Is CEO human capital related to firm performance?

The global economy experienced continuous growth from 2002 to 2007 until the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis caused instability in worldwide stock markets. Simultaneously, global CEO turnover continued to fall to 13.8 percent in 2007. In contrast, the CEO turnover rate in Australia increased to 18 percent in 2007. The purpose of this paper is to determine under what conditions a change in a CEO is associated with firm performance. Succinctly, does the firm’s decision to replace the CEO depend on the CEO’s human capital or firm performance? The empirical study of Australian listed firms (2005 – 2008) shows that firm performance is not a determinant of CEO turnover, rather a CEO with less valuable human capital is more likely to be replaced. The study also finds that merely changing the CEO is not associated firm performance. Rather, there is a positive association between firm performance and the successor’s general human capital for firms that replace the CEO. Specifically, it is the internal successor’s general human capital that is an important determinant of increasing firm performance. These results are important because they imply that CEO turnover is a result of a more active market for CEOs and contributes to explaining why firms retain CEOs despite poor firm performance.

Conservatism, disclosure and the cost of equity capital

This study seeks insights into the economic consequences of accounting conservatism by examining the relation between conservatism and cost of equity capital. Appealing to the analytical and empirical literatures, we posit an inverse relation. Importantly, we also posit that the strength of the relation is conditional on the firm’s information environment, being the strongest for firms with high information asymmetry and the weakest (potentially negligible) for firms with low information asymmetry. Based on a sample of US-listed entities, we find, as predicted, an inverse relation between conservatism and the cost of equity capital, but further, that this relation is diminished for firms with low information asymmetry environments. This evidence indicates that there are economic benefits associated with the adoption of conservative reporting practices and leads us to conclude that conservatism has a positive role in accounting principles and practices, despite its increasing rejection by accounting standard setters.

Company taxation and tax spillovers: Separate accounting versus formula apportionment

It is observed in the real world that taxes matter for location decisions and that multinationals shift profits by transfer pricing. The US and Canada use so-called formula apportionment (FA) to tax corporate income, and the EU is debating a switch from separate accounting (SA) to FA. This paper develops a theoretical model that compares basic properties of FA to SA. The focal point of the analysis is how changes in tax rates affect capital formation, input choice, and transfer pricing, as well as on spillovers on tax revenue in other countries. The analysis shows that a move from SA to FA will not eliminate such spillovers and will, in cases identified in the paper, actually aggravate them.

Demanda de información sobre capital intelectual en las Universidades públicas españolas

[ES] En el actual contexto de la Sociedad del Conocimiento las instituciones de educación superior deben prestar una atención preferente a las nuevas demandas informativas de sus stakeholders. El objetivo de este trabajo será evidenciar la necesidad de que las universidades incorporen información sobre capital intelectual en su actual sistema de información contable.

Adoção do valor justo: um estudo sobre a relevância do valor justo dos ativos biológicos e propriedades para investimento nas empresas não financeiras de capital aberto no Brasil nos anos de 2010 e 2011

O presente estudo analisou a relevância (value relevance) do valor justo dos ativos biológicos, propriedades para investimento e instrumento financeiros apurado pelas empresas brasileiras não financeiras de capital aberto nos anos de 2010 e 2011 (após implementação das normas internacionais de contabilidade) na formação do preço de suas ações. Foram selecionadas para o estudo empresas não financeiras de capital aberto que foram impactadas pelo CPC 28 Propriedades para Investimento e pelo CPC 29 Ativos Biológicos, sendo identificadas 70 empresas no ano de 2010 e 76 no ano de 2011. Foi utilizada como procedimento metodológico análise quantitativa, realizada através de estatística univariada (teste de diferença de média) e estatística multivariada (utilizando-se o modelo de Ohlson (1995)). O estudo constatou que: (a) 8% das empresas brasileiras não financeiras de capital aberto foram impactadas pelo CPC 29, enquanto que 16% foram impactadas pelo CPC 28; (b) na média, o efeito do valor justo dos ativos biológicos e propriedades para investimento reconhecido no resultado contribuiu para o aumento dessa variável contábil das empresas analisadas, enquanto que o efeito do valor justo proveniente dos instrumentos financeiros contribuiu, na média, para diminuir o resultado das empresas analisadas; (c) o teste de diferença de média (Wilcoxon) apontou que as alterações do valor justo foram responsáveis por diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre as variáveis contábeis (patrimônio líquido e resultado) com o efeito do valor justo e sem o efeito do valor justo em todos os anos e casos analisados; e (d) os resultados do modelo de Ohlson indicam que efeito do total do valor justo reconhecido no resultado foi detectado como relevante em 2010, assim como o valor justo das propriedades para investimento, e instrumentos financeiros. No pooled, foram encontradas evidências da relevância do efeito do valor justo provenientes do CPC 28, CPC 29 e CPC38. Não foram encontradas evidências da relevância do valor justo no ano de 2011.

