Tensions, transisitions and triumphs : examining the transitional experience of fashion students between school and university

Joining any new community involves transition and adaptation. Just as we learn to adapt to different cultures when we choose to live abroad, so students learn the language and culture of an academic community in order to succeed within that environment. At the same time however, students bring with them individual learning styles and expectations, influenced by their prior experiences of learning and of life more generally. Some have excelled at school; others have come to fashion seeking something in which to excel for the first time. Commencing a degree in fashion design brings students into contact with peers and lecturers who share their passion, providing them with a community of practice which can be both supportive and at the same time intimidating.----- In Queensland where university level study in fashion is such a new phenomenon, few applicants have any depth of training in design when they apply to study fashion. Unlike disciplines such as Dance or Visual Art, where lecturers can expect a good level of skill upon entry to a degree program, we have to look for the potential evidenced in an applicant’s portfolio, much of which is untutored work that they have generated themselves in preparation for application. This means that many first year fashion students at QUT whilst very passionate about the idea of fashion design are often very naïve about the practice of fashion design, with limited knowledge of the history or cultural context of fashion and few of the technical skills needed to translate their ideas into three dimensional products.----- For teachers engaging with first year students in the design studios, it is critical to be cognizant of this mix of different experiences, expectations and emotions in order to design curricula and assessment that stretch and engage students without unduly increasing their sense of frustration and anxiety. This paper examines a first year project designed to provide an introduction to design process and to learning within a creative discipline. The lessons learnt provide a valuable and transferable resource for lecturers in a variety of art and design disciplines.

Rebuilding in Ranongga : reflecting on practice based research

Two hundred million people are displaced annually due to natural disasters with a further one billion living in inadequate conditions in urban areas. Architects have a responsibility to respond to this statistic as the effects of natural and social disasters become more visibly catastrophic when paired with population rise. The research discussed in this paper initially questions and considers how digital tools can be employed to enhance rebuilding processes, but still achieve sensitive, culturally appropriate and accepted built solutions. Secondly the paper reflects on the impact ‘real-world’ projects have on architectural education. Research aspirations encouraged an atypical ‘research by design’ methodology involving a focused case study in the recently devastated village Keigold, Ranongga, Solomon Islands. Through this qualitative approach specific place data and the accounts of those affected were documented through naturalistic and archival methods of observation and participation. Findings reveal a number of unanticipated results which would have been otherwise undetected if field research within the design and rebuilding process was not undertaken, reflecting the importance of place specific research in the design process. Ultimately, the study proves that it is critical for issues of disaster to be addressed on a local rather than global scale; decisions cannot be speculative, or solved at a distance, but require intensive collaborative work with communities to achieve optimum solutions. Architectural education and design studios would continue to benefit from focused community engagement and field research within the design process.

CAM : a collaborative object memory system

Physical design objects such as sketches, drawings, collages, storyboards and models play an important role in supporting communication and coordination in design studios. CAM (Cooperative Artefact Memory) is a mobile-tagging based messaging system that allows designers to collaboratively store relevant information onto their design objects in the form of messages, annotations and external web links. We studied the use of CAM in a Product Design studio over three weeks, involving three different design teams. In this paper, we briefly describe CAM and show how it serves as 'object memory'.

Workplace surfaces as resource for social interactions

Space and spatial arrangements play an important role in our everyday social interactions. The way we use and manage our surrounding space is not coincidental, on the contrary, it reflects the way we think, plan and act. Within collaborative contexts, its ability to support social activities makes space an important component of human cognition in the post-cognitive era. As technology designers, we can learn a lot by rigorously understanding the role of space for the purpose of designing collaborative systems. In this paper, we describe an ethnographic study on the use of workplace surfaces in design studios. We introduce the idea of artful surfaces. Artful surfaces are full of informative, inspirational and creative artefacts that help designers accomplish their everyday design practices. The way these surfaces are created and used could provide information about how designers work. Using examples from our fieldwork, we show that artful surfaces have both functional and inspirational characteristics. We indentify four types of artful surfaces: personal, shared, project-specific and live surfaces. We believe that a greater insight into how these artful surfaces are created and used could lead to better design of novel display technologies to support designers’ everyday work.

Connecting theory, practice and place in today’s landscape : an education initiative

Since the establishment of Australia’s earliest formal studies in landscape architecture, landscape planning has been a traditional focus within post-graduate studies at QUT. Study in this area has evolved from an earlier emphasis on applied physical geography through to traditional techniques and processes in visual assessment and management. The emphasis on these techniques has shifted again to a more complex exploration of natural, economic, social and cultural landscapes. Recently, the School has explored more innovative and complex dimensions of human and natural landscapes. This has involved a focus on particular regions under pressure from local social and economic change. These have included the under-threat ‘picturesque’ landscapes of the Blackall Range and the Tweed Valley. Attempts to bridge the institution and the landscape have unearthed, through a studio focus, strong connections with notions of sustainable villages, roadside interpretation, way finding, local economic initiatives, special area creation, cultural heritage brokering and ecological enhancements. These initiatives have spanned both local practice interests and academic pursuits. Central to this exploration is the concept of problem solving through the investigation of the concept of ‘multiple scales’. An open, yet intensive program is being developed with a team of ‘futurist’ practitioners offering a range of experiences and perspectives to students. The program is being increasingly linked to design studios so that landscape planning and landscape design form a fabric of inquiry that works towards reclaiming complex landscapes.

Moderneja ryijyjä, metritavaraa ja käsityötä : Tekstiilitaide ja nykyaikaistuva taideteollisuus Suomessa maailmansotien välisenä aikana

Modern ryijys, fabric by the yard and handicrafts. Finnish textile art and modernizing applied art during the inter-war years Textile art was in the 1920s and 1930s in the front rank of Finnish applied art and design. Modern ryijys, tapestries and fabrics by the yard by contemporary textile artists were on show in Finland and abroad. Textile art had also become interesting commercially, especially in interior textiles of modern homes. The research uses sources of the Ornamo Association of Decorative Artists, for example the Ornamo year books published from 1927, the Finnish Society of Crafts and Design and the country s only school of applied arts, the Central School of Arts and Crafts and the Museum of Applied Arts maintained by the society and also the national specialist organisation the Friends of Finnish Handicraft. It also refers to the magazines Käsiteollisuus and Kotiliesi. The art historical dissertation studies the renaissance of weaving art of the inter-war years in Finland. It problematizes the relation of the succesfull and appreciated textile art to the concept of breakthrough of Modernism (Functionalism). With the material from textile artists activities it questions the prevailing idea of slow modernization of Finnish applied art and design and challenges the polarization of craft and industry in the discourses of Modernisms of design. The public discussions about modernization of design and applied art where textile art and especially the ryijy got sometimes into difficult positions are interpreted as power struggles. After taking independence in 1917 the Finnish tradition of ryijy rugs was set as a symbol of the original culture of the young nation. The research studies the development of the so called art ryijy and the notions and meanings of hand weaving in the national context and also in relation to contemporary events in international applied art and design. It highlights the continuity of hand crafted production of textiles and the strong position of textile artists working in this field. The research opens new perspectives to Finnish textile artists by showing their activities as entrepreneurs in their own weaving studios or design studios and referring to their many relations and functions as pattern designers and educators in the growing handicraft industries.

