The description of stencilling by Gilles Filleau des Billettes: transcription and translation

This article presents the description of stencilling by Gilles Filleau des Billettes. The description sets out a method for stencilling letters, words, and texts, and specifies equipment for doing the work; it forms the basis for a reconstruction of the equipment and method, which is presented in a parallel article in this volume of Typography papers (see E. Kindel, 'A reconstruction of stencilling based on the description by Gilles Filleau des Billettes', Typography papers, 9, pp. 28–65). The original French text, approximately 10,000 words in length, is here transcribed and accompanied by a parallel English translation. Introductory notes on the preparation of both texts are provided; images of stencil letters found among the papers of Sébastien Truchet, Des Billettes’s colleague, are shown in an appendix.

Das andanças do pensar : cenas infantis

Na estrada, pegadas sugerem passos e descompassos de andarilhos de diferentes tribos. Por toda parte, pisadas: rastejantes, superficiais, firmes, a-fundadas, dançarinas, crianceiras e até rasuradas. A diagramação é a máquina que captura as relações de forças e ressalta, no percurso e no percorrido, linhas, fluxos e composições. Da vida, lampejos de pensamentos desgarram-se. Dos pensamentos, possibilidades de vida desprendem-se. É nesse ponto que a experimentação suscita outros modos de pensamento e desencadeia novas maneiras de viver. É por essa conjugação com a vida que os signos se dão à sensibilidade e coagem-na a sentir. A agressão inicial repercute: leva a memória a aprender um imemorial, a fabular um por vir e a resistir ao presente; introduz o tempo no pensamento e o desafia a pensar o impensado. À vista disso, a aprendizagem conduz as faculdades ao exercício transcendente e requer uma educação voltada para a emissão e a exploração dos signos. Da conexão entre educação, crianceiria e filosofia, forças são duplicadas e devires precipitados.

Acontecimento e história: pensamento de Deleuze e problemas epistemológicos das ciências humanas

O conceito de acontecimento foi desenvolvido para o domínio epistemológico da história por P. Veyne, no intuito de ativar determinados problemas foucaultianos que indicavam a estrita ligação entre o trabalho historiográfico e o trabalho filosófico. A definição deste conceito poderia ser aprofundada se fosse extraído do domínio epistemológico para o qual fora elaborado e levado a uma dimensão mais abrangente. Vislumbra-se tal possibilidade a partir da articulação do referido conceito a determinadas injunções do pensamento de Deleuze, particularmente tendo em vista o conceito deleuzeano de acontecimento, em suas implicações ontológicas e éticas.

A amizade como paisagem conceitual e o amigo como personagem conceitual, segundo deleuze e guattari

This paper begins with the Proposal of a pedagogy of concept according to Deleuze and Guattari. On this basis, I emphasize and explore the assertion that every thought demands relational traces as their internal condition. Among the relational traces defined by this pedagogy of concept, I selected friend as a character who distinguishes a given thought. I try, after that, to define, generally what friend and the scene of friendship in Plato's, Nietzsche's, Heidegger's and Foucault's philosophies are.

Sobre o esquecimento

Pós-graduação em Educação Escolar - FCLAR

Arte e filosofia como disciplinas das multiplicidades: problema filosóficos e problemas estéticos em interferência intrínseca, segundo Deleuze

The most challenging Deleuze/Guattari’s lesson regar- ding art is that it is an autonomous way of thinking and bears of no lack relatively to philosophy and science. In fact, creating artistically is thinking. Throughout this article, I will try to show that art and philosophy are autonomous modes of thinking, as far as the statute of their creations is multiplicity. The multiplicity that characterizes philosophy is concept; the multiplicity that characterizes art is sen- sation. Both of them have their multiplicity character guaranteed by the instance of the problems, to which they are solutions. The most important is that the problems although independent constitute in- terference channels through which two modalities of meeting could happen. First, sensations point out how could a thinker endures in the instance of problems, avoiding both to deprive the concept and to fall in philosophical illusions. In second place in the instance of the problem philosophy and art exchange, so that either a thinker takes an art sensation and extracts from it its generating problem to be philosophically solved or, vice-versa, an artist takes a concept and solves its problem creating new art sensations.

