Diseño para fabricación digital: definición unívoca entre forma y fabricación en arquitectura

La presente investigación se inicia planteando el objetivo de identificar los parámetros geométricos que son exclusivos del proceso de generación de la Forma y relacionarlos con los invariantes relacionados con la Fabricación digital aplicada a la Arquitectura. Con ello se pretende recuperar la geometría como herramienta principal del proceso de Proyecto ampliando su ámbito de actuación al encontrar una relación con los procesos de fabricación digital. El primer capítulo describe los antecedentes y contexto histórico centrándose especialmente en la influencia de la capacidad de definir geometrías complejas digitalmente mediante la aplicación de algoritmos. En los primeros ejemplos la aproximación del Arquitecto a proyectos con geometrías complejas no euclídeas aún se emplea sin precisión en la comunicación de la geometría ideada para su puesta en obra. Las técnicas constructivas obligan a asumir una tolerancia de desviación entre proyecto y obra y la previsión del comportamiento de esa geometría no permite asegurar su comportamiento final. No será hasta la introducción de herramientas CAD en el proceso de ideación arquitectónica cuando el Arquitecto se capacite para generar geometrías no representables de forma analógica. Sin embargo, la imposibilidad de trasladar la geometría proyectada a la praxis constructiva impedirá la plasmación de un proceso completo, salvo en las contadas ocasiones que se recogen en este texto. “El análisis cronológico de las referencias establece como aspecto esencial para la construcción de geometrías complejas la capacidad primero para definir y comunicar de forma precisa e inequívoca la geometría y después la capacidad de analizar el desempeño prestacional de dicha propuesta geométrica”. La presente investigación se inicia planteando el objetivo de identificar los parámetros geométricos que son exclusivos del proceso de generación de la Forma y relacionarlos con los invariantes relacionados con la Fabricación digital aplicada a la Arquitectura. Con ello se pretende recuperar la geometría como herramienta principal del proceso de Proyecto ampliando su ámbito de actuación al encontrar una relación con los procesos de fabricación digital. El primer capítulo describe los antecedentes y contexto histórico centrándose especialmente en la influencia de la capacidad de definir geometrías complejas digitalmente mediante la aplicación de algoritmos. En los primeros ejemplos la aproximación del Arquitecto a proyectos con geometrías complejas no euclídeas aún se emplea sin precisión en la comunicación de la geometría ideada para su puesta en obra. Las técnicas constructivas obligan a asumir una tolerancia de desviación entre proyecto y obra y la previsión del comportamiento de esa geometría no permite asegurar su comportamiento final. No será hasta la introducción de herramientas CAD en el proceso de ideación arquitectónica cuando el Arquitecto se capacite para generar geometrías no representables de forma analógica. Sin embargo, la imposibilidad de trasladar la geometría proyectada a la praxis constructiva impedirá la plasmación de un proceso completo, salvo en las contadas ocasiones que se recogen en este texto. “El análisis cronológico de las referencias establece como aspecto esencial para la construcción de geometrías complejas la capacidad primero para definir y comunicar de forma precisa e inequívoca la geometría y después la capacidad de analizar el desempeño prestacional de dicha propuesta geométrica”. Establecida la primera conclusión, el capítulo de contexto histórico continúa enfocándose sobre la aplicación de las técnicas digitales en el Proceso de proyecto primero, y en la puesta en obra después. Los casos de estudio identifican claramente como un punto de inflexión para la generación de formas complejas mediante un software CAD el Museo Guggenheim de Bilbao en 1992. El motivo esencial para elegir este proyecto como el primer proyecto digital es el uso de la herramienta de definición digital de la geometría para su reproducción inequívoca en obra. “La revolución digital ha aportado al Arquitecto la posibilidad de abandonar las tipologías arquitectónicas basados en restricciones geométricas-constructivas. La aplicación de técnicas de fabricación digital ha permitido la capacidad de diseñar con independencia del sistema constructivo y libertad formal. En este nuevo contexto las prestaciones suponen los nuevos límites conceptuales, ya que el acceso y disposición de la información del comportamiento de las alternativas que cada geometría conlleva demanda del Arquitecto la jerarquización de los objetivos y la formulación en un conjunto coherente de parámetros”. Los proyectos que emplean herramientas digitales para la resolución de las distintas etapas del proceso proyectual se verán incrementados de forma exponencial desde 1992 hasta nuestros días. A pesar del importante auge de las técnicas de diseño asistido por ordenador el principal desafío sigue siendo la vinculación de las geometrías y materiales propuestos con las capacidades de las técnicas de manufactura y puesta en obra. El proceso de diseño para fabricación en un entorno digital es una tecnología madura en otras industrias como la aeroespacial o la automovilística, incluso la de productos de consumo y decoración, sin embargo en el sector de Construcción es un sistema inmaduro e inconexo. Las particularidades de la industria de la construcción aún no han sido abordadas en su totalidad y las propuestas de investigación realizadas en este ámbito se han centrado hasta 2015 en partes del proceso y no en el proceso total. “El principal obstáculo para la estandarización e implantación globalizada de un proceso digital desde el origen de la forma hasta la construcción es la inexistencia de un protocolo integrado que integre las limitaciones de fabricación, económicas y de puesta en obra junto a la evaluación de desempeño prestacional durante la fases iniciales de proyecto”. En el capítulo número 3 se estudian los distintos procesos de generación de la forma. Se propone una definición específica para el ámbito de la investigación de “forma” en el entendemos que se incluye la envolvente exterior y el conjunto organizativo de espacios interiores conectados. Por lo tanto no es excluyente del interior. