, omvårdnadstiden som patienter får av sjuksköterskor samt kandidatexamen och klinisk erfarenhet hos sjuksköterskorna. Vid en ökning av omvårdnadskompetensen så minskade vårdskador oavsett avdelningens karaktär. Konklusion: Mer än hälften av vården består av omvårdnad där sjuksköterskor leder omvårdnadsarbetet. Sammansättningen av omvårdnadsgrupper har en avgörande roll för patientsäkerheten. Procentandel sjuksköterskor i omvårdnadsgruppen bör vara omkring 85- 88%. För att öka patientsäkerheten krävs mer evidens och datainsamling kring vilka omvårdnadshandlingar som påverkar vårdutfall utifrån struktur, process och vårdutfallsnivå. Detta skulle stärka sjuksköterskeprofessionens betydelse och underlätta för verksamheter och beslutsfattare vid kvalitetsförbättring av vården.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND: Conceptualization of quality of care - in terms of what individuals, groups and organizations include in their meaning of quality, is an unexplored research area. It is important to understand how quality is conceptualised as a means to successfully implement improvement efforts and bridge potential disconnect in language about quality between system levels, professions, and clinical services. The aim is therefore to explore and compare conceptualization of quality among national bodies (macro level), senior hospital managers (meso level), and professional groups within clinical micro systems (micro level) in a cross-national study. METHODS: This cross-national multi-level case study combines analysis of national policy documents and regulations at the macro level with semi-structured interviews (383) and non-participant observation (803 hours) of key meetings and shadowing of staff at the meso and micro levels in ten purposively sampled European hospitals (England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, and Norway). Fieldwork at the meso and micro levels was undertaken over a 12-month period (2011-2012) and different types of micro systems were included (maternity, oncology, orthopaedics, elderly care, intensive care, and geriatrics). RESULTS: The three quality dimensions clinical effectiveness, patient safety, and patient experience were incorporated in macro level policies in all countries. Senior hospital managers adopted a similar conceptualization, but also included efficiency and costs in their conceptualization of quality. 'Quality' in the forms of measuring indicators and performance management were dominant among senior hospital managers (with clinical and non-clinical background). The differential emphasis on the three quality dimensions was strongly linked to professional roles, personal ideas, and beliefs at the micro level. Clinical effectiveness was dominant among physicians (evidence-based approach), while patient experience was dominant among nurses (patient-centered care, enough time to talk with patients). Conceptualization varied between micro systems depending on the type of services provided. CONCLUSION: The quality conceptualization differed across system levels (macro-meso-micro), among professional groups (nurses, doctors, managers), and between the studied micro systems in our ten sampled European hospitals. This entails a managerial alignment challenge translating macro level quality definitions into different local contexts.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

BACKGROUND: Errors in the decision-making process are probably the main threat to patient safety in the prehospital setting. The reason can be the change of focus in prehospital care from the traditional "scoop and run" practice to a more complex assessment and this new focus imposes real demands on clinical judgment. The use of Clinical Guidelines (CG) is a common strategy for cognitively supporting the prehospital providers. However, there are studies that suggest that the compliance with CG in some cases is low in the prehospital setting. One possible way to increase compliance with guidelines could be to introduce guidelines in a Computerized Decision Support System (CDSS). There is limited evidence relating to the effect of CDSS in a prehospital setting. The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of CDSS on compliance with the basic assessment process described in the prehospital CG and the effect of On Scene Time (OST). METHODS: In this time-series study, data from prehospital medical records were collected on a weekly basis during the study period. Medical records were rated with the guidance of a rating protocol and data on OST were collected. The difference between baseline and the intervention period was assessed by a segmented regression. RESULTS: In this study, 371 patients were included. Compliance with the assessment process described in the prehospital CG was stable during the baseline period. Following the introduction of the CDSS, compliance rose significantly. The post-intervention slope was stable. The CDSS had no significant effect on OST. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CDSS in prehospital care has the ability to increase compliance with the assessment process of patients with a medical emergency. This study was unable to demonstrate any effects of OST.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Esta investigación midió la percepción del personal asistencial sobre la cultura de seguridad de los pacientes en un hospital de primer nivel de complejidad por medio de un estudio descriptivo de corte transversal. Se utilizó como herramienta de medición la encuesta ‘Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Cultura’ (HSOPSC) de la Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) versión en español, la cual evalúa doce dimensiones. Los resultados mostraron fortalezas como el aprendizaje organizacional, las mejoras continuas y el apoyo de los administradores para la seguridad del paciente. Las dimensiones clasificadas como oportunidades de mejora fueron la cultura no punitiva, el personal, las transferencias y transiciones y el grado en que la comunicación es abierta. Se concluyó que aunque el personal percibía como positivo el proceso de mejoramiento y apoyo de la administración también sentía que era juzgado si reportaba algún evento adverso.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