Ontopolíticas e diagramas históricos do poder: maioria e minoria segundo Deleuze e a teoria das multidões segundo Peirce

This article aims at developing the so-called ontopolitics as G. Deleuze s innovative contribution to contemporary political philosophy. This objective will lead us to inspect the concept of power that Deleuze borrowed from Foucault and extended in order to assign to it an ontological adequacy. The concept of power opens access to another important element of the Deleuzean political philosophy, that is, the study of the historical diagrams of the power in the so-called discipline and control societies. With the combined dynamical diagram of both, we become aware of the portrait Deleuze draws for the democracy in contemporary societies. Digging into the Deleuzean ontopolitics, we will devote ourselves to the concepts of majority, minority and minor-becoming. It is in this point that the meeting between Deleuze s ontoplitics and Ch. Sanders Peirce s mathematical ontology becomes sound. It happens that Deleuze s ontopolitical concepts, besides their bond to an ontology of the power, receive also a mathematical treatment related to certain arithmetical (denumerable and nondenumerable) and geometrical notions (lines). The majorities and minorities are denumerable sets which are crossed by nondenumerable becomings. This step done, we will reach the stand point of the present paper, where we carry out initial approach with regard to an image for the concepts of majority and minority on the basis of Peirce s theory of collections and multitudes, mostly envisaging the mathematical ontology included in it. Accordingly, the main operation to be accomplished is that the Deleuzean distinction between the denumerable majorities/minorities and the nondenumerable mino-becoming may be mapped out in terms of discrete collections called enumerable, denumerable and abnumerable or postnumerable, in compliance with Peirce s terminology.

Deleuze e Bergson: desejo como problema do inconsciente-multiplicidade

O conceito de problema, que Deleuze desenvolve em vários momentos-chave de seu pensamento, tem em sua alçada bergsoniana um ponto forte. No presente artigo, procuraremos mostrar de que modo Deleuze vale-se do caminho de Bergson neste âmbito para propor e articular, em torno da idéia de problema, dois dos conceitos originais pelos quais ficou conhecido, ou seja, a multiplicidade e o inconsciente. Veremos que o conceito de problema está na base de uma tipologia deleuzeana das multiplicidades, assim como lhe permite elaborar uma idéia de inconsciente como multiplicidade onde o desejo responde pela instância problemática. Desse modo, conclui-se pela importância determinante da filosofia bergsoniana para Deleuze, particularmente quanto à passagem de sua ontologia para um dos concietos que a realizam e aplicam.

Da teoria crítica ao pós-estruturalismo: breves apontamentos para uma possível confrontação entre Adorno e Deleuze

The Frankfurt critical theory and the French post-structuralism are important lines of thought in the philosophy of education, which inspired several academic productions in recent decades. In the 1950s and 1960s, both opposed philosophical resistance against many types of totalitarianism. One big difference between the two lines of thought has been the critical of the dialectic considered an insufficient method to think about the difference (Deleuze) and the reaffirmation of a negative dialectic (Adorno). This article intends to analyze the thematic affinities and the differences of method between the thought of these two authors.

Repetitive behaviours in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome: tics, compulsions, or both?

Background Repetitive behaviours (RB) in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) are frequent. However, a controversy persists whether they are manifestations of obssessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) or correspond to complex tics. Methods 166 consecutive patients with GTS aged 15–68 years were recruited and submitted to extensive neurological, psychiatric and psychological evaluations. RB were evaluated by the YBOCS symptom checklist and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I), and classified on the basis of a semi-directive psychiatric interview as compulsions or tics. Results RB were present in 64.4% of patients with GTS (107/166) and categorised into 3 major groups: a ‘tic-like’ group (24.3%–40/166) characterised by RB such as touching, counting, ‘just right’ and symmetry searching; an ‘OCD-like’ group (20.5%–34/166) with washing and checking rituals; and a ‘mixed’ group (13.2%–22/166) with both ‘tics-like’ and ‘OCD-like’ types of RB present in the same patient. In 6.3% of patients, RB could not be classified into any of these groups and were thus considered ‘undetermined’. Conclusions The results confirm the phenomenological heterogeneity of RB in GTS patients and allows to distinguish two types: tic-like behaviours which are very likely an integral part of GTS; and OCD-like behaviours, which can be considered as a comorbid condition of GTS and were correlated with higher score of complex tics, neuroleptic and SSRIs treatment frequency and less successful socio-professional adaptation. We suggest that a meticulous semiological analysis of RB in GTS patients will help to tailor treatment and allow to better classify patients for future pathophysiologic studies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00169351