La compétence internationale des tribunaux dans les poursuites civiles contre les sociétés transnationales pour violation des droits humains : une critique de la jurisprudence québécoise

Aucune instance spécifique n’existe sur le plan international pour les litiges civils impliquant la violation par les sociétés transnationales (ci après, STN) des normes de droits humains. Les tribunaux nationaux représentent l’instance compétente afin d’entendre ces causes de droit international privé. Cependant, les tribunaux originaires des STN manifestent leur réticence à exercer leur compétence, alors que les États où sont commises les violations souffrent parfois d’un important déficit de gouvernance. Les victimes se retrouvent ainsi fréquemment sans forum adéquat où adresser leur requête pour les dommages subis. L’objectif du mémoire est de rechercher puis d’élaborer différents arguments afin de faire évoluer l’interprétation de la compétence des tribunaux québécois actuellement préconisée dans le cadre de deux jurisprudences phares en matière d’activité des STN à l’étranger, soit Association canadienne contre l’impunité (ACCI) c. Anvil Mining Ltd., et Recherches Internationales Québec c. Cambior Inc. Le premier chapitre porte sur les règles fondant la compétence des autorités québécoises et les principes les sous-tendant. Notre deuxième chapitre se consacrera à la recherche d’arguments au sein de la jurisprudence étrangère. Notre troisième chapitre présentera les arguments de nature politique, sociale, éthique et théorique rencontrés dans le domaine du droit global. Nous verrons alors plusieurs propositions théoriques afin de mieux appréhender les problèmes liés au vide juridictionnel dont souffrent les victimes demanderesses. Cet éclairage théorique contribuera à justifier l’apport du droit international privé dans le contrôle du respect par les STN des normes de droits humains.

The margin of appreciation, domestic irregularity and domestic court rulings in ECHR environmental jurisprudence: Global legal pluralism in action

Global legal pluralism is concerned, inter alia, with the growing multiplicity of normative legal orders and the ways in which these different orders intersect and are accommodated with one another. The different means used for accommodation will have a critical bearing on how individuals fare within them. This article examines the recent environmental jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights to explore some of the means of reaching an accommodation between national legal orders and the European Convention. Certain types of accommodation – such as the margin of appreciation given to states by the Court – are well known. In essence, such mechanisms of legal pluralism raise a presumptive barrier which generally works for the state and against the individual rights-bearer. However, the principal focus of the current article is on a less well-known, recent set of pluralistic devices employed by the Court, which typically operate presumptively in the other direction, in favour of the individual. First, the Court looks to instances of breaches of domestic environmental law (albeit not in isolation); and second, it places an emphasis on whether domestic courts have ruled against the relevant activity. Where domestic standards have been breached or national courts have ruled against the state, then, presumptive weight is typically shifted towards the individual.

Operações justiça rápida itinerante e de execução penal em Rondônia: a modernização da justiça como fator promotor da eficiência do poder judiciário de Rondônia

Esta dissertação trata da modernização da Justiça trazida pela Carta Magna de 1988 e pela Reforma do Judiciário realizada através da Emenda Constitucional 45/2004, em conjunto e com especial ênfase para o princípio da eficiência acrescido ao artigo 37, caput pela Emenda 19/1998. Busca descobrir o que se entende por eficiência em administração, em administração pública e no Poder Judiciário. Apresentou as Operações Justiça Rápida Itinerante e Justiça Rápida de Execução Penal implantadas na Justiça estadual de Rondônia como estudo de caso, visando apurar se elas podem ser consideradas efetiva modernização da Justiça e se atendem ao princípio da eficiência nas suas execuções. Foi feito um apanhado dos antecedentes históricos das reformas mais importantes realizadas no Estado brasileiro durante o século XX e das reformas do Judiciário a partir da CF/88. Deu-se especial destaque à implantação do paradigma gerencial feito pela reforma Bresser- Pereira nos anos FHC. No Poder Judiciário houve um avanço importantíssimo com a implantação do CNJ em 2005, que trouxe para o dia-a-dia dos Tribunais instrumentos científicos e modernas técnicas que estão profissionalizando a gestão desses órgãos, buscando eficiência, eficácia e efetividade. A utilização de estatísticas e fixação de metas são exemplos meritórios de sua atuação. Ao final do estudo de caso, observou-se que o primeiro programa atende aos anseios da população e propõe-se a sua continuidade, enquanto que o segundo deveria ser repensado.

