976 resultados para Bisexual Branching Processes


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Quenching process, TRIP, J2-plasticity theory, phase transition, distortion

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Passive trip system, reactor trip, runaway reaction, batch reactor

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Mathematik, Diss., 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Informatik, Diss., 2009

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

1 - This paper is a joined publication of the Dept. of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", University of São Paulo, and Secção de Citricultura e Frutas Tropicais, Instituto Agronômico, de Campinas, and deal with the number of seed per fruit and the polyembryony in Citrus, with special reference to the pummelos (C. grandis). 2 - For C. pectinifera, hibrid limon x acid lime, C. histrix and Citrus sp. the mean of seeds per fruit is 5,8 - 17,3 - 30,2 -94,6; for 14 pummelos the average was 100 and the range of variation 11 to 185 seeds per fruit. For the four above mentioned Citrus the cotyledons were classified into 3 types: big (near 8 mm.), medium (near 6 mm) and small (near 4 mm) and for the pummelos there was only one size of cotyledons, about 10 mm (table 1). 3 - The polyembryony was determined by two processes: a) counting of the embryos in the mature seed; b) counting after germination in flats or seed-beds. The rasults obtained are in table 2; the process a gave larger results than process b.The following pummelos are monoembryonics: melancia, inerme, Kaune Paune, sunshine, vermelha, Singapura, periforme, Zamboa, doce, Indochina, Lau-Tau, Shantenyau and Siamesa. Sometime it was found a branching of the main stem that gave a impression of polyembryonic seeds. 4 - It was shown by the x2 test that the distribution of embryo numbers fits the Poisson's series (table 2) in both processes. 5 - It is discussed in table 2 the variability of polyembryony for the following cases: a) between plants, within years. The teste for the differences of mean of polyembryony between 3 plants of C. pectinifera is statistically significant in 1948 and 1949; b) between yields of the same plant, within year. The same case of C. pectinifera may be used for this purpose; c) between process, within year. It is shown in table 3, for C. pectinifera and the hibrid "limon x acid lime" that there is a statistically signicicant between both process above mentioned.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Diss., 2012

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Verfahrens- und Systemtechnik, Diss., 2012

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Diss., 2013

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Verfahrens- und Systemtechnik, Diss., 2012

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Verfahrens- und Systemtechnik, Diss., 2014

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Verfahrens- und Systemtechnik, Diss., 2014

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Magdeburg, Univ., Fak. für Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, Diss., 2015

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Fakultät für Naturwissenschaften, Univ., Dissertation, 2015

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

We address the question of how a third-party payer (e.g. an insurer) decides what providers to contract with. Three different mechanisms are studied and their properties compared. A first mechanism consists in the third-party payer setting up a bargaining procedure with both providers jointly and simultaneously. A second mechanism envisages the outcome of the same simultaneous bargaining but independently with every provider. Finally, the last mechanism is of different nature. It is the so-called "any willing provider" where the third-party payer announces a contract and every provider freely decides to sign it or not. The main finding is that the decision of the third-party payer depends on the surplus to be shared. When it is relatively high the third-party payer prefers the any willing provider system. When, on the contrary, the surplus is relatively low, the third-party payer will select one of the other two systems accor ing to how bargaining power is distributed.