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar y clasificar los procesos para la generación digital de formas en los distintos proyectos seleccionados como emblemáticos de cada tipología. Se concluye que la aproximación a este proceso es muy variada y compleja, con aplicación segregada y descoordinada entre los distintos agentes que han intervenir. En un proceso de generación formal analógico los parámetros que intervienen son en parte conscientes y en parte inconscientes o aprendidos. El Arquitecto sólo tiene control sobre la parte consciente de los parámetros a integrar en el diseño, de acuerdo a sus conocimientos y capacidades será capaz de manejar un número limitado de parámetros. La parte aprendida permanece en el inconsciente y dirige el proceso analógico, aportando prejuicios estéticos incorporados durante el proceso formativo y propio del entorno cultural. “El empleo de herramientas digitales basadas en la evaluación prestacional durante el proceso de selección formal permite al Arquitecto conocer “en tiempo real” el desempeño en el conjunto de prestaciones evaluadoras del conjunto de alternativas geométricas a la propuesta previamente definida por la intuición arquitectónica. El proceso definido no persigue identificar una solución óptima sino asistir al Arquitecto en el proceso de generación de la forma mediante la evaluación continua de los vectores direccionales más idóneos que el procedimiento generativo plantea”. La definición de complejidad en generación y producción de formas en relación con el proceso de diseño digital paramétrico global o integrado, es esencial para establecer un protocolo que optimice su gestión. “Se propone como definición de complejidad como factor resultante de multiplicar el número de agentes intervinientes por el número de parámetros e interacciones comunes que intervienen en el proceso de generación de la forma, dividido por la complejidad de intercambio de información digital desde el origen hasta la fase de fabricación y construcción”. Una vez analizados los procesos de generación digital de Arquitectura se propone identificar los parámetros geométricos que definen el proceso de Diseño digital, entendiendose por Diseño el proceso que engloba desde la proposición de una forma inicial basada en la intuición del Arquitecto, la generación y evaluación de variantes y posterior definición digital para producción, tanto de un objeto, un sistema o de la totalidad del Proyecto. En la actualidad el proceso de Diseño es discontinuo y lineal organizandose los parámetros por disciplinas en las que está estructurada las atribuciones profesionales en la industria de la construcción. Para simplificar la identificación y listado se han agrupado siguiendo estos grupos de conocimiento. Entendemos parametros invariables aquellos que son independientes de Tipologías arquitectónicas o que dependen del mismo proceso de generación de la Forma. “El listado de los parámetros que intervienen en un proceso de generación formal es una abstracción de una realidad compleja. La parametrización de las decisiones que intervienen en la selección de una forma determinada mediante “well defined problems” es imposible. El proceso que esta tesis describe entiende esta condición como un elemento que pone en valor el propio procedimiento generativo por la riqueza que la subjetividad que el equipo de diseño aporta”. La segunda parte esencial de esta investigación pretende extraer las restricciones propias del estado del arte de la fabricación digital para posteriormente incorporarlos en los procesos digitales de definición de la Forma arquitectónica. “La integración de las restricciones derivadas de las técnicas de fabricación y construcción digitales en el proceso de generación de formas desde el ámbito de la Arquitectura debe referirse a los condicionantes geométricos asociados a cada sistema constructivo, material y técnica de fabricación. La geometría es además el vínculo que permite asociar el conjunto de parámetros prestacionales seleccionados para un Proyecto con los sistemas de fabricación digital”. A estos condicionantes geométricos obtenidos del análisis de cada sistema de fabricación digital se les ha denominado “invariantes geométricos”. Bajo este término se engloban tanto límites dimensionales de fabricación, como materiales compatibles, tolerancias de manufactura e instalación y cualidades prestacionales asociadas. El objetivo de esta propuesta es emplear la geometría, herramienta fundamental y propia del Arquitecto, como nexo de unión entre el conjunto complejo y heterogéneo de parámetros previamente listados y analizados. Para ello se han simplificado en tablas específicas para cada parámetro prestacional los condicionantes geométricos que se derivan de los Sistemas de fabricación digital compatibles (ver apéndice 1). El estudio y evaluación de las capacidades y objetivos de las distintas plataformas de software disponibles y de las experiencias profesionales evaluadas en los proyectos presentados, permiten concluir que la propuesta de plataforma digital de diseño integral multi-paramétrico de formas arquitectónicas requiere de un protocolo de interoperatibilidad específico aún no universalmente establecido. Actualmente el enfoque de la estrategia para normalizar y universalizar el contexto normativo para regular la interoperatibilidad se centra en figura del gestor denominado “BIM manager”. Las atribuciones y roles de esta figura se enfocan a la gestión del continente y no del contenido (Definición de los formatos de intercambio, niveles de desarrollo (LOD) de los componentes o conjuntos constructivos, detección de interferencias y documentación del propio modelo). Siendo este ámbito un desarrollo necesario para la propuesta de universalización del sistema de diseño para fabricación digital integrado, la presente investigación aporta un organigrama y protocolo asociado. El protocolo: 1. Establece la responsabilidad de identificar y definir la Información que debe determinar el proceso de generación y desarrollo de la forma arquitectónica. 