Il contratto a Tempo Determinato nel lavoro privato e pubblico. Assetti e linee di tendenza in un mercato del lavoro dinamico e globale

L’elaborato, dopo una ricostruzione della disciplina normativa presente in materia di contratto a tempo determinato in Italia e nei principali ordinamenti europei (Spagna, Francia ed Inghilterra), affronta i più rilevanti nodi problematici dell’istituto, in riferimento al settore privato e pubblico, mettendo in luce le principali querelle dottrinali e giurisprudenziali. Particolare attenzione è dedicata alle questioni insorte a seguito delle ultime modifiche normative di cui al c.d. Collegato lavoro (legge n. 183/2010), sino al decisivo intervento della Corte Costituzionale, con pronuncia n. 303 del 9 novembre 2011, che ha dichiarato legittima la disposizione introduttiva dell’indennità risarcitoria forfetizzata, aggiuntiva rispetto alla conversione del contratto. Tutte le problematiche trattate hanno evidenziato le difficoltà per le Corti Superiori, così come per i giudici comunitari e nazionali, di trovare una linea univoca e condivisa nella risoluzione delle controversie presenti in materia. L’elaborato si chiude con alcune riflessioni sui temi della flessibilità e precarietà nel mondo del lavoro, attraverso una valutazione quantitativa e qualitativa dell’istituto, nell’intento di fornire una risposta ad alcuni interrogativi: la flessibilità è necessariamente precarietà o può essere letta quale forma speciale di occupazione? Quali sono i possibili antidoti alla precarietà? In conclusione, è emerso come la flessibilità possa rappresentare un problema per le imprese e per i lavoratori soltanto nel lungo periodo. La soluzione è stata individuata nell’opportunità di investire sulla formazione. Si è così ipotizzata una nuova «flessibilità socialmente ed economicamente sostenibile», da realizzarsi tramite l’ausilio delle Regioni e, quindi, dei contributi del Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale: al lavoratore, in tal modo, potrà essere garantita la continuità con il lavoro tramite percorsi formativi mirati e, d’altro canto, il datore di lavoro non dovrà farsi carico dei costi per la formazione dei dipendenti a tempo determinato.

Il potere normativo delle Corti sul processo

La tesi intende offrire una riflessione in merito al potere degli organi giurisdizionali di disporre normativamente su determinati aspetti del processo che si svolge dinanzi ad essi, sostituendosi così al legislatore. Il piano di indagine della tesi si sviluppa prevalentemente nella descrizione della realtà europea davanti alle autorità giurisdizionali di Lussemburgo, attraverso continui riferimenti a pronunce giurisprudenziali. La candidata si sofferma, preliminarmente, definendo, in termini generali, l’origine e l’applicazione dei c.d. atti di soft law in ambito europeo e soffermandosi sul ruolo che ricopre la giurisprudenza nell’ordinamento europeo. Sempre nel capitolo di apertura, un accenno è dedicato al panorama italiano che, alla luce delle recenti e continue riforme processuali ed, in particolare, della lettura costituzionalmente orientata del processo civile in forza della sua ragionevole durata, sta conoscendo, sempre più largamente, il fenomeno dei c.d. protocolli. La tesi si sviluppa, poi, in altri tre capitoli, nei quali sono analizzati tre esempi di manifestazione del potere normativo degli organi giurisdizionali europei sul processo. La candidata passa, così, all’esame delle “Istruzioni pratiche alle parti”, sviscerando le disposizioni ivi contenute alla luce di casi giurisprudenziali, al fine di poter definire la reale efficacia di tali atti e la loro vincolatività nei confronti dei rappresentanti delle parti. A tale capitolo segue quello sull’applicazione del rinvio pregiudiziale tra soft law (c.d. Raccomandazioni) e giurisprudenza. Infine, la candidata svolge le ultime riflessioni sul potere “eccezionale” della Corte di giustizia di limitare nel tempo gli effetti delle proprie sentenze interpretative. Potere che, in questo caso, si manifesta non mediante l’emanazione di atti di soft law, ma attraverso le proprie pronunce giurisprudenziali.

