Multi institutional phase II study of concomitant stereotactic reirradiation and cetuximab for recurrent head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: Recurrent head and neck cancer is associated to a poor survival prognosis. A high toxicity rate is demonstrated when surgery and/or radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy are combined. Furthermore, the duration of treatment is often not ethically compatible with the expected survival (median survival<1year). Normal tissues tolerance limits the use of reirradiation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could offer precise irradiation while sparing healthy tissues. After completion of a feasibility study, results of a multicentric study (Lille, Nancy & Nice) using SBRT with cetuximab are reported. The aim of the study was to deliver non toxic short course SBRT (2weeks) in order to get the same local control as the one demonstrated with longer protocols. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with inoperable recurrent, or new primary tumor in a previously irradiated area, were included (WHO<3). Reirradiation (RT) dose was 36Gy in six fractions of 6Gy to the 85% isodose line covering 95% of the PTV with 5 injections of concomitant cetuximab (CT). All patients had previous radiotherapy, 85% had previous surgery and 48% previous chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between 11/2007 and 08/2010, 60 were included (46 men and 14 women), 56 received CT+RT, 3 were not treated and 1 received only CT. Median age was 60 (42-87)) and all 56 patients had squamous carcinoma and received concomitant cetuximab. Mean time between previous radiotherapy and the start of SBRT was 38months. Cutaneous toxicity was observed for 41 patients. There was one toxic death from hemorrhage and denutrition. Median follow-up was 11.4months. At 3months, response rate was 58.4% (95% CI: 43.2-72.4%) and disease control rate was 91.7% (95% CI: 80.0-97.7%). The one-year OS rate was 47.5% (95% CI: 30.8-62.4). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that short SBRT with cetuximab is an effective salvage treatment with good response rate in this poor prognosis population with previously irradiated HNC. Treatment is feasible and, with appropriate care to limiting critical structure, acute toxicities are acceptable. This combination may be the reference treatment is this population.

Stereotactict body radiotherapy (SBRT)

Purpose: evaluation and comparison of volumetric modulated RapidarcTM radiotherapy (RA-IMRT) vs linac based Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the salvage treatment of isolated lymph node recurrences in patients affected by gynaecological cancer. Materials and Methods From January 2010 to September 2011, 15 patients affected by isolated lymph nodes recurrence of gynaecological cancer underwent salvage radiotherapy after conventional imaging staging with CT and 18-FDG-PET/CT. Two different radiotherapy techniques were used in this study: RA-IMRT (RapidarcTM implemented radiotherapy Varian Medical System, Palo Alto, CA, USA) or SBRT (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany). Five patients underwent CT scan and all patients underwent 18FDG-PET/CT for pre-treatment evaluation and staging. The mean total dose delivered was 54.3 Gy (range 50-60 Gy with conventional fractionation and 27.4 Gy (range 12-40 Gy hypofractionation) for RA-IMRT and SBRT respectively. The mean number of fractions was 27.6 fractions (range 25-31) and 3-4 fractions , the mean overall treatment duration was 40.5 days (range 36-45) and 6.5 days (range 5-8 days) for RA-IMRT and SBRT respectively. Results: At the time of the analysis, October 2011, the overall survival was 92.3 % (80% for RA-IMRT and 100% for SBRT). Six patients are alive with no evidence of disease and also six patients are alive with clinically evident disease in other sites (40% and 50% patients RA-IMRT vs SBRT respectively, one patient died for systemic progression of disease and two patient were not evaluable at this time. Conclusions: Our preliminary results showed that, the use of RA-IMRT and SBRT are an excellent local therapy for isolated lymph nodes recurrences of gynaecological cancer with a good toxicity profile and local control rate, even if any long term survivors would be expected. New treatment modalities like Cyberknife are also being implemented.

