Highway design and operations standards affected by driver characteristics. Volume II: final technical report.

Federal Highway Administration, Office of Safety and Traffic Operations Research and Development, Washington, D.C.

Recent international activity in cooperative vehicle-highway automation systems /

This report summarizes the current state of the art in cooperative vehicle-highway automation systems in Europe and Asia based on a series of meetings, demonstrations, and site visits, combined with the results of literature review. This review covers systems that provide drivers with a range of automation capabilities, from driver assistance to fully automated driving, with an emphasis on cooperative systems that involve active exchanges of information between the vehicles and the roadside and among separate vehicles. The trends in development and deployment of these systems are examined by country, and the similarities and differences relative to the U.S. situation are noted, leading toward recommendations for future U.S. action. The Literature Review on Recent International Activity in Cooperative Vehicle-Highway Automation Systems is published separately as FHWA-HRT-13-025.

Sensitivity analysis of vehicle design attributes that affect vehicle response in critical accident situations - part II: technical report. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

CRASH III model improvements: derivation of new side stiffness parameters from crash tests. Volume 2. Final report.

Mode of access: Internet.

Further laboratory testing of in-vehicle alcohol test devices. Technical report.

Mode of access: Internet.

An analysis of the automobile market: modeling of the long-run determinants of the demand for automobiles. Volume II: simulation analysis using the Wharton E.F.A. Automobile Demand Model. Final report.

Transportation Department, Washington, D.C.

Diagnostic motor vehicle inspection demonstration projects, program engineering support. Volume 9 - appendix H: vehicle designs that facilitate or hinder inspection and repair and interchangeability and interface capability of test equipment and vehicles. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

On-board vehicle sensor technology. Volume I--summary report. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Final impact assessment of the automotive fuel economy standards for model year 1981-1984 passenger cars. NHTSA technical report.

Mode of access: Internet.

On-board vehicle sensor technology. Volume II--technical report. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

A study of administrative hearings conducted by state driver licensing agencies. Volume I. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

A study of administrative hearings conducted by state driver licensing agencies. Volume II - appendices. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Visibility tests of 1978 model cars. [Part 2]. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

CRASH III model improvements: MRB-to-car side impact test of a 90 [degree] moving rigid barrier to a 1981 Chevrolet Citation test speed 35.2 mph.

Mode of access: Internet.

Investigation of driver reactions to tread separation scenarios in the National Advanced Driving Simulator (NADS).

Decreasing vehicle understeer was strongly associated with the likelihood of control loss following both the unexpected and expected tire failures. Knowledge of the imminent tread separation reduced the overall probability of control loss from 55% to 20% and had a significant effect on how quickly drivers responded as well as on the nature of their initial responses (i.e., steering orbraking). Driver age was marginally associated with increased likelihood of vehicle control loss, but only on unexpected trials. Vehicle speed at the time of first steering input also contributed to the probability of control loss. Neither the location of the tire that failed (left rear vs. right rear) nor the specific instructions about how best to respond to the tread separation influenced the probability of control loss. Differences associated with vehicle understeer conditions observed in the present study were large and consistent, independent of driver expectations and across driver age groups. It is thus fair to conclude that in the event of a complete rear-tire detread, the increased difficulty in vehicle handling and the associated increased likelihood of loss of vehicle control with decreasing vehicle understeer generalize to real-world driving.