O direito coletivo prestacional à saúde e o poder judiciário: a concretização do art. 196 da Constituição de 1988 pela via jurisdicional

During the ninth century, owing to the process of industrialization, new social conflicts were showed, forcing the Government not to remain inert. The necessity of answer to these new demands requires from the State some actions that assure the new economic, cultural and social rights, able to exceed the formal equality, according to the principles of redistributive equality and well-being. Among the social rights, the right to health is showed up, which is placed at the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Treaty for the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, as a necessary term to promote the dignity and the free development of the human personality. Under the Constitutional Law, it is clear that the implementation of the right to health, placed at the 6th article of the Brazilian Constitution, demands a government activity, which usually requires a provision of material goods, depending on budgetary resources. The Legislative and Executive Branches have a very important role in compliance with the constitutional regulations about the satisfactory offer of health care services, besides the correct use of the resources at this area. The adoption of public policies is the way of Government action to the planning and realization of this right. Though, some public policies are usually made apart from the social compromises, to the detriment of the basic social rights. The government has a discretionary competence to manage the health services. That is the reason it is necessary the control of the political choices, through the popular control, the extrajudicial control by the Account Courts, or the judicial review. Owed to the constitutionalization of social rights, the constitutional justice has a very relevant role, concerning to the constitutional jurisdiction, in a way the Judiciary Branch assume your position as a player that transforms the society. On the control of the public health policies, there is a cast of official instruments, judicial or not, to the guarantee of the collective right to the public health services, and to allow the citizens to reach the real implementation of the right to health

Art. 194 - 196 ZPO (Rechtshilfe zwischen schweizerische Gerichten)

Der Kurzkommentar zur ZPO erlaubt in handlicher Form einen schnellen Zugriff auf das schweizerische Zivilverfahrensrecht. In knapper und übersichtlicher Darstellung werden die wesentlichen Fragestellungen analysiert und die wichtigsten Argumente und Gegenargumente zu umstrittenen Punkten für die Praxis verfügbar gemacht. Zur Neuauflage Für die 2. Auflage wurde der Kommentar umfassend aktualisiert und überarbei- tet. Die Nutzerinnen und Nutzer erhalten damit ein kompaktes Arbeitsmittel auf dem Stand Frühjahr 2013. Berücksichtigt werden insbesondere: − das neue Erwachsenenschutzrecht − die am 1.5.2013 in Kraft getretenen neuen Protokollierungsvorschriften für die Zeugeneinvernahme − die inzwischen schon zahlreichen Weichenstellungen in der Rechtsprechung zur schweizerischen Zivilprozessordnung − die seit 2011 erschienene praxisrelevante neue Literatur (inkl. Neuauflage des BSK ZPO

Na 50 Nachlass Arthur Schopenhauer - 'Schopenhauer-Archiv', 196 - Ausdruck der Verehrung von Eduard von Reichlin-Meldegg für die Philosophie Schopenhauers

u.a.: Philosophiestudium;

Na 50 Nachlass Arthur Schopenhauer - 'Schopenhauer-Archiv', 1173 - Kritik an der Auseinandersetzung zwischen Karl Gutzkows und Arthur Schopenhauer

Preisaufgabe der Philosophischen Fakultät; Rezensionen der Werke Schopenhauers in den 20er und 30er Jahren des 19. Jahrhunderts;