Trans arquitectura : imaginación, invención e individuación del objeto técnico arquitectónico : transferencia tecnológica desde la industria del transporte al proyecto arquitectónico (1900-1973)

Se presenta la tesis doctoral, titulada ‘TRANS Arquitectura. Imaginación, Invención e individuación del objeto tecnico arquitectónico. Transferencia tecnológica desde la Industria del Transporte al Proyecto de Arquitectura [1900-1973]'’, que aborda la relación entre la Arquitectura y el Objeto Técnico durante la Modernidad.1 La temática de la tesis gravita en torno a la cultura técnica, la cultura material y la historia de la Tecnología del siglo XX. Hipótesis Se sostiene aquí la existencia de unas arquitecturas que se definen como Objetos Técnicos. Para demostrarlo se estudia si éstas comparten las mismas propiedades ontológicas de los objetos técnicos. Industria y Arquitectura La historia de la Arquitectura Moderna es la historia de la Industria Moderna y sus instalaciones industriales, sus productos y artefactos o sus procedimientos y procesos productivos. Fábricas, talleres, acerías, astilleros, minas, refinerías, laboratorios, automóviles, veleros, aviones, dirigibles, transbordadores, estaciones espaciales, electrodomésticos, ordenadores personales, teléfonos móviles, motores, baterías, turbinas, aparejos, cascos, chassis, carrocerías, fuselajes, composites, materiales sintéticos, la cadena de montaje, la fabricación modular, la cadena de suministros, la ingeniería de procesos, la obsolescencia programada… Todos estos objetos técnicos evolucionan constantemente gracias al inconformismo de la imaginación humana, y como intermediarios que son, cambian nuestra manera de relacionarnos con el mundo. La Arquitectura, al igual que otros objetos técnicos, media entre el hombre y el mundo. Con el objetivo de reducir el ámbito tan vasto de la investigación, éste se ha filtrado a partir de varios parámetros y cualidades de la Industria, estableciendo un marco temporal, vinculado con un determinado modo de hacer, basado en la ciencia. El inicio del desarrollo industrial basado en el conocimiento científico se da desde la Segunda Revolución Industrial, por consenso en el último tercio del siglo XIX. Este marco centra el foco de la tesis en el proceso de industrialización experimentado por la Arquitectura desde entonces, y durante aproximadamente un siglo, recorriendo la Modernidad durante los 75 primeros años del siglo XX. Durante este tiempo, los arquitectos han realizado transferencias de imágenes, técnicas, procesos y materiales desde la Industria, que ha servido como fuente de conocimiento para la Arquitectura, y ha evolucionado como disciplina. Para poder abordar más razonablemente un periodo tan amplio, se ha elegido el sector industrial del transporte, que históricamente ha sido, no sólo fuente de inspiración para los Arquitectos, sino también fuente de transferencia tecnológica para la Arquitectura. Conjuntos técnicos como los astilleros, fábricas de automóviles o hangares de aviones, individuos técnicos como barcos, coches o aviones, y elementos técnicos como las estructuras que les dan forma y soporte, son todos ellos objetos técnicos que comparten propiedades con las arquitecturas que aquí se presentan. La puesta en marcha de la cadena móvil de montaje en 1913, se toma instrumentalmente como primer foco temporal desde el que relatar la evolución de numerosos objetos técnicos en la Primera Era de la Máquina; un segundo foco se sitúa en 19582, año de la creación de la Agencia Espacial norteamericana (NASA), que sirve de referencia para situar la Segunda Era de la Máquina. La mayoría de los objetos técnicos arquitectónicos utilizados para probar la hipótesis planteada, gravitan en torno a estas fechas, con un rango de más menos 25 años, con una clara intención de sincronizar el tiempo de la acción y el tiempo del pensamiento. Arquitectura y objeto técnico Los objetos técnicos han estado siempre relacionados con la Arquitectura. En el pasado, el mismo técnico que proyectaba y supervisaba una estructura, se ocupaba de inventar los ingenios y máquinas para llevarlas a cabo. Los maestros de obra, eran verdaderos ‘agentes de transferencia tecnológica’ de la Industria y su conocimiento relacionaba técnicas de fabricación de diferentes objetos técnicos. Brunelleschi inventó varia grúas para construir la cúpula de Santa Maria dei Fiori (ca.1461), seguramente inspirado por la reedición del tratado de Vitruvio, De Architectura (15 A.C.), cuyo último capítulo estaba dedicado a las máquinas de la arquitectura clásica romana, y citaba a inventores como Archimedes. El arquitecto florentino fue el primero en patentar un invento en 1421: una embarcación anfibia que serviría para transportar mármol de Carrara por el río Arno, para su obra en Florencia. J. Paxton. Crystal Palace. London 1851. Viga-columna. Robert McCormick. Cosechadora 1831. 2ª patente, 1845. La Segunda Revolución Industrial nos dejó un primitivo ejemplo moderno de la relación entre la Arquitectura y el objeto técnico. El mayor edificio industrializado hasta la fecha, el Crystal Palace de Londres, obra de Joseph Paxton, fue montado en Londres con motivo de la Gran Exposición sobre la Industria Mundial de 1851, y siempre estará asociado a la cosechadora McCormick, merecedora del Gran Premio del Jurado. De ambos objetos técnicos, podrían destacarse características similares, como su origen industrial, y ser el complejo resultado de un ensamblaje simple de elementos técnicos. Desde la entonces, el desarrollo tecnológico ha experimentado una aceleración continuada, dando lugar a una creciente especialización y separación del conocimiento sobre las técnicas antes naturalmente unidas. Este proceso se ha dado a expensas del conocimiento integrador y en detrimento de la promiscuidad entre la Industria y la Arquitectura. Este es, sin lugar a dudas, un signo consustancial a nuestro tiempo, que provoca un natural interés de los arquitectos y otros tecnólogos, por las transferencias, trans e inter-disciplinareidades que tratan de re-establecer los canales de relación entre los diferentes campos del conocimiento. La emergencia de objetos técnicos como los vehículos modernos a principios del siglo XX (el automóvil, el trasatlántico, el dirigible o el aeroplano) está relacionada directamente con la Arquitectura de la Primera Era de la Máquina. La fascinación de los arquitectos modernos por aquellas nuevas estructuras habitables, se ha mantenido durante más de un siglo, con diferente intensidad y prestando atención a unos objetos técnicos u otros, oscilando entre el dominio del valor simbólico de los vehículos como objetosimágenes, durante el periodo heroico de la Primera Era de la Máquina, y la mirada más inquisitiva durante la Segunda, que perseguía un conocimiento más profundo de la organización de los mismos y del sistema técnico en el que estaban incluidos. La relación homóloga que existe entre arquitecturas y vehículos, por su condición de estructuras habitables, es algo de sobra conocido desde que Le Corbusier utilizara aquellas imágenes de barcos, coches y aviones para ilustrar su manifiesto Vers une architecture, de 1923. Los vehículos modernos han sido los medios con los que transmitir los conceptos que ansiaban transformar las propiedades tradicionales de la Arquitectura, relativas a su factura, su habitabilidad, su duración, su funcionalidad o su estética. Destaca particularmente el caso del automóvil en las décadas de los años 30 y 50, y los vehículos del programa espacial en las décadas de los 60 y 70. El conocimiento y la documentación previa de estos hechos, fueron un buen indicio para identificar y confirmar que el sector industrial del transporte, era un especialmente trascendente y fértil proveedor de casos de transferencia tecnológica para la Arquitectura. La tradición Moderna inaugurada por Le Corbusier en los años 20, ha sido mantenida y defendida por una multitud de arquitectos modernos como Albert Frey, Richard Neutra, Ralph Soriano, Charles Eames o Craig Ellwood, cuyo trabajo, animado por el legado de anteriores tecnólogos como Bucky Fuller o Jean Prouvé, fue fundamental y referencia obligada para la siguiente generación de arquitectos como Cedric Price, Archigram, Norman Foster, Richard Rogers, Renzo Piano, Jean Kaplicky o Richard Horden, entre otros. Todos ellos han contribuido a engrosar el imaginario del objeto técnico, aportando sus obras arquitectónicas. Estos arquitectos que aparecen repetidamente en el discurrir de la tesis, pertenecen a un mismo linaje, y son agrupados según una estructura ‘genealógica’, que se ha denominado ‘Estirpe Técnica’. Unidos por intereses comunes y similares enfoques o actitudes ante el proyecto de arquitectura, entendida como objeto Técnico, han operado mediante la práctica de la transferencia tecnológica, sin limitarse a las técnicas compositivas propias de la disciplina arquitectónica. Durante la investigación, se ha recopilado una selección de menciones explícitas -hechas por arquitectos- sobre otros objetos técnicos para referirse a la Arquitectura, mostrando las constantes y las variaciones de sus intereses a lo largo del siglo, lo que nos ha llevado a conclusiones como por ejemplo, que los conjuntos técnicos (fábricas