TITULO DEL TRABAJO: Evaluación de las causas de los eventos adversos o incidentes que afectan la seguridad del paciente, en el hospital central de la policía de enero 2012 a diciembre 2013. OBJETIVO: Determinar y analizar la causa raíz de los principales factores de riesgo que afectan la seguridad del paciente que puedan ocasionar eventos adversos en la atención de los pacientes, con el uso de la teoría de restricciones TOC en el Hospital Central de la Policía HOCEN. MATERIALES Y METODO: Se realizó una investigación descriptiva de naturaleza mixta – cuantitativa de tipo correlacional, la población es la totalidad de pacientes atendidos en el hospital de la policía entre enero de 2012 a diciembre de 2013, en el cual se presentaron un total de 189 eventos adversos los cuales sirvieron de objeto a esta investigación, la recolección de datos se realizó por medio de tablas de Excel 2010, posterior a esto se exporto la información al software de IBM SPSS Statistics 19 donde se analiza la información arrojando datos descriptivos y tablas de frecuencia. Finalmente haciendo uso de la Teoría de restricciones TOC se identificó la causa raíz para la ocurrencia de eventos adversos y plantear una intervención estratégica que promueva un sistema efectivo de seguridad del paciente en pro de la búsqueda de la mejora continua. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 189 eventos adversos, de los cuales 89 fueron reportados en el turno de la noche, seguido por el turno de la mañana con 57, el turno tarde con 27, 28 eventos que no registraron horario, el servicio con mayor ocurrencia es el de medicina interna con 25 eventos, y finalmente la caída de pacientes, lo relacionado con medicamentos, nutriciones y accesos vasculares son los eventos con mayor incidencia. CONCLUSIONES: Se pudo concluir que es necesario que los procesos de seguridad del paciente deben tener un lineamiento directo desde la dirección de la organización permitiendo que las mejoras sean de inmediata aplicación, también es importante generar en el personal una actitud de compromiso frente al proceso de mejora, hay que redefinir las políticas institucionales ya que se concluyó por medio de la teoría de restricciones TOC que el principal factor para la ocurrencia de eventos adversos son las multitareas que el personal tiene que realizar en el proceso de atención.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Los eventos adversos (EA) están presentes en todos los niveles de atención en salud y deben ser evaluados de manera integral, tanto en los servicios hospitalarios como en el entorno de la Atención Primaria en Salud (APS). Los EA que se presentan en los servicios hospitalarios, son diferentes a los que se presentan en los servicios de Atención Primaria en Salud (APS) y por ello se debe dar un abordaje diferenciado. La seguridad del paciente debe ser una prioridad para todos los sistemas de salud. Desde esta perspectiva se deben identificar cuáles son las herramientas más adecuadas para el reporte, análisis, intervenciones y acciones de mejora, con las que deben contar los programas de seguridad del paciente y la apropiación de conceptos de gestión de riesgo, facilita la identificación y el manejo institucional de situaciones que ponen en peligro la integridad y la vida de los pacientes.

Relevância:

60.00% 60.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Resumen Introducción: Con el fin de estimar la prevalencia del síndrome de cementación ósea (SICO) en pacientes llevados a artroplastia de cadera cementada en el Hospital Universitario Mayor Méderi 2014. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, descriptivo, de corte transversal, se evaluaron los registros de historia clínica de los pacientes llevados a artroplastia cementada de cadera desde enero a diciembre de 2014. Se estimó la prevalencia del número total de casos de SICO sobre el total de intervenidos y la mortalidad del número de muertes intraoperatorias sobre el total de pacientes que desarrollaron el SICO. Resultados: Se encontraron 102 pacientes llevados a artroplastia cementada de cadera; 73,5% de género femenino, la mediana de edad fue 82 años, la prevalencia de SICO fue de 0,96 x 100 procedimientos y la mortalidad de 7,14 x 100 eventos (1 caso), el evento más frecuentemente relacionado fue las Perdida sanguínea < 300ml (p.valor: 0,006), el resto de diferencias entre los factores de riesgo reconocidos no fueron estadísticamente significativas. Discusión Se encontró una baja frecuencia del evento, con una muerte relacionada, se requieren estudios prospectivos para explorar desenlaces en el tiempo para la presentación de SICO y factores de riesgo adicionales. Palabras clave: "Hipotensión/Diagnóstico", "Prevalencia", "Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/Efectos Adversos", "Cementos Óseos/Efectos Adversos", "Complicaciones Postoperatorias/Etiología" y "Complicaciones Postoperatorias/Inducido Químicamente"