Il giudice tributario come giudice europeo

Questo lavoro, tramite un'analisi attenta ed accurata dello sviluppo delle pronunce della Corte di Giustizia in materia tributaria, ha lo scopo di mettere in evidenza i canoni interpretativi utilizzati dalla Corte, tenendo presente gli effetti che tali pronunce hanno prodotto nei singoli stati ed in particolare sul ruolo del giudice tributario come giudice europeo. Assistiamo infatti oggi ad una vera e propria europeizzazione della produzione giuridica in grado di aprire nuovi spiragli alla tutela del cittadino anche nei confronti dell'amministrazione finanziaria. L'interazione, per molti aspetti problematica, tra gli organi di giustizia tributaria dei singoli ordinamenti ed il giudice comunitario sono diventate vera e propria fucina di un diritto tributario europeo, nell'ambito del quale a svolgere un ruolo di estrema rilevanza è il giudice interno. Le sentenze del giudice tributario nazionale infatti rappresentano lo strumento più efficace di chiarificazione del diritto comunitario. Il presente lavoro si propone quindi di esaminare nel dettaglio il rapporto complementare e funzionalista che si estrinseca nella peculiare funzione attribuita al giudice tributario nazionale che gli fa assumere le vesti di "giudice europeo" nonché la funzione attribuita alla Corte di Giustizia che assume i caratteri sempre più marcati di "giudice tributario sovranazionale". Partendo dalla disamina delle figure dei giudici tributari di Germania, Francia ed Italia, si passerà poi ad evidenziare i ruoli che hanno avuto le Corti nazionali nell'applicazione del diritto comunitario, evidenziando come nei vari casi le sentenze si sono affiancate alla preminenza gerarchica della norma europea.

Reserva de ley y transposición de directivas europeas

La presente tesis analiza el problema de la validez de las disposiciones de transposición de las Directivas Europeas en los ordenamientos nacionales desde la perspectiva del principio constitucional de reserva de ley. En el primer capítulo se desarrolla un análisis del estado de la cuestión en las jurisprudencias española e italiana. En el segundo se afronta el estudio de los requisitos impuestos por la jurisprudencia del TJUE en relación con las normas por las que se procede a la incorporación en los ordenamientos internos del contenido de las Directivas; teniendo en cuenta que ha de partirse del principio de autonomía institucional y procedimental de los Estados Miembros y que las Directivas, en tanto carentes por razón de su forma de directa aplicabilidad, no pueden sustituir a la ley nacional, el principio de reserva de ley ha de aplicarse en este tipo de operaciones siempre que así lo exija la Constitución nacional. En el tercer capítulo se estudian los efectos que han producido en los ordenamientos italiano, francés y alemán las cláusulas constitucionales "europeas", alcanzándose la fundamental conclusión de que las mismas no han supuesto quiebra alguna de la disciplina general de producción normativa en lo que se refiere a las operaciones de ejecución interna del Derecho Europeo. En el cuarto y último capítulo, en fin, se analiza el sistema italiano de ejecución de las políticas europeas mediante normas reglamentarias y la posible toma en consideración del mismo para la formulación de propuestas de lege ferenda en relación con el Derecho Español.