de zepelines, aviones, automóviles o trasatlánticos) eran tomados por los arquitectos de la primera Modernidad, como un modelo imaginario, formal y compositivo, mientras que los de la Segunda Era de la Máquina los tomaban como modelo espacial y organizativo para la arquitectura. La mencionada estirpe de tecnólogos incluye líneas de descendencia conocidas, como: EiffelSuchovBehrens GropiusMiesLeCorbusierLodsProuve, en la Europa continental, o una rama británica como: LoudonPaxtonWilliamsStirlingGowan SmithsonsPriceArchigramFosterRogersPiano KaplickyHorden. También podemos encontrar conexiones intercontinentales como Fuller EamesRudolphFosterRogers, o ramificaciones menos previsibles como: LeRicolaisKahn PianoKaplicky, o LeCorbusierFreyLacaton Vassal… Seguramente muchos más merecerían incluirse en esta lista, y de hecho, la tesis asume la imposibilidad de incluirlo todo (por motivos prácticos) aunque contempla la posibilidad de ser ampliada en un futuro. Con lo aquí incluido, se pretende mostrar la continuidad en los enfoques, planteamientos y técnicas de proyectos aplicadas, de los que podemos deducir algunas conclusiones, como por ejemplo, que en los periodos inmediatamente posteriores a las dos Guerras Mundiales, aumentó la intensidad de aportaciones de nuevas imágenes de vehículos, al imaginario del objeto técnico utilizado por los arquitectos, a través de publicaciones y exposiciones. Hoy, cien años después de que Ford pusiera en marcha la cadena móvil de montaje, aún encontramos viva esta tradición en las palabras de un arquitecto, Richard Horden, cuyo trabajo porta consigo –como la información embebida en los elementos técnicos- toda una cultura técnica de una tradición moderna. Horden representa uno de los exponentes de la que he denominado estirpe de tecnólogos. Es por ello que he querido concluir la tesis con una entrevista, realizada en Mayo de 2015, en su estudio de Berkeley Square en Londres (ver Apéndices). Guías Para el desarrollo de la presente tesis, se ha tomado, como principal obra de referencia, otra tesis, titulada El modo de existencia de los objetos técnicos, leída y publicada en 1958 por el filósofo francés Gilbert Simondon [1924-89], dedicada a la ontología del objeto técnico. Esta obra enmarca el enfoque intelectual de la tesis, que entronca con la fenomenología, para movilizar una visión particular de la Arquitectura, a la que sirve como modelo de análisis ontológico para estudiar sus procesos de génesis, invención e individuación. Para el desarrollo de éstos, se ha utilizado como complemento bibliográfico, otra obra del mismo autor, titulada Imaginación e invención 1965-66. En cuanto a las fuentes historiográficas disciplinares, se ha elegido utilizar a Reyner P. Banham [1922-1988] y a Martin E. Pawley [1938-2008] como guías a través de la arquitectura del siglo XX. Sus crónicas sobre la Primera y Segunda Era de la Máquina3 y su obra crítica, han servido como índices desde los que reconstruir el imaginario del objeto técnico moderno, y del que aprovisionarse de proyectos y obras de Arquitectura como casos de estudio para la tesis. Estas obras han servido además como índices de otra bibliografía, que ha sido complementaria a la de éstos. Objetivos de la Tesis El principal objetivo de la tesis es demostrar la hipótesis: si una obra de arquitectura puede ser considerada un objeto técnico y bajo qué condiciones, construyendo un criterio que permita reconocer cuándo una obra de Arquitectura responde a la definición de objeto técnico. Otro objetivo es demostrar la importancia y potencia de la Transferencia tecnológica en el proceso evolutivo de la Arquitectura, y para ello se presentan ejemplos de una metodología de proyecto por ensamblaje, que Martin Pawley denominaba ‘Design by Assembly’. También es un objetivo el de reconstruir un Atlas del Imaginario del objeto técnico moderno, con el fin de conocer mejor las causas, razones y finalidades que llevaron a los arquitectos modernos a perseguir una arquitectura como objeto técnico. Este Atlas permite relacionar panópticamente los distintos objetos técnicos entre sí, revelando la verdadera importancia y trascendencia de aquéllos y las arquitecturas con las que se relacionan. En él, las arquitecturas vuelven a situarse en el contexto más extenso y complejo de la industria y la historia de la tecnología, al que siempre pertenecieron. De este modo, éstas son capaces de desvelar todo el conocimiento -en forma de información- que portan en su propio código ‘genético’, desplegando capítulos completos de cultura tecnológica, tan antigua como la Humanidad y en constante y creciente evolución. Estructura de la tesis Tras una Introducción en la que se presentan algunos de los conceptos principales que se instrumentalizan en la tesis sobre la ontología Simondoniana del objeto técnico y sobre la transferencia tecnológica aplicada al proyecto de Arquitectura, el texto principal de la tesis consta de tres partes: La primera se dedica a la Imaginación, una segunda parte a la Invención y una tercera a Individuación o evolución del objeto técnico. Se termina con una Discusión de la tesis y un apartado de Conclusiones. En la Introducción al objeto técnico, éste se define ontológicamente y se distinguen sus diferentes categorías (conjuntos técnicos, individuos técnicos y elementos técnicos). Se explica el proceso de génesis del objeto técnico y sus fases de imaginación, invención e individuación. También se presentan los conceptos de transducción, tecnicidad y sistema técnico, fundamentales para entender el concepto de transferencia tecnológica que se desarrollará después. La concretización, explica el modo particular de individuación y evolución de los objetos técnicos, un proceso por el que las diferentes partes de un objeto técnico, se integran y tienden hacia la propia convergencia. Aquí se comprueba la efectividad del concepto simondoniano de Transducción, como señal o información transmitida y transformada, y se relaciona con la Transferencia Tecnológica - un proceso sinergético, por el que un sector industrial se beneficia del desarrollo de otro sector- a la que se han referido explícitamente arquitectos e historiadores para explicar sus obras, durante la Segunda Era de la Máquina, y que es determinante para el desarrollo de la Industria. La transferencia tecnológica sería la transmisión del conjunto de conocimientos sobre la técnica, que incluyen su esfera fáctica, pero también la esfera sensible de la experiencia. En su aplicación a la arquitectura, las transferencias se han clasificado según tres tipos: Eidéticas, Tectónicas, Orgánicas. En la primera parte dedicada a la Imaginación del objeto técnico arquitectónico se realiza una reconstrucción ‘arqueológica’ –y parcial- del imaginario del objeto técnico moderno, con la intención de conocer mejor su génesis y la relación con otros objetos técnicos. Las fuentes de ese imaginario se buscan en las instalaciones de la Industria de principios de siglo XX, en particular en las fábricas de vehículos, con la finalidad de comprobar hasta qué punto, esos objetos técnicos fueron importantes para imaginar la Arquitectura moderna. La reconstrucción se continúa hasta la Segunda Era de la Máquina, cuando una nueva mirada más inquisitiva y precisa, se dirige a otras fábricas, vehículos y componentes, interesándose por sus cualidades materiales y organizativas. Transferencias Eidéticas, que operan desde un conocimiento intuitivo y son útiles para transmitir información sobre la esencia de un objeto técnico que sirve de fuente. Conceptos abstractos se transmiten por medio de las imágenes—objeto, para producir una transformación en su equivalente arquitectónico. Fruto de la investigación, se han detectado un grupo de conceptos que han sido objeto de transferencias tecnológicas de naturaleza eidética, provenientes del imaginario del objeto técnico moderno: FABRICADO, HABITABLE, FUNCIONAL, EFICIENTE, OBSOLESCENTE y BELLO. En la segunda parte dedicada a la Invención del objeto técnico arquitectónico, las transferencias también pueden ser Tectónicas, cuando lo que se transmite es una técnica constructiva o estructural aplicada mediante MATERIALES artificiales (como los metales, los composites como el ferrocemento, y el plywood, o las aleaciones como el aluminio) o mediante el ensamblaje de ESTRUCTURAS o partes componentes de otro objeto técnico, (como cascos, fuselajes, carrocerías o aparejos) y tiene como resultado la invención de un nuevo objeto técnico arquitectónico. En la tercera parte dedicada a la individuación, se abordan las transferencias ORGÁNICAS, lo que se transfiere es una técnica organizativa, aplicada a través de PROCEDIMIENTOS que definen la actividad del arquitecto como tecnólogo e inventor de objetos técnicos. Estos procedimientos tienen un efecto transformador en tres instituciones tradicionales para la Arquitectura: la Escuela, el Estudio y la Obra, y sus resultados se resumen en nuevos modelos de organización de la Educación de la Arquitectura, con la aparición de los Talleres de proyectos; nuevos modelos de organización del ejercicio de arquitecto: la Oficina técnica; nuevos modelos de organización del espacio, basados en la organización espacial de la Industria, que da lugar a patrones o Matrices