985 resultados para DE MOUSSY, MARTIN


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Handwritten postcard addressed to Ruth Goldschmidt in Italy and dated 1937 from Zurich

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Paula Goldschmidt, née Harmelin, born 1880; Martin Goldschmidt, born circa 1879; Ruth Augusta Beatrice Goldschmidt, born 1923?

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Relatives of the Judey-Barosin and Finkel families

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Handwritten on verso: Prof. Martin Buber mit Naemah Beer-Hofmann in meinem Zimmer, Kurhaus Sonn-Matt bei Luzern. September 1963 fuer meine leibe Lily an einem schweren Tag, der durch sie viel leichter wurde.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Digital Image

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Martin Riesenburger (May 14, 1896 – Apr. 14, 1966) was Prediger (Preacher) for the Jewish community in Berlin-Weissensee throughout the Nazi era (protected by his gentile wife, Natalie Riesenburger). In 1953 he became Rabbi of the Jewish community in Berlin (East) and then Landesrabbiner of the German Democratic Republic.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Handwritten thank you note under photograph signed by Lotte Lewin dated February 6, 1935

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Relatives of the Judey-Barosin and Finkel families

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Born 1879?; Married September 2, 1903 in Leipzig to Paula Harmelin; Father of Henry H. Goldschmidt Gould and Ruth Augusta Beatrice Goldschmidt

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Paula Goldschmidt, née Harmelin, born 1880; Martin Goldschmidt, born circa 1879; Married September 2, 1903 in Leipzig

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Born 1879?; Married September 2, 1903 in Leipzig to Paula Harmelin; Father of Henry H. Goldschmidt Gould and Ruth Augusta Beatrice Goldschmidt

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Born 1879?; Married September 2, 1903 in Leipzig to Paula Harmelin, father of Henry H. Goldschmidt Gould and Ruth Augusta Beatrice Goldschmidt

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

The purpose of this study is to examine the reception of Matthew 5 in Martin Luther s sermons; in other words to investigate how Luther interprets and applies Jesus teaching of the better righteousness and the law in Mt 5. The study applies the reception-historical approach and contributes to the history of effects and the history of interpretation in New Testament exegesis. The study shows that Luther understands the better righteousness of Mt 5 as good works and fulfillment of the law. Luther s interpretation coheres with the intention of the Evangelist, even if Luther s overall concept of righteousness is foreign to Matthew. In Luther s view righteousness is twofold: The greater righteousness of Mt 5 is the second and the actual righteousness (iustitia activa), which follows the first and the foreign righteousness (iustitia passiva). The first righteousness (faith) is for Luther the work of God, while the second righteousness (good works) is co-operation between a Christian and God. In this co-operation the law, as it is taught by Jesus, is not the opposite of the gospel, but the gospel itself in the sense of Christ as an example . The task of the law is to show the dependence of a Christian on God and to help one to love and to serve one s neighbour (brothers as well as enemies) properly. The study underlines a feature in Luther s thinking that has received little attention in Lutheran theology: Luther insists on preaching the law to Christians. In his view Mt 5 is directed to all Christians and particularly to pastors, for whom Jesus here gives an example of how to preach the law. Luther believes similarly to Matthew that Jesus reveals the real meaning of Mosaic Law and confirms its validity for Christians in Mt 5. Like Matthew, Luther insists on the practicability of the commandments of Mt 5 in his view Christians fulfil the law also with joy yet his interpretation of Mt 5 attenuates the radical nature of its commandments. Luther s reception of the individual pericopes of Mt 5 is considerably generative and occasionally contradictory, which is explained by the following factors, among others: Luther receives many ideas from tradition and reads them and his own theological concepts into Matthew s Gospel. He interprets Mt 5 through his understanding of some Old Testament passages as well as Paul. Most of all, Luther s reception of Mt 5 is shaped by his own experience as a preacher, by his relation to his religious enemies, rulers and to the congregation of Wittenberg. Here Luther shares with Matthew the experience of being opposed and concern about the upright living of the believers, which in both cases also explains the polemical tone of the paraenesis.