Decentralisation of EC Competition Law Enforcement and General Principles of Community Law. Research Papers in Law, 4/2004

From the Introduction. By virtue of Council Regulation No. 1/2003, as of 1st May 2004 the full application of EC competition law will be entrusted to national competition authorities (hereinafter NCAs) and national courts. The bold reform of EC competition law enforcement adheres to the system of executive federalism1 which characterises the EC legal system. The repartition of competences within the Community allocates implementation of Community law mainly at Member States level. Pursuant to Article 10 EC, they are responsible for the implementation of the measures which have been adopted at Community level for the achievement of the objectives specified in the EC Treaty. Consequently, the attainment of the Community objectives depends very much upon the cooperation of national authorities, which act in accordance with their own national procedural rules.2 The various national procedural rules present themselves as conduits through which Community law is implemented and enforced. While as a rule Community law is not designed to alter national procedural rules, the Community legal order cannot afford to leave national procedural rules untouched when they are liable to hamper the effective application of Community law....For reason of space, this contribution intends only to highlight some aspects of Regulation No. 1/2003 with regard to which general principles of Community law are able to condition national procedural rules.

Ten Years of Judicial Cooperation. Occasional Paper 4/2014

This paper intends to illustrate the respective roles and functions of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) on the one hand, and the Maltese national courts on the other. It will then define the scope and role of the judicial cooperation between the CJEU and the national courts, highlighting the procedure relating to the preliminary rulings. The paper will then briefly describe the cases brought before the CJEU involving Malta, including those concerning requests for preliminary rulings originating from Malta, and the direct actions by the European Commission before the Court of Justice, as well as those before the General Court. After a description of the rationale behind the publication of the book Malta u l-Qorti tal-Ġustizzja tal-Unjoni Ewropea (Malta and the Court of Justice of the European Union), and following the conference in which it was presented, the main points that emerged from the conference will serve as a backdrop to some statistical analysis pertaining to the Maltese cases, as well as some reflections on the current situation of the judicial cooperation obtained after ten years. It will propose that, besides a mere statistical analysis of the raw figures that emerge, one must rather address his attention to the spirit of EU membership, and reflect on whether Malta’s legal system has actually absorbed and understood the full meaning of the EU membership, ten years after it took place.

Testing limited environmental liability against human rights requirements. IES WORKING PAPER 3/2009

Questions regarding oil spills remain high on the political agenda. Legal scholars, legislators as well as the international, European and national Courts struggle to determine key issues, such as who is to be held liable for oil spills, under which conditions and for which damage. The international regime on oil spills was meant to establish an “equilibrium” between the needs of the victims (being compensated for their harm) and the needs of the economic actors (being able to continue their activities). There is, however, a constantly increasing array of legal scholars’ work that criticizes the regime. Indeed, the victims of a recent oil spill, the Erika, have tried to escape the international regime on oil spills and to rely instead on the provisions of national criminal law or EC waste legislation. In parallel, the EC legislator has questioned the sufficiency of the international regime, as it has started preparing legislative acts of its own. One can in fact wonder whether challenging the international liability regime with the European Convention on Human Rights could prove to be a way forward, both for the EC regulators as well as the victims of oil spills. This paper claims that the right to property, as enshrined in Article P1-1 of the Human Rights Convention, could be used to challenge the limited environmental liability provisions of the international frameworks.