Estudo comparativo dos modelos de avaliação de inovação para obtenção de capital de risco: programa governamental Criatec I - BNDES versus modelos teóricos para cálculo de intangíveis propostos na Contabilidade.

Como forma de impulsionar o crescimento econômico, governos de diversos países incentivam o empreendedorismo, a inovação e o desenvolvimento tecnológico. Para isto, se utilizam de programas governamentais por meio de políticas de incentivo ou subvenção econômica a empreendimentos com este perfil. No Brasil, o capital de risco público vem sendo oferecido à empresas inovadoras através dos fundos da série Criatec, com recursos do BNDES. Estas empresas possuem, principalmente, ativos intangíveis, que devem ser considerados pelos investidores em suas avaliações que antecedem o aporte de recursos. Neste contexto, esta pesquisa foi desenvolvida com o objetivo de analisar como a metodologia de avaliação de intangíveis utilizada pelo Fundo Criatec I do BNDES, como ferramenta de apoio de decisão de investimento de capital de risco público, considera os indicadores de inovação frente aos modelos teóricos propostos na literatura contábil. Para isto foi realizado estudo de campo através de entrevistas realizadas com os gestores do Fundo e com diversas empresas investidas por este. Por meio da pesquisa foi observado que é realizada profunda análise das empresas candidatas ao aporte de recursos através da avaliação de três fatores de risco. Foi possível verificar indicadores de inovação presentes nas metodologias de avaliação de intangíveis propostas na literatura contábil na análise de um destes fatores. Contudo foi possível identificar que os indicadores de inovação não são avaliados de forma pré definida e parametrizada no modelo utilizado pelo Fundo.

Information Disclosure, Market Discipline and the Management of Bank Capital: Evidence from the Chinese Financial Sector

Is there evidence that market forces effectively discipline risk management behaviour within Chinese financial institutions? This study analyses information from a comprehensive sample of Chinese banks over the 1998-2008 period. Market discipline is captured through the impact of four sets of factors namely, market concentration, interbank deposits, information disclosure, and ownership structure. We find some evidence of a market disciplining effect in that: (i) higher (lower) levels of market concentration lead banks to operate with a lower (higher) capital buffer; (ii) joint-equity banks that disclose more information to the public maintain larger capital ratios; (iii) full state ownership reduces the sensitivity of changes in a bank's capital buffer to its level of risk;(iv) banks that release more transparent financial information hold more capital against their non-performing loans. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Crucial silences: When Accountability Met PFI and Finance Capital

During recent years, a wide spectrum of research has questioned whether public services/infrastructure procurement through private finance, as exemplified by the UK Private Finance Initiative (PFI), meets minimum standards of democratic accountability. While broadly agreeing with some of these arguments, this paper suggests that this debate is flawed on two grounds. Firstly, PFI is not about effective procurement, or even about a pragmatic choice of procurement mechanisms which can potentially compromise public involvement and input; rather it is about a process where the state creates new profit opportunities at a time when the international financial system is increasingly lacking in safe investment opportunities. Secondly, because of its primary function as investment opportunity, PFI, by its very nature, prioritises the risk-return criteria of private finance over the needs of the public sector client and its stakeholders. Using two case studies of recent PFI projects, the paper illustrates some of the mechanisms through which finance capital exercises control over the PFI procurement process. The paper concludes that recent proposals aimed at “reforming” or “democratising” PFI fail to recognise the objective constraints which this type of state-finance capital nexus imposes on political process.

Accounting, Regulation and Profitability: The Case of PFI Hospital Refinancing

The refinancing of PFI (Private Finance Initiative) projects represents one of the most contentious aspects of Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) in the UK. The negative publicity associated with UK PFI refinancing deals is associated with several factors, including, evidence of massive private sector profit making, the failure of private sector financiers to share refinancing profits and, lastly, private sector frustration of adequate regulatory intervention in this area. Utilising a dynamic model of capital market and state interaction, this paper explains these outcomes as a function of effective private sector lobbying of bureaucratic state agencies to alter the structure of accounting, accountability and regulation with the goal of securing favourable profit and risk outcomes. These dynamics are illustrated with reference to the history of UK PFI refinancing and a case study of one of the projects where these gains reached extreme levels.

The Development of Entrepreneurial Leadership: The Role of Human, Social and Institutional Capital

This paper contributes to the literature on entrepreneurial leadership development. Leadership studies are characterized by an increasing emphasis given to an individual leader's social and organizational domain. Within the context of human capital and social capital theory, the paper reflects on the emergence of a social capital theory of leadership development. Using a retrospective, interpretivist research method, the authors present the experience of a cohort of business leaders on an executive development programme to uncover the everydayness of leadership development in practice. Specifically, they explore how entrepreneurial leadership develops as a social process and what the role of social capital is in this. The findings suggest that the enhancement of leaders’ human capital only occurred through their development of social capital. There is not, as extant literature suggests, a clear separation between leader development and leadership development. Further, the analysis implies that the social capital theory of leadership is limited in the context of the entrepreneurial small firm, and the authors propose that it should be expanded to incorporate institutional capital, that is, the formal structures and organizations which enhance the role of social capital and go beyond enriching the human capital stock of individual leaders