2. Define la forma digital apropiada para generar la geometría del Proyecto, incluyendo la precisión necesaria para cada componente y el nivel de detalle necesario para su exportación inequívoca al proceso de fabricación. 3. Define el tempo de cada etapa de diseño identificando un nivel de detalle acorde. 4. Acopla este organigrama dentro de las estructuras nuevas que se proponen en un entorno BIM para asegurar que no se producen solapes o vacíos con las atribuciones que se identifican para el BIM Manager. “El Arquitecto debe dirigir el protocolo de generación coordinada con los sistemas de producción digital para conseguir que la integración completa. El protocolo debe asistir al proceso de generación de forma mediante la evaluación del desempeño prestacional de cada variante en tiempo real. La comunicación entre herramientas digitales es esencial para permitir una ágil transmisión de información. Es necesario establecer un protocolo adaptado a los objetivos y las necesidades operativas de cada proyecto ya que la estandarización de un protocolo único no es posible”. Una decisión estratégica a la hora de planificar una plataforma de diseño digital común es establecer si vamos a optar por un Modelo digital único o diversos Modelos digitales federados. Cada uno de los modos de trabajo tiene fortalezas y debilidades, no obstante en el ámbito de investigación se ha concluido que un proceso integrado de Diseño que incorpore la evaluación prestacional y conceptual definida en el Capítulo 3, requiere necesariamente de varios modelos de software distintos que han de relacionarse entre sí mediante un protocolo de comunicación automatizado. Una plataforma basada en un modelo federado consiste en establecer un protocolo de comunicación entre los programas informáticos empleados por cada disciplina. En este modelo de operación cada equipo de diseño debe establecer las bases de comunicación en función del número y tipo de programas y procesos digitales a emplear. En esta investigación se propone un protocolo basado en los estándares de intercambio de información que estructura cualquier proceso de generación de forma paramétrico “La investigación establece el empleo de algoritmos evolutivos como el sistema actual óptimo para desarrollar un proceso de generación de formas basadas en la integración y coordinación de invariantes geométricos derivados de un conjunto de objetivos prestacionales y constructivos. No obstante, para la aplicación en el caso práctico realizado se ha podido verificar que la evaluación del desempeño aún no puede realizarse en una única herramienta y por lo tanto el proceso de selección de las variantes genéticas óptimas ha de ejecutarse de forma manual y acumulativa. El proceso debe realizarse de manera federada para la selección evolutiva de los invariantes geométricos dimensionales”. La evaluación del protocolo de integración y los condicionantes geométricos obtenidos como parámetros geométricos que controlan las posibles formas compatibles se realiza mediante su aplicación en un caso práctico. El ejercicio simula la colaboración multidisciplinar con modelos federados de plataformas distintas. La elección del tamaño y complejidad constructiva del proyecto se ha modulado para poder alcanzar un desarrollo completo de cada uno de los parámetros prestacionales seleccionados. Continuando con el mismo objetivo propuesto para los parámetros prestacionales, la tipología constructiva-estructural seleccionada para el ejercicio permite la aplicación la totalidad de invariantes geométricos asociados. El objetivo de este caso práctico es evaluar la capacidad alterar la forma inicialmente propuesta mediante la evaluación del desempeño prestacional de conjunto de variantes geométricas generadas a partir de un parámetro dimensional determinado. Para que este proceso tenga sentido, cada una de las variantes debe ser previamente validada conforme a las limitaciones geométricas propias de cada sistema de fabricación y montaje previstos. El interés de las conclusiones obtenidas es la identificación de una variante geométrica distante a la solución simétrica inicialmente como la solución óptima para el conjunto de parámetros seleccionados. Al tiempo se ha comprobado como la participación de un conjunto de parámetros multi-disciplinares que representan la realidad compleja de los objetivos arquitectónicos favorecen la aparición de variaciones genéticas con prestaciones mejoradas a la intuición inicial. “La herencias tipológicas suponen un límite para la imaginación de variantes formales al proceso de ideación arquitectónica. El ejercicio realizado demuestra que incluso en casos donde aparentemente la solución óptima aparenta ser obvia una variante aleatoria puede mejorar su desempeño global. La posibilidad de conocer las condiciones geométricas de las técnicas de fabricación digital compatibles con el conjunto de parámetros seleccionados por el Arquitecto para dirigir el proceso asegura que los resultados del algoritmo evolutivo empleado sean constructivamente viables. La mejora de imaginación humana con la aportación de geometrías realmente construibles supone el objetivo último de esta tesis”. ABSTRACT Architectural form generation process is shifting from analogical to digital. Digital technology has changed the way we design empowering Architects and Engineers to precisely define any complex geometry envisioned. At the same time, the construction industry, following aeronautical and automotive industries, is implementing digital manufacturing techniques to improve efficiency and quality. Consequently construction complexity will no longer be related to geometry complexity and it is associated to coordination with digital manufacturing capacities. Unfortunately it is agreed that non-standard geometries, even when proposed with performance optimization criteria, are only suitable for projects with non-restricted budgets. Furthemore, the lack of coordinated exportation protocol and geometry management between design and construction is avoiding the globalization of emergence process in built projects Present research first objective is to identify exclusive