Résultats du voyage du S.Y. Belgica en 1897-1898-1899 : sous le commandement de A. de Gerlache de Gomery. Rapports scientifiques publiés aux frais du gouvernement belge, sous la direction de la Commission de la Belgica.

R53, Zoologie, Cirripedia

Siboga expeditie.

Mono.31a (Cirripedia: Cirripedia Pedunculata); Livr.36

Siboga expeditie.

Mono.31b (Cirripedia: Cirripedia Sessilia); Livr.67

Macroepizoísmo em Libinia ferreirae (Crustacea, Brachyura, Majidae)

Um estudo de distribuição dos macroepizóicos foi realizado numa população do caranguejo-aranha Libinia ferreirae Brito Capello, 1871 proveniente do litoral dos estados do Paraná e de Santa Catarina. O material biológico foi obtido junto aos pescadores, e faz parte do rejeito de pesca. Os caranguejos foram mensurados e os macroepizóicos identificados e contados. Os seguintes macroepizóicos sésseis foram registrados: Calliactis tricolor (Lesueur, 1817) (Cnidaria); Actiniaria (Cnidaria); Arca sp. (Mollusca); Ostreidae (Mollusca); Acanthodesia tenuis (Desor, 1848) (Bryozoa); Cirripedia e duas espécies tubícolas de Gammaridea (Crustacea). Além destes organismos ocorreram dois tubos desabitados e quatro animais vágeis. A anêmona C. tricolor foi a espécie mais abundante e freqüente, sendo, provavelmente, utilizada como mecanismo de camuflagem pelo caranguejo. O macroepizoísmo em L. ferreirae está relacionado com a idade ou tamanho do caranguejo, tendo maior incidência naqueles mais velhos ou de maior porte. Entretanto, a densidade dos macroepizóicos por caranguejo se mantém em torno de três. Não há relação entre o macroepizoísmo e o sexo do hospedeiro; somente fêmeas ovígeras utilizam desse recurso mais freqüentemente do que as não-ovígeras. Devido à maior área de fixação, os macroepizóicos colonizam principalmente a carapaça do caranguejo, enquanto nos pereiópodos há predominância de Bryozoa.

Dieta de juvenis de Trachinotus carolinus (Actinopterygii, Carangidae) em praias arenosas na costa do Rio de Janeiro

Estudamos a dieta dos juvenis de Trachinotus carolinus (Linnaeus, 1766) em praias da Baía de Sepetiba (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil) entre janeiro de 2000 e abril de 2001. Procuramos avaliar a plasticidade trófica de peixes desta espécie ao longo de um gradiente espacial com diferentes níveis de exposição às ondas, sazonalidade, além de avaliar mudanças ontogenéticas na dieta. Os itens alimentares foram analisados através do índice de importância relativa (IIR), determinado pelos valores das frequências de ocorrência, de número e de peso. Os itens de maior importância foram do subfilo Crustacea, ordens Mysidacea, e o representante da ordem Decapoda Emerita brasiliensis (Schmitt, 1935), além de Cefalochordata, representado por Branchiostoma platae (Fitzinger, 1862). Na zona de maior exposição às ondas (praia de Barra de Guaratiba) e com substrato predominantemente arenoso, a dieta foi constituída principalmente por Emerita brasiliensis e Cirripedia, este último presente nos costões rochosos que limitam a praia; na zona de exposição intermediária (praia de Muriqui), houve um predomínio de Mysidacea e Branchiostoma platae; na zona mais protegida (praia de Itacuruçá), os itens de maior abundância foram Polychaeta, Mysidacea e Branchiostoma platae. Sazonalmente não ocorreu variação no uso de Mysidacea, enquanto Branchiostoma platae foi mais consumido durante o inverno, Polychaeta na primavera e Cirripedia e Emerita brasiliensis, no verão. Mysidacea foi o alimento predominante em todas as classes de tamanho, enquanto Polychaeta foi utilizado predominantemente por peixes menores que 20 mm de comprimento padrão e Emerita brasiliensis e Cirripedia foram consumidos principalmente por indivíduos maiores que 40 mm, somente na praia de maior exposição. O sucesso no uso de praias desprotegidas e zonas de arrebentação por esta espécie de peixe pode ser em parte devido à estratégia trófica oportunista, que utiliza uma ampla variedade de recursos disponíveis no ambiente.