espaciales; un nuevo modelo de organización del proyecto, que utiliza las herramientas gráficas de la industria y el ensamblaje como metodología; y un nuevo modelo de producción arquitectónica, basado en la Industrialización. Tras explicar los conceptos y la génesis del ensamblaje y el montaje, se presenta el proyecto por ensamblaje (Design by assembly) como un método que promueve la invención arquitectónica. Se demuestra utilizando algunos casos analizados en la tesis, en los que se ha realizado alguna transferencia conceptual, constructiva u organizativa. Tras analizar las arquitecturas estudiadas en la tesis, se ha utilizado el método genético propuesto por Simondon para comprender cada evolución particular, reconstruyendo las líneas genealógicas hasta sus ancestros, e identificando una serie de linajes genéticos, que corresponderían con los conjuntos técnicos estudiados en la tesis: el astillero, la fábrica de coches, y la fábrica de aeronaves: los Ancestros de la Modernidad. Los sistemas de organización espacial de estos conjuntos técnicos, están directamente relacionados con el objeto técnico que se produce en él. A partir de ellos se definen una serie de matrices operativas (MILL, SHOP, SHED), que sirven para hacer una taxonomía del objeto técnico arquitectónico. Esto se ejemplifica con algunos proyectos de Norman Foster, Richard Rogers, Renzo Piano, Nicholas Grimshaw, Jean Kaplicky y Richard Horden. Tesis: Comprobación de la hipótesis Simondon definía ontológicamente el Objeto técnico como aquello de lo que existe génesis y que desarrolla una tendencia hacia la solidaridad y unidad. Para que una Arquitectura pueda ser reconocida como un Objeto técnico, se deben dar una serie de condiciones, en las sucesivas fases que intervienen en su modo de existencia: Imaginación. Estas arquitecturas remiten a un imaginario protagonizado por imágenes-objeto de otros objetos técnicos (conjuntos técnicos, individuos técnicos y elementos técnicos). Esas imágenes-objeto vehiculizan una transferencia eidética de los objetos técnicos que simbolizan. Invención. Estas arquitecturas son el resultado de transferencias tectónicas, que se producen durante el proceso de proyecto, mediante el ensamblaje de materiales, componentes o procedimientos, utilizados en la industria para la producción de otros objetos técnicos. Individuación. Estas arquitecturas evolucionan y se individualizan por concretización, un proceso por el que los objetos técnicos se organizan para seguir su tendencia hacia la integración de sus partes, con el fin de alcanzar la convergencia de funciones en una única estructura. Esta integración tiende hacia la naturalización del objeto técnico, mediante la inclusión simbiótica de sus medios naturales asociados. En este caso, veremos cómo se ha producido transferencias orgánicas, o lo que es lo mismo, cómo los objetos técnicos –en el nivel de los conjuntos técnicos- se han tomado como modelo de organización por la arquitectura. Tras comprobar que de ellas existe una génesis, que evoluciona por las fases de imaginación e invención y concretización, se analiza su imaginario, su materialidad, sus estructuras y su organización, con el fin de detectar patrones y principios organizativos comunes a otros objetos técnicos. Interés de la tesis Desde el comienzo del nuevo siglo, diversos autores han demostrado un renovado interés por definir qué es el proyecto, qué lo constituye para qué sirve. Las aproximaciones al tema provienen de la filosofía analítica (Galle, 2008) o de la filosofía de la tecnología (Verbeek, 2005; Vermaas, 2009) y a menudo versan sobre la relación entre diseño y la cultura material (Dorschel 2003, Boradkar 2010 o Preston 2012). Es importante indicar el reciente y también creciente interés suscitado por la obra del filósofo francés, Gilbert Simondon [1924-1989], reconocida por su importante contribución a la filosofía de la técnica y la fenomenología, y por la influencia en el pensamiento de filósofos como Gilles Deleuze, autor presente en multitud de tesis doctorales e investigaciones teóricas llevadas a cabo en las principales escuelas de Arquitectura de todo el mundo desde los años 90 hasta el presente. La reedición y traducción de la obra de Simondon (ing. 1980, esp. 2008) ha recibido la atención de filósofos actuales como Paolo Virno, Bruno Latour o Bernard Stiegler, que siguen recurriendo a su estudio y análisis para avanzar en su pensamiento, estando por tanto presente en el debate contemporáneo sobre la técnica. Tras su reciente traducción al español, el pensamiento de Simondon ha despertado un gran interés en América Latina, como demuestra la organización de varios congresos y simposios, así como la proliferación de publicaciones en torno a su obra y pensamiento. Las futuras traducciones del resto de sus principales obras, asegurarán una introducción cada vez mayor en la comunidad académica. Se ha procurado presentar una mirada alternativa de la Historia de la Arquitectura Moderna, utilizando como guía a un cronista como Reyner Banham. La Era de la Máquina se ha cruzado con la Mecanología y el “vitalismo técnico” de Simondon, obteniendo como resultado una interpretación fresca, renovada y optimista de algunas de las más importantes obras de Arquitectura del siglo XX, que seguro contribuirán al desarrollo de la del siglo XXI, inmerso ya en el cambio de paradigma hacia la sostenibilidad y la ecología. ABSTRACT 'TRANS architecture. Imagination, invention and technical individuation of the architectural technical object. Technology transfer from the Transport Industry to Architectural Design [1900- 1973]' is a thesis dealing with the relationship between Architecture and the Technical Object during Modernity5. The theme of the thesis revolves around the technical culture, material culture and the history of twentieth-century technology. Hypothesis Held here is the existence of some architectures defined as technical objects. A study has been developed to prove if those architectures share the ontological properties of a technical object. Industry and Architecture The history of Modern Architecture is also the history of modern industry and its facilities, its products and devices, its procedures and production processes. Factories, workshops, steel mills, shipyards, mines, refineries, laboratories, cars, yachts, airplanes, airships, shuttles, space stations, home appliances, personal computers, mobile phones, motors, batteries, turbines, rigs, hulls, chassis, bodies, fuselages , composites and synthetic materials, the assembly line, modular manufacturing, the supply chain, process engineering, the planned obsolescence ... All these technical objects are constantly evolving thanks to the inconsistency of the human imagination and, as our intermediates, keep changing our way of relating and being in the world. Architecture, alike other technical objects, mediates between man and the World. In order to frame the vast field of the research, it has been filtered according to various parameters and qualities of Industry, establishing also a time frame which is related to a particular science-based way of making. The start of an industrial development, based on scientific knowledge is given from the Second Industrial Revolution -by consensus on the last third of the nineteenth century. This frame puts the focus of the thesis in the process of industrialization experienced by the Architecture of at least one century, and tours through Modernity during the first 75 years of the twenieth century. During this time, architects have made transfers of images, techniques, processes and materials from Industry, serving as a source of knowledge and thus allowing Architecture to evolve as a discipline. To reasonably address the enormous scope of the thesis, the industrial sector of transportation has ben chosen. It is not only a historical source of inspiration for architects, but also a traditional source of technology transfer for Modern Architecture. Technical sets such as shipyards, automobile factories or aircraft hangars, technical individuals as boats, cars or planes, and technical elements like the structures shaping and supporting them, are all technical objects which share properties with the architectures here presented. The launch of the moving assembly line in 1913, is instrumentally taken as a first time focus, from which to describe the evolution of many technical objects in the First Machine Age; a second focus could be found in 19586, year of the creation of the North American Space Agency (NASA), serving as a reference to the Second Machine Age. Most architectural technical objects used to test the hypothesis, gravitate around this second focus, in a range of plus or minus 25 years, with a clear intention to synchronize the time for action and time of thought. Architecture and Technical Object Technical objects have always been related to Architecture. In the past, the same technician who planned and oversaw a building structure, invented the devices and machines to carry them out. The foremen were the true 'technology transfer agents' from Industry. Their knowledge naturally related different manufacturing techniques to make diverse technical objects. Brunelleschi invented various cranes