form-generation parameters related to digital manufacturing geometrical restraints. The intention was to use geometry as the form-generation tool and integrate the digital manufacturing capacities at first stages of the project. The first chapter of this text describes the investigation historical context focusing on the influence between accurate geometry definition at non-standard forms and its construction. At first examples of non-Euclidean geometries built the communication between design and construction were based on analogical partial and imprecise documentation. Deficient communication leads to geometry adaptation on site leaving the final form uncontrolled by the Architect. Computer Aided Design enable Architects to define univocally complex geometries that previously where impossible to communicate. “The univocally definition of the Form, and communication between design and construction is essential for complex geometry Projects”. The second chapter is focused on digital technologies application in form finding process and site construction. The case studies selected identifies a clear inflexion node at 1992 with the Guggenheim Museum in Bilbao. The singularity of this project was the use of Aeronautics software to define digitally the external envelope complex geometry to enable the contractor to build it. “The digital revolution has given the Architect the capacity to design buildings beyond the architectural archetypes driven by geometric-constructive limitations. The application of digital manufacturing techniques has enabled a free-form construction without geometrical limitations. In this new context performance shall be the responsible to set new conceptual boundaries, since the behavior of each possible geometry can be compare and analyze beforehand. The role of the Architect is to prioritize the performance and architectural objectives of each project in a complete and coherent set of parameters”. Projects using digital tools for solving various stages of the design process were increased exponentially since 1992 until today. Despite the significant rise of the techniques of computer-aided design the main challenge remains linking geometries and materials proposed at each design with the capabilities of digital manufacturing techniques. Design for manufacturing in a digital environment is a mature technology in other industries such as aerospace and automotive, including consumer products and decoration, but in the construction sector is an immature and disjointed system. The peculiarities of the construction industry have not yet been addressed in its entirety and research proposals made in this area until 2015 have focused in separate parts of the process and not the total process. “The main obstacle to global standardization and implementation of a complete digital process from the form-finding to construction site is the lack of an integrated protocol that integrates manufacturing, economic and commissioning limitations, together with the performance evaluation of each possible form”. The different form generation processes are studied at chapter number 3. At the introduction of this chapter there is a specific definition of "form" for the research field. Form is identified with the outer envelope geometry, including the organizational set of connected indoor spaces connected to it. Therefore it is not exclusive of the interior. The aim of this study is to analyze and classify the main digital form generation processes using different selected projects as emblematic of each type. The approach to this process is complex, with segregated and uncoordinated different actors have to intervene application. In an analogical form-generation process parameters involved are partly conscious and partly unconscious or learned. The architect has control only over limited part of the parameters to be integrated into the design, according to their knowledge and. There is also a learned aesthetical prejudice that leads the form generation process to a specific geometry leaving the performance and optimization criteria apart from the decision making process. “Using performance evaluation digital tools during form finding process provides real-time comparative information to the Architect enabling geometry selection based on its performance. The generative form generation process described at this document does not ambition to identify the optimum geometry for each set of parameters. The objective is to provide quick information at each generation of what direction is most favorable for the performance parameters selected”. Manufacturing complexity definition in relation to a global and integral process of digital design for manufacture is essential for establishing an efficient managing protocol. “The definition of complexity associated to design for production in Architecture is proposed as the factor between number of different agents involved in the process by the number of interactions required between them, divided by the percentage of the interchange of information that is standardized and proof of information loss”. Design in architecture is a multi-objective process by definition. Therefore, addressing generation process linked to a set of non-coherent parameters requires the selection of adequate generative algorithm and the interaction of the architect. During the second half of the twentieth century and early twenty-first century it have been developed various mathematical algorithms for multi-parametric digital design. Heuristic algorithms are the most adequate algorithms for architectural projects due to its nature. The advantage of such algorithms is the ability to efficiently handle large scale optimization cases where a large number of design objectives and variables are involved. These generative processes do not pursue the optimum solution, in fact it will be impossible to proof with such algorithm. This is not a problem in architectural design where the final goal is to guide the form finding process towards a better performance within the initial direction provided by the architect. This research has focused on genetic algorithms due to its capacity to generate