Utilité et limites du dosage de l'antigène carcinoembryonnaire (CEA) dans la surveillance postopératoire de malades atteints de carcinomes du côlon et du rectu

An attempt is made to define the usefulness and limitations of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) radioimmunoassay for evaluation of tumor resection and detection of tumor relapse in patients with large-bowel carcinoma. In 45 patients for whom complete tumor resection was reported, all but 5 showed a drop in CEA to normal values after surgery. The 5 patients whose CEA did not fall to below 5 ng/ml showed a subsequent rise in CEA level and later were all found to have a tumor relapse. The results indicate that an incomplete drop in circulating CEA level one month after surgery is a bad prognostic sign. Twenty-two of these patients were followed up by repeated CEA radioimmunoassay for several months after surgery; 8 showed a progressive increase in CEA levels preceding clinical diagnosis of tumor relapse by 2-10 months. The clinical history of these 8 patients is briefly described. The results demonstrate that relapses of colon and rectum carcinoma can be detected by increased CEA levels months before the appearance of any clinical evidence.

Accès aux soins d'urgence: organisation et utilité de la chaîne des secours [Access to prehospital medical care: organization and utility of the chain of survival].

In order to be effective, access to prehospital care must be integrated into a system described as "the chain of survival". This system is composed of 5 essential phases: 1) basic help by witnesses; 2) call for help; 3) basic life support; 4) professional rescue and transport to the appropriate institution and 5) access to emergency ward and hospital management. Each phase is characterized by a specific organization, dedicated skills and means in order to increase the level of care brought to the patient. This article describes the organization, the utility and the specificity of the chain of survival allowing access to prehospital medical care in the western part of Switzerland.

Clairvoyance de l'utilité et de la désirabilité sociales dans les situations d'évaluation

Résumé Le concept de clairvoyance normative (Py & Somat, 1991), qui a vu le jour dans la continuité des études sur la norme d'internalité (Beauvois, 1984), traduit la connaissance du caractère normatif ou contre-normatif d'un type de comportements ou d'un type de jugements. Un certain nombre de recherches semble alors attester que la clairvoyance normative participe à l'obtention d'une évaluation positive. Toutefois, ces différentes recherches font toutes fi de l'idée qu'il existerait deux dimensions de la valeur sociale : l'utilité sociale et la désirabilité sociale. La prise en compte de ces deux dimensions, surtout si l'on admet que les normes sociales ne renvoient pas toutes à la même dimension (Beauvois, 1995 ; Dubois & Beauvois, 2005 ; Dubois, 2005), vient alors quelque peu compliquer le modèle liant clairvoyance normative et évaluation positive car elle suggère que la clairvoyance de certaines normes aidera avant tout à être bien évalué sur le plan de l'utilité sociale alors que la clairvoyance d'autres normes participera davantage à être évalué favorablement sur le plan de la désirabilité sociale. Ces réflexions ont été à la base de ce travail de thèse et ont conduit à la réalisation de notre première étude. Les quelques résultats inattendus que nous avons obtenus nous ont cependant incité par la suite à reconsidérer la pertinence de rattacher la notion de clairvoyance à certains types de contenu (internalité, autosuffisance, etc.), ce qui nous a amené à la proposition de deux nouvelles notions : la clairvoyance de l'utilité sociale et la clairvoyance de la désirabilité sociale. C'est dans l'optique de valider cette proposition que deux nouvelles études ont alors été réalisées. Si celles-ci appuient dans leur ensemble l'idée que les clairvoyances de l'utilité et de la désirabilité sociales seraient des indicateurs plus performants d'une évaluation sociale positive que ne le seraient les clairvoyances des normes sociales de jugement, elles n'ont néanmoins pas manqué de soulever de nouvelles questions. Cela nous a ainsi mené, dans un troisième temps, à nous interroger sur ce qui détermine la valeur en jeu dans une situation d'évaluation. Nos trois dernières études ont été construites dans ce dessein et ont participé, en conclusion de ce travail, à étayer l'idée que la clairvoyance de la valeur sociale des jugements ne permettrait l'obtention d'une évaluation positive que si celle-ci va de pair avec une certaine clairvoyance de la valeur sociale des éléments constitutifs de la situation d'interaction. Abstract The concept of normative clearsightedness (Py & Somat, 1991), born in continuity with studies on the norm of internality (Beauvois, 1984), reflects the knowledge of the normative or counter-normative nature of a type of behaviour or a type of judgement. Several researches appear to show that normative clearsightedness helps to obtain a positive evaluation. However, none of these researches takes into account the idea that there might be two dimensions of social value: social utility and social desirability. Considering those two dimensions, especially if we accept that not all social norms refer to the same dimension (Beauvois, 1995; Dubois & Beauvois, 2005; Dubois, 2005), somehow complicates the model linking normative clearsightedness with a positive evaluation. It suggests indeed that while clearsightedness of some norms will help first of all to get a good evaluation on the dimension of social utility, clearsightedness of other norms will help above all to get a good evaluation on the dimension of social desirability. These considerations were the foundation of this work and led to our first study. However, we reached some unexpected results that prompted us thereafter to reconsider the pertinence to attach the notion of clearsightedness to particular types of content (internality, self-sufficiency, etc.), which led us to propose two new notions: clearsightedness of social utility and clearsightedness of social desirability. Two new studies were thus executed to challenge this proposal. While these researches support as a whole that clearsightedness of social utility and social desirability are better indicators of positive evaluation than clearsightedness of social norms of judgement, they also raised new questions, which led us, in a third time, to wonder about what will determine the dominating social value in an evaluative situation. Our last three studies were designed to this purpose and helped to support the idea, in conclusion of this work, that the clearsightedness of the social value of judgements would bring a positive evaluation only if this clearsightedness is combined with a kind of clearsightedness of the social value of elements constituting the interaction's situation.

Utilité clinique des ultrasons osseux quantitatifs dans le dépistage de l'ostéoporose [Clinical utility of quantitative bone ultrasonography in the staging of osteoporosis]

Osteoporosis is well recognized as a public health problem in industrialized countries. Because of the efficiency of new treatments to decrease fracture risk, it is of a major interest to detect the patients who should benefit from such treatments. A diagnosis of osteoporosis is necessary before to start a specific treatment. This diagnosis is based on the measurement of the skeleton (hip and spine) with dual X-ray absorptiometry, using diagnostic criteria established by the World Health Organisation (WHO). In Switzerland, indications for bone densitometry are limited to precise situations. This technique cannot be applied for screening. For this purpose, peripheral measurements and particularly quantitative ultrasounds of bone seem to be promising. Indeed, several prospective studies clearly showed their predictive power for hip fracture risk in women aged more than 65 years. In order to facilitate the clinical use of bone ultrasounds, thresholds of risk of fracture and osteoporosis of the hip will be shortly published. This will integrate bone ultrasound in a global concept including bone densitometry and its indications, but also other risk factors for osteoporosis recognized by the Swiss association against osteoporosis (ASCO).