Taking pluralism seriously:Embedded moralities in management accounting and control systems

Professor Norman Macintosh has long been a leading, and at times a dissonant, voice in critical accounting studies, exhibiting an intellectual dexterity seldom encountered in the accounting academy. His work ranges from the application of traditional organizational theories within work organizations to poststructural renderings of capital market exigencies. Here, we consider and extend Professor Macintosh's work contemplating the morality embedded within, and propagated by, management accounting and control systems (macs). We begin with Macintosh (1995) employing structuration theory in investigating the ethics of profit manipulation within large, decentralized corporations. The work highlights the fundamental dialectical contradictions within these work organizations, demonstrates the indeterminacy of traditional ethical reasoning, and shows the extent to which macs provide legitimating underpinnings for management action. We propose to extend the conversation using the tools provided in Macintosh's subsequent work: a Levinasian ethic (Macintosh et al., 2009), and heteroglossic accounting (Macintosh, 2002)—both emerging from his poststructuralist predilections. A Levinasian perspective provides an ontologically grounded ethic, and heteroglossic accounting calls for multiple accountings representing alternative moral voices. A critical dialogic framework is proposed as a theoretic for imagining heteroglossic accounting that takes pluralism seriously by recognizing the reality of irresolvable differences and asymmetric power relationships associated with assorted moral perspectives.

A IAS 32 e os novos critérios de contabilização das entradas para o capital social das cooperativas: uma análise contabílistica e jurídica

Jornadas de Contabilidade e Fiscalidade promovidas pelo Instituto Superior de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto, em Abril de 2009

Impacto da NCRF 27 no capital próprio das cooperativas vitivinícolas da região demarcada do Douro

Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada ao Instituto de Contabilidade e Administração do Porto para a obtenção do grau de Mestre em Contabilidade e Finanças, sob orientação de Professora Doutora Ana Maria Alves Bandeira, e Professora Doutora Deolinda Maria Moreira Aparício Meira

Accounting accruals and information asymmetry in Europe

We investigate whether the positive relation between accounting accruals and information asymmetry documented for U.S. stock markets also holds for European markets, considered as a whole and at the country level. This research is relevant because this relation is likely to be affected by differences in accounting standards used by companies for financial reporting, in the traditional use of the banking system or capital markets for firm financing, in legal systems and cultural environment. We find that in European stock markets discretionary accruals are positively related with the Corwin and Schultz high-low spread estimator used as a proxy for information asymmetry. Our results suggest that the earnings management component of accruals outweighs the informational component, but the significance of the relation varies across countries. Further, such association tends to be stronger for firms with the highest levels of positive discretionary accruals. Consistent with the evidence provided by the authors, our results also suggest that the high-low spread estimator is more efficient than the closing bid-ask spread when analysing the impact of information quality on information asymmetry.

Introducción de la metodología análisis modal de fallos y efectos (AMFE) como herramienta de gestión en una ese del distrito capital de II nivel

El presente trabajo expone la elaboración de un proceso sistemático para la identificación y clasificación de modos de fallo utilizando la metodología ANÁLISIS MODAL DE FALLOS Y EFECTOS (AMFE), como un procedimiento de gran utilidad para mejorar la calidad y seguridad de la prestación de servicios asistenciales. Se analizaron 254 modos de fallo, en el servicio de urgencias de una ESE de II Nivel del Distrito Capital, se utilizó una herramienta de selección de procesos denominada Matriz de Priorización utilizada por el Centro de Gestión Hospitalaria con algunas adaptaciones de acuerdo con las necesidades institucionales. Se calificaron 227 de ellos correspondiendo a un 89,37%. Se entrevistaron 48 médicos, 27 enfermeras, 27 auxiliares de enfermería y 9 camilleros, para un total de 111 colaboradores que corresponden al 30% del total del personal del servicio de urgencias. Se generó una hoja de control de calidad (aceptación) del ejercicio con un porcentaje total del 85%, teniendo como resultado que 102 personas de las 111 encuestadas, diligenciaron correctamente la totalidad de los campos del formato AMFE. Se buscó Implementar el uso de la metodología AMFE como herramienta de gestión y mejora de procesos institucionales, realizando una prueba piloto al proceso seleccionado y evaluando si esta metodología se podía aplicar a otros procesos asistenciales. Se observó que de la totalidad de los modos de fallo el mayor valor de criticidad se encontró en el rango de 45 puntos. Se determinaron 11 modos de fallos en esta categoría, los cuales se encuentran dos asociados dos están asociados con el acceso del paciente a la institución, siete relacionados con el Registro e Ingreso del usuario, uno relacionado con la planeación de la atención y dos relacionados con la ejecución del tratamiento. Palabras claves: Análisis Modal De Fallos y Efectos (AMFE), urgencias, mejora continua.