geometric alternatives in multiple directions and evaluate the fitness against a set of parameters specified in a single process. "Any protocol seeks to achieve standardization. The design to manufacturing protocol aims to provide a coordinated and coherent form generation process between a set of design parameters and the geometrical requirements of manufacturing technique. The protocol also provides an information exchange environment where there is a communication path and the level of information is ensured. The research is focused on the process because it is considered that each project will have its own singularities and parameters but the process will stay the same. Again the development of a specific tool is not a goal for the research, the intention is to provide an open source protocol that is valid for any set of tools”. Once the digital generation processes are being analized and classified, the next step is to identify the geometric parameters that define the digital design process. The definition of design process is including from the initial shape proposal based on the intuition of the architect to the generation, evaluation, selection and production of alternatives, both of an object , system or of the entire project . The current design process in Architecture is discontinuous and linear, dividing the process in disciplines in which the construction industry is structured. The proposal is to unify all relevant parameters in one process. The parameters are listed in groups of knowledge for internal classification but the matrix used for parameter relationship determination are combined. “A multi-parameter determination of the form-finding process is the integration all the measurable decisions laying behind Architect intuition. It is not possible to formulate and solve with an algorithm the design in Architecture. It is not the intention to do so with the proposal of this research. The process aims to integrate in one open protocol a selection of parameters by using geometry as common language. There is no optimum solution for any step of the process, the outcome is an evaluation of performance of all the form variations to assist the Architect for the selection of the preferable solution for the project”. The research follows with the geometrical restrictions of today Digital manufacturing techniques. Once determined it has been integrated in the form-finding process. “Digital manufacturing techniques are integrated in the form-finding process using geometry as common language. Geometric restraints define the boundary for performance parametric form-finding process. Geometrical limitations are classified by material and constructive system”. Choose between one digital model or several federate models is a strategic decision at planning a digital design for manufacturing protocol. Each one of the working models have strengths and weakens, nevertheless for the research purposes federated models are required to manage the different performance evaluation software platforms. A protocol based on federated models shall establish a communication process between software platforms and consultants. The manager shall integrate each discipline requirements defining the communication basis. The proposed protocol is based on standards on information exchange with singularities of the digital manufacturing industry. “The research concludes evolutionary algorithms as current best system to develop a generative form finding process based on the integration and coordination of a set of performance and constructive objectives. However, for application in professional practice and standardize it, the performance evaluation cannot be done in only one tool and therefore the selection of optimal genetic variants must be run in several iterations with a cumulative result. Consequently, the evaluation process within the geometrical restraints shall be carried out with federated models coordinated following the information exchange protocol”. The integration protocol and geometric constraints evaluation is done by applying in a practical case study. The exercise simulates multidisciplinary collaboration across software platforms with federated models. The choice of size and construction complexity of the project has been modulated to achieve the full development of each of the parameters selected. Continuing with the same objective proposed for the performance parameters the constructive and structural type selected for the exercise allows the application all geometric invariants associated to the set of parameters selected. The main goal of the case study is to proof the capacity of the manufacturing integrated form finding process to generate geometric alternatives to initial form with performance improved and following the restrictions determined by the compatible digital manufacturing technologies. The process is to be divided in consecutive analysis each one limited by the geometrical conditions and integrated in a overall evaluation. The interest of this process is the result of a non-intuitive form that performs better than a double symmetrical form. The second conclusion is that one parameter evaluation alone will not justify the exploration of complex geometry variations, but when there is a set of parameters with multidisciplinary approach then the less obvious solution emerge as the better performing form. “Architectural typologies impose limitation for Architects capacity to imagine formal variations. The case study and the research conclusions proof that even in situations where the intuitive solution apparently is the optimum solution, random variations can perform better when integrating all parameters evaluation. The capacity of foreseing the geometrical properties linking each design parameter with compatible manufacturing technologies ensure the result of the form-finding process to be constructively viable. Finally, the propose of a complete process where the geometry alternatives are generated beyond the Architect intuition and performance evaluated by a set of parameters previously selected and coordinated with the manufacturing requirements is the final objective of the Thesis”.