to build the dome of Santa Maria dei Fiori in Florence (ca.1461). Probably inspired by the reedition of Vitruvius’ treaty De Architectura (15 BC), whose last chapter was dedicated to the machines of classical Roman architecture and quoted inventors as Archimedes, the florentine architect was the first to patent an invention in 1421: an amphibious craft serving as a means of transportation for Carrara marble along the Arno river. At the daw of the Second Industrial Revolution, whose development was based on the scientific knowledge, we find a primitive modern example of the relationship between Architecture and a Technical Object: The Crystal Palace, built in London for the Great Exhibition of 1851 World Industry and designed by Joseph Paxton, was the largest to date industrialized building, and it will be always associated with the McCormick Reaper, worthy of the Grand Jury’s Prize. Similar characteristics could be emphasized of both technical objects, such as their industrial origin and for being be the complex result of a simple assembly of technical elements. Since then, technological development has experienced a continued acceleration, resulting in an increasing specialization and separation of knowledge about techniques which were naturally attached in the past. This process has happened at the expense of an integrative knowledge and against promiscuity between Industry and Architecture. This is, undoubtedly, an inherent sign of our time, which causes the natural and interest of architects and other technicians about transfers, trans-disciplinarity and inter-disciplinarity, as a reaction to reestablish channels of relationships between these different fields of knowledge. The emergence of technical objects as modern vehicles in the early twentieth century (the car, the Ocean liner, the airship or the airplane) is directly related to the Architecture of the First Machine Age. Modern architects’ fascination for those new ‘inhabitable’ structures has been maintained for over a century, with different intensity and paying attention to one and other technical objets, ranging from the domain of the symbolic value of the vehicles as objectsimages, during heroic period of the First Machine Age, to the more inquisitive glance characterizing the Second Machine Age, which sought a deeper understanding of the organization of such objects and the technical system to which they belonged. The periods immediately following both World Wars, showed a concentrated effort to bring new images of vehicles to the imaginary of architects, by means of publications and exhibitions. The homologous relationship between architectures and vehicles, in their capacity as living structures, is something well known since Le Corbusier used the images of cars, boats and airplanes to illustrate his manifesto, Towards an architecture in 1923. Modern vehicles have been the means by which to convey the concepts eager to transform the traditional attributes of Architecture: those relating to its manufacture, habitability, duration, functionality or aesthetics. The automobile stands out during the 30s and 50s, and the new vehicles of the Space Program satnd in the 60s and 70s. The prior knowledge and documentation of these events were a good indication to identify the industrial sector of Transportation as one of especial importance and as a fertile provider of technology transfer cases for Architecture. The Modern tradition, inaugurated by Le Corbusier in the 20s, has been maintained and defended by a host of modern architects like Albert Frey, Richard Neutra, Ralph Soriano, Charles Eames and Craig Ellwood, whose work - inspired by the legacy of previous technologists as Bucky Fuller or Jean Prouvé- was fundamental and a mandatory reference for the next generation of architects like Cedric Price, Archigram, Norman Foster, Richard Rogers, Renzo Piano, Jean and Richard Horden Kaplicky, among others. They have all contributed to increase the imaginary of the technical object, adding to it their architectural works. In the passage of the thesis, we repeatedly find a number of architects, who have been grouped according to a 'genealogical' structure, which has been called 'Technical Lineage'. Gathered by common interests and similar views or attitudes to the architectural design, understood as a technical object, they have operated through the practice of technology transfer, without limiting itself to specific compositional techniques of the architectural discipline. During the investigation, a selection of explicit references made by those architects, about other technical objects referring to their Architecture, has been compiled, showing constants and variations in their interests throughout the century, which has led to conclusions such as, having technicians sets (zeppelins factories, airships factories, car factories and shipyards) been taken by the architects of the first Modernity, as their main formal, compositional and imaginary models, while the Second Machine Age had taken them as a spatial and organizational model for their architecture. The above mentioned lineage of technologists includes weel-known ‘seed lines’ as: Eiffel- Suchov-Behrens, Gropius-Mies-LeCorbusier- Lods-Prouve, in continental Europe; British branches as Loudon-Paxton-Williams-Stirling- Gowan-Smithsons-Price-Archigram-Foster- Rogers-Piano-Kaplicky-Horden. And we could also find intercontinental connections as Fuller- Eames-Rudolph-Foster-Rogers, or other less predictable ramifications as LeRicolais-Kahn Piano-Kaplicky, or LeCorbusier-Frey-Lacaton & Vassal... Many more would surely deserve to be included in this list, and indeed, the thesis assumes the impossibility of including them all (for practical reasons) and even contemplates possible future extensions. The material included herein is to demonstrate the continuity in the approaches, statements and in the applied architectural design techniques, from which we can draw some conclusions. Today, one hundred years after Ford put up the moving assembly line, we still find this tradition alive in the words of the architect Richard Horden, whose work carries with it –as with the information embedded in every technical element- the whole techncial culture of a modern tradition. Horden is represented here as one of the exponents of what I have called the lineage of technologists. That is why I wanted to conclude the thesis with an interview to Richard Horden, held in May 2015 in his studio in London's Berkeley Square (see Appendices). Guides For the development of this thesis, another thesis, entitled: The mode of existence of technical objects, is taken as the main reference work. Read and published in 1958 by the French philosopher Gilbert Simondon [1924- 1989], it was dedicated to the ontology of the technical object. This work frames the intellectual approach of the thesis, which connects with phenomenology to mobilize a particular vision of Architecture. It is used as a model of ontological analysis to study its genesis, invention and evolutionary processes. To develop these, another work by the same author, titled Imagination and Invention (1965- 1966) has been used as a bibliographical complement. As for the disciplinary historical sources, Reyner P. Banham [1922-1988] and Martin E. Pawley [1938-2008] have been chosen as guides through the modern Architecture of the twentieth century. Their cronical reports on the First and Second Machine Age and their critical works have served as an index from which to reconstruct the imaginary of the modern technical object in the Machine Age7, and to stock up on projects and works of architecture, used as case studies for the thesis. These works have also been used as triggers for other literatures, which has been complementary to the former. Objectives of the Thesis The main objective of the thesis is to prove its hypothesis: if a work of architecture can be considered a technical object and under what conditions, building then a criterion for recognizing when a work of architecture meets the definition of a technical object. Another aim is to demonstrate the importance and power of Technology Transfer in the evolutionary process of Architecture, and to do it, some examples of a methodology for architectural design that Martin Pawley called 'Design by Assembly' are presented. It is also an objective to reconstruct an Atlas of the imaginary of the modern technical object, in order to better understand the causes, reasons and purposes that led modern architects to pursue architecture as a technical object. This Atlas allows to panoptically relate the various technical objects, revealing the true importance and significance of those and the architecture with whom they interact. Architectures are again at the largest and most complex industrial context and the history of technology, which always belonged. Thus, they are able to reveal all the knowledge-in the shape of information-carried in their own 'genetic' code, displaying full chapters of technological culture as old as mankind and constantly growing and evolving. Thesis: Proving the Hypothesis Simondon ontologically defined the technical object as ‘that of which genesis exists’ and that develops ‘a tendency towards solidarity