A wolf in sheep"s clothing: carnivory in dominant sea urchins in the Mediterranean

Arbacia lixula and Paracentrotus lividus are the dominant sea urchins in the Mediterranean sublittoral, where they are key structuring species due to their grazing activity. It has been commonly accepted that competition between both species is minimized by specializing in different algal foods. A. lixula is considered to feed mainly on encrusting coralline algae, while P. lividus prefers fleshy macroalgae. We used stable isotope analysis to test if these species occupy different trophic positions at 3 locations in the western Mediterranean and one in Macaronesia. Our results show unambiguously that A. lixula always occupies a higher trophic level than P. lividus, with a δ15N comparable in some locations to strict carnivores such as Actinia schmidti or Marthasterias glacialis. A temporal monitoring at one locality showed that this signature of a higher trophic level is consistent throughout the year. These results are incompatible with the current belief of an herbivorous diet for A. lixula and suggest that it must be considered an omnivore tending to carnivory in Mediterranean ecosystems, feeding at least partially on sessile animals such as Cirripedia, Hydrozoa or Bryozoa. A parallel analysis of gut contents showed a predominance of vegetal items in both species, although A. lixula consistently had a higher abundance of animal components than P. lividus. Our results challenge the validity of using gut content observations alone for characterizing the trophic behaviour of omnivorous marine invertebrates that feed on a variety of food sources with different digestibility.

Studies on meroplankton

Plankton community, drawn from a vary wide variety of animal phyla, formed the basic food supply of marine life and indicators of water mass. The term meroplankton generally referred to that portion of the zooplankton which is transient in nature, remaining rest of their lives in the nektonic or benthic environment. This group was selected for intensive studies, considering the role of meroplankton in the economy of the sea and the scarcity of literature on them from the Indian Ocean. The preser .udy besides providing information regarding the fixation and preservation !e _ iniques and biochemical aspects of tropical meroplankton, also consolidates information regarding their zoogeography in the Indian Ocean region, with a view to amplifying the limited information available from this area. The distribution studies are based on the collections made during the International Indian Ocean Expedition (1960-65), whereas the material for preservation and biochemical studies was collected from the coastal waters during 1968-1978. Salient features:- 2% of formaldehyde buffered with 2% borax, added to the plankton in the ratio of 9:1 was found the best fixative. On fixation the plankton underwent shrinkage due to loss of 15 to 87% water. Addition of antioxidants prevented colour fading. Narcotization by different specific reagents prior to fixation reduced distortions due to violent reaction and improved morphological conditions. One percent formaldehyde solution in sea water buffered with borax or neutralised with calcium carbonate perfectly preserved majority of meroplankton. Equally good was one percent propylene phenoxetol buffered with borax. Biochemical compostion of vaioous taxa showed variations according to their age class, size groups metamorphosing stage, feeding mechanism, type of organism fed and time of collection. General distribution studies of 4 meroplankton taxa - Anthozoan larvae, cirripedia larvae, sipunculoid larvae and gastropod larvae stowed abundance in the coastal areas especially during the SW monsoon period. Based on the larval distribution different zoo-geographical areas in the Indian Ocean are differentiated.