Guidelines for air quality maintenance planning and analysis.

Vol. 7: second ed., 1975.

The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble

As with all new ideas, the concept of Open Innovation requires extensive empirical investigation, testing and development. This paper analyzes Procter and Gamble's 'Connect and Develop' strategy as a case study of the major organizational and technological changes associated with open innovation. It argues that although some of the organizational changes accompanying open innovation are beginning to be described in the literature, more analysis is warranted into the ways technological changes have facilitated open innovation strategies, particularly related to new product development. Information and communications technologies enable the exchange of distributed sources of information in the open innovation process. The case study shows that furthermore a suite of new technologies for data mining, simulation, prototyping and visual representation, what we call 'innovation technology', help to support open innovation in Procter and Gamble. The paper concludes with a suggested research agenda for furthering understanding of the role played by and consequences of this technology.

Biomolecular engineering at interfaces

A broad review of technologically focused work concerning biomolecules at interfaces is presented. The emphasis is on developments in interfacial biomolecular engineering that may have a practical impact in bioanalysis, tissue engineering, emulsion processing or bioseparations. We also review methods for fabrication in an attempt to draw out those approaches that may be useful for product manufacture, and briefly review methods for analysing the resulting interfacial nanostructures. From this review we conclude that the generation of knowledge and-innovation at the nanoscale far exceeds our ability to translate this innovation into practical outcomes addressing a market need, and that significant technological challenges exist. A particular challenge in this translation is to understand how the structural properties of biomolecules control the assembled architecture, which in turn defines product performance, and how this relationship is affected by the chosen manufacturing route. This structure-architecture-process-performance (SAPP) interaction problem is the familiar laboratory scale-up challenge in disguise. A further challenge will be to interpret biomolecular self- and directed-assembly reactions using tools of chemical reaction engineering, enabling rigorous manufacturing optimization of self-assembly laboratory techniques. We conclude that many of the technological problems facing this field are addressable using tools of modem chemical and biomolecular engineering, in conjunction with knowledge and skills from the underpinning sciences. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

The sugar cane biofactory - building blocks for the future

The sugarcane plant, with its enormous genetic capacity to accumulate carbon and manufacture and store sucrose, also has the potential to accumulate carbon and metabolically create a wide range of new molecules for industrial and other commercial uses. The extent to which this change can be developed and realised commercially is a function of the technical competence of the industry's R&D capacity, the reality of the commercial drivers which support this global agenda, and the determination of the industry to achieve such goals. The outcomes of existing R&D work already strongly support the technical challenges of this opportunity in sugarcane. The current challenge remains the commercialisation of the technology in a global market in which the current business structures and systems for the manufacture and distribution of existing (competitive) products makes the development of new product lines a higher risk than might otherwise be the case. This is despite all the claims that global markets are expecting and (in some cases) legislating the creation of more sustainable production systems. The options and issues for the development of a sugarcane biofactory system are discussed.

From bush to bouquet: The relevance of market research

‘Adopt a consumer focus’ is the mantra that pervades the commercialisation strategies of horticultural products world-wide, but does this translate into practice in small and medium enterprises or is the process still production driven? Typically, new products in floriculture are modifications of existing products, which are introduced to existing markets, where consumers’ needs are well understood. Under these circumstances, the traditional role of market research is marginalised. In contrast, the commercialisation of ‘true’ new products into new markets involves a greater effort. Here, market research can identify market segments that are more receptive to innovation and experimentation. In this paper, the authors draw upon preliminary research and their initial experiences in the commercialisation of an Australian native flower to examine the inter-play of information flows and new product development.