Radiotherapy for renal-cell carcinoma

Renal-cell carcinoma is considered to be a radioresistant tumour, but this notion might be wrong. If given in a few (even single) fractions, but at a high fraction dose, stereotactic body radiotherapy becomes increasingly important in the management of renal-cell carcinoma, both in primary settings and in treatment of oligometastatic disease. There is an established biological rationale for the radiosensitivity of renal-cell carcinoma to stereotactic body radiotherapy based on the ceramide pathway, which is activated only when a high dose per fraction is given. Apart from the direct effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy on renal-cell carcinoma, stereotactic body radiotherapy can also induce an abscopal effect. This effect, caused by immunological processes, might be enhanced when targeted drugs and stereotactic body radiotherapy are combined. Therefore, rigorous, prospective randomised trials involving a multidisciplinary scientific panel are needed urgently.

SABR for early-stage lung cancer: Early-adoption and future directions

Early-stage lung cancer incidence among older adults is expected to increase due to demographic trends and CT-based screening, yet optimal treatment of lung cancer in the elderly remains controversial. There are several accepted strategies for treating lung cancer including surgery, conventional radiation, and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR). However, there are currently no randomized controlled trials to help distinguish the comparative effectiveness of these various strategies. This is an unfortunate omission as lung cancer causes the most deaths among all cancers in the United States (as well as the entire world). SABR holds particular promise as it is a completely non-invasive, ambulatory technique for achieving cure without an operation, thus avoiding the risks of surgery and the associated pre-operative and post-operative costs. To provide fair view of the potential effect on SABR on controlling lung cancer in the United States, a systematic review of SABR with a focus on its achieved outcomes, toxicities, and comparison to conventional radiation and surgical options is presented. ^

O tratamento de metástases ósseas de fração única vs múltiplas frações com 3D CRT ou SBRT: artigo de revisão sistemática

Introdução – A escolha do tratamento depende de vários fatores, incluindo o estado clínico e prognóstico de cada doente. Estes fatores desempenham um papel importante na escolha da intervenção terapêutica em metástases ósseas. A deteção precoce e o tratamento adequado podem melhorar a qualidade de vida e independência funcional dos doentes. Metodologia – Este artigo pretende realizar uma revisão sistemática da literatura dos últimos 15 anos, identificando os diferentes tipos de fracionamentos (fração única versus múltiplas frações) e técnicas utilizadas em radioterapia no tratamento de metástases ósseas. Resultados – Os recentes avanços na tecnologia e nas técnicas de tratamento de radioterapia ajudam na distribuição de doses altamente conformacionais e com orientação por imagem para uma entrega mais precisa do tratamento. A radioterapia estereotáxica corporal (SBRT, do acrónimo inglês stereotactic body radiotherapy) permite delimitar e aumentar a dose nos tumores a irradiar. No caso das metástases ósseas, os resultados de controlo local do tumor e da dor têm-se revelado promissores. A radioterapia convencional de 8Gyx1, no entanto, continua a ser o tratamento mais indicado nos doentes paliativos. Conclusão – O tratamento de metástases ósseas é complexo e uma abordagem multidisciplinar é sempre necessária. O tratamento deve ser individualizado para se adequar aos sintomas e estado clínico de cada doente.

Nouvelles stratégies thérapeutiques en oncologie ophtalmo-pédiatrique [New strategies in pediatric ophthalmic oncology]

Le rétinoblastome représente 11% de tous les cancers apparaissant pendant la première année de vie. Pour éviter les effets secondaires de la chimiothérapie systémique ou de la radiothérapie externe, de nouveaux médicaments et de nouvelles techniques de traitement focalisé ont été développés. Des voies d'administration telles la voie périoculaire (topotécan) ou la voie artérielle ophtalmique directe (carboplatine) sont utilisées aujourd'hui dans certains cas résistants. La radiothérapie actuelle, appliquée exclusivement en deuxième intention, fait appel également à des techniques ciblées, permettant d'éviter les tissus sains et de réduire le risque de cancers radio-induits non oculaires. La radiothérapie stéréotaxique conformationnelle ou conformale et la proton-thérapie font ainsi partie du nouvel arsenal thérapeutique du rétinoblastome. Retinoblastoma represents 11% of all cancers during the first year of life. New drugs and focal treatments have been developed in order to avoid the side effects of systemic chemotherapy and external radiotherapy. New targeted and local administration strategies such as periocular chemotherapy (topotecan) or direct ophthalmic artery delivery (carboplatin), are already used today in selected resistant cases. Radiotherapy, presently indicated only as a second-line treatment, is also subject to new techniques, targeting tumors more closely to avoid involving healthy tissue and reduce the risk of radio-induced nonocular tumors. Stereotactic conformal radiotherapy and proton therapy may thus be included in the new range of treatment methods in retinoblastoma