Compulsory licensing of standard-essential patents and injunctive relief as abuse of dominant position in violation of Article 102 TFEU

When a dominant undertaking holding a standard-essential patent uses its exclusive right to the IP to seek injunctions against those wishing to produce either de jure or de facto standard compliant products, it creates a conflict between the exclusive right to the use of the IP on the one hand and the possible abuse of dominance due to the exclusionary conduct on the other. The aim of the thesis is to focus on the issues concerning abuse of dominance in violation of Article 102 TFEU when the holder of the standard-essential patent seeks an injunction against a would-be licensee. The thesis is mainly based on the most recent ECJ case law in Huawei and the Commission’s recent decisions in Samsung and Motorola. The case law in Europe prior to those decisions was mainly focused on the German case law from Orange Book Standard which provided IP holders great leverage due to the almost automatic granting of injunctions against infringers. The ECJ in Huawei set out the requirements for when a de jure standard-essential patent holder would not be violating Article 102 TFEU when seeking an injunction, requiring that negotiations in good faith must take place prior to the seeking of the injunction and that all offers must comply with FRAND terms, thus limiting the scope of case law derived from Orange Book Standard in Germany. The ECJ chose not to follow all of the reasoning the Commission had laid out in Samsung and Motorola which provided a more licensee-friendly approach on the matter, but rather chose a compromise between the IP holder friendly German case law and the Commission’s decisions. However, the ECJ did not disclose how FRAND terms themselves should be interpreted, but rather left it for the national courts to decide. Furthermore, the thesis strongly argues that Huawei did not change the fact that only vertically integrated IP holders who have made a FRAND declaration are subject to the terms laid out in Huawei, thus leaving non-practicing entities such as patent trolls and entities that have not made a FRAND declaration outside its scope. The resulting conclusion from the thesis is that while the ECJ in Huawei presented new exceptional circumstances for when an IP holder could be abusing its dominant position when it seeks an injunction, it still left many more questions answered, such as the meaning of FRAND and whether deception in giving a FRAND declaration is prohibited under Article 102 TFEU or not.

Spain and Investment Arbitration: The Renewable Energy Explosion

In the past decade, Spain’s generous incentive system for renewable energy production attracted substantial foreign and national investment. However, when the global financial crisis hit, and the consequent reduction of electricity consumption, the incentives began to cause a tariff deficit in the electricity system, leading the Spanish government to cut back and then eliminate the incentives. In the wake of losses, international investors turned to investment arbitration, while national investors could only present their claims before Spanish courts. The result was a potential for differential treatment between national and foreign investors. This paper examines the incentive regime and the government’s changes to it in order to understand the investors’ claims and the reasoning that resulted in their rejections, both in national courts and in the only arbitration award issued up to now. The paper concludes with a discussion of the effect of the renewable energies situation on the investment arbitration debate within Spanish civil society.

National Security and Secret Evidence in Legislation and before the Courts: Exploring the Challenges. CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe No. 78/January 2015

This study provides a comparative analysis of the national legal regimes and practices governing the use of intelligence information as evidence in the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands and Sweden. It explores notably how national security can be invoked to determine the classification of information and evidence as 'state secrets' in court proceedings and whether such laws and practices are fundamental rights- and rule of law-compliant. The study finds that, in the majority of Member States under investigation, the judiciary is significantly hindered in effectively adjudicating justice and guaranteeing the rights of the defence in ‘national security’ cases. The research also illustrates that the very term ‘national security’ is nebulously defined across the Member States analysed, with no national definition meeting legal certainty and “in accordance with the law” standards and a clear risk that the executive and secret services may act arbitrarily. The study argues that national and transnational intelligence community practices and cooperation need to be subject to more independent and effective judicial accountability and be brought into line with EU 'rule of law' standards.

Regulating Multi-National Corporations Through State-Based Laws : Problems with Enforcing Human Rights Under The Alien Tort Statute

Under the Alien Tort Statute United States of America (“America”) Federal Courts have the jurisdiction to hear claims for civil wrongs, committed against non-American citizens, which were perpetrated outside America’s national borders. The operation of this law has confronted American Federal Courts with difficulties on how to manage conflicts between American executive foreign policy and judicial interpretations of international law. Courts began to pass judgment over conduct which was approved by foreign governments. Then in 2005 the American Supreme Court wound back the scope of the Alien Tort Statute. This article will review the problems with the expansion of the Alien Tort Statute and the reasons for its subsequent narrowing.