The role of the object and the mourning process in the child

The young child's ability to go through a genuine mourning process has been a source of controversy in the psychoanalytical literature. This may seem surprising, considering that mourning is essential for and inherent to psychic development. This paper attempts to show that the young child's ability to go through a mourning process does not depend mainly on ego maturity, nor just on an acknowledgment of a loss in the external world, nor on the child's understanding the idea of death at an intellectual and cognitive level. But it may depend mainly on the establishment of the primordial mourning process inherent to the separation of the transnarcissistic mother-child relation and on the existence of the objectalizing function (A. Green, 1986) in the remaining or substitute parent's psyche. A clinical example serves to illustrate these hypotheses.

The de facto independence of regulatory agencies and its consequences for policy making and regulatory outcomes

This dissertation focuses on the practice of regulatory governance, throughout the study of the functioning of formally independent regulatory agencies (IRAs), with special attention to their de facto independence. The research goals are grounded on a "neo-positivist" (or "reconstructed positivist") position (Hawkesworth 1992; Radaelli 2000b; Sabatier 2000). This perspective starts from the ontological assumption that even if subjective perceptions are constitutive elements of political phenomena, a real world exists beyond any social construction and can, however imperfectly, become the object of scientific inquiry. Epistemologically, it follows that hypothetical-deductive theories with explanatory aims can be tested by employing a proper methodology and set of analytical techniques. It is thus possible to make scientific inferences and general conclusions to a certain extent, according to a Bayesian conception of knowledge, in order to update the prior scientific beliefs in the truth of the related hypotheses (Howson 1998), while acknowledging the fact that the conditions of truth are at least partially subjective and historically determined (Foucault 1988; Kuhn 1970). At the same time, a sceptical position is adopted towards the supposed disjunction between facts and values and the possibility of discovering abstract universal laws in social science. It has been observed that the current version of capitalism corresponds to the golden age of regulation, and that since the 1980s no government activity in OECD countries has grown faster than regulatory functions (Jacobs 1999). Following an apparent paradox, the ongoing dynamics of liberalisation, privatisation, decartelisation, internationalisation, and regional integration hardly led to the crumbling of the state, but instead promoted a wave of regulatory growth in the face of new risks and new opportunities (Vogel 1996). Accordingly, a new order of regulatory capitalism is rising, implying a new division of labour between state and society and entailing the expansion and intensification of regulation (Levi-Faur 2005). The previous order, relying on public ownership and public intervention and/or on sectoral self-regulation by private actors, is being replaced by a more formalised, expert-based, open, and independently regulated model of governance. Independent regulation agencies (IRAs), that is, formally independent administrative agencies with regulatory powers that benefit from public authority delegated from political decision makers, represent the main institutional feature of regulatory governance (Gilardi 2008). IRAs constitute a relatively new technology of regulation in western Europe, at least for certain domains, but they are increasingly widespread across countries and sectors. For instance, independent regulators have been set up for regulating very diverse issues, such as general competition, banking and finance, telecommunications, civil aviation, railway services, food safety, the pharmaceutical industry, electricity, environmental protection, and personal data privacy. Two attributes of IRAs deserve a special mention. On the one hand, they are formally separated from democratic institutions and elected politicians, thus raising normative and empirical concerns about their accountability and legitimacy. On the other hand, some hard questions about their role as political actors are still unaddressed, though, together with regulatory competencies, IRAs often accumulate executive, (quasi-)legislative, and adjudicatory functions, as well as about their performance.

LES LINGUISTIQUES DE L'EUROPE NOUVELLE : Analyse comparée de l'utilisation des représentations sur la langue et de la linguistique dans la construction de l'Europe de Versailles et de l'URSS (1914-1953)