Qualidade ambiental, distribuição e densidade do mesozooplâncton do estuário de Guajará-Miri, Vigia de Nazaré, NE do Estado do Pará

Com o objetivo de caracterizar a área do estuário de Guajará-Miri (Vigia Pará), quanto à sua qualidade ambiental e de dispersão do zooplâncton, foi amostrada em quatro pontos na região situada entre a sua Foz e o limite da extensão máxima da penetração da cunha salina rio acima, as amostragens foram realizadas em um barco adaptado para os trabalhos. Sendo bimestralmente, com início em nov/04 e término em novlOS. Tendo-se no total 6 campanhas, incluindo assim os meses de março (período chuvoso) e setembro (período seco) de 2005. Os dados de qualidade da água foram medidos através da sonda multiparâmetros "Datasound 4a". Realizados estudos de abundância, dominância e diversidade do zooplâncton, sendo estes parâmetros relacionados aos dados de qualidade de água. O grupo zooplanctônico mais diverso encontrado nas amostras analisadas foi o dos Copepoda, destacandose Pseudodíatomus rich a rd, Pseudodíatomus marsh, Pseudodíatomus grací/ís, Acarlía plumosa, Acarlía tonsa, Qithona gessneri, Notodiaptomus paraensi e Notodiaptomus amazonicus, tendo densidades variando de 2,6 a 129,24 org/m3. Destacaram-se também as larvas de Crustacea (Brachyura), principalmente em mar/OS, onde foram muito abundantes, chegando a apresentar 860,86 org/m3. Ficando evidenciado um período de maior desova para estas larvas. Além destes, também ocorreram Cladoceros, larvas de Bivalves, Gastrópodes, Cirripedia, Hidromedusas e Isópodes. De uma forma geral a composição das espécies nas áreas estudas foram semelhantes, apresentando alterações sazonais de dominância de espécies. A diversidade específica no estuário foi relativamente baixa, em decorrência do pequeno número de espécies encontradas, a análise de agrupamentos dos organismos revelou grupos fortemente definidos, e pequenos subgrupos correlacionados entre si. Foi verificada uma grande quantidade de larvas de peixes e de crustáceos, o que caracteriza o estuário como uma área berçário, de importância fundamental para o desenvolvimento da vida marinha, estuarina e de água doce na região de Vigia de Nazaré.

Caracterização estrutural e funcional da comunidade do costão rochoso da praia da Feiticeira, Ilhabela: contribuição para avaliação de impactos gerados por vazamento de óleo

Costões rochosos são ecossistemas que propiciam o desenvolvimento de comunidades com grande riqueza de espécies e são ambientes de muita importância para a manutenção dos ecossistemas costeiros. Tais ambientes estão extremamente sujeitos a impactos antrópicos, principalmente no que se refere às contaminações por petróleo. O município da Ilhabela concentra o maior número de costões do Estado de São Paulo, e apresenta um notável histórico desses derrames. A fim de contribuir com o monitoramento dos costões da área do Canal de São Sebastião executado pela CETESB, o presente trabalho tem como objetivo central o estudo da estrutura da comunidade do costão rochoso da Praia da Feiticeira, um dos pontos monitorados pela CETESB entre 1993 e 1996. Além da caracterização das variáveis abióticas, a metodologia, com relação as variáveis biológicas, foi dividida em três partes: estudo quantitativo das espécies dominantes da macrofauna séssil encontradas no campo, baseado na porcentagem de cobertura de Chthamalus bisinuatus (Cirripedia), Brachidontes sp. (Bivalvia) e Tetraclita stalactifera (Cirripedia), gerando gráficos sazonais e demográficos. Para aprimorar as comparações entre os dois trabalhos, foi feito o Teste de hipótese para igualdade de proporções, comparando ano a ano as coletas de inverno, que mostrou que as três espécies dominantes obtiveram mudanças de um trabalho para o outro, rejeitando assim a Ho em todas as situações; estudo qualitativo das espécies de macrofauna e macroalgas encontradas dentro da área amostrada. Este levantamento resultou em uma lista de espécies que foi adicionada ao inventário do programa de monitoramento. O índice de similaridade entre os dois trabalhos foi determinado segundo o coeficiente de Sorrensen, que mostrou uma similaridade média entre as comunidades. Estas espécie ...(Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo)