Combined approaches in large vestibular schwannomas: surgical and radiosurgical perspective

Purpose: The management of vestibular schwanommas (VS) is challenging, with microsurgery remaining the main treatment option. Planned subtotal resection is now being increasingly considered to reduce the risk of neurological deficits following complete resection. The residual part of the tumor can then be treated with Gamma Knife surgery (GKS) to achieve long-term growth control. Methods: This case series of 11 patients documents early results with planned subtotal resection followed by GKS in Lausanne University Hospital, between July 2010 and March 2012. We analyzed clinical symptoms and signs for all cases, as well as MRI and audiograms. Results: Mean age in this series was 50.3 years (range 24.1-73.4). Two patients (18.2%) had a stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy, which had failed to ensure tumor control, before the microsurgical intervention. The lesions were solid in 9 cases (81.8%), and mixed (solid and cystic) in 2 patients (18.2%). Presurgical tumor volume was of a mean of 18.5 cm3 (range 9.7-34.9 cm3). The mean duration between microsurgery and GKS was 10.5 months (range 4-22.8). The mean tumor volume at the time of GKS treatment was 4.9 cm3 (range 0.5- 12.8). A mean number of 20.7 isocenters was used (range 8-31). Nine patients received 12 Gy and 2 patients with 11 Gy at the periphery (at the 50% prescription isodose). We did not have any major complications in our series. Postoperative status showed no facial nerve deficits. Four patients with useful pre-operative hearing underwent surgery aiming to preserve the cochlear nerve function. Of these patients, the patient who had Gardner-Robertson (GR) class 1 before surgery, remained in GR class 1. Two patients improved after surgery, one changing from GR 5 to GR 3 and the other with slight improvement, remaining in the same GR 3 class. Mean follow-up after surgery was 15.4 months (range 4-31.2). One patient, who presented with secondary trigeminal neuralgia before surgery, had transitory facial hypoesthesia following surgery. No other neurological deficits were encountered. Following GKS, the patients had a mean follow-up of 5.33 months (range 1-13). No new neurological deficits were encountered. Conclusions: Our data suggest that planned subtotal resection followed by GKS has an excellent clinical outcome with respect to preservation of cranial nerves, and other neurological functions, and a good possibility of recovery of many of the pre-operative cranial nerve dysfunctions

Outcome analysis of predictors in locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Guidelines report a wide range of options in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): definitive chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy or the emerging stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (+/- chemotherapy). On behalf of the AIRO (Italian Association of Radiation Oncology and Clinical Oncology) Gastrointestinal Study Group, we collected retrospective clinical data on 419 LAPC from 15 Italian centers. The study protocol (PAULA-1: Pooled Analysis in Unresectable Locally Advanced pancreatic cancer) was approved by institutional review board of S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital (201/2015/O/OssN). From this large database we performed tree different studies. The first was a retrospective study about 56 LAPC treated with SBRT at a median biologically equivalent dose of 48 Gy +/- chemotherapy. We demonstrated a statistically significant impact of biologically equivalent dose based on an α/β ratio of 10Gy ≥ 48Gy for local control (LC) (p: 0.045) and overall survival (p: 0.042) in LAPC. The second was a retrospective matched-cohort case-control study comparing SBRT (40 patients) and chemoradiation (40 patients) in LAPC in terms of different endpoints. Our findings suggested an equivalence in terms of most outcomes among the two treatments and an advantage of SBRT in terms of LC (p: 0.017). The third study was a retrospective comparison of definitive chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and SBRT (+/- chemotherapy) in terms of different outcomes in LAPC. A predictive model for LC in LAPC was also developed reaching an AUC of 68% (CI 58,7%-77,4%). SBRT treatment emerged as a positive predictive factor for improved LC. Findings deriving from our three studies suggest that SBRT is comparable to standard of care (definitive chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy) in terms of outcomes. SBRT seems to be an emerging therapeutic option in LAPC significantly improving local control. Furthermore, we have shown the potential of a predictive model for LC. Randomized trials are needed to compare these different therapeutic options in LAPC.

