Auditoria da gestão pública: diferenças de expectativas, qualidade e satisfação nas autarquias locais

O presente estudo baseou-se na avaliação dos factores mais influentes na percepção da qualidade da auditoria e satisfação dos Directores dos Serviços Financeiros das Autarquias Locais Portuguesas sujeitas a Certificação Legal de Contas. Aferir se existiam opiniões divergentes por região administrativa foi outro objectivo a que nos propusemos. Os resultados da pesquisa demonstram que os factores mais influentes são a especialização, o planeamento e trabalho de campo da empresa de auditoria. A percepção da qualidade de auditoria por Distrito/Região revela-se homogénea, ao invés da satisfação em relação à actividade de auditoria. Tendo em conta os resultados obtidos, a auditoria deverá equacionar o alargamento do seu campo de actuação, reorientar o seu papel, reforçar a comunicação e especialização no sector, por forma a potenciar a responsabilização, avaliação e apoio na tomada de decisão na gestão dos dinheiros públicos e, por outro lado, harmonizar as expectactivas entre auditado e auditor. /ABSTRACT: The present study was based on the assessment of the most influential factors in the perception of audit quality and satisfaction of the Directors of Financial Services of Portuguese Local Government subject to the Statutory Auditors. To assess whether there were differing opinions by administrative region was another goal we set ourselves. The survey results demonstrate that the most influential factors are the expertise, the planning and fieldwork of the audit firm. The perception of audit quality by District I Region proves to be homogeneous, rather than satisfaction with the audit work. Given the results, the audit should consider extending its scope to act, to reorient their role, to strengthen the communication and expertise in the sector in order to enhance accountability, assessment and support in decision making in the management of public resources and, secondly, to harmonize expectations between auditee and auditor.

Comparison between detailed model simulation and artificial neural network for forecasting building energy consumption

There are several ways to attempt to model a building and its heat gains from external sources as well as internal ones in order to evaluate a proper operation, audit retrofit actions, and forecast energy consumption. Different techniques, varying from simple regression to models that are based on physical principles, can be used for simulation. A frequent hypothesis for all these models is that the input variables should be based on realistic data when they are available, otherwise the evaluation of energy consumption might be highly under or over estimated. In this paper, a comparison is made between a simple model based on artificial neural network (ANN) and a model that is based on physical principles (EnergyPlus) as an auditing and predicting tool in order to forecast building energy consumption. The Administration Building of the University of Sao Paulo is used as a case study. The building energy consumption profiles are collected as well as the campus meteorological data. Results show that both models are suitable for energy consumption forecast. Additionally, a parametric analysis is carried out for the considered building on EnergyPlus in order to evaluate the influence of several parameters such as the building profile occupation and weather data on such forecasting. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance

This article examines whether the emotions of frustration and optimism mediate, fully or partially, the relationship between leadership style and subordinate performance in the context of structural equation modeling. The findings show that transformational leadership has a significant direct influence on frustration and optimism, with the negative influence of frustration having a stronger effect on performance than the positive influence of optimism. Frustration and optimism are found to have a direct influence on performance, and the emotions, frustration and optimism, fully mediate the relationship between transformational leadership and performance. Thus, the effect of transformational leadership style on performance is significant, but indirect. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

Debiasing the outcome effect: The role of instructions in an audit litigation setting

The outcome effect occurs where an evaluator, who has knowledge of the outcome of a judge's decision , assesses the quality of the judgment of that decision maker. If the evaluator has knowledge of a negative outcome, then that knowledge negatively influences his or her assessment of the ex ante judgment. For instance, jurors in a lawsuit brought against an auditor for alleged negligence are informed of an undetected fraud, even though an unqualified opinion was issued. This paper reports the results of an experiment in an applied audit judgment setting that examined methods of mitigating the outcome effect by means of instructions. The results showed that simply instructing or warning the evaluator about the potential biasing effects of outcome information was only weakly effective. However, instructions that stressed either (1) the cognitive non-normativeness of the outcome effect or (2) the seriousness and gravity of the evaluation ameliorated the effect significantly. From a theoretical perspective, the results suggest that there may both motivational and cognitive components to the outcome effect. In all, the findings suggest awareness of the outcome effect and use of relatively nonintrusive instructions to evaluators may effectively counteract the potential for the outcome bias.

Auditor conservatism and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from the Year 2000 systems issue

This study further examines the phenomenon of conservative auditor behaviour by considering the level of voluntary disclosure of Year 2000 remediation information in company annual reports. Previous studies have provided evidence of conservative auditor behaviour by examining the link between Big 6 auditor choice and accruals (Francis and Krishnan 1999; Becker et al., 1998; Defond and Subramanyam 1998). Protecting their reputation capital increases Big 6 auditor incentives to act conservatively to avoid litigation risk. We propose and find that Big 6 auditor clients disclose more Year 2000 remediation information than non–Big 6 auditor clients.