Editorial

This second issue of Knowledge Management Research & Practice (KMRP) continues the international nature of the first issue, with papers from authors based on four different continents. There are five regular papers, plus the first of what is intended to be an occasional series of 'position papers' from respected figures in the knowledge management field, who have specific issues they wish to raise from a personal standpoint. The first two regular papers are both based on case studies. The first is 'Aggressively pursuing knowledge management over two years: a case study a US government organization' by Jay Liebowitz. Liebowitz is well known to both academics and practictioners as an author on knowledge management and knowledge based systems. Government departments in many Western countries must soon face up to the problems that will occur as the 'baby boomer' generation reaches retirement age over the next decade. This paper describes how one particular US government organization has attempted to address this situation (and others) through the introduction of a knowledge management initiative. The second case study paper is 'Knowledge creation through the synthesizing capability of networked strategic communities: case study on new product development in Japan' by Mitsuru Kodama. This paper looks at the importance of strategic communities - communities that have strategic relevance and support - in knowledge management. Here, the case study organization is Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT), a Japanese telecommunication firm. The third paper is 'Knowledge management and intellectual capital: an empirical examination of current practice in Australia' by Albert Zhou and Dieter Fink. This paper reports the results of a survey carried out in 2001, exploring the practices relating to knowledge management and intellectual capital in Australia and the relationship between them. The remaining two regular papers are conceptual in nature. The fourth is 'The enterprise knowledge dictionary' by Stuart Galup, Ronald Dattero and Richard Hicks. Galup, Dattero and Hicks propose the concept of an enterprise knowledge dictionary and its associated knowledge management system architecture as offering the appropriate form of information technology to support various different types of knowledge sources, while behaving as a single source from the user's viewpoint. The fifth and final regular paper is 'Community of practice and metacapabilities' by Geri Furlong and Leslie Johnson. This paper looks at the role of communities of practice in learning in organizations. Its emphasis is on metacapabilities - the properties required to learn, develop and apply skills. This discussion takes work on learning and core competences to a higher level. Finally, this issue includes a position paper 'Innovation as an objective of knowledge management. Part I: the landscape of management' by Dave Snowden. Snowden has been highly visible in the knowledge management community thanks to his role as the Director of IBM Global Services' Canolfan Cynefin Centre. He has helped many government and private sector organizations to consider their knowledge management problems and strategies. This, the first of two-part paper, is inspired by the notion of complexity. In it, Snowden calls for what he sees as a 20th century emphasis on designed systems for knowledge management to be consigned to history, and replaced by a 21st century emphasis on emergence. Letters to the editor on this, or any other topic related to knowledge management research and practice, are welcome. We trust that you will find the contributions stimulating, and again invite you to contribute your own paper(s) to future issues of KMRP.

Stimulating design reuse through automated coding

In designing new product the ability to retrieve drawings of existing components is important if costs are to be controlled by preventing unnecessary duplication if parts. Component coding and classification systems have been used successfully for these purposes but suffer from high operational costs and poor usability arising directly from the manual nature of the coding process itself. A new version of an existing coding system (CAMAC) has been developed to reduce costs by automatically coding engineering drawings. Usability is improved be supporting searches based on a drawing or sketch of the desired component. Test results from a database of several thousand drawings are presented.

Economists' perceptions versus managers' decisions:an experiment in transaction cost analysis

Are the perceptions of professional economists on transaction costs consistent with make-or-buy decisions made within firms? The answer may have important implications for transaction cost research. Data on firms' outsourcing during the new product development process are taken from a largescale survey of UK, German and Irish manufacturing plants, and we test the consistency of these outsourcing decisions with the predictions derived from the transaction cost perceptions of a panel of economists. Little consistency is evident between actual outsourcing patterns and the predictions of the (Williamsonian) transactions cost model derived from the panel of economists. There is, however, evidence of a systematic pattern to the differences, suggesting that a competence or resource-based approach may be relevant to understanding firm outsourcing, and that firms are adopting a strategic approach to managing their external relationships. © Cambridge Political Economy Society 2005; all rights reserved.

Go/no-go criteria during grocery brand development

Past research into new product screening criteria have largely centered on industrial new products. This study investigates the criteria that managers use for screening and evaluating new grocery products or brands. Theory suggests that the branding, promotional, and trade needs of grocery brands mean that screening criteria for grocery product development will differ from those applied to industrial goods. Our methodology departs from earlier research in gathering information on the accept/reject criteria during new product development rather than examining the reasons for success and failure after launch. The results endorse many findings from the extant literature on new product development. However, we highlight a set of factors that new product managers regard as important to the go/no-go decision in new grocery product or brand development that differs significantly from previous studies. From a research perspective, our study findings make an important contribution to the field by developing measurement scales for addressing NPD in the grocery sector.

How screening criteria change during brand development

Purpose - Despite the increasing sophistication of new product development (NPD) research, the reliance on traditional approaches to studying NPD has left several areas in need of further research. The authors propose addressing some of these gaps, especially the limited focus on consumer brands, evaluation criteria used across different project-review points in the NPD process, and the distinction between "kills", "successes", and "failures". Moreover, they propose investigating how screening criteria change across project-review points, using real-time NPD projects. Design/methodology/approach - A postal survey generated 172 usable questionnaires from a sample of European, North American, Far Eastern and Australian consumer packaged-goods firms, providing data on 314 new product projects covering different development and post-commercialization review points. Findings - The results confirm that acceptance-rejection criteria vary through the NPD process. However, financial criteria dominate across all the project-review points. Initial screening is coarse, focusing predominantly on financial criteria. Fit with organizational, product, brand, promotional, and market requirements dominate in the detailed screen and pre-development evaluation points. At pre-launch, decision-makers focus on product, brand, and promotional criteria. Commercial fit, production synergies, and reliability of the firm's market intelligence are significant discriminators in the post-launch review. Moreover, the importance of marketing and channel issues makes the criteria for screening brands different from those of industrial markets. Originality/value - The study, although largely descriptive and involves a relatively small sample of consumer goods firms, offers new insights into NPD project evaluation behavior. Future, larger-scale investigations covering a broader spectrum of consumer product sectors are needed to validate our results and to explain the reasons behind managers' decisions. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