Preliminary Experience in Treatment of Papillary and Macular Retinoblastoma: Evaluation of Local Control and Local Complications After Treatment with Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy with Micromultileaf Collimator as Second-Line or Salvage Treatment after chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To determine the local control and complication rates for children with papillary and/or macular retinoblastoma progressing after chemotherapy and undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with a micromultileaf collimator. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2004 and 2008, 11 children (15 eyes) with macular and/or papillary retinoblastoma were treated with SRT. The mean age was 19 months (range, 2-111). Of the 15 eyes, 7, 6, and 2 were classified as International Classification of Intraocular Retinoblastoma Group B, C, and E, respectively. The delivered dose of SRT was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions using a dedicated micromultileaf collimator linear accelerator. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 20 months (range, 13-39). Local control was achieved in 13 eyes (87%). The actuarial 1- and 2-year local control rates were both 82%. SRT was well tolerated. Late adverse events were reported in 4 patients. Of the 4 patients, 2 had developed focal microangiopathy 20 months after SRT; 1 had developed a transient recurrence of retinal detachment; and 1 had developed bilateral cataracts. No optic neuropathy was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Linear accelerator-based SRT for papillary and/or macular retinoblastoma in children resulted in excellent tumor control rates with acceptable toxicity. Additional research regarding SRT and its intrinsic organ-at-risk sparing capability is justified in the framework of prospective trials.

Preliminary Experience in Treatment of Papillary and Macular Retinoblastoma: Evaluation of Local Control and Local Complications After Treatment with Linear Accelerator-Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy with Micromultileaf Collimator as Second-Line or Salvage Treatment after chemotherapy

To determine the local control and complication rates for children with papillary and/or macular retinoblastoma progressing after chemotherapy and undergoing stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with a micromultileaf collimator.

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with static field conformal and non coplanar arcs for pediatric patients with craniopharyngioma: analysis of long term visual outcome and endocrine toxicity

We assessed the efficacy and the toxicity for pediatric craniopharyngioma patients of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). Between May 2000 and May 2009, 9 patients (male to female ratio, 5:4) with craniopharyngiomas underwent FSRT (median dose, 54 Gy). Among the 9 patients, 6 received radiation therapy (RT) for recurrent tumors and 3 for residual disease as adjuvant therapy after incomplete surgery. Median tumor 3 volume was 2.3 cm (range, 0.1-5.8). The median target coverage was 93.7% (range 79.3-99.8%). The median conformity index was 0.94 (range, 0.6-1.4). Dose to the hippocampal region was assessed for all patients. After a median follow-up of 62.5 months (range, 32-127)the treated volume decreased in size in four of eight patients (50%). One patient was lost to follow-up. Local control and survival rates at 3 years were 100% and there were no marginal relapses. One patient, with a chronic bilateral papillary oedema after surgery, visual defect deteriorated after FSRT to a complete hemianopsia. One male patient with normal pituitary function before FSRT presented with precocious puberty at the age of 7.4 years, 24 months after FSRT. Four patients (50%) were severely obese at their last visit. FSRT is a safe treatment option for craniopharyngioma after incomplete resection.

Verification of intensity modulated stereotactic radiotherapy using Monte Carlo calculations and EPID dosimetry