and unity’. For an architecture to be recognized as a technical object, a number of conditions should be given, in the successive phases involved in their mode of existence: Imagination. These architectures refer to an imaginary featuring images-object other technical objects (technical sets, technical individuals and technical elements). These images are the means to an eidetic transfer of the technical objects which they symbolize. Invention. These architectures are the result of tectonic transfers, which occur during the architectural design process, by assembling materials, components or procedures used in industry for the production of other technical objects. Individuation. These architectures evolve and are individualized by ‘concretization’, a process leading to the full integration of its parts and aiming the full convergence of its functions into a single structure. This integration tends towards the naturalization of the technical object, by means of a symbiotic incorporation of their associated milieus. After checking if there is a genesis of them, which evolves through the phases of imagination and invention and concretization, their imaginary, materiality, structure and organization are analyzed in order to detect patterns and common organizational principles to other technical objects counterparts. Structure The main text of the thesis consists of three parts. Before there is an Introduction to the main concepts that are exploited in the thesis on ontology Simondonian technical object, and technology transfer applied to Architecture. Then a first part covers the Imaginary of the modern technical object, a second part is dedicated to the Invention and a third part to the individuation process The thesis ends with a section for the Discussion and the Conclusions. The Introduction to the technical object, this is ontologically defined and its different categories are distinguished. The process of genesis of the technical object and the phases of imagination, invention and indivuation are explained. Concepts as Transduction, Technicality and Technical system are presented for being fundamental to understand the concept of Technology Transfer that will take place later. The concretization is explained as the particular mode of individuation and evolution of technical objects, a process by which the different parts of a technical object, are integrated and begin a tendency towards a convergence in itself. The first part, dedicated to the Imagination of the architectural technical object presents a parcial "archaeological" reconstruction the imaginary of the modern technical object, intended to better understand its genesis and the relationship with other technical objects. The imaginary sources are searched in the premises of the Industry of the early twentieth century, and particularly in the factories of modern vehicles, in order to see, to what extent these technical objects were important to imagine modern architecture. The reconstruction is continued until the Second Machine Age, when a new, more inquisitive and precise gaze turns to other factories, other vehicles and other components and materials, inquiring now about their organizational qualities. The second part is devoted to the Invention of the architectural technical object. The effectiveness of the simondonian concept of Transduction is checked: a transmitted and transformed sign or information, which relates to Technology Transfer, a synergetic process by which an industrial sector benefits from the development of another sector, to which some architects and historians have explicitly referred to explain their works during Machine Age, and which is crucial for the development of the industry. Technology transfer would be the transmission of a set of information or knowledge about technique, including the factual sphere of technique, but also the sensitive sphere of experience. In their application to Architecture, these transfers have been classified according to three types: Eidetic, Tectonic and Organic. Eidetic Transfers operate from an intuitive knowledge and are useful for transmitting information about the essence of the technical object serving as a source. Abstract concepts are transmitted through the object-images to produce an equivalent transformation in Architecture. A group of concepts that have been the subject of technology transfers of eidetic nature, and have been originated in the imaginary of the modern technical object, have been detected as a result of the research: FABRICATED, INHABITABLE, FUNCTIONAL, EFFICIENT, OBSOLESCENT, and BEAUTIFUL. The transfers can also be Tectonic when, that which is transferred is a constructive or structural technique, applied through artificial MATERIALS such as metals, composites as the ferrocement, or plywood, or alloys such as aluminum; or by means of the assembly of STRUCTURES or parts of other technical objects such as hulls, fuselages, car bodies or rigs, resulting in the invention of a new architectural technical object. In the case of ORGANIC transfers, what is transferred is an organizational technique, applied by means of a set of PROCEDURES defining the activity of the architect as a technologist and inventor of technical objects. These procedures have a transformative effect on three traditional institutions for Architecture: the School, the Atelier and the Work, and the results are summarized in new models of organization of the Education of Architecture, with the onset of the Architectural Design Studios or workshops; new models of organization of the practice of architect: the technical office; and new models of space organization, based on the spatial organization of the industry, resulting in spatial patterns or spatial matrices; a new model of organization of the project, which uses graphical tools and industrail protocols as the assembly as a methodology; a new model of architectural production based on the industrialization. After explaining the concepts and the genesis of assembly and montage, Design by assembly is presented as a method that promotes architectural invention, and is shown using some case studies analyzed in the thesis, in which there has been made some conceptual, constructive or organizational transfer. After analyzing the architectures studied in the thesis, genetic method proposed by Simondon was used to understand every particular evolution, reconstructing their genealogical lines up to their ancestors, identifying a series of genetic lineages, which correspond to the technical sets studied in the thesis : the shipyard, the car factory, and aircraft factory. The real ancestors of Modernity. The spatial organization systems of these technical sets are directly related to the technical object that is fabricated within them. From that point, a number of operational matrices are defined (MILL, SHOP, SHED) and used to make a taxonomy of the architectural technical object. This is exemplified by some projects by architects as Norman Foster, Richard Rogers, Renzo Piano, Nicholas Grimshaw, Jean and Richard Horden Kaplicky. Interest of the thesis Since the beginning of the new century, several authors have shown a renewed interest in defining what a project is, how it is constituted and what it is for. The approaches to the subject are brought from analytic philosophy (Galle, 2008) or from the philosophy of technology (Verbeek, 2005; Vermaas, 2009) and they often speak about the relationship between design and material culture (Dorschel 2003, 2010 or Preston Boradkar 2012). It is also important to note the recent and growing interest in the work of French philosopher Gilbert Simondon [1924-1989], mainly known for its important contribution to the philosophy of technology and phenomenology of the technical object, and the influence on the thinking of contemporary philosophers as Paolo Virno, Bruno Latour or Gilles Deleuze, being the latter a author present in many doctoral theses and theoretical research conducted at major architecture schools around the world since the 90s to the present. The republication and translation of the work of Simondon (eng. 1980, spn. 2008) has received the attention from current philosophers such as Bernard Stiegler who continues to use its study and analysis to advance his thinking, thus being present in the contemporary debate about the technique. After its recent translation into Spanish, the thought of Simondon has aroused great interest in Latin America, as evidenced by the organization of various conferences and symposia, as well as the proliferation of publications about his work and thought8. Future translations of the rest of his major works, will ensure increased introduction in the academic community. Efforts have been made to present an alternative view of the History of Modern Architecture, using a reporter as Reyner P.Banham as a guide. The Machine Age intersects Simondon’s mechanology and his "technical vitalism", resulting in a fresh, renewed and optimistic interpretation of some of the most important works of Architecture of the twentieth century, which will surely contribute to the development of this century’s Architecture, already immersed in the paradigm shift towards sustainability and ecology.