A multi-agent system using iterative bidding mechanism to enhance manufacturing agility

The global market has become increasingly dynamic, unpredictable and customer-driven. This has led to rising rates of new product introduction and turbulent demand patterns across product mixes. As a result, manufacturing enterprises were facing mounting challenges to be agile and responsive to cope with market changes, so as to achieve the competitiveness of producing and delivering products to the market timely and cost-effectively. This paper introduces a currency-based iterative agent bidding mechanism to effectively and cost-efficiently integrate the activities associated with production planning and control, so as to achieve an optimised process plan and schedule. The aim is to enhance the agility of manufacturing systems to accommodate dynamic changes in the market and production. The iterative bidding mechanism is executed based on currency-like metrics; each operation to be performed is assigned with a virtual currency value and agents bid for the operation if they make a virtual profit based on this value. These currency values are optimised iteratively and so does the bidding process based on new sets of values. This is aimed at obtaining better and better production plans, leading to near-optimality. A genetic algorithm is proposed to optimise the currency values at each iteration. In this paper, the implementation of the mechanism and the test case simulation results are also discussed. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Alliance behaviour, absorptive capacity and competitive advantage: a comparative study of biopharmaceutical firms in Europe and the US

In this thesis, we explore the relationship between absorptive capacity and alliances, and their influence on firms’ competitive advantage in the US and European biopharmaceutical sectors. The study undertaken in this thesis is based on data from a large-scale international survey of over 2,500 biopharmaceutical firms in the US, the UK, Germany, France and Ireland. The thesis advanced a conceptual framework, which integrated the multi-dimensions of absorptive capacity, exploration-exploitation alliances, and competitive advantage, into a biopharmaceutical firm’s new product development process. The proposed framework is then tested in the empirical analysis, using truncated models to estimate firms’ sales growth, with zero-inflated negative binominal models capturing the number of alliances in which firms engage, and aspects of realised absorptive capacity analysed by ordinal probit models. The empirical results suggest that both skill-based and exploitation-based absorptive capacity play crucial roles in shaping firms’ competitive advantage, while neither exploratory nor exploitation alliances contribute to the improvement in firms’ competitive position. In terms of the interaction between firms’ absorptive capacity and alliance behaviour, the results suggest that engagement with exploratory alliances depends more strongly on firms’ assimilation capability (skills levels and continuity of R&D activities), while participation in exploitation alliances is more conditional on firms’ relevant knowledge monitoring capability. The results highlight the major differences between the determinants of firms’ alliance behaviour, and competitive advantage in the US and Europe – in the US firms’ skill levels prove more significant in determining firms’ engagement with exploratory alliances, whereas in Europe continuity of R&D proves more important. Correspondingly, while US firms’ engagement with exploitation alliances depends on market monitoring capability, that in Europe is more strongly linked to exploitation-based absorptive capacity. In respect of the determinants of firms’ competitive advantage – in Europe, market monitoring capability, engagement with exploitation alliances, and continuous R&D activities, prove more important, while in the US, it is firms’ market characteristics that matter most.

The impact of drug information on the prescribing of drugs

Using prescription analyses and questionnaires, the way drug information was used by general medical practitioners during the drug adoption process was studied. Three new drugs were considered; an innovation and two 'me-too' products. The innovation was accepted by general practitioners via a contagion process, information passing among doctors. The 'me-too' preparations were accepted more slowly and by a process which did not include the contagion effect. 'Industrial' information such as direct mail was used more at the 'awareness' stage of the adoption process while 'professional' sources of information such as articles in medical journals were used more to evaluate a new product. It was shown that 'industrial' information was preferred by older single practice doctors who did not specialise, had a first degree only and who did not dispense their own prescriptions. Doctors were divided into early and late-prescribers by using the date they first prescribed the innovatory drug. Their approach to drug information sources was further studied and it was shown that the early-prescriber issued slightly more prescriptions per month, had a larger list size, read fewer journals and generally rated industrial sources of information more highly than late-prescribers. The prescribing habits of three consultant rheumatologists were analysed and compared with those of the general practitioners in the community which they served. Very little association was noted and the influence of the consultant on the prescribing habits of general practitioners was concluded to be low. The consultants influence was suggested to be of two components, active and passive; the active component being the most influential. Journal advertising and advertisement placement were studied for one of the 'me-too' drugs. It was concluded that advertisement placement should be based on the reading patterns of general practitioners and not on ad-hoc data gathered by representatives as was the present practice. A model was proposed relating the 'time to prescribe' a new drug to the variables suggested throughout this work. Four of these variables were shown to be significant. These were, the list size, the medical age of the prescriber, the number of new preparations prescribed in a given time and the number of partners in the practice.