The purpose of this work was to develop a comprehensive IMSRT QA procedure that examined, using EPID dosimetry and Monte Carlo (MC) calculations, each step in the treatment planning and delivery process. These steps included verification of the field shaping, treatment planning system (RTPS) dose calculations, and patient dose delivery. Verification of each step in the treatment process is assumed to result in correct dose delivery to the patient. ^ The accelerator MC model was verified against commissioning data for field sizes from 0.8 × 0.8 cm 2 to 10 × 10 cm 2. Depth doses were within 2% local percent difference (LPD) in low gradient regions and 1 mm distance to agreement (DTA) in high gradient regions. Lateral profiles were within 2% LPD in low gradient regions and 1 mm DTA in high gradient regions. Calculated output factors were within 1% of measurement for field sizes ≥1 × 1 cm2. ^ The measured and calculated pretreatment EPID dose patterns were compared using criteria of 5% LPD, 1 mm DTA, or 2% of central axis pixel value with ≥95% of compared points required to pass for successful verification. Pretreatment field verification resulted in 97% percent of the points passing. ^ The RTPS and Monte Carlo phantom dose calculations were compared using 5% LPD, 2 mm DTA, or 2% of the maximum dose with ≥95% of compared points required passing for successful verification. RTPS calculation verification resulted in 97% percent of the points passing. ^ The measured and calculated EPID exit dose patterns were compared using criteria of 5% LPD, 1 mm DTA, or 2% of central axis pixel value with ≥95% of compared points required to pass for successful verification. Exit dose verification resulted in 97% percent of the points passing. ^ Each of the processes above verified an individual step in the treatment planning and delivery process. The combination of these verification steps ensures accurate treatment delivery to the patient. This work shows that Monte Carlo calculations and EPID dosimetry can be used to quantitatively verify IMSRT treatments resulting in improved patient care and, potentially, improved clinical outcome. ^

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after hyperbaric oxygenation for recurrent high-grade glioma: a pilot study

Purpose The presence of hypoxic cells in high-grade glioma (HGG) is one of the main reasons of local failure after radiotherapy (RT). The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) could help to overcome the problem of hypoxia in poorly oxygenated regions of the tumor. We performed a pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of hypofractionated image-guided helical TomoTherapy (HT) after HBO in the treatment of recurrent HGG (rHGG). Methods We enrolled 15 patients (aged >18 years) with diagnosis of rHGG. A total dose of 15-25 Gy was administered in daily 5-Gy fractions for 3-5 consecutive days after daily HBO. Each fraction was delivered up to maximum of 60 minutes after HBO. Results Median follow-up from HBO-RT was 28.6 (range: 5.3-56.8). No patient was lost to follow-up. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) for all patients was 3.2 months (95% CI: 1.34- 6.4 ), while 3-month, 6-month and 12 month PFS was 60% (95%CI: 31.8.4-79.7), 40% (95%CI: 16.5- 62.8) and10.0 (0.8-33.5) , respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) of HBO-RT was 11.7 months (95% CI: 7.3-29.3), while 3-month, 6-month and 12 month OS was 100% , 93.3% (61.3-99.0) and 46.7 % (21.2-68.8). No acute or late neurologic toxicity >grade 2 (CTCAE version 4.3) was observed in 86.66% of patients. Two patients developed G3 Radionecrosis. Conclusion HSRT combined to HBO seems effective and safe in the treatment of rHGG. One of advantages of HBO-RT is the reduced overall treatment time (3-5 consecutive days).

Ultra-hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for prostate cancer in 5 fractions: current evidences and our clinical experience

AIMS: The present is a retrospective evaluation of acute genito-urinary (GU) and gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity, in addition to biochemical recurrence rate in 57 prostate cancer patients treated at our Institution with ultra-hypofractionated RT (UHRT) schedule. METHODS: From January 2021 to December 2022 we have treated 57 patients with prostate cancer, using an UHRT scheme of 5-fractions every other day for a total dose delivered of 36.25 Gy, according to the PACE-B trial treatment schedule. Good urinary function, assessed by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), were required. The simulation CT scans were acquired in supine position and fused with MRI for CTVs definition for every patient. Each treatment was performed by Accuray's TomoTherapy with daily IGRT. The evaluation of the set-up was very restrictive before daily treatment delivery. RESULTS: According to RTOG toxicity scale, the acute GU toxicity at 3 months from RT, GU toxicity was G0 for 30 patients (52.6%), G1 for 26 (45.6%) and G2 for one only (1.75%); rectal toxicity was G0 for 56 patients (98.25%) and G1 for one only (1.75%). The median follow-up (FU) was 9 months (2-24 months). In the following FU months, we observed progressively lower urinary and rectal toxicity, except for one patient who showed G2 GU toxicity at 12 months. All but one patient had a progressive PSA value decrease. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, UHRT appears to be safe and well tolerated even without the use of rectal spacer devices. A longer FU is necessary to evaluate late toxicity and disease control rate.