Teacher resistance to school-based consultation with the school psychologist: An analysis according to school level and model of identification for special education services

Consultation is promoted throughout school psychology literature as a best practice in service delivery. This method has numerous benefits including being able to work with more students at one time, providing practitioners with preventative rather than strictly reactive strategies, and helping school professionals meet state and federal education mandates and initiatives. Despite the benefits of consultation, teachers are sometimes resistant to this process.This research studies variables hypothesized to lead to resistance (Gonzalez, Nelson, Gutkin, & Shwery, 2004) and attempts to distinguish differences between school level (elementary, middle and high school) with respect to the role played by these variables and to determine if the model used to identify students for special education services has an influence on resistance factors. Twenty-sixteachers in elementary and middle schools responded to a demographicquestionnaire and a survey developed by Gonzalez, et al. (2004). This survey measures eight variables related to resistance to consultation. No high school teachers responded to the request to participate. Results of analysis of variance indicated a significant difference in the teaching efficacy subscale with elementary teachers reporting more efficacy in teaching than middle school teachers. Results also indicate a significant difference in classroom managementefficacy with teachers who work in schools that identify students according to a Response to Intervention model reporting higher classroom management efficacy than teachers who work in schools that identify students according to a combined method of refer-test-place/RtI combination model. Implications, limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

Special Education and the Risk of Becoming Less Educated in Germany and the United States. CES Germany & Europe Working Papers, No. 05.1, 13 December, 2004

Over the twentieth century, a growing group of students has been transferred into considerably expanded special education systems. These programs serve children with diagnosed impairments and disabilities and students with a variety of learning difficulties. Children and youth “with special educational needs” constitute a heterogeneous group with social, ethnic, linguistic, and physical disadvantages. An increasingly large percentage of those students at risk of leaving school without credentials participate in special education, a highly legitimated low status (and stigmatizing) school form. While most countries commit themselves to school integration or inclusive education to replace segregated schools and separate classes, cross-national and regional comparisons of special education’s diverse student bodies show considerable disparities in their (1) rates of classification, (2) provided learning opportunities, and (3) educational attainments. Analyzing special education demographics and organizational structures indicates which children and youth are most likely to grow up less educated and how educational systems distribute educational success and failure. Findings from a German-American comparison show that which students bear the greatest risk of becoming less educated depends largely on definitions of “special educational needs” and the institutionalization of special education systems.

Special education and the Hispanic child : proceedings from the second annual Colloquium on Hispanic Issues /

"August 1981."

Cooperation of prevocational programs for handicapped young adults; rehabilitation-special education. Proceedings of a conference at Highland Park, Illinois. Sponsored by the U.S. Office of Vocational Rehabilitation and Illinois State Normal University, Oct. 30-31 and Nov. 1, 1961.

Mode of access: Internet.

Resources for special education.

Mode of access: Internet.

Medicaid and special education : coordination of services for children with disabilities is evolving : report to the Honorable Edolphus Towns, House of Representatives /

"GAO/HEHS-00-20."

Directory of special education personnel in state education agencies.

OE-35098

Peace Corps in special education and rehabilitation /

"Prepared for the Peace Corps by Partners of the Americas under contract no. 80-043-1023"--T.p. verso.

Amended rules for determining special education per capita tuition charge (Part 130).

"The effective date of these rules will be March 10, 2000."--P. [1] of memorandum.

Annual state report on special education performance /

Title from cover.

Estimated number of special education students projected to exit the public school system after the ... school year

Description based on: 1988-89; title from caption.

Final report of the Special Education Advisory Panels and special education content-area standards /

The content-area standards recommended by the panels include standards for: all special education teachers; teachers of students with mild and moderate disabilities; teachers of students with moderate and severe disabilities; early childhood special education teachers; teachers of students who are deaf/hard of hearing; teachers of students who are deaf-blind/blind or visually impaired; speech-language pathologists; bilingual special education teachers; and special education standards for regular classroom teachers.

Fiscal procedures for special education pupil reimbursement.

Compilation of procedures and instructions, supported by rules and regulations filed with the Secretary of State, to assist local education agencies in claiming reimbursement.

Illinois transition project : transition plan development for special education students in Illinois public schools /

Cover title.

Nonregulatory guidance to assist state educational agencies in administering federal financial assistance to local educational agencies for projects designed to meet the special education needs of educationally deprived children under Chapter 1 of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act of 1981.

On cover: Chapter 1 nonregulatory guidance.