Orderly book, Second Regiment of U.S. Dragoons, New York, 1812-1813

The Second U.S. Regiment of Light Dragoons was formed in January 1812. In March of 1814, it merged with the First U.S. Regiment of Light Dragoons to form the Regiment of Light Dragoons.

Orderly book, Second Regiment of U.S. Dragoons, New York, 1812-1813

An orderly book of the Second Regiment of U.S. Dragoons, New York, dated August 14, 1812-July 29, 1813. The book contains orders pertaining to day-to-day military matters, such as punishments for disobedience, court-martial proceedings, camp rules and regulations, and guidelines for interacting with civilians in the vicinity of the camp. The Regiment was stationed at various locations in upstate New York and Canada, including Greenbush, Albany, Sackets Harbor, Utica, Geneva, Fort Niagara and Fort George. General Henry Dearborn originally commanded the Regiment at Greenbush. Names noted in this book include:E. Beebe, Deputy Adjt. General; William King, Capt. 15th; John Chandler, General ;W. Gamewood, Major ;James Burns, Colonel;John Woodford, Major; Andrew McDowell, Capt.; Abm. Gustis, Major; C.W. Hunter, Brigade Major; Selden, Captain; Holland, Captain; Harris, Captain; Clarkson, Lieutenant; Johnson, Lieutenant; Robert Craig, Adjt.; R.G. Hith, A.A. General. Also included with the orderly book are a monthly return form, a contract for medical services, and a bonus pay voucher for Thomas Blunt. The monthly return form is partially completed and dated January 1813 at Greenbush, New York. It is signed by Captain Jonas Holland. The contract is dated May 20, 1812, between John Dodge, physician and surgeon, and Jonas Holland. The contract describes the services required of the physician and the salary to be paid. The bonus pay voucher is dated April 25, 1813, for $8.00 paid to Thomas Blunt by Captain Jonas Holland for 'enlisting into the army of the United States for five years'.

A roll of non-commissioned Officers, Drummers, & Private men enlisted for the first Battalion of the King’s Royal Regiment of New York, 1781 [photocopy]

The King’s Royal Regiment of New York was a Loyalist regiment that served on the Canadian frontier during the American Revolutionary War. The regiment was commanded by Sir John Johnson, who recruited members from the settlers on his estates in the Mohawk Valley. After the War, the two battalions of the regiment were disbanded. The First Battalion settled on the north shore of the St. Lawrence, while the Second Battalion settled by the Bay of Quinte.

Certificate of Promotion to Lieutenant in the 19th Lincoln Regiment

Certificate of Promotion to Lieutenant in the 19th Lincoln Regiment (32 cm x 40 cm). This was presented to Samuel DeVeaux Woodruff and signed by Eugene Fiset, Surgeon General, Deputy Minister of Militia and Defense. This certificate is framed, June 5, 1917.

Certificate to Announce Thomas Henderson Captain of a Company of the Northern Regiment

Certificate (vellum) to announce that Thomas Henderson is to be Captain of a company of the Northern Regiment of Local Militia in the County of Northumberland, England. The document is stained, faded and contains holes. The text is slightly affected. The signature on this document has been cut away, Sept. 4, 1813.

Appointment of William Woodruff to be Ensign in the 1st Regiment of Lincoln Militia in the Niagara District

Appointment of William Woodruff to be Ensign in the 1st Regiment of Lincoln Militia in the Niagara District. This is signed by Francis Gore, Lieutenant Governor of the Province of Upper Canada. The document is quite stained and watermarked. The text is not affected, Nov. 5, 1815.

Letter to Colonel Robert Nelles, Commander of the 4th Regiment of Lincoln Militia from Colonel Nathaniel Coffin of York

Letter to Colonel Robert Nelles, Commander of the 4th Regiment of Lincoln Militia from Colonel Nathaniel Coffin of York. His is enquiring about the post of collector at Niagara for his son-in-law Edward Pilkington. There is a small hole in this letter which affects the text slightly, Aug. 28, 1820.

Appointment of John Turney to be an ensign in the 4th Regiment of Lincoln Militia in the Niagara District

Appointment of John Turney to be an ensign in the 4th Regiment of Lincoln Militia in the Niagara District of which, Robert Nelles is the Lieutenant Colonel. This was signed by Francis Gore, Lieutenant Governor, Oct. 31, 1815.

Appointment of Edmund Hodges to be a lieutenant in the 4th Regiment of Lincoln Militia

Appointment of Edmund Hodges to be a lieutenant in the 4th Regiment of Lincoln Militia of which Robert Nelles is the Colonel. This is signed by Hillier and Maitland, April 19, 1822.

List of officers and dates of commissions and appointments in the 4th Regiment of the Lincoln Militia

List of officers and dates of commissions and appointments in the 4th Regiment of the Lincoln Militia including the troop of cavalry in the 4th Lincoln Militia (2 pages, handwritten), June 18, 1838.

Sketches of the campaign in northern México in eighteen hundred forty-six and seven by an officer of the first regiment of Ohio volunteers.

UANL

Die Nibelungen ; e in deuts hes trauerspiel in drei abteilunget von Friedrich Gebbel

UANL

Autobiography of Friedrich Froebel

UANL

Friedrich Nietzsche. Metteur en scène de la forme aphoristique

Les écrits aphoristiques de Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) posent une évidente difficulté. Cette difficulté n’a pas échappé à l’auteur qui a recommandé à ses lecteurs, en 1887 dans sa préface à Zur Genealogie der Moral, qu’ils pratiquent en lisant ses aphorismes un « art de l’interprétation [Kunst der Auslegung] » [KSA, V, p. 255, § 8.]. Malheureusement, Nietzsche ne dit pas précisément en quoi consiste une telle lecture. Comment le lecteur doit-il alors interpréter les écrits aphoristiques de Friedrich Nietzsche? Pour répondre à cette question herméneutique nous nous servirons de la « métaphore du théâtre », présente en filigrane dans l’œuvre du philosophe. Notre mémoire se propose d’abord d’examiner ce que Nietzsche a lui-même dit au sujet des « formes brèves » (la maxime, la sentence, mais surtout l’aphorisme), et en même temps ce qu’il attend plus particulièrement d’un lecteur de ces formes d’expression. Cette analyse philologique du corpus nietzschéen se fera aussi à la lumière des commentaires que Peter Sloterdijk (1947-) et Sarah Kofman (1934-1994) ont proposés de la philosophie nietzschéenne. Après avoir nous-mêmes analysé les propos de Nietzsche portant sur ce qu’il estime être un lecteur à la hauteur de ses écrits, il sera dès lors possible de porter un jugement critique sur la pertinence et la portée des études de Sloterdijk et Kofman qui abordent eux-mêmes la mise en scène de la pensée nietzschéenne au moyen de la métaphore du théâtre. Une part importante de notre critique portera notamment sur la nature synthétique de leurs interprétations philosophiques, menées dans une perspective thématico-synthétique et trans-aphoristique, qui marginalisent à bien des égards la particularité et l’autonomie des formes d’expression au moyen desquelles Friedrich Nietzsche s’exprime.