COMMON GOOSE BARNACLES LEPAS AUSTRALIS (THORACICA, PEDUNCULATA) ON DECEASED MAGELLANIC PENGUINS SPHENISCUS MAGELLANICUS (AVES)

Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)

Abundance and biomass of zooplankton from 1986-1994 collected in front of Constanta city, Black Sea

The Est Constanta 1986-1994 dataset contains zooplankton data collected allong a 5 station transect in front of the city Constanta (44°10'N, 28°41.5'E - EC1; 44°10'N, 28°47'E - EC2; 44°10'N, 28°54'E - EC3; 44°10'N, 29°08'E - EC4; 44°10'N, 29°22'E - EC5). Zooplankton sampling was undertaken at 5 stations where samples were collected using a Juday closing net in the 0-10, 10-25, 25-50m layer (depending also on the water masses). The dataset includes samples analysed for mesozooplankton species composition and abundance. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Taxon-specific mesozooplankton abundance was count under microscope. Total abundance is the sum of the counted individuals. Total biomass Fodder, Rotifera , Ctenophora and Noctiluca was estimated using a tabel with wet weight for each species an stage.

Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in summer 1998 during the National Monitoring Programme

The dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 1998 in the Western Black Sea in front of Bulgaria coast. The whole dataset is composed of 69 samples (from 22 stations of National Monitoring Grid) with data of mesozooplankton species composition abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 0-20, 0-50, 10-25, 25-50, 50-100 and from bottom up to the surface at depths depending on water column stratification and the thermocline depth. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972).

Abundance and biomass of mesozooplankton from the Romanian littoral during DANUBS_2002 in spring and autumn 2002

The Danubs 2002 dataset contains zooplankton data collected in April, June,September and October 2002 in 11 station allong 5 transect in front of the Romanian littoral. Zooplankton sampling was undertaken at 11 stations where samples were collected using a Juday closing net in the 0-10, 10-25, and 25-50m layer (depending also on the water masses). The dataset includes samples analysed for mesozooplankton species composition and abundance. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Taxon-specific mesozooplankton abundance was count under microscope. Total abundance is the sum of the counted individuals. Total biomass Fodder, Rotifera , Ctenophora and Noctiluca was estimated using a tabel with wet weight for each species an stage.

Abundance of mesozooplankton in the western part of the Black Sea in summer 2001 during the National Monitoring Programme of the Bulgarian Institute of Oceanography

The dataset is based on samples collected in the summer of 2001 in the Western Black Sea in front of Bulgaria coast (transects at c. Kaliakra and c. Galata). The whole dataset is composed of 26 samples (from 10 stations of National Monitoring Grid) with data of mesozooplankton species composition abundance and biomass. Samples were collected in discrete layers 0-10, 10-20, 10-25, 25-50, 50-75, 75-90. Zooplankton samples were collected with vertical closing Juday net,diameter - 36cm, mesh size 150 µm. Tows were performed from surface down to bottom meters depths in discrete layers. Samples were preserved by a 4% formaldehyde sea water buffered solution. Sampling volume was estimated by multiplying the mouth area with the wire length. Mesozooplankton abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska and Kremena Stefanova using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972). Taxon-specific abundance: The collected material was analysed using the method of Domov (1959). Samples were brought to volume of 25-30 ml depending upon zooplankton density and mixed intensively until all organisms were distributed randomly in the sample volume. After that 5 ml of sample was taken and poured in the counting chamber which is a rectangle form for taxomomic identification and count. Copepods and Cladoceras were identified and enumerated; the other mesozooplankters were identified and enumerated at higher taxonomic level (commonly named as mesozooplankton groups). Large (> 1 mm body length) and not abundant species were calculated in whole sample. Counting and measuring of organisms were made in the Dimov chamber under the stereomicroscope to the lowest taxon possible. Taxonomic identification was done at the Institute of Oceanology by Lyudmila Kamburska and Kremena Stefanova using the relevant taxonomic literature (Mordukhay-Boltovskoy, F.D. (Ed.). 1968, 1969,1972).