Studios for the masses : can student colaboration replace the master-apprentice relationship in design instruction?

This action research project investigated the use of a collaborative learning approach for addressing issues associated with teaching urban design to large, diverse cohorts. As a case study, I observed two semesters of an urban design unit that I revised between 2011 and 2012 to incorporate collaborative learning activities. Data include instructional materials, participant observations, peer-reviews of collaborative learning activities, feedback from students and instructors and student projects. Themes that emerged through qualitative analysis include the challenge of removing inequalities inherent in the diverse cohort, the challenge of unifying project guidance and marking criteria, and the challenge of providing project guidance for a very large cohort. Most notably, the study revealed a need to clarify learning objectives relating to design principles in order to fully transition to and benefit from a collaborative learning model.

Daylighting design in the architectural design studio

This paper discusses two different approaches to teaching design and their modes of delivery and reflects upon their successes and failures. Two small groups of third year design students have been given projects focussing on incorporation of daylighting to architectural design in studios having different design themes. In association with the curriculum, the themes were Digital Tools and Sustainability. Although both studios had the topic of daylighting, the aim and methodology used were different. Digital Tool studio’s aim was to teach how to design daylighting by using a digital tool, where as, Sustainability studio aimed at using scale modelling as a tool to learn about daylighting and integrating it into design. Positive results for providing student learning success within the University context were the students’ chance to learn and practice some new skills –using a new tool for designing; integration of the tutors’ extensive research expertise to their teaching practice; and the students’ construction of their own understanding of knowledge in a student-centred educational environment. This environment created a very positive attitude in the form of exchanging ideas and collaboration among the students of Digital Tools students at the discussion forum. Sustainability group students were enthusiastic about designing and testing various proposals. Problems that both studios experienced were mainly related to timing. Synchronizing with other groups of their studios and learning of a new skill on top of an already complicated process of design learning were the setbacks.