Le but principal de ce travail est de comparer les idées sur la langue et sur la linguistique a l'intérieur de deux processus de « construction de monde », à savoir le réagencement de l'Europe après la Première guerre mondiale et la création du monde nouveau voulu par l'Union soviétique. La comparaison est rendue pertinente par le fait que ces deux « constructions de monde » eurent lieu dans des atmosphères idéologiques opposées, puisque la Première guerre mondiale et la révolution bolchevique s'opposent radicalement en représentant, respectivement, le triomphe des nations et celui de l'internationalisme de classe. La comparaison se fera aussi à l'intérieur de l'Union soviétique, puisque l'internationalisme des années 1920 laissera la place dans les années 1930 et jusqu'à la mort de Staline en 1953 à un nationalisme soviétique représenté par la métaphore de la « citadelle assiégée ». L'hypothèse du travail est la suivante : la façon d'utiliser les faits de langue et la linguistique, et la façon de considérer l'objet-langue dans un processus de construction étatique dépendent de l'atmosphère idéologique à l'intérieur de laquelle cette utilisation a lieu. Dans la première partie, nous analysons les idées de trois linguistes professionnels (Antoine Meillet, Aleksandar Belic et Jordan Ivanov) relatives au réagencement de l'Europe après la guerre. De l'analyse de ces trois corpus de textes ressortira une espèce de contradiction, puisque ces linguistes qui, au début du XXème siècle, entendaient user de la science linguistique pour asseoir sur des bases solides la nouvelle Europe, le firent avec une « conscience linguistique » d'inspiration romantique, tout droit sortie du XIXeme siècle. La nécessité de proposer pour l'Europe une solution pratique et durable a très certainement amené ces linguistes à privilégier, peut-être inconsciemment, des théories linguistiques certes dépassées, mais qui avaient l'avantage de considérer les langues comme des objets discontinus et homogènes. Dans notre deuxième partie consacrée à l'Union soviétique, nous analysons des textes (d'auteurs parfois méconnus) traitant de ce que nous avons appelé la « révolution en langue » : partant du principe que le monde nouveau de la dictature du prolétariat allait être totalement différent du monde que l'on avait connu précédemment, certains auteurs des années 1920 furent convaincus que ce monde nouveau allait avoir besoin d'une langue nouvelle. Mais au lieu d'attendre que cette langue nouvelle apparaisse spontanément, par évolution, certains proposèrent d'introduire consciemment dans la langue, par révolution, les changements selon eux nécessaires pour que la langue corresponde aux nouveaux besoins. Dans ce contexte, l'objet-langue est considéré comme un simple outil de communication qu'il est possible de modifier à sa guise, et la linguistique comme une discipline technique. Cette idée de changer la langue disparaîtra de l'URSS des années 1930, avec le passage vers le nationalisme soviétique. A la place, on préférera rappeler que les langues ne peuvent évoluer que par évolution, que l'on ne peut pas changer la langue, que l'on ne peut pas créer une langue selon notre volonté. Dans le contexte de la « citadelle assiégée », la langue russe deviendra le signe distinctif de l'Union soviétique qu'il sera impossible de toucher et de modifier. La langue n'est plus un outil, elle est désormais un symbole. Avec la comparaison de ces deux situations particulières (trois si l'on distingue les deux atmosphères de l'URSS), nous pensons avoir montré que l'apparition de certaines idées sur la langue et sur la linguistique est liée au contexte et aux besoins.

The "speech of the 'intelligentsia" as the object of the study of Soviet social linguistics

В статье будут рассмотрены два исследования русского и советского лингвиста Е.Д. Поливанова, посвященные фонетике «интеллигентского языка». В начале 1930-ч гг. Поливанов выдвинул новаторскую теорию языка, основанную на изучении социолектов и групповых диалектов русского языка современности. Язык интеллигенции - один из излюбленных предметов исследований лингвиста. Поливанов доказывает, что изменениям подвержен не только словарный запас, но и фонетика, и приводит конкретные примеры фонетических изменений, вызванных революцией.

L'exploitation des eaux souterraines en Syrie centrale : construction de diagnostics et politiques d'intervention

Syrian dry areas have been for several millennia a place of interaction between human populations and the environment. If environmental constraints and heterogeneity condition the human occupation and exploitation of resources, socio-political, economic and historical elements play a fundamental role. Since the late 1980s, Syrian dry areas are viewed as suffering a serious water crisis, due to groundwater overdraft. The Syrian administration and international development agencies believe that groundwater overexploitation is also leading to a decline of agricultural activities and to poverty increase. Action is thus required to address these problems.However, the overexploitation diagnosis needs to be reviewed. The overexploitation discourse appears in the context of Syria's opening to international organizations and to the market economy. It echoes the international discourse of "global water crisis". The diagnosis is based on national indicators recycling old Soviet data that has not been updated. In the post-Soviet era, the Syrian national water policy seems to abandon large surface water irrigation projects in favor of a strategy of water use rationalization and groundwater conservation in crisis regions, especially in the district of Salamieh.This groundwater conservation policy has a number of inconsistencies. It is justified for the administration and also probably for international donors, since it responds to an indisputable environmental emergency. However, efforts to conserve water are anecdotal or even counterproductive. The water conservation policy appears a posteriori as an extension of the national policy of food self-sufficiency. The dominant interpretation of overexploitation, and more generally of the water crisis, prevents any controversary approach of the status of resources and of the agricultural system in general and thus destroys any attempt to discuss alternatives with respect to groundwater management, allocation, and their inclusion in development programs.A revisited diagnosis of the situation needs to take into account spatial and temporal dimensions of the groundwater exploitation and to analyze the co-evolution of hydrogeological and agricultural systems. It should highlight the adjustments adopted to cope with environmental and economic variability, changes of water availability and regulatory measures enforcements. These elements play an important role for water availability and for the spatial, temporal, sectoral allocation of water resource. The groundwater exploitation in the last century has obviously had an impact on the environment, but the changes are not necessarily catastrophic.The current groundwater use in central Syria increases the uncertainty by reducing the ability of aquifers to buffer climatic changes. However, the climatic factor is not the only source of uncertainty. The high volatility of commodity prices, fuel, land and water, depending on the market but also on the will (and capacity) of the Syrian State to preserve social peace is a strong source of uncertainty. The research should consider the whole range of possibilities and propose alternatives that take into consideration the risks they imply for the water users, the political will to support or not the local access to water - thus involving a redefinition of the economic and social objectives - and finally the ability of international organizations to reconsider pre-established diagnoses.