Dichotomy in the design studio : adapting to new blended learning environments

In a study aimed at better understanding how staff and students adapt to new blended studio learning environments (BSLE’s), a group of 165 second year architecture students at a large school of architecture in Australia were separated into two different design studio learning environments. 70% of students were allocated to a traditional studio design learning environment (TSLE) and 30% to a new, high technology embedded, prototype digital learning laboratory. The digital learning laboratory was purpose designed for the case-study users, adapted Student-Centred Active Learning Environment for Undergraduate Programs (SCALE-UP) principles, and built as part of a larger university research project. The architecture students attended the same lectures, followed the same studio curriculum and completed the same pieces of assessment; the only major differences were the teaching staff and physical environment within which the studios were conducted. At the end of the semester, the staff and students were asked to complete a questionnaire about their experiences and preferences within the two respective learning environments. Following this, participants were invited to participate in focus groups, where a synergistic approach was effected. Using a dual method qualitative approach, the questionnaire and survey data were coded and extrapolated using both thematic analysis and grounded theory methodology. The results from these two different approaches were compared, contrasted and finally merged, to reveal six distinct emerging themes, which were instrumental in offering resistance or influencing adaptation to, the new BLSE. This paper reports on the study, discusses the major contributors to negative resistance and proposes points for consideration, when transitioning from a TSLE to a BLSE.

Dichotomy in the design studio : adapting to new blended learning environments

Since the architectural design studio learning environment was first established in the early 19th century at the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris, there has been a complete transformation in how the discipline of architecture is practiced and how students of architecture acquire information. Digital technologies allow students to access information instantly and learning is no longer confined to the rigid boundaries of a physical campus environment. In many schools of architecture in Australia, the physical design studio learning environments however, remain largely unchanged. Many learning environments could be mistaken for those last refurbished 30 years ago, being devoid of any significant technological intervention. While some teaching staff are eagerly embracing new digital technologies and attempting to modify their pedagogical approaches, the physical design studio learning environment is resistant to such efforts. In a study aimed at better understanding how staff and students adapt to new blended learning environments, a group of 165 second year architecture students at a large school of architecture in Australia were separated into two different design studio learning environments. 70% of students were allocated to a traditional design studio setting and 30% to a new, high technology embedded, prototype digital learning laboratory. The digital learning laboratory was purpose designed for the case-study users, adapted Student-Centred Active Learning Environment for Undergraduate Programs [SCALE-UP] principles, and built as part of a larger university research project. The architecture students attended the same lectures, followed the same studio curriculum and completed the same pieces of assessment; the only major differences were the teaching staff and physical environment within which the studios were conducted. At the end of the semester, all staff and students were asked to complete a questionnaire about their experiences and preferences within the two respective learning environments. The questionnaire response rate represented the opinions of 100% of the 10 teaching staff and over 70% of the students. Using a qualitative grounded theory approach, data were coded, extrapolated and compared, to reveal emerging key themes. The key themes formed the basis for in-depth interviews and focus groups of teaching staff and students, allowing the researchers to understand the data in more detail. The results of the data verified what had become increasingly evident during the course of the semester: an underlying negative resistance to the new digital studio learning environment, by both staff and students. Many participants openly exhibited a yearning for a return to the traditional design studio learning environments, particularly when the new technology caused frustration, by being unreliable or failing altogether. This paper reports on the study, discusses the negative resistance and explores the major contributors to resistance. The researchers are not aware of any similar previous studies across these particular settings and believe that it offers a necessary and important contribution to emergent research about adaptation to new digital learning environments.

Understanding the past to imagine the future : the history of industrial design practice in Alberta

La pratique du design industriel dans la province canadienne de l’Alberta est en pleine croissance. Ses activités sont principalement concentrées à Edmonton et à Calgary, qui sont les plus grandes villes de la province. On y trouve des studios de design de renom, des communautés de design complexes et des programmes universitaires de design bien établis. Cependant, la pratique du design industriel albertaine est sous-développée en comparaison avec celle du reste du Canada et il y a peu de recherches et de documentation sur le design industriel en Alberta. Dans ce projet de mémoire, la pratique du design industriel en Alberta a été explorée depuis une approche historique. Pour pallier le manque de documentation, la collecte de données a été faite par une recherche qualitative, des entretiens narratifs et une recherche quantitative statistique. Une base d’information historique sur le design industriel albertain a été établie puis située par rapport au développement de la pratique du design industriel ailleurs au Canada. Les facteurs, événements et tendances dans l’histoire de la pratique du design industriel en Alberta ont été identifiés. De plus, le développement de la pratique du design industriel de l’Alberta a été comparé à celui du Québec et de l’Ontario. Les retombées de cette étude indiquent que la pratique du design industriel en Alberta présente quatre domaines de spécialisations distincts se développant depuis les années 1980. La pratique du design industriel en Alberta est sous-développée en comparaison à celui du Québec et de l’Ontario, mais elle peut devenir plus compétitive, au niveau canadien, avec plus de soutien gouvernemental, de meilleures relations avec l’industrie manufacturière et les institutions académiques, une communauté de design plus unifiée et en portant une plus grande attention aux domaines les plus prometteurs de l’industrie. Ces informations supportent une meilleure compréhension de la pratique du design industriel en Alberta et pourront informer les praticiens, enseignants et administrateurs du domaine du design industriel dans la province. Finalement, le mémoire servira de base à d’autres projets de recherche sur les changements potentiels dans la pratique du design industriel en Alberta et l’étude du design canadien et des industries de design régionales.

Between play and design : the emergence of hybrid-identity in single-player videogames

Pour respecter les droits auteur, la version electronique de cette thèse a été dépouillée de ses documents visuels et audio-visuels. La version intégrale de la thèse a été déposée au Service de la gestion des documents et des archives de l'Université de Montréal.

O design como mediador da arte-educação nos materiais didáticos de museus

Pós-graduação em Design - FAAC